Difference between revisions of "L-adic-cohomology"
m (→References: expand bibliodata) |
m (→Comments) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <!-- | + | <!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article, |
− | + | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | |
− | + | was used. | |
− | + | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | Out of 1 formulas, 1 were replaced by TEX code.--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|done}} | ||
{{TEX|auto}} | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
{{TEX|done}} | {{TEX|done}} | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
One of the constructions of cohomology of abstract algebraic varieties and schemes. Etale cohomologies (cf. [[Etale cohomology|Etale cohomology]]) of schemes are torsion modules. Cohomology with coefficients in rings of characteristic zero is used for various purposes, mainly in the proof of the [[Lefschetz formula|Lefschetz formula]] and its application to zeta-functions. It is obtained from étale cohomology by passing to the projective limit. | One of the constructions of cohomology of abstract algebraic varieties and schemes. Etale cohomologies (cf. [[Etale cohomology|Etale cohomology]]) of schemes are torsion modules. Cohomology with coefficients in rings of characteristic zero is used for various purposes, mainly in the proof of the [[Lefschetz formula|Lefschetz formula]] and its application to zeta-functions. It is obtained from étale cohomology by passing to the projective limit. | ||
− | Let $ | + | Let $ \ell $ |
− | be a prime number; an $ | + | be a prime number; an $ \ell $-adic sheaf on a scheme $ X $ |
− | adic sheaf on a scheme $ X $ | ||
is a projective system $ {( F _ {n} ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ | is a projective system $ {( F _ {n} ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ | ||
of étale Abelian sheaves $ F _ {n} $ | of étale Abelian sheaves $ F _ {n} $ | ||
such that, for all $ n $, | such that, for all $ n $, | ||
− | the transfer homomorphisms $ F _ {n+} | + | the transfer homomorphisms $ F _ {n+ 1} \rightarrow F _ {n} $ |
− | are equivalent to the canonical morphism $ F _ {n+} | + | are equivalent to the canonical morphism $ F _ {n+ 1} \rightarrow F _ {n+ 1} / \ell ^ {n} F _ {n+ 1} $. |
− | An $ | + | An $ \ell $-adic sheaf $ F $ |
− | adic sheaf $ F $ | ||
is said to be constructible (respectively, locally constant) if all sheaves $ F _ {n} $ | is said to be constructible (respectively, locally constant) if all sheaves $ F _ {n} $ | ||
are constructible (locally constant) étale sheaves. There exists a natural equivalence of the category of locally constant constructible sheaves on a connected scheme $ X $ | are constructible (locally constant) étale sheaves. There exists a natural equivalence of the category of locally constant constructible sheaves on a connected scheme $ X $ | ||
− | and the category of modules of finite type over the ring $ \mathbf Z _ { | + | and the category of modules of finite type over the ring $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} $ |
− | of integral $ | + | of integral $ \ell $-adic numbers which are continuously acted upon from the left by the fundamental group of the scheme $ X $. |
− | adic numbers which are continuously acted upon from the left by the fundamental group of the scheme $ X $. | + | This proves that locally constant constructible sheaves are abstract analogues of systems of local coefficients in topology. Examples of constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaves include the sheaf $ \mathbf Z _ {l,X} = {( ( \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z ) _ {X} ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $, |
− | This proves that locally constant constructible sheaves are abstract analogues of systems of local coefficients in topology. Examples of constructible $ | + | and the Tate sheaves $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} ( m) _ {X} = ( \mu _ {\ell ^ {n} , X } ^ {\otimes ^ {m} } ) _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ (where $ ( \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z ) _ {X} $ |
− | adic sheaves include the sheaf $ \mathbf Z _ {l,X} = {( ( \mathbf Z / | ||
− | and the Tate sheaves $ \mathbf Z _ { | ||
− | where $ ( \mathbf Z / | ||
is the constant sheaf on $ X $ | is the constant sheaf on $ X $ | ||
− | associated with the group $ \mathbf Z / | + | associated with the group $ \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z $, |
− | while $ \mu _ { | + | while $ \mu _ {\ell ^ {n} , X } $ |
− | is the sheaf of $ | + | is the sheaf of $ \ell ^ {n} $-th power roots of unity on $ X $). |
− | th power roots of unity on $ X $). | ||
If $ A $ | If $ A $ | ||
