Difference between revisions of "MacWilliams identities"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | m1100101.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 68 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 68 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/M110/M.1100010 MacWilliams identities | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A $ k $- | |
+ | dimensional subspace $ C $ | ||
+ | of the [[Linear space|linear space]] $ V $ | ||
+ | of all $ n $- | ||
+ | tuples over the [[Finite field|finite field]] $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $ | ||
+ | is called an $ [ n,k ] $ | ||
+ | linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $. | ||
+ | The vectors in $ C $ | ||
+ | are called code words. The weight of a vector is the number of its non-zero components. A generator matrix for a code $ C $ | ||
+ | is any $ ( k \times n ) $- | ||
+ | matrix $ G $ | ||
+ | whose rows form a basis of $ C $. | ||
+ | The ordinary inner product of vectors $ u = ( u _ {1} \dots u _ {n} ) $, | ||
+ | $ v = ( v _ {1} \dots v _ {n} ) $ | ||
+ | in $ V $ | ||
+ | is | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | u \cdot v = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { n } u _ {i} v _ {i} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The | + | The dual of $ C $ |
+ | is the $ [ n,n - k ] $ | ||
+ | linear code $ C ^ \bot $ | ||
+ | defined by | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | C ^ \bot = \left \{ {v \in V } : {u \cdot v = 0 \textrm{ for all } u \in C } \right \} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The | + | The weight distribution of a code $ C $ |
+ | of length $ n $ | ||
+ | gives the number of vectors of each weight $ i $, | ||
+ | $ 0 \leq i \leq n $, | ||
+ | denoted by $ A _ {i} $. | ||
+ | For example, let $ C $ | ||
+ | be the $ [ 7,4 ] $ | ||
+ | linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( 2 ) $ | ||
+ | with generating matrix | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | G = \left ( | ||
− | + | \begin{array}{ccccccc} | |
+ | 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ | ||
+ | 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ | ||
+ | 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ | ||
+ | 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
− | + | \right ) . | |
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | The only non-zero weights in $ C $ | |
+ | are $ A _ {0} = A _ {7} = 1 $, | ||
+ | $ A _ {3} = A _ {4} = 7 $. | ||
− | + | While the weight distribution does not, in general, uniquely determine a code, it gives important information that has both practical and theoretical significance. The most fundamental result about weight distributions are the MacWilliams equations, a set of linear relations between the weight distributions of $ C $ | |
+ | and $ C ^ \bot $. | ||
+ | These equations imply that the weight distribution of $ C ^ \bot $ | ||
+ | is uniquely determined by the weight distribution of $ C $. | ||
+ | These relations have been the most significant tool available for investigating and calculating weight distributions. | ||
− | + | Let $ B _ {i} $ | |
+ | denote the number of vectors of weight $ i $ | ||
+ | in $ C ^ \bot $. | ||
+ | If $ C $ | ||
+ | is an $ [ n,k ] $ | ||
+ | linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $, | ||
+ | then there are two equivalent sets of MacWilliams equations [[#References|[a1]]]: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a1 } | |
+ | \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { {n } - \nu } \left ( \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | {n - j } \\ | ||
+ | \nu | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right ) A _ {j} = q ^ {k - \nu } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ \nu \left ( \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | {n - j } \\ | ||
+ | {n - \nu } | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right ) B _ {j} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a2 } | |
+ | \sum _ {j = \nu } ^ { n } \left ( \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | j \\ | ||
+ | \nu | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right ) A _ {j} = q ^ {k - \nu } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ \nu ( - 1 ) ^ {j} \left ( \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | {n - j } \\ | ||
+ | {n - \nu } | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right ) ( q - 1 ) ^ {\nu - j } B _ {j} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | where $ 0 \leq \nu \leq n $. | |
