|
|
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{MSC|54B}} | | {{MSC|54B}} |
| + | {{TEX|done}} |
| ==Of a topological space== | | ==Of a topological space== |
− | A closed set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717401.png" /> in a topological space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717402.png" /> that partitions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717403.png" /> between two given sets <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717404.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717405.png" /> (or, in other words, separates <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717406.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717407.png" /> in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717408.png" />), i.e. such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p0717409.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174010.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174011.png" /> are disjoint and open in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174012.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174013.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174014.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174015.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174016.png" /> are open in all of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174017.png" />). A partition is called fine if its interior is empty. Any binary [[Decomposition|decomposition]] (i.e. a partition consisting of two elements) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174018.png" /> of a space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174019.png" /> defines a fine partition in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174020.png" />: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174021.png" /> is the boundary of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174022.png" />, which is the boundary of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174023.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174024.png" />, in which <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174025.png" /> is the open kernel (cf. [[Kernel of a set|Kernel of a set]]) of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174026.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174027.png" />. The converse is also true. In essence, the concept of a partition between sets leads to the concept of connectedness. The converse also applies: A space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174028.png" /> is disconnected if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174029.png" /> is a partition between non-empty sets. | + | A closed set $E$ in a topological space $X$ that partitions $X$ between two given sets $P$ and $Q$ (or, in other words, separates $P$ and $Q$ in $X$), i.e. such that $X \setminus E = H_1 \cup H_2$, where $H_1$ and $H_2$ are disjoint and open in $X \setminus E$, $P \subseteq H_1$, $Q \subseteq H_2$ ($P$ and $Q$ are open in all of $X$). A partition is called fine if its interior is empty. Any binary [[Decomposition|decomposition]] (i.e. a partition consisting of two elements) $\alpha = (A_1,A_2)$ of a space $X$ defines a fine partition in $X$: $B$ is the boundary of $A_1$, which is the boundary of $A_2$, where $X\setminus B = O_1 \cup O_2$, in which $O_i$ is the [[Interior of a set|interior]] of $A_i$, $i=1,2$. The converse is also true. In essence, the concept of a partition between sets leads to the concept of connectedness. The converse also applies: A space $X$ is disconnected if $\emptyset$ is a partition between non-empty sets. |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 8: |
Line 9: |
| Related notions in this context are those of a separator and of a cut. | | Related notions in this context are those of a separator and of a cut. |
| | | |
− | If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174030.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174031.png" /> are disjoint subsets of a space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174032.png" />, then a separator between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174033.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174034.png" /> is a set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174035.png" /> such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174036.png" /> with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174037.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174038.png" /> disjoint and open in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174039.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174040.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174041.png" />. So a partition is a closed separator. | + | If $A$ and $B$ are disjoint subsets of a space $X$, then a ''separator'' between$A$ and $B$ is a set $S$ such that $X \setminus S = V \cup W$ with $V$ and $W$ disjoint and open in $X \setminus S$, and $A \subseteq V$ and $B \subseteq W$. So a partition is a closed separator. |
| | | |
− | A set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174042.png" /> is a cut between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174043.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174044.png" /> if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174045.png" /> intersects every [[Continuum|continuum]] that intersects both <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174046.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174047.png" />. | + | A set $C$ is a cut between $A$ and $B$ if $C$ intersects every [[continuum]] that intersects both $A$ and $B$. |
| | | |
− | One readily sees that every partition is a separator and that every separator is a cut, and the following examples show that the notions are in general distinct: the open interval <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174048.png" /> is a separator between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174049.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174050.png" /> in the interval <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174051.png" />, but not a partition; in the well-known subspace <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174052.png" /> of the Euclidean space, the point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174053.png" /> is a cut but not a separator between the points <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174054.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174055.png" />. | + | One readily sees that every partition is a separator and that every separator is a cut, and the following examples show that the notions are in general distinct: the open interval $(0,1)$ is a separator between $\{0\}$ and $\{1\}$ in the interval $[0,1]$, but not a partition; in the well-known subspace $\{0\} \times [-1,1] \cup \{ (x,\sin(1/x)) : 0 < x \le 1 \}$ of the Euclidean space, the point $(0,0)$ is a cut but not a separator between the points $(0,1)$ and $(1,\sin 1)$. |
