Difference between revisions of "BCI-algebra"
m (partial latex) |
m |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The subset <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018032.png" /> of all elements <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018033.png" /> forms an ideal, called the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018035.png" />-radical of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018036.png" />. The algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018037.png" /> is a [[BCK-algebra|BCK-algebra]] if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018038.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018039.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018041.png" />-semi-simple if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018042.png" />. In the latter case, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018043.png" /> satisfies the identity <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018044.png" /> for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018045.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018046.png" />. It then follows that one can define an operation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018047.png" /> on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018048.png" /> by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018049.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018050.png" />. This makes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018051.png" /> into an [[Abelian group|Abelian group]] with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018052.png" /> as the identity. Conversely, every Abelian group <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018053.png" /> can be given a BCI-algebra structure by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018054.png" />. It follows that the category of Abelian groups is equivalent to the subcategory of the category of BCI-algebras formed by the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018055.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebras. Here, a [[Homomorphism|homomorphism]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018056.png" /> from one BCI-algebra to another is a function satisfying <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018057.png" />. In general, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018058.png" /> always contains a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018059.png" />-semi-simple BCI-subalgebra, namely its <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018060.png" />-semi-simple part <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018061.png" />. Of course, also <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018062.png" />, since it can be verified easily that the induced partial order in a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018063.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebra is always trivial. Clearly, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018064.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018065.png" />-semi-simple if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018066.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018067.png" /> is a BCK-algebra if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018068.png" />. Note that for a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018069.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebra, the closed ideals are precisely the subgroups of the associated Abelian group structure. | The subset <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018032.png" /> of all elements <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018033.png" /> forms an ideal, called the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018035.png" />-radical of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018036.png" />. The algebra <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018037.png" /> is a [[BCK-algebra|BCK-algebra]] if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018038.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018039.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018041.png" />-semi-simple if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018042.png" />. In the latter case, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018043.png" /> satisfies the identity <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018044.png" /> for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018045.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018046.png" />. It then follows that one can define an operation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018047.png" /> on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018048.png" /> by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018049.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018050.png" />. This makes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018051.png" /> into an [[Abelian group|Abelian group]] with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018052.png" /> as the identity. Conversely, every Abelian group <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018053.png" /> can be given a BCI-algebra structure by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018054.png" />. It follows that the category of Abelian groups is equivalent to the subcategory of the category of BCI-algebras formed by the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018055.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebras. Here, a [[Homomorphism|homomorphism]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018056.png" /> from one BCI-algebra to another is a function satisfying <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018057.png" />. In general, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018058.png" /> always contains a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018059.png" />-semi-simple BCI-subalgebra, namely its <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018060.png" />-semi-simple part <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018061.png" />. Of course, also <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018062.png" />, since it can be verified easily that the induced partial order in a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018063.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebra is always trivial. Clearly, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018064.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018065.png" />-semi-simple if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018066.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018067.png" /> is a BCK-algebra if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018068.png" />. Note that for a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/b/b110/b110180/b11018069.png" />-semi-simple BCI-algebra, the closed ideals are precisely the subgroups of the associated Abelian group structure. | ||