is an [[Abelian scheme|Abelian scheme]] over $ X $, | is an [[Abelian scheme|Abelian scheme]] over $ X $, | ||
− | then $ T _ { | + | then $ T _ {\ell} ( A) = {( A _ {\ell ^ {n} } ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ (where $ A _ {\ell ^ {n} } $ |
− | where $ A _ { | + | is the kernel of multiplication by $ \ell ^ {n} $ |
− | is the kernel of multiplication by $ | ||
in $ A $) | in $ A $) | ||
− | forms a locally constant constructible $ | + | forms a locally constant constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaf on $ X $, |
− | adic sheaf on $ X $, | ||
called the Tate module of $ A $. | called the Tate module of $ A $. | ||
Let $ X $ | Let $ X $ | ||
be a scheme over a field $ k $, | be a scheme over a field $ k $, | ||
− | let $ \overline{X} | + | let $ \overline{X} = X \otimes _ {k} \overline{k} _ {s} $ |
be the scheme obtained from $ X $ | be the scheme obtained from $ X $ | ||
by changing the base from $ k $ | by changing the base from $ k $ | ||
− | to the separable closure $ \overline{k} | + | to the separable closure $ \overline{k} _ {s} $ |
of the field $ k $, | of the field $ k $, | ||
and let $ F = ( F _ {n} ) $ | and let $ F = ( F _ {n} ) $ | ||
− | be an $ | + | be an $ \ell $-adic sheaf on $ X $; |
− | adic sheaf on $ X $; | + | the étale cohomology $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} ) $ |
− | the étale cohomology $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} | + | then defines a projective system $ ( H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} )) _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ |
− | then defines a projective system $ ( H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} | + | of $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} _ {s} / k ) $-modules. The projective limit $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , F ) = \lim\limits _ {\leftarrow n } H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} ) $ |
− | of $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} | + | is naturally equipped with the structure of a $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} $-module on which $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} _ {s} / k ) $ |
− | modules. The projective limit $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} | + | acts continuously with respect to the $ \ell $-adic topology. It is called the $ i $-th $ \ell $-adic cohomology of the sheaf $ F $ |
− | is naturally equipped with the structure of a $ \mathbf Z _ { | ||
− | module on which $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} | ||
− | acts continuously with respect to the $ | ||
− | adic topology. It is called the $ i $- | ||
− | th $ | ||
− | adic cohomology of the sheaf $ F $ | ||
on $ X $. | on $ X $. | ||
− | If $ k = \overline{k} | + | If $ k = \overline{k} _ {s} $, |
− | the usual notation is $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} | + | the usual notation is $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , F ) = H ^ {i} ( X, F ) $. |
− | The fundamental theorems in étale cohomology apply to $ | + | The fundamental theorems in étale cohomology apply to $ \ell $-adic cohomology of constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaves. If $ \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ |
− | adic cohomology of constructible $ | + | is the field of rational $ \ell $-adic numbers, then the $ \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $-spaces $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} ( \overline{X} ) = H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \mathbf Z _ {\ell} ) \otimes \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ |
− | adic sheaves. If $ \mathbf Q _ { | + | are called the rational $ \ell $-adic cohomology of the scheme $ X $. |
− | is the field of rational $ | + | Their dimensions $ b _ {i} ( X; \ell) $ (if defined) are called the $ i $-th Betti numbers of $ X $. |
− | adic numbers, then the $ \mathbf Q _ { | + | For complete $ k $-schemes the numbers $ b _ {i} ( X; \ell) $ |
− | spaces $ H _ { | + | are defined and are independent of $ \ell $ ($ \ell \neq \mathop{\rm char} k $). |
− | are called the rational $ | ||
− | adic cohomology of the scheme $ X $. | ||
− | Their dimensions $ b _ {i} ( X; | ||
− | if defined) are called the $ i $- | ||
− | th Betti numbers of $ X $. | ||
− | For complete $ k $- | ||
− | schemes the numbers $ b _ {i} ( X; | ||
− | are defined and are independent of $ | ||
− | $ | ||
If $ k $ | If $ k $ | ||
is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $ p $ | is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $ p $ | ||
− | and if $ | + | and if $ \ell \neq p $, |
− | then the assignment of the spaces $ H _ { | + | then the assignment of the spaces $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} ( X) $ |
