Difference between revisions of "Formal group"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex done) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
An algebraic analogue of the concept of a local Lie group (cf. [[Lie group, local|Lie group, local]]). The theory of formal groups has numerous applications in algebraic geometry, class field theory and cobordism theory. | An algebraic analogue of the concept of a local Lie group (cf. [[Lie group, local|Lie group, local]]). The theory of formal groups has numerous applications in algebraic geometry, class field theory and cobordism theory. | ||
− | A formal group over a field | + | A formal group over a field $ k $ |
+ | is a group object in the category of connected affine formal schemes over $ k $ ( | ||
+ | see [[#References|[1]]], [[#References|[4]]], [[#References|[6]]], [[#References|[7]]]). Let $ H _{A} $ | ||
+ | be the functor that associates with an algebra $ B $ | ||
+ | the set of algebra homomorphism $ A \rightarrow B $ | ||
+ | from some Noetherian commutative local $ k $ - | ||
+ | algebra $ A $ | ||
+ | with maximal ideal $ m $ | ||
+ | and field of residues $ k $ , | ||
+ | complete in the $ m $ - | ||
+ | adic topology, such that the homomorphisms map $ m $ | ||
+ | into the set $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) $ | ||
+ | of nilpotent elements of $ B $ . | ||
+ | Then a connected affine formal scheme is a covariant functor $ H $ | ||
+ | from the category of finite-dimensional commutative $ k $ - | ||
+ | algebras $ B $ | ||
+ | into the category of sets that is isomorphic to an $ H _{A} $ . | ||
+ | That $ H $ | ||
+ | is a group object means that there is a group structure given on all the sets $ H (B) $ | ||
+ | such that for every $ k $ - | ||
+ | algebra homomorphism $ B _{1} \rightarrow B _{2} $ | ||
+ | the corresponding mapping $ H (B _{1} ) \rightarrow H (B _{2} ) $ | ||
+ | is a group homomorphism. If all the groups $ H (B) $ | ||
+ | are commutative, then the formal group $ H $ | ||
+ | is said to be commutative. Every connected [[Group scheme|group scheme]] $ G $ | ||
+ | over $ k $ | ||
+ | defines a formal group $ G: \ B \rightarrow G (B) $ . | ||
+ | Here one can take as $ A $ | ||
+ | the completion of the local ring of $ G $ | ||
+ | at the unit element. | ||
− | If | + | If $ A $ |
+ | is the ring $ k [[X _{1} \dots X _{2} ]] $ | ||
+ | of formal power series in $ n $ | ||
+ | variables over $ k $ , | ||
+ | then $ H $ | ||
+ | is called an $ n $ - | ||
+ | dimensional formal Lie group. For a connected [[Algebraic group|algebraic group]] $ G $ | ||
+ | over $ k $ , | ||
+ | $ \widehat{G} $ | ||
+ | is a formal Lie group. A formal Lie group $ H $ | ||
+ | is isomorphic, as a functor in the category of sets, to the functor $ D ^{n} : \ B \rightarrow \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ | ||
+ | that associates with an algebra $ B $ | ||
+ | the $ n $ - | ||
+ | fold Cartesian product of its nil radical $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) $ | ||
+ | with itself. The group structure on the sets $ H (B) = \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ | ||
+ | is given by a formal group law — a collection of $ n $ | ||
+ | formal power series in $ 2n $ | ||
+ | variables $ X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} $ : | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | F _{1} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ) \dots | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | F _{n} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | satisfying the following conditions:$$ | ||
+ | F _{i} (X,\ 0) = X _{i} , | ||
+ | F _{i} (0,\ Y) = Y _{i} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | F _{i} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ F _{1} (Y,\ Z) \dots F _{n} (Y,\ Z)) = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | = | ||
+ | F _{i} (F _{1} (X,\ Y) \dots F _{n} (X,\ Y),\ Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | Here $ X = (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ) $ , | ||
+ | $ Y = (Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ), $ | ||
+ | $ Z = (Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) $ , | ||
+ | $ 0 = (0 \dots 0) $ . | ||
+ | This group law on the sets $ H (B) = \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ | ||
+ | is given by the formulas$$ | ||
+ | (x _{1} \dots x _{n} ) \circ | ||
+ | (y _{1} \dots y _{n} ) = | ||
+ | (z _{1} \dots z _{n} ), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $ z _{i} = F _{i} (x _{1} \dots x _{n} ,\ y _{1} \dots y _{n} ) $ ; | ||
+ | because $ x $ | ||
+ | and $ y $ | ||
+ | are nilpotent, all except a finite number of terms of the series are zero. Every formal group law gives group structures on $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ | ||
+ | by means of | ||
− | + | and converts the functor $ D ^{n} $ | |
