Difference between revisions of "Quasi-Frobenius ring"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | q0765001.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 91 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 91 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/Q076/Q.0706500 Quasi\AAhFrobenius ring, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''QF-ring'' | ''QF-ring'' | ||
A (left or right) [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] satisfying the annihilator conditions | A (left or right) [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] satisfying the annihilator conditions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L) ) = L \ \ | ||
+ | \textrm{ and } \ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( H) ) = H | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | for each left (or right) ideal | + | for each left (or right) ideal $ L $( |
+ | respectively, $ H $) | ||
+ | (see [[Annihilator|Annihilator]]). A left Artinian ring that satisfies only one of these annihilator conditions need not be a quasi-Frobenius ring. Quasi-Frobenius rings are of interest because of the presence of duality: A left Artinian ring $ R $ | ||
+ | is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if the mapping | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | M \mapsto \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {R} ( M , R ) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | defines a duality between the categories of left and right finitely-generated | + | defines a duality between the categories of left and right finitely-generated $ R $- |
+ | modules. A finite-dimensional algebra $ A $ | ||
+ | over a field $ P $ | ||
+ | is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if each irreducible right summand of the left $ A $- | ||
+ | module $ \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {P} ( A _ {A} , P ) $ | ||
+ | is isomorphic to some minimal left ideal of $ A $. | ||
+ | And this is equivalent to the self-duality of the lattices of left and right ideals of $ A $. | ||
− | Quasi-Frobenius rings were introduced as a generalization of Frobenius algebras, determined by the requirement that the right and left regular representations are equivalent. For a left and right Artinian ring | + | Quasi-Frobenius rings were introduced as a generalization of Frobenius algebras, determined by the requirement that the right and left regular representations are equivalent. For a left and right Artinian ring $ R $ |
+ | the property of being quasi-Frobenius was originally defined in the following way: If $ e _ {1} \dots e _ {n} $ | ||
+ | is the complete list of primitive idempotents of $ R $( | ||
+ | that is, $ R e _ {i} \Nsm R e _ {j} $ | ||
+ | for $ i \neq j $, | ||
+ | and for any primitive idempotent $ e $, | ||
+ | $ R e \cong R e _ {i} $ | ||
+ | for some $ i $), | ||
+ | $ J $ | ||
+ | is the radical of $ R $ | ||
+ | and $ \phi : R \rightarrow R / J $ | ||
+ | is the natural homomorphism, then there is a permutation $ \pi $ | ||
+ | of the set $ \{ 1 \dots n \} $ | ||
+ | such that | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mathop{\rm Soc} ( e _ {i} R ) \cong \phi ( e _ {\pi ( i) } R ) \ \ | ||
+ | \textrm{ and } \ \mathop{\rm Soc} ( R e _ {\pi ( i) } ) \cong \phi ( R e _ {i} ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ \mathop{\rm Soc} M $ |
+ | is the [[Socle|socle]] of the module $ M $. | ||
+ | The property of $ R $ | ||
+ | being quasi-Frobenius is equivalent also to each of the following properties: 1) $ R $ | ||
+ | is left Noetherian (cf. [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian ring]]), $ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( H) ) = H $ | ||
+ | for every right ideal $ H $ | ||
+ | and | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {1} \cap L _ {2} ) = \ | ||
+ | \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {1} ) + \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {2} ) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | for any left ideals | + | for any left ideals $ L _ {1} $ |
+ | and $ L _ {2} $; | ||
+ | 2) $ R $ | ||
+ | satisfies the maximum condition for left (or right) annihilator ideals (in particular, if $ R $ | ||
+ | is left and right Noetherian) and is left and right self-injective (cf. [[Self-injective ring|Self-injective ring]]); 3) $ R $ | ||
