Difference between revisions of "Complete algebraic variety"
m (links) |
m (→References: isbn link) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A generalization of the concept of a compact complex algebraic variety. A separated variety | + | A generalization of the concept of a compact complex algebraic variety. A separated variety $X$ is called complete if for any variety $Y$ the projection $X \times Y \rightarrow Y$ is a closed morphism, i.e. it maps closed subsets of $X \times Y$ (in the [[Zariski topology]]) into closed subsets of $Y$. |
− | Any projective variety is complete, but not vice versa. For any complete algebraic variety | + | Any [[projective variety]] is complete, but not vice versa. For any complete algebraic variety $X$ there exists a projective variety $X_1$ and a projective birational morphism $X_1\rightarrow X$ (Chow's lemma). For any algebraic variety $X$ there exists an open imbedding into a complete variety $\tilde X$ (Nagata's theorem). A generalization of the concept of a complete algebraic variety to the relative case is that of a [[proper morphism]] of schemes. |
+ | |||
+ | There is also the ''valuative completeness criterion'': For any discrete valuation ring $A$ with [[field of fractions]] $K$ and any morphism $u : \mathrm{Spec}\,K \rightarrow X$ there should be a unique morphism $v : \mathrm{Spec}\,A \rightarrow X$ that extends $v$. This condition is an analogue of the requirement that any sequence in $X$ has a limit point. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table> | <table> | ||
− | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) {{MR|0463157}} {{ZBL|0367.14001}} </TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) {{ISBN|0-387-90244-9}} {{MR|0463157}} {{ZBL|0367.14001}} </TD></TR> |
<TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.R. Shafarevich, "Basic algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) (Translated from Russian) {{MR|0447223}} {{ZBL|0362.14001}} </TD></TR> | <TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.R. Shafarevich, "Basic algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) (Translated from Russian) {{MR|0447223}} {{ZBL|0362.14001}} </TD></TR> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|done}} |
Latest revision as of 19:12, 24 November 2023
A generalization of the concept of a compact complex algebraic variety. A separated variety $X$ is called complete if for any variety $Y$ the projection $X \times Y \rightarrow Y$ is a closed morphism, i.e. it maps closed subsets of $X \times Y$ (in the Zariski topology) into closed subsets of $Y$.
Any projective variety is complete, but not vice versa. For any complete algebraic variety $X$ there exists a projective variety $X_1$ and a projective birational morphism $X_1\rightarrow X$ (Chow's lemma). For any algebraic variety $X$ there exists an open imbedding into a complete variety $\tilde X$ (Nagata's theorem). A generalization of the concept of a complete algebraic variety to the relative case is that of a proper morphism of schemes.
There is also the valuative completeness criterion: For any discrete valuation ring $A$ with field of fractions $K$ and any morphism $u : \mathrm{Spec}\,K \rightarrow X$ there should be a unique morphism $v : \mathrm{Spec}\,A \rightarrow X$ that extends $v$. This condition is an analogue of the requirement that any sequence in $X$ has a limit point.
References
[1] | R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) ISBN 0-387-90244-9 MR0463157 Zbl 0367.14001 |
[2] | I.R. Shafarevich, "Basic algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) (Translated from Russian) MR0447223 Zbl 0362.14001 |
Complete algebraic variety. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Complete_algebraic_variety&oldid=35044