Difference between revisions of "Polarity"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | p0734601.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 88 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 88 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/P073/P.0703460 Polarity, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''polar transformation'' | ''polar transformation'' | ||
− | A [[Correlation|correlation]] | + | A [[Correlation|correlation]] $ \pi $ |
+ | for which $ \pi ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $, | ||
+ | that is, $ \pi ( Y) = X $ | ||
+ | if and only if $ \pi ( X) = Y $. | ||
+ | A polarity divides all subspaces into pairs; in particular, if a pair is formed by the subspaces $ S _ {0} $ | ||
+ | and $ S _ {n-} 1 $, | ||
+ | where $ S _ {0} = \pi ( S _ {n-} 1 ) $ | ||
+ | is a point and $ S _ {n-} 1 = \pi ( S _ {0} ) $ | ||
+ | is a hyperplane, then $ S _ {0} $ | ||
+ | is called the pole of the hyperplane $ S _ {n-} 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ S _ {n-} 1 $ | ||
+ | is called the polar of the point $ S _ {0} $. | ||
+ | A projective space $ \Pi _ {n} ( K) $ | ||
+ | over the skew-field $ K $ | ||
+ | has a polarity if and only if $ K $ | ||
+ | admits an involutory [[anti-automorphism]] $ \alpha $( | ||
+ | that is, $ \alpha ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $). | ||
+ | Suppose that $ \pi $ | ||
+ | is represented by a semi-bilinear form $ f _ \alpha ( x , y ) $. | ||
+ | Then $ \pi $ | ||
+ | is a polarity if and only if $ f _ \alpha ( x , y ) = 0 $ | ||
+ | implies $ f _ \alpha ( y , x ) = 0 $. | ||
− | A polarity | + | A polarity $ \pi $ |
+ | is either a symplectic correlation, characterized by the fact that $ P \in \pi ( P) $ | ||
+ | for every point $ P $( | ||
+ | in this case, $ f ( x , y ) $ | ||
+ | is a skew-symmetric form on $ A _ {n+} 1 $, | ||
+ | while $ K $ | ||
+ | is a field), or $ \pi $ | ||
+ | can be represented as an $ \alpha $- | ||
+ | symmetric form on $ A _ {n+} 1 $: | ||
+ | $ \alpha ( f _ \alpha ( x , y ) ) = f _ \alpha ( y , x ) $( | ||
+ | a symmetric polarity), in this case the existence of a non-strictly isotropic null subspace is equivalent to the fact that the characteristic of the skew-field equals 2 (in particular, if $ \mathop{\rm char} K \neq 2 $, | ||
+ | then any null subspace is strictly isotropic). | ||
− | Relative to a polarity | + | Relative to a polarity $ \pi $ |
+ | one defines decomposition of a projective space into subspaces, which makes it possible to reduce the semi-bilinear form representing $ \pi $ | ||
+ | to canonical form. The most important among these are the following: | ||
− | + | $ M $— | |
+ | a maximal non-isotropic null subspace; its dimension is $ n ( \pi ) - 1 $, | ||
+ | where $ n $ | ||
+ | is even and is called the deficiency of $ \pi $, | ||
+ | and $ f $ | ||
+ | is skew-symmetric; | ||
− | + | $ U $— | |
+ | a maximal strictly-isotropic subspace; its dimension is $ i ( \pi ) - 1 $, | ||
+ | $ i $ | ||
+ | is called the index, $ f \equiv 0 $; | ||
− | + | $ J $— | |
+ | a component, free or null subspace, non-isotropic, where $ f $ | ||
+ | is positive or negative definite, $ M \cap J = \emptyset $. | ||
− | + | $ W = M + U $— | |
+ | a maximal null subspace; its dimension is $ i ( \pi ) + n ( \pi ) - 1 $. | ||
− | A projective transformation | + | A projective transformation $ F $ |
+ | is called $ \pi $- | ||
+ | admissible (relative to the polarity $ \pi $) | ||
+ | if $ \pi F = F \pi $. | ||
+ | A semi-linear transformation $ ( \overline{F}\; , \phi ) $ | ||
+ | induces a $ \pi $- | ||
+ | admissible projective transformation if and only if in $ K $ | ||
+ | there is a $ c $ | ||
+ | for which $ f ( \overline{F}\; x , \overline{F}\; y ) = c \phi ( f ( x , y ) ) $. | ||
+ | The $ \pi $- | ||
+ | admissible transformations form a group, $ G _ \pi $( | ||
+ | called the polarity group). If the group $ G _ \pi $ | ||
+ | is transitive, either every point of the space $ \Pi _ {n} $ | ||
+ | is null (and $ G _ \pi $ | ||
+ | is called symplectic) or there is no null point (and in this case $ G _ \pi $ | ||
+ | is called orthogonal for $ \alpha = \mathop{\rm id} $, | ||
+ | and unitary for $ \alpha \neq \mathop{\rm id} $). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.V. Efimov, "Higher geometry" , MIR (1980) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.V. Efimov, "Higher geometry" , MIR (1980) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ G = ( P, E) $ |
+ | be a bipartite graph, and let $ P = A \amalg B $ | ||