+ | into a formal Lie group. The concept of a formal group law, and thus of a formal Lie group, can be generalized to the case of arbitrary commutative ground rings (see [[#References|[2]]], [[#References|[5]]]). Sometimes by a formal group one means just a formal Lie group or even a formal group law. | ||
− | + | Just as for local Lie groups (cf. [[Lie group, local|Lie group, local]]) one can define the Lie algebra of a formal Lie group. Over fields $ k $ | |
− | + | of characteristic 0 the correspondence between a formal Lie group and its Lie algebra defines an equivalence of the respective categories. In characteristic $ p > 0 $ | |
− | + | the situation is more complicated. Thus, over an algebraically closed field (for $ p > 0 $ ) | |
− | + | there is a countable number of pairwise non-isomorphic one-dimensional commutative formal Lie groups [[#References|[1]]], while all one-dimensional Lie algebras are isomorphic [[#References|[3]]]. Over perfect fields of finite characteristic, commutative formal Lie groups are classified by means of Dieudonné modules (see [[#References|[1]]], [[#References|[6]]]). | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Just as for local Lie groups (cf. [[Lie group, local|Lie group, local]]) one can define the Lie algebra of a formal Lie group. Over fields | ||
The theory of formal groups over fields can be generalized to the case of arbitrary formal ground schemes [[#References|[7]]]. | The theory of formal groups over fields can be generalized to the case of arbitrary formal ground schemes [[#References|[7]]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.I. Manin, "The theory of commutative formal groups over fields of finite characteristic" ''Russian Math. Surveys'' , '''18''' (1963) pp. 1–80 ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''18''' : 6 (1963) pp. 3–90 {{MR|157972}} {{ZBL|0128.15603}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.E. Stong, "Notes on cobordism theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1968) {{MR|0248858}} {{ZBL|0181.26604}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-P. Serre, "Lie algebras and Lie groups" , Benjamin (1965) (Translated from French) {{MR|0218496}} {{ZBL|0132.27803}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) {{MR|0463157}} {{ZBL|0367.14001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Lazard, "Commutative formal groups" , Springer (1975) {{MR|0393050}} {{ZBL|0304.14027}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-M. Fontaine, "Groupes | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.I. Manin, "The theory of commutative formal groups over fields of finite characteristic" ''Russian Math. Surveys'' , '''18''' (1963) pp. 1–80 ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''18''' : 6 (1963) pp. 3–90 {{MR|157972}} {{ZBL|0128.15603}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.E. Stong, "Notes on cobordism theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1968) {{MR|0248858}} {{ZBL|0181.26604}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-P. Serre, "Lie algebras and Lie groups" , Benjamin (1965) (Translated from French) {{MR|0218496}} {{ZBL|0132.27803}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) {{MR|0463157}} {{ZBL|0367.14001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Lazard, "Commutative formal groups" , Springer (1975) {{MR|0393050}} {{ZBL|0304.14027}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-M. Fontaine, "Groupes f04082068.png-divisibles sur les corps locaux" ''Astérique'' , '''47–48''' (1977) {{MR|498610}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Mazur, J.T. Tate, "Canonical height pairings via biextensions" J.T. Tate (ed.) M. Artin (ed.) , ''Arithmetic and geometry'' , '''1''' , Birkhäuser (1983) pp. 195–237 {{MR|0717595}} {{ZBL|0574.14036}} </TD></TR></table> |
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | A universal formal group law (for | + | A universal formal group law (for $ n $ - |
+ | dimensional formal group laws) is an $ n $ - | ||
+ | dimensional formal group law $ F _{u} ( X ,\ Y) \in L [ X ,\ Y ] $ , | ||
+ | $ X = ( X _{1} \dots X _{n} ) $ , | ||
+ | $ Y = ( Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ) $ | ||
+ | such that for every $ n $ - | ||
+ | dimensional formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | over a ring $ A $ | ||
+ | there is a unique homomorphism of rings $ \phi _{F} : \ L \rightarrow A $ | ||
+ | such that $ \phi _{F} ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) = F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
+ | Here $ \phi _{F} ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | denotes the result of applying $ \phi _{F} ^{*} $ | ||
+ | to the coefficients of the $ n $ | ||
+ | power series $ F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
+ | Universal formal group laws exist and are unique in the sense that if $ F _{u} ^ {\ \prime} ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | over $ L ^ \prime $ | ||
+ | is another one, then there exists a ring isomorphism $ \psi : \ L \rightarrow L ^ \prime $ | ||
