Difference between revisions of "Lazard set"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
| + | l1100901.png | ||
| + | $#A+1 = 35 n = 0 | ||
| + | $#C+1 = 35 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L110/L.1100090 Lazard set | ||
| + | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
| + | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
| + | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
| + | --> | ||
| − | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
| + | {{TEX|done}} | ||
| − | + | A subset $ T $ | |
| + | of the [[Free magma|free magma]] $ M ( A ) $, | ||
| + | i.e. the free non-associative structure over $ A $( | ||
| + | cf. also [[Associative rings and algebras|Associative rings and algebras]]). The elements of $ M ( A ) $ | ||
| + | correspond to completely bracketed words over $ A $( | ||
| + | or rooted planar binary trees with leaves labelled by generators $ a _ {1} , a _ {2} , \dots $; | ||
| + | cf. also [[Binary tree|Binary tree]]). These are defined recursively as brackets $ t = [ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } ] $ | ||
| + | where $ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } $ | ||
| + | are bracketed words of lower weight; bracketed words of weight one correspond to the generators $ a _ {1} , a _ {2} , \dots $. | ||
| + | A subset $ E \subset M ( A ) $ | ||
| + | is said to be closed, if for each element $ t = [ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } ] \in E $ | ||
| + | one has $ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } \in E $. | ||
| + | Given two elements $ s, t \in M ( A ) $, | ||
| + | one writes $ [ st ^ {p} ] $ | ||
| + | to denote the element | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | [ \dots [ [ s, t ] , t ] \dots t ] ( p \textrm{ closing brackets } ) . | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | Consider trees $ t _ {0} \dots t _ {n} $ | |
| + | and subsets $ T _ {0} \dots T _ {n + 1 } \subset M ( A ) $ | ||
| + | defined as follows: | ||
| − | + | $$ \tag{a1 } | |
| + | \left . | ||
| − | + | \begin{array}{cttt} | |
| + | t _ {0} \in T _ {0} = A, &t _ {1} \in T _ {1} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {0} ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {0} \setminus t _ {0} } \right \} , &\dots \dots &t _ {n} \in T _ {n} = | ||
| + | \left \{ {[ tt _ {n - 1 } ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {n - 1 } \setminus t _ {n - 1 } } \right \} , \\ | ||
| + | t _ {1} \in T _ {1} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {0} ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {0} \setminus t _ {0} } \right \} , &\dots \dots &t _ {n} \in T _ {n} = | ||
| + | \left \{ {[ tt _ {n - 1 } ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {n - 1 } \setminus t _ {n - 1 } } \right \} , \\ | ||
| + | \end{array} | ||
| + | |||
| + | \right \} | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | Lazard | + | A Lazard set is a subset $ L \subset M ( A ) $ |
| + | such that for any finite, non-empty and closed subset $ E \subset M ( A ) $ | ||
| + | one has: | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | L \cap E = \{ t _ {0} > \dots > t _ {n} \} | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | for some $ n \geq 0 $, | |
| + | (a1) holds and, moreover, $ T _ {n + 1 } \cap E = \emptyset $. | ||
| − | Lazard sets were introduced by X. Viennot [[#References|[a1]]] in order to unify combinatorial constructions of bases of the free Lie algebra. The Lyndon basis (see [[Lyndon word|Lyndon word]]) was thought to be of a different nature from the one considered by M. Hall [[#References|[a2]]], and generalizations of it were proposed by many authors. Viennot gave a unifying framework for all these constructions. One may present Lazard sets in terms of words, rather than trees in | + | Lazard sets may be shown to coincide with Hall sets (cf. [[Hall set|Hall set]]). Thus, they give bases of the free Lie algebra over $ A $; |
| + | that is, one may associate a [[Lie polynomial|Lie polynomial]] $ \psi ( t ) $ | ||
| + | to each element $ t \in L $ | ||
| + | of a Lazard set such that the free Lie algebra $ {\mathcal L} ( A ) $( | ||
| + | over $ A $; | ||
| + | cf. [[Lie algebra, free|Lie algebra, free]]) is freely generated (as a module over a commutative ring $ K $) | ||
| + | by the Lie polynomials $ \{ {\psi ( t ) } : {t \in L } \} $. | ||
| + | Lazard's elimination process may then be phrased as follows: One has the direct sum decomposition (as a module over a commutative ring $ K $): | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | {\mathcal L} ( A ) = K \psi ( t _ {0} ) \oplus \dots \oplus K \psi ( t _ {n} ) \oplus {\mathcal L} _ {n + 1 } , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | where $ {\mathcal L} _ {n + 1 } $ | ||
| + | is the Lie subalgebra freely generated by $ T _ {n + 1 } $. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lazard sets were introduced by X. Viennot [[#References|[a1]]] in order to unify combinatorial constructions of bases of the free Lie algebra. The Lyndon basis (see [[Lyndon word|Lyndon word]]) was thought to be of a different nature from the one considered by M. Hall [[#References|[a2]]], and generalizations of it were proposed by many authors. Viennot gave a unifying framework for all these constructions. One may present Lazard sets in terms of words, rather than trees in $ M ( A ) $. | ||
| + | It can then be shown that a unique tree structure is attached to every [[Word|word]] of a Lazard set. Moreover, a Lazard set of words is totally ordered, as is a Lazard set of trees, and it is a complete factorization of the free monoid. That is, every word is a unique non-increasing product of Lazard words. This result makes explicit the link between bases of free Lie algebras and complete factorizations of free monoids. | ||
See also [[Hall word|Hall word]]. | See also [[Hall word|Hall word]]. | ||
Revision as of 22:16, 5 June 2020
A subset $ T $
of the free magma $ M ( A ) $,
i.e. the free non-associative structure over $ A $(
cf. also Associative rings and algebras). The elements of $ M ( A ) $
correspond to completely bracketed words over $ A $(
or rooted planar binary trees with leaves labelled by generators $ a _ {1} , a _ {2} , \dots $;
cf. also Binary tree). These are defined recursively as brackets $ t = [ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } ] $
where $ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } $
are bracketed words of lower weight; bracketed words of weight one correspond to the generators $ a _ {1} , a _ {2} , \dots $.
