Difference between revisions of "Fréchet algebra"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (moved Fréchet algebra to Frechet algebra: ascii title) |
m (fixing spaces) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | f1101702.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 77 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 77 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/F110/F.1100170 Fr\Aeechet algebra, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | '' $ F $-algebra, algebra of type $ F $'' | |
− | |||
− | + | A completely metrizable [[Topological algebra|topological algebra]]. The joint continuity of multiplication need not be demanded since it follows from the separate continuity (see [[Fréchet topology|Fréchet topology]]). The $ F $-algebras can be classified similarly as the $ F $-spaces (see [[Fréchet topology|Fréchet topology]]), so one can speak about complete locally bounded algebras, algebras of type $ B _ {o} $ ($ B _ {o} $-algebras), and locally pseudo-convex $ F $-algebras, i.e. $ F $-algebras whose underlying topological vector space is a locally bounded space, etc. | |
− | |||
− | + | ==Locally bounded algebras of type $ F $.== | |
+ | These are also called $ LB $-algebras. The topology of an $ LB $-algebra $ A $ | ||
+ | can be given by means of a $ p $-homogeneous [[Norm|norm]], $ 0 < p \leq 1 $, | ||
+ | satisfying $ \| {xy } \| \leq \| x \| \| y \| $, | ||
+ | $ x, y \in A $ (the submultiplicativity condition) and, if $ A $ | ||
+ | has a unity $ e $, | ||
+ | $ \| e \| = 1 $. | ||
+ | The theory of these algebras is analogous to that of Banach algebras (cf. [[Banach algebra|Banach algebra]]). In particular, a Gel'fand–Mazur-type theorem holds (even if completeness and joint continuity of multiplication is not assumed). For commutative complex algebras there is a Gelfand-type theory (including a holomorphic functional calculus). That means that local boundedness, and not local convexity, is responsible for the theory of Banach algebras. For more information on $ LB $-algebras see [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]], [[#References|[a7]]]. | ||
− | + | == $ B _ {o} $-algebras.== | |
+ | The topology of such an algebra $ A $ | ||
+ | can be given by means of a sequence $ \| x \| _ {1} \leq \| x \| _ {2} \leq \dots $ | ||
+ | of semi-norms (cf. [[Semi-norm|Semi-norm]]) satisfying | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a1 } | |
− | + | \left \| {xy } \right \| _ {i} \leq \left \| x \right \| _ {i + 1 } \left \| y \right \| _ {i + 1 } , \quad i = 1,2 \dots | |
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | and, if $ A $ | |
+ | has a unit $ e $, | ||
+ | $ \| e \| _ {i} = 1 $ | ||
+ | for all $ i $. | ||
+ | Such an algebra is said to be multiplicatively-convex ( $ m $-convex) if its topology can be given by means of semi-norms satisfying $ \| {xy } \| _ {i} \leq \| x \| _ {i} \| y \| _ {i} $ | ||
+ | instead of (a1) (some authors give the name "Fréchet algebra" to $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebras). Each $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra is an inverse (projective) limit of a sequence of Banach algebras. Each complete locally convex topological algebra is an inverse limit of a directed system of $ B _ {o} $-algebras. A Gelfand–Mazur-type theorem holds for $ B _ {o} $-algebras; however, completeness is essential, and a $ B _ {o} $-algebra can contain a dense subalgebra isomorphic to the field of all rational functions. The latter is impossible for $ m $-convex algebras. The operation of taking an inverse is not continuous on arbitrary $ B _ {o} $-algebras, but it is continuous on $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebras (the operation of taking an inverse is continuous for a general $ F $-algebra $ A $ | ||
+ | if and only if the group $ G ( A ) $ | ||
+ | of its invertible elements is a $ G _ \delta $-set). A commutative unital $ B _ {o} $-algebra can have dense maximal ideals of infinite codimension also if it is $ m $-convex, but in the latter case there is always a closed maximal ideal of codimension one, which is the kernel of a multiplicative linear functional (this is not true in general). Every $ m $-convex algebra has a functional calculus of several complex variables, but in the non- $ m $-convex case it is possible that there operate only the polynomials. If a commutative $ B _ {o} $-algebra is such that its set $ G ( A ) $ | ||
+ | of invertible elements is open, then it must be $ m $-convex. This fails in the non-commutative case, so that a non- $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra can have all its commutative subalgebras $ m $-convex. Also, a non-Banach $ m $-convex algebra can have the property that all its closed commutative subalgebras are Banach algebras. One of most challenging open questions in the theory of topological algebras (see [[#References|[a2]]], [[#References|[a4]]]) is the question whether for an $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra all its multiplicative linear functionals are continuous (this question is also open for algebras of type $ B _ {o} $ | ||