+ | such that $ \psi ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) = F _{u} ^ {\ \prime} ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
− | |||
− | + | For commutative formal group laws explicit formulas are available for the construction of universal formal group laws, cf. [[#References|[a3]]]. The underlying ring $ L $ | |
+ | is a ring of polynomials in infinitely many indeterminates (Lazard's theorem). | ||
− | + | A homomorphism of formal group laws $ \alpha : \ F ( X ,\ Y ) \rightarrow G ( X ,\ Y ) $ , | |
+ | $ \mathop{\rm dim}\nolimits \ F = n $ , | ||
+ | $ \mathop{\rm dim}\nolimits \ G = m $ , | ||
+ | is an $ m $ - | ||
+ | tuple of power series in $ n $ - | ||
+ | variables $ \alpha ( Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) $ , | ||
+ | $ \alpha _{i} (0) = 0 $ , | ||
+ | such that $ \alpha ( F ( X ,\ Y ) ) = G ( \alpha (X) ,\ \alpha (Y)) $ . | ||
+ | The homomorphism is an isomorphism if there exists an inverse homomorphism $ \beta $ | ||
+ | such that $ \alpha ( \beta (X) ) = X $ , | ||
+ | and it is a strict isomorphism of formal group laws if $ \alpha _{i} (Z) = Z _{i} + $ ( | ||
+ | higher order terms). | ||
− | + | Let $ A $ | |
+ | be a ring of characteristic zero, i.e. the homomorphism of rings $ \mathbf Z \rightarrow A $ | ||
+ | which sends $ 1 \in \mathbf Z $ | ||
+ | to the unit element in $ A $ | ||
+ | is injective. Then $ A \rightarrow A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ | ||
+ | is injective. Over $ A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ | ||
+ | all commutative formal group laws are strictly isomorphic and hence isomorphic to the additive formal group law$$ | ||
+ | G _{a} ( X ,\ Y ) = ( X _{1} + Y _{1} \dots X _{n} + Y _{n} ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | It follows that for every commutative formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | over $ A $ | ||
+ | there exists a unique $ n $ - | ||
+ | tuple of power series $ f (X) $ , | ||
+ | $ f _{i} (X) = X _{i} + \dots $ | ||
+ | with coefficients in $ A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ | ||
+ | such that$$ | ||
+ | F ( X ,\ Y ) = f ^ {\ -1} ( f (X) + f (Y) ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $ f ^ {\ -1} (z) $ | ||
+ | is the "inverse function" to $ f (Z) $ , | ||
+ | i.e. $ f ^ {\ -1} ( f (Z) ) = Z $ . | ||
+ | This $ f (X) $ | ||
+ | is called the logarithm of the group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
− | |||
− | + | The formal group law of complex [[Cobordism|cobordism]] is a universal one-dimensional formal group law (Quillen's theorem) and its logarithm is given by Mishchenko's formula$$ | |
+ | \mathop{\rm log}\nolimits \ F _ {\mathbf M \mathbf U} (X) = | ||
+ | \sum _{i=1} ^ \infty | ||
+ | i ^{-1} [ \mathbf C \mathbf P ^{i-1} ] | ||
+ | X ^{i} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | Combined with the explicit construction of a one-dimensional universal group law these facts yield useful information on the generators of the complex cobordism ring $ \mathbf M \mathbf U ^{*} ( \mathop{\rm pt}\nolimits ) $ . | ||
+ | Cf. [[Cobordism|Cobordism]] for more details. | ||
− | + | Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | |
+ | be an $ n $ - | ||
+ | dimensional group law over $ A $ . | ||
+ | A curve over $ A $ | ||
+ | in $ F $ | ||
+ | is an $ n $ - | ||
+ | tuple of power series $ \gamma (T) $ | ||
+ | in one variable such that $ \gamma (0) = 0 $ . | ||
+ | Two curves can be added by $ \gamma (T) + _{F} \delta (T) = F ( \gamma (T) ,\ \delta (T) ) $ . | ||
+ | The set of curves is given the natural power series topology and there results a commutative topological group $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ . | ||
+ | The group $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ | ||
+ | admits a number of operators $ V _{n} $ , | ||
+ | $ F _{n} $ , | ||
+ | $ [a] $ , | ||
+ | $ a \in A $ , | ||
+ | defined as follows:$$ | ||
+ | V _{n} \gamma (T) = \gamma ( T ^{n} ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | [a] \gamma (T) = \gamma ( a T ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | F _{n} \gamma (T) = \gamma ( \zeta _{n} T ^{1}/n ) + _{F} \dots + _{F} \gamma ( \zeta _{n} ^{n} T ^{1}/n ) = {\sum _ | ||
+ | i=1 ^ n} {} ^{F} \gamma ( \zeta _{n} ^{i} T ^{1}/n ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $ \zeta _{n} $ | ||
+ | is a primitive $ n $ - | ||
+ | th root of unity. There are a number of relations between these operators and they combine to define a (non-commutative) ring $ \mathop{\rm Cart}\nolimits (A) $ , | ||
+ | which generalizes the Dieudonné ring, cf. [[Witt vector|Witt vector]] for the latter. Cartier's second and third theorems on formal group laws say that the $ \mathop{\rm Cart}\nolimits (A) $ | ||
+ | modules $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ | ||
+ | classify formal groups and they characterize which groups occur as $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ ' | ||
