Difference between revisions of "Thom catastrophes"
m (ce) |
(gather refs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | t0926501.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 72 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 72 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/T092/T.0902650 Thom catastrophes | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:black;"> <tr><td> <table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" style="background-color:black;"> <tbody> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Notation</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Codim</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Corank</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Germ</td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Universal deformation</td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Name</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">< | + | {{TEX|auto}} |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Singularities of differentiable mappings|Singularities of differentiable mappings]], whose classification was announced by R. Thom [[#References|[1]]] in terms of their gradient dynamical systems and the analogous list of critical points of codimension $ \leq 4 $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Critical point|Critical point]]) of differentiable functions. The original formulation of Thom's result is that a generic four-parameter family of functions is stable, and in the neighbourhood of a critical point it behaves, up to sign and change of variable, like one of seven cases (cf. Table). | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:black;"> <tr><td> <table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" style="background-color:black;"> <tbody> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Notation</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Codim</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Corank</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Germ</td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Universal deformation</td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Name</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ A _ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {3} + y ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Fold</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ A _ {3} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {4} + y ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Cusp</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ A _ {4} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">3</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {5} + y ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} + ux ^ {3} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Swallow-tail</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ D _ {4} ^ {-} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">3</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {3} + xy ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} + wy $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Hyperbolic umbilic</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ D _ {4} ^ {+} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">3</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {3-} xy ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} + wy $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Elliptic umbilic</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ A _ {5} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">4</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {6} + y ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} + wx ^ {3} + tx ^ {4} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Butterfly</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ D _ {5} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">4</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ x ^ {4} + xy ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="5" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"> $ ux + vx ^ {2} + wx ^ {3} + ty $ | ||
+ | </td> <td colname="6" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">Parabolic umbilic</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> | ||
</td></tr> </table> | </td></tr> </table> | ||
− | The germs (cf. [[Germ|Germ]]) corresponding to the Thom catastrophes are finitely determined (specifically, | + | The germs (cf. [[Germ|Germ]]) corresponding to the Thom catastrophes are finitely determined (specifically, $ 6 $- |
+ | determined: in appropriate coordinates they correspond to polynomials in two variables of degrees $ \leq 6 $). | ||
− | The codimension | + | The codimension $ \mathop{\rm codim} $ |
+ | serves as a measure of the complexity of a critical point. Any small perturbation of a function $ f $ | ||
+ | of $ \mathop{\rm codim} r $ | ||
+ | leads to a function with at most $ r $ | ||
+ | complex critical points. The codimension of a singularity (that is, of a germ $ f $ | ||