+ | be the corresponding partition of $ P $. | ||
+ | A polarity on $ G $ | ||
+ | is an automorphism $ \alpha $ | ||
+ | of the graph $ G $ | ||
+ | such that $ \alpha ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $ | ||
+ | and $ \alpha ( A) = B $, | ||
+ | $ \alpha ( B) = A $. | ||
The term polarity is mostly encountered in a geometric setting such as that of a [[Projective space|projective space]] or [[Incidence system|incidence system]]. In this case the two sets of vertices are the lines and points of the incidence structure and there is an edge between a "point-vertex" and a "line-vertex" if and only if the point and line are incident. | The term polarity is mostly encountered in a geometric setting such as that of a [[Projective space|projective space]] or [[Incidence system|incidence system]]. In this case the two sets of vertices are the lines and points of the incidence structure and there is an edge between a "point-vertex" and a "line-vertex" if and only if the point and line are incident. | ||
− | The classical setting is that of a projective space | + | The classical setting is that of a projective space $ \mathbf P ^ {n} $ |
+ | with a non-degenerate bilinear form $ Q $ | ||
+ | on it. The corresponding polarity between $ d $- | ||
+ | dimensional subspaces and $ ( n- d- 1) $- | ||
+ | dimensional subspaces is defined by $ \alpha ( V) = N ^ \perp = \{ {x \in \mathbf P ^ {n} } : {Q( x, y) = 0 \textrm{ for all } y \in V } \} $. | ||
− | In the setting of a (Desarguesian or not) projective space | + | In the setting of a (Desarguesian or not) projective space $ P $ |
+ | a polarity is also viewed as a symmetric relation $ \sigma \subset P \times P $ | ||
+ | such that for all $ v \in P $, | ||
+ | $ v ^ \perp = \{ {w \in P } : {( v, w) \in \sigma } \} $ | ||
+ | is either a hyperplane or $ P $ | ||
+ | itself. If $ P ^ \perp = \cap _ {v \in P } v ^ \perp = \emptyset $, | ||
+ | the polarity is non-degenerate. A subspace $ V $ | ||
+ | is totally isotropic if $ V \subset V ^ \perp = \cap _ {v \in V } v ^ \perp $. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Berger, "Geometry" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1987) (Translated from French)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Busemann, P.J. Kelly, "Projective geometry and projective metrics" , Acad. Press (1953)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H.S.M. Coxeter, "Introduction to geometry" , Wiley (1963)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Baer, "Linear algebra and projective geometry" , Acad. Press (1952)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Pedoe, "Geometry. A comprehensive course" , Dover, reprint (1988) pp. Sect. 85.5</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Dembowsky, "Finite geometries" , Springer (1968)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Berger, "Geometry" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1987) (Translated from French)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Busemann, P.J. Kelly, "Projective geometry and projective metrics" , Acad. Press (1953)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H.S.M. Coxeter, "Introduction to geometry" , Wiley (1963)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Baer, "Linear algebra and projective geometry" , Acad. Press (1952)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Pedoe, "Geometry. A comprehensive course" , Dover, reprint (1988) pp. Sect. 85.5</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Dembowsky, "Finite geometries" , Springer (1968)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 08:06, 6 June 2020
polar transformation
A correlation $ \pi $ for which $ \pi ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $, that is, $ \pi ( Y) = X $ if and only if $ \pi ( X) = Y $. A polarity divides all subspaces into pairs; in particular, if a pair is formed by the subspaces $ S _ {0} $ and $ S _ {n-} 1 $, where $ S _ {0} = \pi ( S _ {n-} 1 ) $ is a point and $ S _ {n-} 1 = \pi ( S _ {0} ) $ is a hyperplane, then $ S _ {0} $ is called the pole of the hyperplane $ S _ {n-} 1 $ and $ S _ {n-} 1 $ is called the polar of the point $ S _ {0} $. A projective space $ \Pi _ {n} ( K) $ over the skew-field $ K $ has a polarity if and only if $ K $ admits an involutory anti-automorphism $ \alpha $( that is, $ \alpha ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $). Suppose that $ \pi $ is represented by a semi-bilinear form $ f _ \alpha ( x , y ) $. Then $ \pi $ is a polarity if and only if $ f _ \alpha ( x , y ) = 0 $ implies $ f _ \alpha ( y , x ) = 0 $.