+ | s. This is the covariant classification of commutative formal groups in contrast with the earlier contravariant classification of commutative formal groups over perfect fields by Dieudonné modules. | ||
− | + | Let $ W : \ \mathbf{Rinj} \rightarrow \mathbf{Rinj} $ | |
+ | be the functor of Witt vectors (cf. [[Witt vector|Witt vector]]). Let $ G _{m} ( X ,\ Y ) = X + Y + X Y $ | ||
+ | be the (one-dimensional) multiplicative formal group law over $ A $ . | ||
+ | Then $ W (A) = {\mathbf C} ( G _{m} ; A ) $ . | ||
+ | Cartier's first theorem for formal group laws says that the functor $ F \mapsto {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ | ||
+ | is representable. More precisely, let $ \widehat{W} $ | ||
+ | be the (infinite-dimensional) formal group law given by the addition formulas of the Witt vectors and let $ \gamma _{0} (T) $ | ||
+ | be the curve $ (T ,\ 0 ,\ 0 ,\dots ) $ . | ||
+ | Then for every formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | and curve $ \gamma (T) \in {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ | ||
+ | there is unique homomorphism of formal group laws $ \alpha _ \gamma : \ \widehat{W} \rightarrow F $ | ||
+ | such that $ \alpha _ \gamma ( \gamma _{0} (T) ) = \gamma (T) $ . | ||
− | |||
− | + | There exists a Pontryagin-type duality between commutative formal groups and commutative affine (algebraic) groups over a field $ k $ , | |
+ | called Cartier duality. Cf. [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a4]]] for more details. Correspondingly, Dieudonné modules are also important in the classification of commutative affine (algebraic) groups. Essentially, Cartier duality comes from the "duality" between algebras and co-algebras; cf. [[Co-algebra|Co-algebra]]. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ A $ |
+ | be a discrete valuation ring with finite residue field $ k $ | ||
+ | and maximal ideal $ \mathfrak m = ( \pi ) $ . | ||
+ | The Lubin–Tate formal group law associated to $ ( A ,\ \pi ) $ | ||
+ | is defined by the logarithm$$ | ||
+ | f _ \pi (X) = X + \pi ^{-1} X ^{q} + \pi ^{-2} X ^ {q ^{2}} + \dots . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | Then $ F _ \pi ( X ,\ Y ) = f _ \pi ^ {\ -1} ( f _ \pi (X) + f _ \pi (Y) ) $ | ||
+ | has its coefficients in $ A $ . | ||
+ | These formal group laws are in a sense formal $ p $ - | ||
+ | adic analogues of elliptic curves with complex multiplication in that they have maximally large endomorphism rings. They are also analogues in the role they play vis à vis the class field theory of $ K $ , | ||
+ | the quotient field of $ A $ . | ||
+ | Indeed, let $ F _ \pi ( \bar{\mathfrak m} ) $ | ||
+ | be the set $ \bar{\mathfrak m} $ | ||
+ | with the addition $ a + b = F _ \pi ( a ,\ b ) $ . | ||
+ | Here $ \bar{\mathfrak m} $ | ||
+ | is the maximal ideal of the ring of integers of an algebraic closure of $ K $ . | ||
+ | Then a maximal Abelian totally ramified extension of $ K $ | ||
+ | is generated by the torsion elements of $ F ( \bar{\mathfrak m} ) $ ; | ||
+ | cf. [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a5]]] for more details. | ||
− | + | Formal groups also are an important tool in algebraic geometry, especially in the theory of Abelian varieties. This holds even more so for a generalization: $ p $ - | |
− | + | divisible groups; cf. [[P-divisible group|$ p $ - | |
− | + | divisible group]]. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Formal groups also are an important tool in algebraic geometry, especially in the theory of Abelian varieties. This holds even more so for a generalization: | ||
Lazard's theorem on one-dimensional formal group laws says that all one-dimensional formal group laws over a ring without nilpotents are commutative. | Lazard's theorem on one-dimensional formal group laws says that all one-dimensional formal group laws over a ring without nilpotents are commutative. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ |
− | + | be a one-dimensional formal group law. Define inductively $ [n] (X) = F ( X ,\ [ n - 1 ] (X) ) $ , | |
− | + | $ n \geq 2 $ , | |
− | + | $ [1] (X) = X $ . | |
− | + | Let $ F $ | |
− | + | be defined over a field $ k $ | |
− | + | of characteristic $ p > 0 $ . | |
+ | Then $ [p] (X) $ | ||
+ | is necessarily of the form $ X ^ {p ^{h}} + $ ( | ||
+ | higher degree terms) or is equal to zero. The positive integer $ h $ | ||
+ | is called the height of $ F $ ; | ||
+ | if $ [p] (X) = 0 $ , | ||
+ | the height of $ F $ | ||
+ | is taken to be $ \infty $ . | ||
+ | Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $ p > 0 $ | ||
+ | the one-dimensional formal group laws are classified by their heights, and all heights $ 1 ,\ 2 \dots \infty $ | ||
+ | occur. | ||
− | + | Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | |
+ | be a one-dimensional formal group law over a ring $ A $ | ||
+ | in which every prime number except $ p $ | ||
+ | is invertible, e.g. $ A $ | ||