+ | such that $ f ( 0) = Df ( 0) = 0 $) | ||
+ | is the number $ \mathop{\rm dim} \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $, | ||
+ | where $ \mathfrak m = \{ {g } : {g( 0) = 0 } \} $ | ||
+ | and $ \langle \partial f \rangle $ | ||
+ | is the ideal generated by the germs $ \partial f/ \partial x ^ {i} $. | ||
+ | For example, if $ f = x ^ {N} $, | ||
+ | then $ \langle \partial f \rangle = \langle x ^ {N - 1 } \rangle $, | ||
+ | and the residue classes of $ x \dots x ^ {N - 2 } $ | ||
+ | form a basis of $ \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $, | ||
+ | so that $ \mathop{\rm codim} = N- 2 $. | ||
+ | The inequality $ \mathop{\rm codim} f \geq c ( c + 1)/2 $, | ||
+ | holds, where $ c $ | ||
+ | is the corank of the Hessian $ \partial ^ {2} f/ \partial x ^ {i} \partial x ^ {j} ( 0) $. | ||
+ | Hence, in particular, if $ r \leq 4 $, | ||
+ | then $ c \leq 2 $. | ||
− | Finite determination (sufficiency) of a germ, roughly speaking, means that it is determined, up to smooth change of coordinates, by its jets (cf. [[Jet|Jet]]). More precisely, a germ | + | Finite determination (sufficiency) of a germ, roughly speaking, means that it is determined, up to smooth change of coordinates, by its jets (cf. [[Jet|Jet]]). More precisely, a germ $ f $ |
+ | is said to be $ k $- | ||
+ | determined if every germ $ f _ {1} $ | ||
+ | with the same $ k $- | ||
+ | jet (that is, the same Taylor series up to order $ k $) | ||
+ | as $ f $ | ||
+ | is right equivalent to $ f $( | ||
+ | i.e. $ f _ {1} = f \circ \varphi $ | ||
+ | where $ \varphi $ | ||
+ | is the germ at $ 0 $ | ||
+ | of a diffeomorphism; cf. [[#References|[2]]]). A germ is finitely determined if and only if it has finite codimension. In particular, if $ \mathop{\rm codim} = r $, | ||
+ | then $ f $ | ||
+ | is $ ( r + 2) $- | ||
+ | determined (whence $ 6 $- | ||
+ | determined for $ r \leq 4 $). | ||
− | The Thom catastrophes, in contrast to the case of [[General position|general position]], are degenerate singularities (that is, the Hessian is degenerate at them), and they can be removed by a small perturbation, as mentioned above. However, in many cases of practical importance, and also theoretically, one is interested not in an individual object, but in a collection of them, depending on some "control" parameters. Degenerate singularities which are removable for each fixed value of the parameters may be removable for the collection as a whole. (Stability of Thom catastrophes may also be considered in this sense.) But then the natural object of study is not the singularity itself, but a collection (a deformation of the singularity) in which it is non-removable (or disintegrates, or "bifurcates" ) under a change of parameters. It turns out that in many cases the study of all possible deformations can be reduced to the study of a single one, which is in a certain sense so big that all the others can be obtained from it. Such deformations are called versal and they, in turn, can be obtained from a universal (or miniversal) deformation, which is characterized by having least possible dimension of its parameter space. The most important result here is Mather's theorem: A singularity | + | The Thom catastrophes, in contrast to the case of [[General position|general position]], are degenerate singularities (that is, the Hessian is degenerate at them), and they can be removed by a small perturbation, as mentioned above. However, in many cases of practical importance, and also theoretically, one is interested not in an individual object, but in a collection of them, depending on some "control" parameters. Degenerate singularities which are removable for each fixed value of the parameters may be removable for the collection as a whole. (Stability of Thom catastrophes may also be considered in this sense.) But then the natural object of study is not the singularity itself, but a collection (a deformation of the singularity) in which it is non-removable (or disintegrates, or "bifurcates" ) under a change of parameters. It turns out that in many cases the study of all possible deformations can be reduced to the study of a single one, which is in a certain sense so big that all the others can be obtained from it. Such deformations are called versal and they, in turn, can be obtained from a universal (or miniversal) deformation, which is characterized by having least possible dimension of its parameter space. The most important result here is Mather's theorem: A singularity $ f $ |
+ | has a universal deformation if and only if its codimension is finite. | ||
− | A deformation | + | A deformation $ F ( x, u) $, |
+ | $ x \in \mathbf R ^ {n} $, | ||
+ | $ u \in \mathbf R ^ {r} $, | ||
+ | of a germ $ f ( x) $, | ||
+ | $ F ( x, 0) = f ( x) $, | ||
+ | is given by a formula | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | F ( x, u) = \ | ||
+ | f ( x) + b _ {1} u _ {1} + \dots + b _ {r} u _ {r} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ ( b _ {1} \dots b _ {r} ) $ |
