Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Boundary value problems in potential theory"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (tex encoded by computer)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--
 +
b0173901.png
 +
$#A+1 = 22 n = 0
 +
$#C+1 = 22 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/B017/B.0107390 Boundary value problems in potential theory
 +
Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics.
 +
Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below,
 +
if TeX found to be correct.
 +
-->
 +
 +
{{TEX|auto}}
 +
{{TEX|done}}
 +
 
Fundamental problems in both classical and abstract [[Potential theory|potential theory]]. The classical Newton and logarithmic potentials satisfy certain partial differential equations of elliptic type: the [[Laplace equation|Laplace equation]] in regions free of the masses generating the potentials, and the [[Poisson equation|Poisson equation]] in regions occupied by the masses. It follows, therefore, that the boundary value problems of potential theory are primarily boundary value problems for elliptic equations and systems (cf. [[Boundary value problem, elliptic equations|Boundary value problem, elliptic equations]]).
 
Fundamental problems in both classical and abstract [[Potential theory|potential theory]]. The classical Newton and logarithmic potentials satisfy certain partial differential equations of elliptic type: the [[Laplace equation|Laplace equation]] in regions free of the masses generating the potentials, and the [[Poisson equation|Poisson equation]] in regions occupied by the masses. It follows, therefore, that the boundary value problems of potential theory are primarily boundary value problems for elliptic equations and systems (cf. [[Boundary value problem, elliptic equations|Boundary value problem, elliptic equations]]).
  
1) The [[Dirichlet problem|Dirichlet problem]], or first boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173901.png" /> in some domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173902.png" />, given its continuous restriction <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173903.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173904.png" />, to the boundary <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173905.png" /> of the domain on the assumption that the mass distribution in the interior of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173906.png" /> is known. This is a fundamental problem in potential theory.
+
1) The [[Dirichlet problem|Dirichlet problem]], or first boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential $  u (x) $
 +
in some domain $  D $,  
 +
given its continuous restriction $  u (x) = f (x) $,  
 +
$  x \in \Gamma $,  
 +
to the boundary $  \partial  D = \Gamma $
 +
of the domain on the assumption that the mass distribution in the interior of $  D $
 +
is known. This is a fundamental problem in potential theory.
 +
 
 +
2) The [[Neumann problem]], or second boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential in  $  D $,
 +
given the continuous restriction of its normal derivative
 +
 
 +
$$
  
2) The [[Neumann problem(2)|Neumann problem]], or second boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173907.png" />, given the continuous restriction of its normal derivative
+
\frac{\partial  u (x) }{\partial  n }
 +
  = \
 +
\phi (x)
 +
$$
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173908.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
to  $  \Gamma $.
  
to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b0173909.png" />.
+
3) The [[Mixed problem|mixed problem]], or third boundary value problem. Here the known data on  $  \Gamma $
 +
constitute a linear combination
  
3) The [[Mixed problem|mixed problem]], or third boundary value problem. Here the known data on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739010.png" /> constitute a linear combination
+
$$ \tag{* }
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739011.png" /></td> <td valign="top" style="width:5%;text-align:right;">(*)</td></tr></table>
+
\frac{\partial  u (x) }{\partial  n }
 +
+
 +
\alpha (x) u (x)  = \
 +
\phi (x),\ \
 +
x \in \Gamma .
 +
$$
  
4) The problem with [[Oblique derivative|oblique derivative]] arises when the normal derivative <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739012.png" /> in condition (*) is replaced by the derivative <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739013.png" /> with respect to an arbitrary direction <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739014.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739015.png" />.
+
4) The problem with [[Oblique derivative|oblique derivative]] arises when the normal derivative $  \partial  u (x)/ \partial  n $
 +
in condition (*) is replaced by the derivative $  \partial  u (x)/ \partial  l $
 +
with respect to an arbitrary direction $  l = l (x) $,  
 +
$  x \in \Gamma $.
  
 
In addition to these general problems, the following specific problems have also arisen in potential theory.
 
In addition to these general problems, the following specific problems have also arisen in potential theory.
  
5) The [[Robin problem|Robin problem]]. Here it is required to find a mass distribution on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739016.png" /> with a constant potential in the interior of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739017.png" />. This problem appears in electrostatics, when it is required to determine an equilibrium charge distribution on a conductor <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739018.png" /> which has no effect anywhere inside <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739019.png" />.
+
5) The [[Robin problem|Robin problem]]. Here it is required to find a mass distribution on $  \Gamma $
 +
with a constant potential in the interior of $  D $.  
 +
This problem appears in electrostatics, when it is required to determine an equilibrium charge distribution on a conductor $  \Gamma $
 +
which has no effect anywhere inside $  D $.
  