+ | and $ F $). | ||
+ | This famous Michael–Mazur problem has been positively solved by R. Arens for finitely generated $ m $-convex algebras. For more on these algebras see [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a4]]], [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]], [[#References|[a7]]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Locally pseudo-convex $ F $-algebras.== | ||
+ | These are analogous to $ B _ {o} $-algebras, but with semi-norms replaced by $ p $-homogeneous semi-norms, $ 0 < p \leq 1 $. | ||
+ | Their theories are similar; however, there are some differences. E.g., a commutative locally pseudo-convex algebra of type $ F $ | ||
+ | with open set $ G ( A ) $ | ||
+ | need not be $ m $-pseudo-convex. Every $ m $-pseudo-convex algebra of type $ F $ | ||
+ | is an inverse limit of a sequence of $ LB $-algebras. For more details see [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]], [[#References|[a7]]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Not much is known about general $ F $-algebras; e.g., a Gelfand–Mazur-type theorem is still (1996) unknown. One result, however, has to be noted. Let $ A $ | ||
+ | be an $ F $-algebra with a continuous involution. Then each positive (i.e. satisfying $ f ( x ^ {*} x ) \geq 0 $) | ||
+ | functional on $ A $ | ||
+ | is continuous [[#References|[a2]]]. Every complete topological algebra is an inverse limit of a directed system of $ F $-algebras. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Beckenstein, L. Narici, C. Suffel, "Topological algebras" , Amsterdam (1977)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Husain, ",Multiplicative functionals on topological algebras" , London (1983)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Mallios, "Topological algebras. Selected topics" , Amsterdam (1986)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Michael, "Locally multiplicatively-convex topological algebras" , ''Memoirs'' , '''11''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1952)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Waelbroeck, "Topological vector spaces and algebras" , ''Lecture Notes in Mathematics'' , '''230''' , Springer (1971)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Zelazko, "Metric generalizations of Banach algebras" ''Dissert. Math.'' , '''47''' (1965)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Zelazko, "Selected topics in topological algebras" , ''Lecture Notes'' , '''31''' , Aarhus Univ. (1971)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Beckenstein, L. Narici, C. Suffel, "Topological algebras" , Amsterdam (1977)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Husain, ",Multiplicative functionals on topological algebras" , London (1983)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Mallios, "Topological algebras. Selected topics" , Amsterdam (1986)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Michael, "Locally multiplicatively-convex topological algebras" , ''Memoirs'' , '''11''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1952)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Waelbroeck, "Topological vector spaces and algebras" , ''Lecture Notes in Mathematics'' , '''230''' , Springer (1971)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Zelazko, "Metric generalizations of Banach algebras" ''Dissert. Math.'' , '''47''' (1965)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Zelazko, "Selected topics in topological algebras" , ''Lecture Notes'' , '''31''' , Aarhus Univ. (1971)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 09:21, 13 May 2022
$ F $-algebra, algebra of type $ F $
A completely metrizable topological algebra. The joint continuity of multiplication need not be demanded since it follows from the separate continuity (see Fréchet topology). The $ F $-algebras can be classified similarly as the $ F $-spaces (see Fréchet topology), so one can speak about complete locally bounded algebras, algebras of type $ B _ {o} $ ($ B _ {o} $-algebras), and locally pseudo-convex $ F $-algebras, i.e. $ F $-algebras whose underlying topological vector space is a locally bounded space, etc.
Locally bounded algebras of type $ F $.
These are also called $ LB $-algebras. The topology of an $ LB $-algebra $ A $ can be given by means of a $ p $-homogeneous norm, $ 0 < p \leq 1 $, satisfying $ \| {xy } \| \leq \| x \| \| y \| $, $ x, y \in A $ (the submultiplicativity condition) and, if $ A $ has a unity $ e $, $ \| e \| = 1 $. The theory of these algebras is analogous to that of Banach algebras (cf. Banach algebra). In particular, a Gel'fand–Mazur-type theorem holds (even if completeness and joint continuity of multiplication is not assumed). For commutative complex algebras there is a Gelfand-type theory (including a holomorphic functional calculus). That means that local boundedness, and not local convexity, is responsible for the theory of Banach algebras. For more information on $ LB $-algebras see [a5], [a6], [a7].
$ B _ {o} $-algebras.