A polarity $ \pi $ is either a symplectic correlation, characterized by the fact that $ P \in \pi ( P) $ for every point $ P $( in this case, $ f ( x , y ) $ is a skew-symmetric form on $ A _ {n+} 1 $, while $ K $ is a field), or $ \pi $ can be represented as an $ \alpha $- symmetric form on $ A _ {n+} 1 $: $ \alpha ( f _ \alpha ( x , y ) ) = f _ \alpha ( y , x ) $( a symmetric polarity), in this case the existence of a non-strictly isotropic null subspace is equivalent to the fact that the characteristic of the skew-field equals 2 (in particular, if $ \mathop{\rm char} K \neq 2 $, then any null subspace is strictly isotropic).
Relative to a polarity $ \pi $ one defines decomposition of a projective space into subspaces, which makes it possible to reduce the semi-bilinear form representing $ \pi $ to canonical form. The most important among these are the following:
$ M $— a maximal non-isotropic null subspace; its dimension is $ n ( \pi ) - 1 $, where $ n $ is even and is called the deficiency of $ \pi $, and $ f $ is skew-symmetric;
$ U $— a maximal strictly-isotropic subspace; its dimension is $ i ( \pi ) - 1 $, $ i $ is called the index, $ f \equiv 0 $;
$ J $— a component, free or null subspace, non-isotropic, where $ f $ is positive or negative definite, $ M \cap J = \emptyset $.
$ W = M + U $— a maximal null subspace; its dimension is $ i ( \pi ) + n ( \pi ) - 1 $.
A projective transformation $ F $ is called $ \pi $- admissible (relative to the polarity $ \pi $) if $ \pi F = F \pi $. A semi-linear transformation $ ( \overline{F}\; , \phi ) $ induces a $ \pi $- admissible projective transformation if and only if in $ K $ there is a $ c $ for which $ f ( \overline{F}\; x , \overline{F}\; y ) = c \phi ( f ( x , y ) ) $. The $ \pi $- admissible transformations form a group, $ G _ \pi $( called the polarity group). If the group $ G _ \pi $ is transitive, either every point of the space $ \Pi _ {n} $ is null (and $ G _ \pi $ is called symplectic) or there is no null point (and in this case $ G _ \pi $ is called orthogonal for $ \alpha = \mathop{\rm id} $, and unitary for $ \alpha \neq \mathop{\rm id} $).
References
[1] | N.V. Efimov, "Higher geometry" , MIR (1980) (Translated from Russian) |
Comments
Let $ G = ( P, E) $ be a bipartite graph, and let $ P = A \amalg B $ be the corresponding partition of $ P $. A polarity on $ G $ is an automorphism $ \alpha $ of the graph $ G $ such that $ \alpha ^ {2} = \mathop{\rm id} $ and $ \alpha ( A) = B $, $ \alpha ( B) = A $.
The term polarity is mostly encountered in a geometric setting such as that of a projective space or incidence system. In this case the two sets of vertices are the lines and points of the incidence structure and there is an edge between a "point-vertex" and a "line-vertex" if and only if the point and line are incident.
The classical setting is that of a projective space $ \mathbf P ^ {n} $ with a non-degenerate bilinear form $ Q $ on it. The corresponding polarity between $ d $- dimensional subspaces and $ ( n- d- 1) $- dimensional subspaces is defined by $ \alpha ( V) = N ^ \perp = \{ {x \in \mathbf P ^ {n} } : {Q( x, y) = 0 \textrm{ for all } y \in V } \} $.
In the setting of a (Desarguesian or not) projective space $ P $ a polarity is also viewed as a symmetric relation $ \sigma \subset P \times P $ such that for all $ v \in P $, $ v ^ \perp = \{ {w \in P } : {( v, w) \in \sigma } \} $ is either a hyperplane or $ P $ itself. If $ P ^ \perp = \cap _ {v \in P } v ^ \perp = \emptyset $, the polarity is non-degenerate. A subspace $ V $ is totally isotropic if $ V \subset V ^ \perp = \cap _ {v \in V } v ^ \perp $.
References
[a1] | M. Berger, "Geometry" , 1–2 , Springer (1987) (Translated from French) |
[a2] | H. Busemann, P.J. Kelly, "Projective geometry and projective metrics" , Acad. Press (1953) |
[a3] | H.S.M. Coxeter, "Introduction to geometry" , Wiley (1963) |
[a4] | R. Baer, "Linear algebra and projective geometry" , Acad. Press (1952) |
[a5] | D. Pedoe, "Geometry. A comprehensive course" , Dover, reprint (1988) pp. Sect. 85.5 |
[a6] | P. Dembowsky, "Finite geometries" , Springer (1968) |
Polarity. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Polarity&oldid=39394