− | Some of the homological algebra properties of BCI-algebras are known. For example, it is known that a BCI-algebra is injective if and only if it is | + | Some of the homological algebra properties of BCI-algebras are known. For example, it is known that a BCI-algebra is injective if and only if it is $p$-semi-simple and its associated Abelian group structure is divisible (cf, also [[Divisible group]]). |
Fuzzy ideals of BCI-algebras are described in [[#References|[a1]]] and [[#References|[a2]]]. | Fuzzy ideals of BCI-algebras are described in [[#References|[a1]]] and [[#References|[a2]]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy ideals of BCI and MV-algebras" ''Fuzzy Sets and Systems'' , '''62''' (1994) pp. 111–114</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy implicative and Boolean ideals of MV-algebras" ''Fuzzy Sets and Systems'' , '''66''' (1994) pp. 315–327</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Y. Imai, K. Iséki, "On axiom systems of propositional calculi, XIV" ''Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci.'' , '''42''' (1966) pp. 19–22</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, "An algebra related with a propositional calculus" ''Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci.'' , '''42''' (1966) pp. 26–29</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, "On BCI-algebras" ''Math. Seminar Notes (Kobe University)'' , '''8''' (1980) pp. 125–130</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, S. Tanaka, "An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras" ''Math. Japon.'' , '''23''' (1978) pp. 1–26</TD></TR></table> | + | <table> |
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy ideals of BCI and MV-algebras" ''Fuzzy Sets and Systems'' , '''62''' (1994) pp. 111–114</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy implicative and Boolean ideals of MV-algebras" ''Fuzzy Sets and Systems'' , '''66''' (1994) pp. 315–327</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Y. Imai, K. Iséki, "On axiom systems of propositional calculi, XIV" ''Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci.'' , '''42''' (1966) pp. 19–22</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, "An algebra related with a propositional calculus" ''Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci.'' , '''42''' (1966) pp. 26–29</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, "On BCI-algebras" ''Math. Seminar Notes (Kobe University)'' , '''8''' (1980) pp. 125–130</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Iséki, S. Tanaka, "An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras" ''Math. Japon.'' , '''23''' (1978) pp. 1–26</TD></TR> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
{{TEX|want}} | {{TEX|want}} |
Revision as of 20:30, 13 December 2023
Algebras introduced by K. Iséki in [a4] as a generalized version of BCK-algebras (cf. BCK-algebra). The latter were developed by Iséki and S. Tannaka in [a6] to generalize the set difference in set theory, and by Y. Imai and Iséki in [a3] as the algebras of certain propositional calculi. It turns out that Abelian groups (cf. Abelian group) are a special case of BCI-algebras. One may take different axiom systems for BCI-algebras, and one such system says that a BCI-algebra is a non-empty set $X$ with a binary relation $\ast$ and a constant $0$ satisfying
i) ;
ii) ;
iii) $x \ast x = 0$;
iv) $x \ast y = 0$ and $y \ast x = 0$ imply that $x = y$;
v) $x \ast 0 = 0$ implies that $x=0$.
A partial order $\leq$ may be defined by $x \leq y$ if and only if $x \ast y = 0$. A very useful identity satisfied by $X$ is . One can then develop many of the usual algebraic concepts. An ideal is a set with the properties that and that whenever and , then . The ideal is implicative if and imply that . It is known that one always has . An ideal is closed if whenever then . While ideals in general are not subalgebras, closed ideals are. A subalgebra simply means a subset containing and closed under that is itself a BCI-algebra under .
The subset of all elements forms an ideal, called the -radical of . The algebra is a BCK-algebra if and only if , and is -semi-simple if and only if . In the latter case, satisfies the identity for all and . It then follows that one can define an operation on by , and . This makes into an Abelian group with as the identity. Conversely, every Abelian group can be given a BCI-algebra structure by . It follows that the category of Abelian groups is equivalent to the subcategory of the category of BCI-algebras formed by the -semi-simple BCI-algebras. Here, a homomorphism from one BCI-algebra to another is a function satisfying . In general, always contains a -semi-simple BCI-subalgebra, namely its -semi-simple part . Of course, also , since it can be verified easily that the induced partial order in a -semi-simple BCI-algebra is always trivial. Clearly, is -semi-simple if , and is a BCK-algebra if . Note that for a -semi-simple BCI-algebra, the closed ideals are precisely the subgroups of the associated Abelian group structure.
Some of the homological algebra properties of BCI-algebras are known. For example, it is known that a BCI-algebra is injective if and only if it is $p$-semi-simple and its associated Abelian group structure is divisible (cf, also Divisible group).
Fuzzy ideals of BCI-algebras are described in [a1] and [a2].
References
[a1] | C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy ideals of BCI and MV-algebras" Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 62 (1994) pp. 111–114 |
[a2] | C.S. Hoo, "Fuzzy implicative and Boolean ideals of MV-algebras" Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 66 (1994) pp. 315–327 |
[a3] | Y. Imai, K. Iséki, "On axiom systems of propositional calculi, XIV" Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci. , 42 (1966) pp. 19–22 |
[a4] | K. Iséki, "An algebra related with a propositional calculus" Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A, Math. Sci. , 42 (1966) pp. 26–29 |
[a5] | K. Iséki, "On BCI-algebras" Math. Seminar Notes (Kobe University) , 8 (1980) pp. 125–130 |
[a6] | K. Iséki, S. Tanaka, "An introduction to the theory of BCK-algebras" Math. Japon. , 23 (1978) pp. 1–26 |
BCI-algebra. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=BCI-algebra&oldid=54782