+ | is the ring of integers of a local field of residue characteristic $ p $ | ||
+ | or $ A $ | ||
+ | is a field of characteristic $ p $ . | ||
+ | Assume for the moment that $ A $ | ||
+ | is of characteristic zero and let$$ | ||
+ | f (X) = X + a _{2} X ^{2} + a _{3} X ^{3} + \dots | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | be the logarithm of $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
+ | Then $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | is strictly isomorphic over $ A $ | ||
+ | to the formal group law $ F _{(p)} ( X ,\ Y ) $ | ||
+ | whose logarithm is equal to$$ | ||
+ | f _{(p)} (X) = X + a _{p} X ^{p} + a _ {p ^{2}} X ^ {p ^{2}} + \dots . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | The result extends to the case that $ A $ | ||
+ | is not of characteristic zero and to more-dimensional commutative formal group laws. $ F _{(p)} ( X ,\ Y) $ | ||
+ | is called the $ p $ - | ||
+ | typification of $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . | ||
− | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.T. Tate, "<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f040/f040820/f040820211.png" />-divisible groups" T.A. Springer (ed.) et al. (ed.) , ''Proc. Conf. local fields (Driebergen, 1966)'' , Springer (1967) pp. 158–183 {{MR|0231827}} {{ZBL|0157.27601}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-P. Serre, "Groupes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f040/f040820/f040820212.png" />-divisible (d' après J. Tate)" ''Sem. Bourbaki'' , '''19, Exp. 318''' (1966–1967) {{MR|1610452}} {{MR|0393040}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Hazewinkel, "Formal groups and applications" , Acad. Press (1978) {{MR|0506881}} {{MR|0463184}} {{ZBL|0454.14020}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Demazure, P. Gabriel, "Groupes algébriques" , '''1''' , Masson & North-Holland (1970) {{MR|0302656}} {{MR|0284446}} {{ZBL|0223.14009}} {{ZBL|0203.23401}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Lubin, J. Tate, "Formal complex multiplication in local fields" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''81''' (1965) pp. 380–387 {{MR|0172878}} {{ZBL|0128.26501}} </TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.T. Tate, "<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f040/f040820/f040820211.png" />-divisible groups" T.A. Springer (ed.) et al. (ed.) , ''Proc. Conf. local fields (Driebergen, 1966)'' , Springer (1967) pp. 158–183 {{MR|0231827}} {{ZBL|0157.27601}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-P. Serre, "Groupes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f040/f040820/f040820212.png" />-divisible (d' après J. Tate)" ''Sem. Bourbaki'' , '''19, Exp. 318''' (1966–1967) {{MR|1610452}} {{MR|0393040}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Hazewinkel, "Formal groups and applications" , Acad. Press (1978) {{MR|0506881}} {{MR|0463184}} {{ZBL|0454.14020}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Demazure, P. Gabriel, "Groupes algébriques" , '''1''' , Masson & North-Holland (1970) {{MR|0302656}} {{MR|0284446}} {{ZBL|0223.14009}} {{ZBL|0203.23401}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Lubin, J. Tate, "Formal complex multiplication in local fields" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''81''' (1965) pp. 380–387 {{MR|0172878}} {{ZBL|0128.26501}} </TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 22:38, 15 December 2019
An algebraic analogue of the concept of a local Lie group (cf. Lie group, local). The theory of formal groups has numerous applications in algebraic geometry, class field theory and cobordism theory.
A formal group over a field $ k $ is a group object in the category of connected affine formal schemes over $ k $ ( see [1], [4], [6], [7]). Let $ H _{A} $ be the functor that associates with an algebra $ B $ the set of algebra homomorphism $ A \rightarrow B $ from some Noetherian commutative local $ k $ - algebra $ A $ with maximal ideal $ m $ and field of residues $ k $ , complete in the $ m $ - adic topology, such that the homomorphisms map $ m $ into the set $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) $ of nilpotent elements of $ B $ . Then a connected affine formal scheme is a covariant functor $ H $ from the category of finite-dimensional commutative $ k $ - algebras $ B $ into the category of sets that is isomorphic to an $ H _{A} $ . That $ H $ is a group object means that there is a group structure given on all the sets $ H (B) $ such that for every $ k $ - algebra homomorphism $ B _{1} \rightarrow B _{2} $ the corresponding mapping $ H (B _{1} ) \rightarrow H (B _{2} ) $ is a group homomorphism. If all the groups $ H (B) $ are commutative, then the formal group $ H $ is said to be commutative. Every connected group scheme $ G $ over $ k $ defines a formal group $ G: \ B \rightarrow G (B) $ . Here one can take as $ A $ the completion of the local ring of $ G $ at the unit element.