+ | is right Artinian and left and right self-injective; 4) every injective (projective) left $ R $- | ||
+ | module is projective (injective) (cf. [[Projective module|Projective module]]; [[Injective module|Injective module]]); 5) every flat left $ R $- | ||
+ | module is injective (cf. [[Flat module|Flat module]]); 6) $ R $ | ||
+ | is left and right self-injective and right perfect (cf. [[Perfect ring|Perfect ring]]); 7) $ R $ | ||
+ | is left and right self-injective and each of its right ideals is an annihilator of some finite set in $ R $; | ||
+ | 8) $ R $ | ||
+ | is right perfect and every finitely-generated left $ R $- | ||
+ | module is contained in a projective module; 9) $ R $ | ||
+ | is coherent (cf. [[Coherent ring|Coherent ring]]), right perfect, and $ \mathop{\rm Ext} _ {R} ( M , R ) = 0 $ | ||
+ | for all finitely-presented left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules $ M $; | ||
+ | 10) $ R $ | ||
+ | satisfies the maximum condition for left annihilators and $ \mathop{\rm Ext} _ {R} ( M , R ) = 0 $ | ||
+ | for all finitely-presented left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules $ M $; | ||
+ | 11) $ R $ | ||
+ | is left and right Artinian and for every finitely-generated left $ R $- | ||
+ | module $ M $ | ||
+ | the lengths of the modules $ M $ | ||
+ | and $ \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {R} ( M , R ) $ | ||
+ | are the same; 12) the ring of endomorphisms of each free left $ R $- | ||
+ | module is left self-injective; or 13) finitely-generated one-sided ideals of the ring of endomorphisms of a projective generator (injective co-generator) of the category of left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules are annihilators. | ||
− | Injective modules over a quasi-Frobenius ring split into a direct sum of cyclic modules. For commutative rings the converse is also true. If the [[Jacobson radical|Jacobson radical]] | + | Injective modules over a quasi-Frobenius ring split into a direct sum of cyclic modules. For commutative rings the converse is also true. If the [[Jacobson radical|Jacobson radical]] $ J $ |
+ | of a ring $ R $ | ||
+ | is transfinitely nilpotent (that is, $ J ^ \alpha = 0 $ | ||
+ | for some transfinite number $ \alpha $, | ||
+ | where $ J ^ {1} = J $, | ||
+ | $ J ^ \alpha = J ^ {\alpha - 1 } J $ | ||
+ | and $ J ^ \alpha = \cap _ {\beta < \alpha } J ^ \beta $ | ||
+ | for a limit ordinal number $ \alpha $), | ||
+ | then $ R $ | ||
+ | is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if $ R $ | ||
+ | is left self-injective and all its one-sided ideals are annihilators. A left module over a quasi-Frobenius ring $ R $ | ||
+ | is faithful if and only if it is a generator of the category of left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules. The group ring $ R G $ | ||
+ | is a quasi-Frobenius ring and if and only if $ G $ | ||
+ | is a finite group and $ R $ | ||
+ | is a quasi-Frobenius ring. | ||
− | Certain generalizations of quasi-Frobenius rings have also been studied; a left QF- | + | Certain generalizations of quasi-Frobenius rings have also been studied; a left QF- $ 3 $- |
+ | ring $ R $ | ||
+ | is defined by the requirement that there exists a faithful left $ R $- | ||
+ | module that is contained as a direct summand in any faithful left $ R $- | ||
+ | module; a left QF- $ 3 ^ \prime $- | ||
+ | ring $ R $ | ||
+ | is defined by the requirement that the [[injective hull]] of the left $ R $- | ||
+ | module $ R $ | ||
+ | can be imbedded in the direct product of some set of copies of $ R $. | ||
+ | A left pseudo-Frobenius ring (or left PF-ring) is defined by each of the following properties: a) $ R $ | ||
+ | is an injective co-generator of the category of left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules; b) every faithful left $ R $- | ||
+ | module is a generator of the category of left $ R $- | ||
+ | modules; or c) $ R $ | ||
+ | is a left QF- $ 3 $- | ||
+ | ring and the annihilator of any right ideal different from $ R $ | ||