The topology of such an algebra $ A $ can be given by means of a sequence $ \| x \| _ {1} \leq \| x \| _ {2} \leq \dots $ of semi-norms (cf. Semi-norm) satisfying
$$ \tag{a1 } \left \| {xy } \right \| _ {i} \leq \left \| x \right \| _ {i + 1 } \left \| y \right \| _ {i + 1 } , \quad i = 1,2 \dots $$
and, if $ A $ has a unit $ e $, $ \| e \| _ {i} = 1 $ for all $ i $. Such an algebra is said to be multiplicatively-convex ( $ m $-convex) if its topology can be given by means of semi-norms satisfying $ \| {xy } \| _ {i} \leq \| x \| _ {i} \| y \| _ {i} $ instead of (a1) (some authors give the name "Fréchet algebra" to $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebras). Each $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra is an inverse (projective) limit of a sequence of Banach algebras. Each complete locally convex topological algebra is an inverse limit of a directed system of $ B _ {o} $-algebras. A Gelfand–Mazur-type theorem holds for $ B _ {o} $-algebras; however, completeness is essential, and a $ B _ {o} $-algebra can contain a dense subalgebra isomorphic to the field of all rational functions. The latter is impossible for $ m $-convex algebras. The operation of taking an inverse is not continuous on arbitrary $ B _ {o} $-algebras, but it is continuous on $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebras (the operation of taking an inverse is continuous for a general $ F $-algebra $ A $ if and only if the group $ G ( A ) $ of its invertible elements is a $ G _ \delta $-set). A commutative unital $ B _ {o} $-algebra can have dense maximal ideals of infinite codimension also if it is $ m $-convex, but in the latter case there is always a closed maximal ideal of codimension one, which is the kernel of a multiplicative linear functional (this is not true in general). Every $ m $-convex algebra has a functional calculus of several complex variables, but in the non- $ m $-convex case it is possible that there operate only the polynomials. If a commutative $ B _ {o} $-algebra is such that its set $ G ( A ) $ of invertible elements is open, then it must be $ m $-convex. This fails in the non-commutative case, so that a non- $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra can have all its commutative subalgebras $ m $-convex. Also, a non-Banach $ m $-convex algebra can have the property that all its closed commutative subalgebras are Banach algebras. One of most challenging open questions in the theory of topological algebras (see [a2], [a4]) is the question whether for an $ m $-convex $ B _ {o} $-algebra all its multiplicative linear functionals are continuous (this question is also open for algebras of type $ B _ {o} $ and $ F $). This famous Michael–Mazur problem has been positively solved by R. Arens for finitely generated $ m $-convex algebras. For more on these algebras see [a1], [a3], [a4], [a5], [a6], [a7].
Locally pseudo-convex $ F $-algebras.
These are analogous to $ B _ {o} $-algebras, but with semi-norms replaced by $ p $-homogeneous semi-norms, $ 0 < p \leq 1 $. Their theories are similar; however, there are some differences. E.g., a commutative locally pseudo-convex algebra of type $ F $ with open set $ G ( A ) $ need not be $ m $-pseudo-convex. Every $ m $-pseudo-convex algebra of type $ F $ is an inverse limit of a sequence of $ LB $-algebras. For more details see [a5], [a6], [a7].
Not much is known about general $ F $-algebras; e.g., a Gelfand–Mazur-type theorem is still (1996) unknown. One result, however, has to be noted. Let $ A $ be an $ F $-algebra with a continuous involution. Then each positive (i.e. satisfying $ f ( x ^ {*} x ) \geq 0 $) functional on $ A $ is continuous [a2]. Every complete topological algebra is an inverse limit of a directed system of $ F $-algebras.
References
[a1] | E. Beckenstein, L. Narici, C. Suffel, "Topological algebras" , Amsterdam (1977) |
[a2] | T. Husain, ",Multiplicative functionals on topological algebras" , London (1983) |
[a3] | A. Mallios, "Topological algebras. Selected topics" , Amsterdam (1986) |
[a4] | E. Michael, "Locally multiplicatively-convex topological algebras" , Memoirs , 11 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1952) |
[a5] | L. Waelbroeck, "Topological vector spaces and algebras" , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 230 , Springer (1971) |
[a6] | W. Zelazko, "Metric generalizations of Banach algebras" Dissert. Math. , 47 (1965) |
[a7] | W. Zelazko, "Selected topics in topological algebras" , Lecture Notes , 31 , Aarhus Univ. (1971) |
Fréchet algebra. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Fr%C3%A9chet_algebra&oldid=22453