If $ A $ is the ring $ k [[X _{1} \dots X _{2} ]] $ of formal power series in $ n $ variables over $ k $ , then $ H $ is called an $ n $ - dimensional formal Lie group. For a connected algebraic group $ G $ over $ k $ , $ \widehat{G} $ is a formal Lie group. A formal Lie group $ H $ is isomorphic, as a functor in the category of sets, to the functor $ D ^{n} : \ B \rightarrow \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ that associates with an algebra $ B $ the $ n $ - fold Cartesian product of its nil radical $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) $ with itself. The group structure on the sets $ H (B) = \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ is given by a formal group law — a collection of $ n $ formal power series in $ 2n $ variables $ X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} $ : $$ F _{1} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ) \dots $$ $$ F _{n} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ), $$ satisfying the following conditions:$$ F _{i} (X,\ 0) = X _{i} , F _{i} (0,\ Y) = Y _{i} , $$ $$ F _{i} (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ,\ F _{1} (Y,\ Z) \dots F _{n} (Y,\ Z)) = $$ $$ = F _{i} (F _{1} (X,\ Y) \dots F _{n} (X,\ Y),\ Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) . $$ Here $ X = (X _{1} \dots X _{n} ) $ , $ Y = (Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ), $ $ Z = (Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) $ , $ 0 = (0 \dots 0) $ . This group law on the sets $ H (B) = \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ is given by the formulas$$ (x _{1} \dots x _{n} ) \circ (y _{1} \dots y _{n} ) = (z _{1} \dots z _{n} ), $$ where $ z _{i} = F _{i} (x _{1} \dots x _{n} ,\ y _{1} \dots y _{n} ) $ ; because $ x $ and $ y $ are nilpotent, all except a finite number of terms of the series are zero. Every formal group law gives group structures on $ \mathop{\rm nil}\nolimits (B) ^{n} $ by means of
and converts the functor $ D ^{n} $ into a formal Lie group. The concept of a formal group law, and thus of a formal Lie group, can be generalized to the case of arbitrary commutative ground rings (see [2], [5]). Sometimes by a formal group one means just a formal Lie group or even a formal group law.
Just as for local Lie groups (cf. Lie group, local) one can define the Lie algebra of a formal Lie group. Over fields $ k $ of characteristic 0 the correspondence between a formal Lie group and its Lie algebra defines an equivalence of the respective categories. In characteristic $ p > 0 $ the situation is more complicated. Thus, over an algebraically closed field (for $ p > 0 $ ) there is a countable number of pairwise non-isomorphic one-dimensional commutative formal Lie groups [1], while all one-dimensional Lie algebras are isomorphic [3]. Over perfect fields of finite characteristic, commutative formal Lie groups are classified by means of Dieudonné modules (see [1], [6]).
The theory of formal groups over fields can be generalized to the case of arbitrary formal ground schemes [7].
References
[1] | Yu.I. Manin, "The theory of commutative formal groups over fields of finite characteristic" Russian Math. Surveys , 18 (1963) pp. 1–80 Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 18 : 6 (1963) pp. 3–90 MR157972 Zbl 0128.15603 |
[2] | R.E. Stong, "Notes on cobordism theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1968) MR0248858 Zbl 0181.26604 |
[3] | J.-P. Serre, "Lie algebras and Lie groups" , Benjamin (1965) (Translated from French) MR0218496 Zbl 0132.27803 |
[4] | R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) MR0463157 Zbl 0367.14001 |
[5] | M. Lazard, "Commutative formal groups" , Springer (1975) MR0393050 Zbl 0304.14027 |
[6] | J.-M. Fontaine, "Groupes f04082068.png-divisibles sur les corps locaux" Astérique , 47–48 (1977) MR498610 |
[7] | B. Mazur, J.T. Tate, "Canonical height pairings via biextensions" J.T. Tate (ed.) M. Artin (ed.) , Arithmetic and geometry , 1 , Birkhäuser (1983) pp. 195–237 MR0717595 Zbl 0574.14036 |
Comments
A universal formal group law (for $ n $ - dimensional formal group laws) is an $ n $ - dimensional formal group law $ F _{u} ( X ,\ Y) \in L [ X ,\ Y ] $ , $ X = ( X _{1} \dots X _{n} ) $ , $ Y = ( Y _{1} \dots Y _{n} ) $ such that for every $ n $ - dimensional formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ over a ring $ A $ there is a unique homomorphism of rings $ \phi _{F} : \ L \rightarrow A $ such that $ \phi _{F} ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) = F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . Here $ \phi _{F} ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) $ denotes the result of applying $ \phi _{F} ^{*} $ to the coefficients of the $ n $ power series $ F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) $ . Universal formal group laws exist and are unique in the sense that if $ F _{u} ^ {\ \prime} ( X ,\ Y ) $ over $ L ^ \prime $ is another one, then there exists a ring isomorphism $ \psi : \ L \rightarrow L ^ \prime $ such that $ \psi ^{*} F _{u} ( X ,\ Y ) = F _{u} ^ {\ \prime} ( X ,\ Y ) $ .
For commutative formal group laws explicit formulas are available for the construction of universal formal group laws, cf. [a3]. The underlying ring $ L $
is a ring of polynomials in infinitely many indeterminates (Lazard's theorem).