+ | is an arbitrary collection of representative elements of a basis of the space $ \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $. | ||
+ | Thom catastrophes correspond to deformations with at most four parameters. | ||
− | Important for applications is the so-called bifurcation set, or singular set, | + | Important for applications is the so-called bifurcation set, or singular set, $ D _ {f} = \{ {( x, u) \in \mathbf R ^ {n} \times U } : {d _ {x} f = 0 \textrm{ and } d ^ {2} f \textrm{ is degenerate } } \} $; |
+ | its projection to the $ u $- | ||
+ | space, the set $ \{ {u \in U } : {( x, u) \in D _ {f} \textrm{ for some } x \in \mathbf R ^ {n} } \} $, | ||
+ | is called the catastrophe set. It lies in the control space and hence is "observable" , and all "discontinuities" or "catastrophes" originate from it. Fig.1a, Fig.1b and Fig.1c illustrate the cases corresponding to $ \mathop{\rm codim} 3 $. | ||
<img style="border:1px solid;" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/common_img/t092650a.gif" /> | <img style="border:1px solid;" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/common_img/t092650a.gif" /> | ||
Line 34: | Line 116: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Thom, "Topological models in biology" ''Topology'' , '''8''' (1969) pp. 313–335 {{MR|0245318}} {{ZBL|0165.23301}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Bröcker, L. Lander, "Differentiable germs and catastrophes" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1975) {{MR|0494220}} {{ZBL|0302.58006}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Poston, I. Stewart, "Catastrophe theory and its applications" , Pitman (1978) {{MR|0501079}} {{ZBL|0382.58006}} </TD></TR></table> | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Thom, "Topological models in biology" ''Topology'' , '''8''' (1969) pp. 313–335 {{MR|0245318}} {{ZBL|0165.23301}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Bröcker, L. Lander, "Differentiable germs and catastrophes" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1975) {{MR|0494220}} {{ZBL|0302.58006}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Poston, I. Stewart, "Catastrophe theory and its applications" , Pitman (1978) {{MR|0501079}} {{ZBL|0382.58006}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Thom, "Structural stability and morphogenesis" , Benjamin (1976) (Translated from French) {{MR|0488155}} {{MR|0488156}} {{ZBL|0392.92001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Thom, "Mathematical models of morphogenesis" , Wiley (1983) (Translated from French) {{MR|0729829}} {{ZBL|0565.92002}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.I. Arnol'd, "Catastrophe theory" , Springer (1984) (Translated from Russian) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0791.00009}} {{ZBL|0746.58001}} {{ZBL|0704.58001}} {{ZBL|0721.01001}} {{ZBL|0674.01033}} {{ZBL|0645.58001}} {{ZBL|0797.58002}} {{ZBL|0517.58002}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.C. Zeeman, "Catastrophe theory" , Addison-Wesley (1977) {{MR|0474383}} {{ZBL|0398.58012}} </TD></TR></table> |
− | |||
− | + | {{OldImage}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 18:07, 1 June 2023
Singularities of differentiable mappings, whose classification was announced by R. Thom [1] in terms of their gradient dynamical systems and the analogous list of critical points of codimension $ \leq 4 $(
cf. Critical point) of differentiable functions. The original formulation of Thom's result is that a generic four-parameter family of functions is stable, and in the neighbourhood of a critical point it behaves, up to sign and change of variable, like one of seven cases (cf. Table).
<tbody> </tbody>
|
The germs (cf. Germ) corresponding to the Thom catastrophes are finitely determined (specifically, $ 6 $- determined: in appropriate coordinates they correspond to polynomials in two variables of degrees $ \leq 6 $).
The codimension $ \mathop{\rm codim} $ serves as a measure of the complexity of a critical point. Any small perturbation of a function $ f $ of $ \mathop{\rm codim} r $ leads to a function with at most $ r $ complex critical points. The codimension of a singularity (that is, of a germ $ f $ such that $ f ( 0) = Df ( 0) = 0 $) is the number $ \mathop{\rm dim} \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $, where $ \mathfrak m = \{ {g } : {g( 0) = 0 } \} $ and $ \langle \partial f \rangle $ is the ideal generated by the germs $ \partial f/ \partial x ^ {i} $. For example, if $ f = x ^ {N} $, then $ \langle \partial f \rangle = \langle x ^ {N - 1 } \rangle $, and the residue classes of $ x \dots x ^ {N - 2 } $ form a basis of $ \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $, so that $ \mathop{\rm codim} = N- 2 $. The inequality $ \mathop{\rm codim} f \geq c ( c + 1)/2 $, holds, where $ c $ is the corank of the Hessian $ \partial ^ {2} f/ \partial x ^ {i} \partial x ^ {j} ( 0) $. Hence, in particular, if $ r \leq 4 $, then $ c \leq 2 $.