− | to a smooth complete $ k $- | + | to a smooth complete $ k $-variety defines a [[Weil cohomology|Weil cohomology]]. If $ k = \mathbf C $ |
− | variety defines a [[Weil cohomology|Weil cohomology]]. If $ k = \mathbf C $ | + | is the field of complex numbers, the comparison theorem $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} = H ^ {i} ( X, \mathbf Q ) \otimes \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ |
− | is the field of complex numbers, the comparison theorem $ H _ { | ||
is valid. | is valid. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The fact (mentioned above) that for complete | + | The fact (mentioned above) that for complete $k$-schemes the Betti numbers are independent of $\ell$ follows from Deligne's proof of the Weil conjectures (cf. also [[Zeta-function|Zeta-function]]). |
− | schemes the Betti numbers are independent of | ||
− | follows from Deligne's proof of the Weil conjectures (cf. also [[Zeta-function|Zeta-function]]). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table> | <table> | ||
− | < | + | <tr><td valign="top">[1]</td> <td valign="top"> A. Grothendieck, "Formule de Lefschetz et rationalité des fonctions $L$", ''Sém. Bourbaki'', '''17''' : 279 (1964–1965)</td></tr> |
− | < | + | <tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> A. Grothendieck, "Cohomologie $\ell$-adique et fonctions $L$", ''SGA 5'' , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''589''' , Springer (1977). {{ISBN|0-387-08248-4}} {{ZBL|0345.00011}}</td></tr> |
− | < | + | <tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> J.S. Milne, "Etale cohomology", Princeton Univ. Press (1980)</td></tr> |
− | < | + | <tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top"> E. Freitag, R. Kiehl, "Etale cohomology and the Weil conjectures", Springer (1988)</td></tr> |
− | < | + | <tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top"> P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil I" ''Publ. Math. IHES'', '''43''' (1974) pp. 273–307</td></tr> |
+ | <tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top"> P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil II" ''Publ. Math. IHES'', '''52''' (1980) pp. 137–252</td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Latest revision as of 11:49, 8 April 2023
One of the constructions of cohomology of abstract algebraic varieties and schemes. Etale cohomologies (cf. Etale cohomology) of schemes are torsion modules. Cohomology with coefficients in rings of characteristic zero is used for various purposes, mainly in the proof of the Lefschetz formula and its application to zeta-functions. It is obtained from étale cohomology by passing to the projective limit.
Let $ \ell $ be a prime number; an $ \ell $-adic sheaf on a scheme $ X $ is a projective system $ {( F _ {n} ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ of étale Abelian sheaves $ F _ {n} $ such that, for all $ n $, the transfer homomorphisms $ F _ {n+ 1} \rightarrow F _ {n} $ are equivalent to the canonical morphism $ F _ {n+ 1} \rightarrow F _ {n+ 1} / \ell ^ {n} F _ {n+ 1} $. An $ \ell $-adic sheaf $ F $ is said to be constructible (respectively, locally constant) if all sheaves $ F _ {n} $ are constructible (locally constant) étale sheaves. There exists a natural equivalence of the category of locally constant constructible sheaves on a connected scheme $ X $ and the category of modules of finite type over the ring $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} $ of integral $ \ell $-adic numbers which are continuously acted upon from the left by the fundamental group of the scheme $ X $. This proves that locally constant constructible sheaves are abstract analogues of systems of local coefficients in topology. Examples of constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaves include the sheaf $ \mathbf Z _ {l,X} = {( ( \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z ) _ {X} ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $, and the Tate sheaves $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} ( m) _ {X} = ( \mu _ {\ell ^ {n} , X } ^ {\otimes ^ {m} } ) _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ (where $ ( \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z ) _ {X} $ is the constant sheaf on $ X $ associated with the group $ \mathbf Z / \ell ^ {n} \mathbf Z $, while $ \mu _ {\ell ^ {n} , X } $ is the sheaf of $ \ell ^ {n} $-th power roots of unity on $ X $). If $ A $ is an Abelian scheme over $ X $, then $ T _ {\ell} ( A) = {( A _ {\ell ^ {n} } ) } _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ (where $ A _ {\ell ^ {n} } $ is the kernel of multiplication by $ \ell ^ {n} $ in $ A $) forms a locally constant constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaf on $ X $, called the Tate module of $ A $.