A homomorphism of formal group laws $ \alpha : \ F ( X ,\ Y ) \rightarrow G ( X ,\ Y ) $ , $ \mathop{\rm dim}\nolimits \ F = n $ , $ \mathop{\rm dim}\nolimits \ G = m $ , is an $ m $ - tuple of power series in $ n $ - variables $ \alpha ( Z _{1} \dots Z _{n} ) $ , $ \alpha _{i} (0) = 0 $ , such that $ \alpha ( F ( X ,\ Y ) ) = G ( \alpha (X) ,\ \alpha (Y)) $ . The homomorphism is an isomorphism if there exists an inverse homomorphism $ \beta $ such that $ \alpha ( \beta (X) ) = X $ , and it is a strict isomorphism of formal group laws if $ \alpha _{i} (Z) = Z _{i} + $ ( higher order terms).
Let $ A $ be a ring of characteristic zero, i.e. the homomorphism of rings $ \mathbf Z \rightarrow A $ which sends $ 1 \in \mathbf Z $ to the unit element in $ A $ is injective. Then $ A \rightarrow A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ is injective. Over $ A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ all commutative formal group laws are strictly isomorphic and hence isomorphic to the additive formal group law$$ G _{a} ( X ,\ Y ) = ( X _{1} + Y _{1} \dots X _{n} + Y _{n} ) . $$ It follows that for every commutative formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ over $ A $ there exists a unique $ n $ - tuple of power series $ f (X) $ , $ f _{i} (X) = X _{i} + \dots $ with coefficients in $ A \otimes _ {\mathbf Z} \mathbf Q $ such that$$ F ( X ,\ Y ) = f ^ {\ -1} ( f (X) + f (Y) ) , $$ where $ f ^ {\ -1} (z) $ is the "inverse function" to $ f (Z) $ , i.e. $ f ^ {\ -1} ( f (Z) ) = Z $ . This $ f (X) $ is called the logarithm of the group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ .
The formal group law of complex cobordism is a universal one-dimensional formal group law (Quillen's theorem) and its logarithm is given by Mishchenko's formula$$
\mathop{\rm log}\nolimits \ F _ {\mathbf M \mathbf U} (X) =
\sum _{i=1} ^ \infty
i ^{-1} [ \mathbf C \mathbf P ^{i-1} ]
X ^{i} .
$$
Combined with the explicit construction of a one-dimensional universal group law these facts yield useful information on the generators of the complex cobordism ring $ \mathbf M \mathbf U ^{*} ( \mathop{\rm pt}\nolimits ) $ .
Cf. Cobordism for more details.
Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ be an $ n $ - dimensional group law over $ A $ . A curve over $ A $ in $ F $ is an $ n $ - tuple of power series $ \gamma (T) $ in one variable such that $ \gamma (0) = 0 $ . Two curves can be added by $ \gamma (T) + _{F} \delta (T) = F ( \gamma (T) ,\ \delta (T) ) $ . The set of curves is given the natural power series topology and there results a commutative topological group $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ . The group $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ admits a number of operators $ V _{n} $ , $ F _{n} $ , $ [a] $ , $ a \in A $ , defined as follows:$$ V _{n} \gamma (T) = \gamma ( T ^{n} ) , $$ $$ [a] \gamma (T) = \gamma ( a T ) , $$ $$ F _{n} \gamma (T) = \gamma ( \zeta _{n} T ^{1}/n ) + _{F} \dots + _{F} \gamma ( \zeta _{n} ^{n} T ^{1}/n ) = {\sum _ i=1 ^ n} {} ^{F} \gamma ( \zeta _{n} ^{i} T ^{1}/n ) , $$ where $ \zeta _{n} $ is a primitive $ n $ - th root of unity. There are a number of relations between these operators and they combine to define a (non-commutative) ring $ \mathop{\rm Cart}\nolimits (A) $ , which generalizes the Dieudonné ring, cf. Witt vector for the latter. Cartier's second and third theorems on formal group laws say that the $ \mathop{\rm Cart}\nolimits (A) $ modules $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ classify formal groups and they characterize which groups occur as $ {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ ' s. This is the covariant classification of commutative formal groups in contrast with the earlier contravariant classification of commutative formal groups over perfect fields by Dieudonné modules.
Let $ W : \ \mathbf{Rinj} \rightarrow \mathbf{Rinj} $ be the functor of Witt vectors (cf. Witt vector). Let $ G _{m} ( X ,\ Y ) = X + Y + X Y $ be the (one-dimensional) multiplicative formal group law over $ A $ . Then $ W (A) = {\mathbf C} ( G _{m} ; A ) $ . Cartier's first theorem for formal group laws says that the functor $ F \mapsto {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ is representable. More precisely, let $ \widehat{W} $ be the (infinite-dimensional) formal group law given by the addition formulas of the Witt vectors and let $ \gamma _{0} (T) $ be the curve $ (T ,\ 0 ,\ 0 ,\dots ) $ . Then for every formal group law $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ and curve $ \gamma (T) \in {\mathbf C} ( F ; \ A ) $ there is unique homomorphism of formal group laws $ \alpha _ \gamma : \ \widehat{W} \rightarrow F $ such that $ \alpha _ \gamma ( \gamma _{0} (T) ) = \gamma (T) $ .