Finite determination (sufficiency) of a germ, roughly speaking, means that it is determined, up to smooth change of coordinates, by its jets (cf. Jet). More precisely, a germ $ f $ is said to be $ k $- determined if every germ $ f _ {1} $ with the same $ k $- jet (that is, the same Taylor series up to order $ k $) as $ f $ is right equivalent to $ f $( i.e. $ f _ {1} = f \circ \varphi $ where $ \varphi $ is the germ at $ 0 $ of a diffeomorphism; cf. [2]). A germ is finitely determined if and only if it has finite codimension. In particular, if $ \mathop{\rm codim} = r $, then $ f $ is $ ( r + 2) $- determined (whence $ 6 $- determined for $ r \leq 4 $).
The Thom catastrophes, in contrast to the case of general position, are degenerate singularities (that is, the Hessian is degenerate at them), and they can be removed by a small perturbation, as mentioned above. However, in many cases of practical importance, and also theoretically, one is interested not in an individual object, but in a collection of them, depending on some "control" parameters. Degenerate singularities which are removable for each fixed value of the parameters may be removable for the collection as a whole. (Stability of Thom catastrophes may also be considered in this sense.) But then the natural object of study is not the singularity itself, but a collection (a deformation of the singularity) in which it is non-removable (or disintegrates, or "bifurcates" ) under a change of parameters. It turns out that in many cases the study of all possible deformations can be reduced to the study of a single one, which is in a certain sense so big that all the others can be obtained from it. Such deformations are called versal and they, in turn, can be obtained from a universal (or miniversal) deformation, which is characterized by having least possible dimension of its parameter space. The most important result here is Mather's theorem: A singularity $ f $ has a universal deformation if and only if its codimension is finite.
A deformation $ F ( x, u) $, $ x \in \mathbf R ^ {n} $, $ u \in \mathbf R ^ {r} $, of a germ $ f ( x) $, $ F ( x, 0) = f ( x) $, is given by a formula
$$ F ( x, u) = \ f ( x) + b _ {1} u _ {1} + \dots + b _ {r} u _ {r} , $$
where $ ( b _ {1} \dots b _ {r} ) $ is an arbitrary collection of representative elements of a basis of the space $ \mathfrak m /\langle \partial f \rangle $. Thom catastrophes correspond to deformations with at most four parameters.
Important for applications is the so-called bifurcation set, or singular set, $ D _ {f} = \{ {( x, u) \in \mathbf R ^ {n} \times U } : {d _ {x} f = 0 \textrm{ and } d ^ {2} f \textrm{ is degenerate } } \} $; its projection to the $ u $- space, the set $ \{ {u \in U } : {( x, u) \in D _ {f} \textrm{ for some } x \in \mathbf R ^ {n} } \} $, is called the catastrophe set. It lies in the control space and hence is "observable" , and all "discontinuities" or "catastrophes" originate from it. Fig.1a, Fig.1b and Fig.1c illustrate the cases corresponding to $ \mathop{\rm codim} 3 $.
Figure: t092650a
Figure: t092650b
Figure: t092650c
References
[1] | R. Thom, "Topological models in biology" Topology , 8 (1969) pp. 313–335 MR0245318 Zbl 0165.23301 |
[2] | P. Bröcker, L. Lander, "Differentiable germs and catastrophes" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1975) MR0494220 Zbl 0302.58006 |
[3] | T. Poston, I. Stewart, "Catastrophe theory and its applications" , Pitman (1978) MR0501079 Zbl 0382.58006 |
[a1] | R. Thom, "Structural stability and morphogenesis" , Benjamin (1976) (Translated from French) MR0488155 MR0488156 Zbl 0392.92001 |
[a2] | R. Thom, "Mathematical models of morphogenesis" , Wiley (1983) (Translated from French) MR0729829 Zbl 0565.92002 |
[a3] | V.I. Arnol'd, "Catastrophe theory" , Springer (1984) (Translated from Russian) Zbl 0791.00009 Zbl 0746.58001 Zbl 0704.58001 Zbl 0721.01001 Zbl 0674.01033 Zbl 0645.58001 Zbl 0797.58002 Zbl 0517.58002 |
[a4] | E.C. Zeeman, "Catastrophe theory" , Addison-Wesley (1977) MR0474383 Zbl 0398.58012 |
Thom catastrophes. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Thom_catastrophes&oldid=34170