− | + | If $ \nu = 0 $, | |
+ | both sets of equations say that $ \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ {n} A _ {j} = q ^ {k} B _ {0} = q ^ {k} $, | ||
+ | which states the obvious result that an $ [ n,k ] $ | ||
+ | code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $ | ||
+ | contains $ q ^ {k} $ | ||
+ | codewords. The other equations are not so obvious. One can solve either set of equations for the weight distribution of $ C ^ \bot $, | ||
+ | obtaining $ B _ {0} = 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ B _ {4} = 7 $. | ||
− | + | An elegant and much used way to express these relations is in terms of polynomials. The weight enumerator of a code $ C $ | |
+ | of length $ n $ | ||
+ | is: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | W _ {C} ( x,y ) = \sum _ {i = 0 } ^ { n } A _ {i} x ^ {n - i } y ^ {i} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | The following equation is equivalent to either (a1) or (a2) for a code $ C $ | |
+ | over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a3 } | |
+ | W _ {C ^ \bot } ( x,y ) = { | ||
+ | \frac{1}{\left | C \right | } | ||
+ | } W _ {C} ( x + ( q - 1 ) y,x - y ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The power moments are particularly useful for giving conditions under which the weight distributions of a code and its dual are uniquely determined. This is illustrated in the following theorem: A unique solution to the power moments exists under the conditions that | + | Two other sets of equations equivalent to either (a1), (a2) or (a3) and more convenient for some calculations are called the power moment identities [[#References|[a3]]]. They involve the [[Stirling numbers]] of the second kind $ S ( r, \nu ) $( |
+ | cf. also [[Combinatorial analysis|Combinatorial analysis]]). One such set is | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \tag{a4 } | ||
+ | \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { n } j ^ {r} A _ {j} = \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { { \min } ( n,r ) } ( - 1 ) ^ {j} B _ {j} \cdot | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \cdot | ||
+ | \left ( \sum _ {\nu = j } ^ { r } \nu! S ( r, \nu ) q ^ {k - \nu } ( q - 1 ) ^ {\nu - j } \left ( \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | {n - j } \\ | ||
+ | {n - \nu } | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right ) \right ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $ 0 \leq r $. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The power moments are particularly useful for giving conditions under which the weight distributions of a code and its dual are uniquely determined. This is illustrated in the following theorem: A unique solution to the power moments exists under the conditions that $ s $ | ||
+ | or fewer $ A _ {i} $' | ||
+ | s are unknown and that $ B _ {1} \dots B _ {s - 1 } $ | ||
+ | are known [[#References|[a3]]]. In this situation, the weight distributions of both $ C $ | ||
+ | and $ C ^ \bot $ | ||
+ | are uniquely determined. | ||
There are also MacWilliams equations for non-linear codes [[#References|[a2]]]. | There are also MacWilliams equations for non-linear codes [[#References|[a2]]]. |
Latest revision as of 04:11, 6 June 2020
A $ k $-
dimensional subspace $ C $
of the linear space $ V $
of all $ n $-
tuples over the finite field $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $
is called an $ [ n,k ] $
linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $.
The vectors in $ C $
are called code words. The weight of a vector is the number of its non-zero components. A generator matrix for a code $ C $
is any $ ( k \times n ) $-
matrix $ G $
whose rows form a basis of $ C $.
The ordinary inner product of vectors $ u = ( u _ {1} \dots u _ {n} ) $,
$ v = ( v _ {1} \dots v _ {n} ) $
in $ V $
is
$$ u \cdot v = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { n } u _ {i} v _ {i} . $$
The dual of $ C $ is the $ [ n,n - k ] $ linear code $ C ^ \bot $ defined by
$$ C ^ \bot = \left \{ {v \in V } : {u \cdot v = 0 \textrm{ for all } u \in C } \right \} . $$
The weight distribution of a code $ C $ of length $ n $ gives the number of vectors of each weight $ i $, $ 0 \leq i \leq n $, denoted by $ A _ {i} $. For example, let $ C $ be the $ [ 7,4 ] $ linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( 2 ) $ with generating matrix
$$ G = \left ( \begin{array}{ccccccc} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \end{array} \right ) . $$
The only non-zero weights in $ C $ are $ A _ {0} = A _ {7} = 1 $, $ A _ {3} = A _ {4} = 7 $.