There exists a Pontryagin-type duality between commutative formal groups and commutative affine (algebraic) groups over a field $ k $ ,
called Cartier duality. Cf. [a3], [a4] for more details. Correspondingly, Dieudonné modules are also important in the classification of commutative affine (algebraic) groups. Essentially, Cartier duality comes from the "duality" between algebras and co-algebras; cf. Co-algebra.
Let $ A $ be a discrete valuation ring with finite residue field $ k $ and maximal ideal $ \mathfrak m = ( \pi ) $ . The Lubin–Tate formal group law associated to $ ( A ,\ \pi ) $ is defined by the logarithm$$ f _ \pi (X) = X + \pi ^{-1} X ^{q} + \pi ^{-2} X ^ {q ^{2}} + \dots . $$ Then $ F _ \pi ( X ,\ Y ) = f _ \pi ^ {\ -1} ( f _ \pi (X) + f _ \pi (Y) ) $ has its coefficients in $ A $ . These formal group laws are in a sense formal $ p $ - adic analogues of elliptic curves with complex multiplication in that they have maximally large endomorphism rings. They are also analogues in the role they play vis à vis the class field theory of $ K $ , the quotient field of $ A $ . Indeed, let $ F _ \pi ( \bar{\mathfrak m} ) $ be the set $ \bar{\mathfrak m} $ with the addition $ a + b = F _ \pi ( a ,\ b ) $ . Here $ \bar{\mathfrak m} $ is the maximal ideal of the ring of integers of an algebraic closure of $ K $ . Then a maximal Abelian totally ramified extension of $ K $ is generated by the torsion elements of $ F ( \bar{\mathfrak m} ) $ ; cf. [a3], [a5] for more details.
Formal groups also are an important tool in algebraic geometry, especially in the theory of Abelian varieties. This holds even more so for a generalization: $ p $ - divisible groups; cf. $ p $ - divisible group.
Lazard's theorem on one-dimensional formal group laws says that all one-dimensional formal group laws over a ring without nilpotents are commutative.
Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ be a one-dimensional formal group law. Define inductively $ [n] (X) = F ( X ,\ [ n - 1 ] (X) ) $ , $ n \geq 2 $ , $ [1] (X) = X $ . Let $ F $ be defined over a field $ k $ of characteristic $ p > 0 $ . Then $ [p] (X) $ is necessarily of the form $ X ^ {p ^{h}} + $ ( higher degree terms) or is equal to zero. The positive integer $ h $ is called the height of $ F $ ; if $ [p] (X) = 0 $ , the height of $ F $ is taken to be $ \infty $ . Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $ p > 0 $ the one-dimensional formal group laws are classified by their heights, and all heights $ 1 ,\ 2 \dots \infty $ occur.
Let $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ be a one-dimensional formal group law over a ring $ A $ in which every prime number except $ p $ is invertible, e.g. $ A $ is the ring of integers of a local field of residue characteristic $ p $ or $ A $ is a field of characteristic $ p $ . Assume for the moment that $ A $ is of characteristic zero and let$$ f (X) = X + a _{2} X ^{2} + a _{3} X ^{3} + \dots $$ be the logarithm of $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ . Then $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ is strictly isomorphic over $ A $ to the formal group law $ F _{(p)} ( X ,\ Y ) $ whose logarithm is equal to$$ f _{(p)} (X) = X + a _{p} X ^{p} + a _ {p ^{2}} X ^ {p ^{2}} + \dots . $$ The result extends to the case that $ A $ is not of characteristic zero and to more-dimensional commutative formal group laws. $ F _{(p)} ( X ,\ Y) $ is called the $ p $ - typification of $ F ( X ,\ Y ) $ .
References
[a1] | J.T. Tate, "-divisible groups" T.A. Springer (ed.) et al. (ed.) , Proc. Conf. local fields (Driebergen, 1966) , Springer (1967) pp. 158–183 MR0231827 Zbl 0157.27601 |
[a2] | J.-P. Serre, "Groupes -divisible (d' après J. Tate)" Sem. Bourbaki , 19, Exp. 318 (1966–1967) MR1610452 MR0393040 |
[a3] | M. Hazewinkel, "Formal groups and applications" , Acad. Press (1978) MR0506881 MR0463184 Zbl 0454.14020 |
[a4] | M. Demazure, P. Gabriel, "Groupes algébriques" , 1 , Masson & North-Holland (1970) MR0302656 MR0284446 Zbl 0223.14009 Zbl 0203.23401 |
[a5] | J. Lubin, J. Tate, "Formal complex multiplication in local fields" Ann. of Math. , 81 (1965) pp. 380–387 MR0172878 Zbl 0128.26501 |
Formal group. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Formal_group&oldid=21866