Let $ X $ be a scheme over a field $ k $, let $ \overline{X} = X \otimes _ {k} \overline{k} _ {s} $ be the scheme obtained from $ X $ by changing the base from $ k $ to the separable closure $ \overline{k} _ {s} $ of the field $ k $, and let $ F = ( F _ {n} ) $ be an $ \ell $-adic sheaf on $ X $; the étale cohomology $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} ) $ then defines a projective system $ ( H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} )) _ {n \in \mathbf N } $ of $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} _ {s} / k ) $-modules. The projective limit $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , F ) = \lim\limits _ {\leftarrow n } H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \overline{F} _ {n} ) $ is naturally equipped with the structure of a $ \mathbf Z _ {\ell} $-module on which $ \mathop{\rm Gal} ( \overline{k} _ {s} / k ) $ acts continuously with respect to the $ \ell $-adic topology. It is called the $ i $-th $ \ell $-adic cohomology of the sheaf $ F $ on $ X $. If $ k = \overline{k} _ {s} $, the usual notation is $ H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , F ) = H ^ {i} ( X, F ) $. The fundamental theorems in étale cohomology apply to $ \ell $-adic cohomology of constructible $ \ell $-adic sheaves. If $ \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ is the field of rational $ \ell $-adic numbers, then the $ \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $-spaces $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} ( \overline{X} ) = H ^ {i} ( \overline{X} , \mathbf Z _ {\ell} ) \otimes \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ are called the rational $ \ell $-adic cohomology of the scheme $ X $. Their dimensions $ b _ {i} ( X; \ell) $ (if defined) are called the $ i $-th Betti numbers of $ X $. For complete $ k $-schemes the numbers $ b _ {i} ( X; \ell) $ are defined and are independent of $ \ell $ ($ \ell \neq \mathop{\rm char} k $). If $ k $ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $ p $ and if $ \ell \neq p $, then the assignment of the spaces $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} ( X) $ to a smooth complete $ k $-variety defines a Weil cohomology. If $ k = \mathbf C $ is the field of complex numbers, the comparison theorem $ H _ {\ell} ^ {i} = H ^ {i} ( X, \mathbf Q ) \otimes \mathbf Q _ {\ell} $ is valid.
Comments
The fact (mentioned above) that for complete $k$-schemes the Betti numbers are independent of $\ell$ follows from Deligne's proof of the Weil conjectures (cf. also Zeta-function).
References
[1] | A. Grothendieck, "Formule de Lefschetz et rationalité des fonctions $L$", Sém. Bourbaki, 17 : 279 (1964–1965) |
[a1] | A. Grothendieck, "Cohomologie $\ell$-adique et fonctions $L$", SGA 5 , Lect. notes in math. , 589 , Springer (1977). ISBN 0-387-08248-4 Zbl 0345.00011 |
[a2] | J.S. Milne, "Etale cohomology", Princeton Univ. Press (1980) |
[a3] | E. Freitag, R. Kiehl, "Etale cohomology and the Weil conjectures", Springer (1988) |
[a4] | P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil I" Publ. Math. IHES, 43 (1974) pp. 273–307 |
[a5] | P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil II" Publ. Math. IHES, 52 (1980) pp. 137–252 |
L-adic-cohomology. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=L-adic-cohomology&oldid=49656