| + | |
| + | ====References==== |
| + | <table> |
| + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Engelking, "Dimension theory" , North-Holland & PWN (1978) pp. 19; 50</TD></TR> |
| + | </table> |
| | | |
| {{MSC|11P}} | | {{MSC|11P}} |
| + | |
| ==Of a positive integer== | | ==Of a positive integer== |
− | A partition of a positive integer <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174056.png" /> is a decomposition of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174057.png" /> as a sum of positive integers. For example, the partitions of 4 read: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174058.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174059.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174060.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174061.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174062.png" />. The number of different partitions of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174063.png" /> is denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174064.png" />. So, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174065.png" />. L. Euler gave a non-trivial recurrence relation for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174066.png" /> (see [[#References|[a1]]]) and Ramanujan discovered the surprising congruences <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174067.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174068.png" />), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174069.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174070.png" />), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174071.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174072.png" />), and others. He also found the asymptotic relation | + | A partition of a positive integer $n$ is a decomposition of $n$ as a sum of positive integers. For example, the partitions of $4$ read: $4$, $3+1$, $2+2$, $2+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$. The ''[[Partition function (number theory)|partition function]]'' $p(n)$ gives the number of different partitions of $n$. So, $p(4) = 5$. L. Euler gave a non-trivial recurrence relation for $p(n)$ (see [[#References|[a1]]]) and Ramanujan discovered the surprising congruences $p(5n+4) \equiv 0 \pmod 5$, $p(7m+5) \equiv 0 \pmod 7$, $p(11m+6) \equiv 0 \pmod{11}$, and others. He also found the asymptotic relation |
| + | $$ |
| + | p(n) \sim \frac{e^{K\sqrt n}}{4n\sqrt3}\ \ \ \text{as}\ n\rightarrow \infty |
| + | $$ |
| + | where $K=\pi\sqrt{2/3}$. Later this was completed to an exact series expansion by H. Rademacher (see [[#References|[a2]]]). |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174073.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | One can also distinguish other partitions, having particular properties, such as the numbers in the decomposition being distinct (see [[#References|[a3]]]). See also [[Additive number theory]]; [[Additive problems]]. |
| | | |
− | where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/p/p071/p071740/p07174074.png" />. Later this was completed to an exact series expansion by H. Rademacher (see [[#References|[a2]]]).
| + | ====References==== |
| + | <table> |
| + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, "An introduction to the theory of numbers" , Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. XVI</TD></TR> |
| + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.M. Apostol, "Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory" , Springer (1976)</TD></TR> |
| + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.E. Andrews, "The theory of partitions" , Addison-Wesley (1976)</TD></TR> |
| + | </table> |
| | | |
− | One can also distinguish other partitions, having particular properties, such as the numbers in the decomposition being distinct (see [[#References|[a3]]]). See also [[Additive number theory|Additive number theory]]; [[Additive problems|Additive problems]].
| + | ==Of a set== |
| + | Expression of a set $Y$ as a [[disjoint union]] of subsets: a family of subsets $X_\lambda \subseteq Y$ for $\lambda \in \Lambda$, for some index set $\Lambda$, which are pairwise disjoint, $\lambda \neq \mu \Rightarrow X_\lambda \cap X_\mu = \emptyset$ and such that the union $\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} X_\lambda = Y$. The classes of an [[equivalence relation]] on $Y$ form a partition of $Y$, as does the [[kernel of a function]]; conversely a partition defines an equivalence relation and a function giving rise to that partition. See also [[Decomposition]]. |
| | | |
| ====References==== | | ====References==== |
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, "An introduction to the theory of numbers" , Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. XVI</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.M. Apostol, "Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory" , Springer (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.E. Andrews, "The theory of partitions" , Addison-Wesley (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Engelking, "Dimension theory" , North-Holland & PWN (1978) pp. 19; 50</TD></TR></table> | + | <table> |
| + | <TR><TD valign="top">[b1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. R. Halmos, ''Naive Set Theory'', Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer (1960) {{ISBN|0-387-90092-6}}</TD></TR> |
| + | </table> |
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 54B [MSN][ZBL]
Of a topological space
A closed set $E$ in a topological space $X$ that partitions $X$ between two given sets $P$ and $Q$ (or, in other words, separates $P$ and $Q$ in $X$), i.e. such that $X \setminus E = H_1 \cup H_2$, where $H_1$ and $H_2$ are disjoint and open in $X \setminus E$, $P \subseteq H_1$, $Q \subseteq H_2$ ($P$ and $Q$ are open in all of $X$). A partition is called fine if its interior is empty. Any binary decomposition (i.e. a partition consisting of two elements) $\alpha = (A_1,A_2)$ of a space $X$ defines a fine partition in $X$: $B$ is the boundary of $A_1$, which is the boundary of $A_2$, where $X\setminus B = O_1 \cup O_2$, in which $O_i$ is the interior of $A_i$, $i=1,2$. The converse is also true. In essence, the concept of a partition between sets leads to the concept of connectedness. The converse also applies: A space $X$ is disconnected if $\emptyset$ is a partition between non-empty sets.