While the weight distribution does not, in general, uniquely determine a code, it gives important information that has both practical and theoretical significance. The most fundamental result about weight distributions are the MacWilliams equations, a set of linear relations between the weight distributions of $ C $ and $ C ^ \bot $. These equations imply that the weight distribution of $ C ^ \bot $ is uniquely determined by the weight distribution of $ C $. These relations have been the most significant tool available for investigating and calculating weight distributions.
Let $ B _ {i} $ denote the number of vectors of weight $ i $ in $ C ^ \bot $. If $ C $ is an $ [ n,k ] $ linear code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $, then there are two equivalent sets of MacWilliams equations [a1]:
$$ \tag{a1 } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { {n } - \nu } \left ( \begin{array}{c} {n - j } \\ \nu \end{array} \right ) A _ {j} = q ^ {k - \nu } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ \nu \left ( \begin{array}{c} {n - j } \\ {n - \nu } \end{array} \right ) B _ {j} , $$
$$ \tag{a2 } \sum _ {j = \nu } ^ { n } \left ( \begin{array}{c} j \\ \nu \end{array} \right ) A _ {j} = q ^ {k - \nu } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ \nu ( - 1 ) ^ {j} \left ( \begin{array}{c} {n - j } \\ {n - \nu } \end{array} \right ) ( q - 1 ) ^ {\nu - j } B _ {j} , $$
where $ 0 \leq \nu \leq n $.
If $ \nu = 0 $, both sets of equations say that $ \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ {n} A _ {j} = q ^ {k} B _ {0} = q ^ {k} $, which states the obvious result that an $ [ n,k ] $ code over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $ contains $ q ^ {k} $ codewords. The other equations are not so obvious. One can solve either set of equations for the weight distribution of $ C ^ \bot $, obtaining $ B _ {0} = 1 $ and $ B _ {4} = 7 $.
An elegant and much used way to express these relations is in terms of polynomials. The weight enumerator of a code $ C $ of length $ n $ is:
$$ W _ {C} ( x,y ) = \sum _ {i = 0 } ^ { n } A _ {i} x ^ {n - i } y ^ {i} . $$
The following equation is equivalent to either (a1) or (a2) for a code $ C $ over $ { \mathop{\rm GF} } ( q ) $:
$$ \tag{a3 } W _ {C ^ \bot } ( x,y ) = { \frac{1}{\left | C \right | } } W _ {C} ( x + ( q - 1 ) y,x - y ) . $$
Two other sets of equations equivalent to either (a1), (a2) or (a3) and more convenient for some calculations are called the power moment identities [a3]. They involve the Stirling numbers of the second kind $ S ( r, \nu ) $( cf. also Combinatorial analysis). One such set is
$$ \tag{a4 } \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { n } j ^ {r} A _ {j} = \sum _ {j = 0 } ^ { { \min } ( n,r ) } ( - 1 ) ^ {j} B _ {j} \cdot $$
$$ \cdot \left ( \sum _ {\nu = j } ^ { r } \nu! S ( r, \nu ) q ^ {k - \nu } ( q - 1 ) ^ {\nu - j } \left ( \begin{array}{c} {n - j } \\ {n - \nu } \end{array} \right ) \right ) , $$
where $ 0 \leq r $.
The power moments are particularly useful for giving conditions under which the weight distributions of a code and its dual are uniquely determined. This is illustrated in the following theorem: A unique solution to the power moments exists under the conditions that $ s $ or fewer $ A _ {i} $' s are unknown and that $ B _ {1} \dots B _ {s - 1 } $ are known [a3]. In this situation, the weight distributions of both $ C $ and $ C ^ \bot $ are uniquely determined.
There are also MacWilliams equations for non-linear codes [a2].
References
[a1] | F.J. MacWilliams, "A theorem on the distribution of weights in a systematic code" Bell System Techn. J. , 42 (1963) pp. 79–94 |
[a2] | F.J. MacWilliams, N.J.A. Sloane, J.M. Goethals, "The MacWilliams identities for nonlinear codes" Bell System Techn. J. , 51 (1972) pp. 803–819 |
[a3] | V. Pless, "Power moment identities on weight distributions in error-correcting codes" Inform. and Control , 6 (1963) pp. 147–152 |
MacWilliams identities. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=MacWilliams_identities&oldid=47743