A subset $ E \subset M ( A ) $
is said to be closed, if for each element $ t = [ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } ] \in E $
one has $ t ^ \prime , t ^ {\prime \prime } \in E $.
Given two elements $ s, t \in M ( A ) $,
one writes $ [ st ^ {p} ] $
to denote the element
$$ [ \dots [ [ s, t ] , t ] \dots t ] ( p \textrm{ closing brackets } ) . $$
Consider trees $ t _ {0} \dots t _ {n} $ and subsets $ T _ {0} \dots T _ {n + 1 } \subset M ( A ) $ defined as follows:
$$ \tag{a1 } \left . \begin{array}{cttt} t _ {0} \in T _ {0} = A, &t _ {1} \in T _ {1} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {0} ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {0} \setminus t _ {0} } \right \} , &\dots \dots &t _ {n} \in T _ {n} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {n - 1 } ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {n - 1 } \setminus t _ {n - 1 } } \right \} , \\ t _ {1} \in T _ {1} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {0} ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {0} \setminus t _ {0} } \right \} , &\dots \dots &t _ {n} \in T _ {n} = \left \{ {[ tt _ {n - 1 } ^ {p} ] } : {p \geq 0, t \in T _ {n - 1 } \setminus t _ {n - 1 } } \right \} , \\ \end{array} \right \} $$
A Lazard set is a subset $ L \subset M ( A ) $ such that for any finite, non-empty and closed subset $ E \subset M ( A ) $ one has:
$$ L \cap E = \{ t _ {0} > \dots > t _ {n} \} $$
for some $ n \geq 0 $, (a1) holds and, moreover, $ T _ {n + 1 } \cap E = \emptyset $.
Lazard sets may be shown to coincide with Hall sets (cf. Hall set). Thus, they give bases of the free Lie algebra over $ A $; that is, one may associate a Lie polynomial $ \psi ( t ) $ to each element $ t \in L $ of a Lazard set such that the free Lie algebra $ {\mathcal L} ( A ) $( over $ A $; cf. Lie algebra, free) is freely generated (as a module over a commutative ring $ K $) by the Lie polynomials $ \{ {\psi ( t ) } : {t \in L } \} $. Lazard's elimination process may then be phrased as follows: One has the direct sum decomposition (as a module over a commutative ring $ K $):
$$ {\mathcal L} ( A ) = K \psi ( t _ {0} ) \oplus \dots \oplus K \psi ( t _ {n} ) \oplus {\mathcal L} _ {n + 1 } , $$
where $ {\mathcal L} _ {n + 1 } $ is the Lie subalgebra freely generated by $ T _ {n + 1 } $.
Lazard sets were introduced by X. Viennot [a1] in order to unify combinatorial constructions of bases of the free Lie algebra. The Lyndon basis (see Lyndon word) was thought to be of a different nature from the one considered by M. Hall [a2], and generalizations of it were proposed by many authors. Viennot gave a unifying framework for all these constructions. One may present Lazard sets in terms of words, rather than trees in $ M ( A ) $. It can then be shown that a unique tree structure is attached to every word of a Lazard set. Moreover, a Lazard set of words is totally ordered, as is a Lazard set of trees, and it is a complete factorization of the free monoid. That is, every word is a unique non-increasing product of Lazard words. This result makes explicit the link between bases of free Lie algebras and complete factorizations of free monoids.
See also Hall word.
References
| [a1] | X. Viennot, "Algèbres de Lie libres et monoïdes libres" , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 691 , Springer (1978) |
| [a2] | M. Hall, "A basis for free Lie rings and higher commutators in free groups" Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 1 (1950) pp. 57–581 |
| [a3] | C. Reutenauer, "Free Lie algebras" , London Math. Soc. Monographs New Ser. , 7 , Oxford Univ. Press (1993) |
Lazard set. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lazard_set&oldid=14203