Related notions in this context are those of a separator and of a cut.
If $A$ and $B$ are disjoint subsets of a space $X$, then a separator between$A$ and $B$ is a set $S$ such that $X \setminus S = V \cup W$ with $V$ and $W$ disjoint and open in $X \setminus S$, and $A \subseteq V$ and $B \subseteq W$. So a partition is a closed separator.
A set $C$ is a cut between $A$ and $B$ if $C$ intersects every continuum that intersects both $A$ and $B$.
One readily sees that every partition is a separator and that every separator is a cut, and the following examples show that the notions are in general distinct: the open interval $(0,1)$ is a separator between $\{0\}$ and $\{1\}$ in the interval $[0,1]$, but not a partition; in the well-known subspace $\{0\} \times [-1,1] \cup \{ (x,\sin(1/x)) : 0 < x \le 1 \}$ of the Euclidean space, the point $(0,0)$ is a cut but not a separator between the points $(0,1)$ and $(1,\sin 1)$.
References
[a4] | R. Engelking, "Dimension theory" , North-Holland & PWN (1978) pp. 19; 50 |
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 11P [MSN][ZBL]
Of a positive integer
A partition of a positive integer $n$ is a decomposition of $n$ as a sum of positive integers. For example, the partitions of $4$ read: $4$, $3+1$, $2+2$, $2+1+1$, $1+1+1+1$. The partition function $p(n)$ gives the number of different partitions of $n$. So, $p(4) = 5$. L. Euler gave a non-trivial recurrence relation for $p(n)$ (see [a1]) and Ramanujan discovered the surprising congruences $p(5n+4) \equiv 0 \pmod 5$, $p(7m+5) \equiv 0 \pmod 7$, $p(11m+6) \equiv 0 \pmod{11}$, and others. He also found the asymptotic relation
$$
p(n) \sim \frac{e^{K\sqrt n}}{4n\sqrt3}\ \ \ \text{as}\ n\rightarrow \infty
$$
where $K=\pi\sqrt{2/3}$. Later this was completed to an exact series expansion by H. Rademacher (see [a2]).
One can also distinguish other partitions, having particular properties, such as the numbers in the decomposition being distinct (see [a3]). See also Additive number theory; Additive problems.
References
[a1] | G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, "An introduction to the theory of numbers" , Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. XVI |
[a2] | T.M. Apostol, "Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory" , Springer (1976) |
[a3] | G.E. Andrews, "The theory of partitions" , Addison-Wesley (1976) |
Of a set
Expression of a set $Y$ as a disjoint union of subsets: a family of subsets $X_\lambda \subseteq Y$ for $\lambda \in \Lambda$, for some index set $\Lambda$, which are pairwise disjoint, $\lambda \neq \mu \Rightarrow X_\lambda \cap X_\mu = \emptyset$ and such that the union $\bigcup_{\lambda \in \Lambda} X_\lambda = Y$. The classes of an equivalence relation on $Y$ form a partition of $Y$, as does the kernel of a function; conversely a partition defines an equivalence relation and a function giving rise to that partition. See also Decomposition.
References
[b1] | P. R. Halmos, Naive Set Theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer (1960) ISBN 0-387-90092-6 |