6) The [[Balayage method|balayage method]], which, in its simplest presentation dating back to H. Poincaré, amounts to finding a  "swept-out"  mass distribution on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739020.png" /> the potential of which in the complementary domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739021.png" /> coincides with the potential of given masses in the interior of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b017/b017390/b01739022.png" />. The two last problems are particularly important in abstract potential theory (see [[Potential theory, abstract|Potential theory, abstract]]). See also [[Bessel potential|Bessel potential]]; [[Non-linear potential|Non-linear potential]]; [[Riesz potential|Riesz potential]].
+
6) The [[Balayage method|balayage method]], which, in its simplest presentation dating back to H. Poincaré, amounts to finding a  "swept-out"  mass distribution on $  \Gamma $
 +
the potential of which in the complementary domain $  C \overline{D}\; $
 +
coincides with the potential of given masses in the interior of $  D $.  
 +
The two last problems are particularly important in abstract potential theory (see [[Potential theory, abstract|Potential theory, abstract]]). See also [[Bessel potential|Bessel potential]]; [[Non-linear potential|Non-linear potential]]; [[Riesz potential|Riesz potential]].
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.M. Günter,  "Potential theory and its applications to basic problems of mathematical physics" , F. Ungar  (1967)  (Translated from French)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.S. Landkof,  "Foundations of modern potential theory" , Springer  (1972)  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Brélot,  "Eléments de la théorie classique du potentiel" , Sorbonne Univ. Centre Doc. Univ. , Paris  (1959)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Constantinescu,  A. Cornea,  "Potential theory on harmonic spaces" , Springer  (1972)</TD></TR></table>
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.M. Günter,  "Potential theory and its applications to basic problems of mathematical physics" , F. Ungar  (1967)  (Translated from French)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.S. Landkof,  "Foundations of modern potential theory" , Springer  (1972)  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Brélot,  "Eléments de la théorie classique du potentiel" , Sorbonne Univ. Centre Doc. Univ. , Paris  (1959)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Constantinescu,  A. Cornea,  "Potential theory on harmonic spaces" , Springer  (1972)</TD></TR></table>
 
 
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====

Latest revision as of 06:29, 30 May 2020


Fundamental problems in both classical and abstract potential theory. The classical Newton and logarithmic potentials satisfy certain partial differential equations of elliptic type: the Laplace equation in regions free of the masses generating the potentials, and the Poisson equation in regions occupied by the masses. It follows, therefore, that the boundary value problems of potential theory are primarily boundary value problems for elliptic equations and systems (cf. Boundary value problem, elliptic equations).

1) The Dirichlet problem, or first boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential $ u (x) $ in some domain $ D $, given its continuous restriction $ u (x) = f (x) $, $ x \in \Gamma $, to the boundary $ \partial D = \Gamma $ of the domain on the assumption that the mass distribution in the interior of $ D $ is known. This is a fundamental problem in potential theory.

2) The Neumann problem, or second boundary value problem. Here the problem is to find a potential in $ D $, given the continuous restriction of its normal derivative

$$ \frac{\partial u (x) }{\partial n } = \ \phi (x) $$

to $ \Gamma $.

3) The mixed problem, or third boundary value problem. Here the known data on $ \Gamma $ constitute a linear combination

$$ \tag{* } \frac{\partial u (x) }{\partial n } + \alpha (x) u (x) = \ \phi (x),\ \ x \in \Gamma . $$

4) The problem with oblique derivative arises when the normal derivative $ \partial u (x)/ \partial n $ in condition (*) is replaced by the derivative $ \partial u (x)/ \partial l $ with respect to an arbitrary direction $ l = l (x) $, $ x \in \Gamma $.

In addition to these general problems, the following specific problems have also arisen in potential theory.

5) The Robin problem. Here it is required to find a mass distribution on $ \Gamma $ with a constant potential in the interior of $ D $. This problem appears in electrostatics, when it is required to determine an equilibrium charge distribution on a conductor $ \Gamma $ which has no effect anywhere inside $ D $.

6) The balayage method, which, in its simplest presentation dating back to H. Poincaré, amounts to finding a "swept-out" mass distribution on $ \Gamma $ the potential of which in the complementary domain $ C \overline{D}\; $ coincides with the potential of given masses in the interior of $ D $. The two last problems are particularly important in abstract potential theory (see Potential theory, abstract). See also Bessel potential; Non-linear potential; Riesz potential.

References

[1] N.M. Günter, "Potential theory and its applications to basic problems of mathematical physics" , F. Ungar (1967) (Translated from French)
[2] N.S. Landkof, "Foundations of modern potential theory" , Springer (1972) (Translated from Russian)
[3] M. Brélot, "Eléments de la théorie classique du potentiel" , Sorbonne Univ. Centre Doc. Univ. , Paris (1959)
[4] C. Constantinescu, A. Cornea, "Potential theory on harmonic spaces" , Springer (1972)

Comments

Well-known additional references are [a1], [a2], [a3]. Boundary value problems for parabolic equations can be considered in the same way as those in potential theory, cf. [a3]. The relation between boundary value problems and the theory of Markov processes is considered in [a3].

References

[a1] O.D. Kellogg, "Foundations of potential theory" , F. Ungar (1929) (Re-issue: Springer, 1967)
[a2] L.L. Helms, "Introduction to potential theory" , Wiley (Interscience) (1969)
[a3] J.L. Doob, "Classical potential theory and its probabilistic counterpart" , Springer (1983)
How to Cite This Entry:
Boundary value problems in potential theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Boundary_value_problems_in_potential_theory&oldid=18939
This article was adapted from an original article by E.D. Solomentsev (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article