+ | is non-zero. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.W. Curtis, I. Reiner, "Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras" , Interscience (1962)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.S. Tol'skaya, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and their generalizations" L.A. Skornyakov (ed.) A.V. Mikhalev (ed.) , ''Modules'' , '''2''' , Novosibirsk (1973) pp. 42–48 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.W. Curtis, I. Reiner, "Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras" , Interscience (1962)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.S. Tol'skaya, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and their generalizations" L.A. Skornyakov (ed.) A.V. Mikhalev (ed.) , ''Modules'' , '''2''' , Novosibirsk (1973) pp. 42–48 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Kasch, "Modules and rings" , Acad. Press (1982) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Tachikawa, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations, QF-3 and QF-1 rings" , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''351''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Kasch, "Modules and rings" , Acad. Press (1982) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Tachikawa, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations, QF-3 and QF-1 rings" , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''351''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 08:09, 6 June 2020
QF-ring
A (left or right) Artinian ring satisfying the annihilator conditions
$$ \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L) ) = L \ \ \textrm{ and } \ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( H) ) = H $$
for each left (or right) ideal $ L $( respectively, $ H $) (see Annihilator). A left Artinian ring that satisfies only one of these annihilator conditions need not be a quasi-Frobenius ring. Quasi-Frobenius rings are of interest because of the presence of duality: A left Artinian ring $ R $ is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if the mapping
$$ M \mapsto \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {R} ( M , R ) $$
defines a duality between the categories of left and right finitely-generated $ R $- modules. A finite-dimensional algebra $ A $ over a field $ P $ is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if each irreducible right summand of the left $ A $- module $ \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {P} ( A _ {A} , P ) $ is isomorphic to some minimal left ideal of $ A $. And this is equivalent to the self-duality of the lattices of left and right ideals of $ A $.
Quasi-Frobenius rings were introduced as a generalization of Frobenius algebras, determined by the requirement that the right and left regular representations are equivalent. For a left and right Artinian ring $ R $ the property of being quasi-Frobenius was originally defined in the following way: If $ e _ {1} \dots e _ {n} $ is the complete list of primitive idempotents of $ R $( that is, $ R e _ {i} \Nsm R e _ {j} $ for $ i \neq j $, and for any primitive idempotent $ e $, $ R e \cong R e _ {i} $ for some $ i $), $ J $ is the radical of $ R $ and $ \phi : R \rightarrow R / J $ is the natural homomorphism, then there is a permutation $ \pi $ of the set $ \{ 1 \dots n \} $ such that
$$ \mathop{\rm Soc} ( e _ {i} R ) \cong \phi ( e _ {\pi ( i) } R ) \ \ \textrm{ and } \ \mathop{\rm Soc} ( R e _ {\pi ( i) } ) \cong \phi ( R e _ {i} ) , $$
where $ \mathop{\rm Soc} M $ is the socle of the module $ M $. The property of $ R $ being quasi-Frobenius is equivalent also to each of the following properties: 1) $ R $ is left Noetherian (cf. Noetherian ring), $ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( \mathfrak Z _ {l} ( H) ) = H $ for every right ideal $ H $ and
$$ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {1} \cap L _ {2} ) = \ \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {1} ) + \mathfrak Z _ {r} ( L _ {2} ) $$
for any left ideals $ L _ {1} $ and $ L _ {2} $; 2) $ R $ satisfies the maximum condition for left (or right) annihilator ideals (in particular, if $ R $ is left and right Noetherian) and is left and right self-injective (cf. Self-injective ring); 3) $ R $ is right Artinian and left and right self-injective; 4) every injective (projective) left $ R $- module is projective (injective) (cf. Projective module; Injective module); 5) every flat left $ R $- module is injective (cf. Flat module); 6) $ R $ is left and right self-injective and right perfect (cf. Perfect ring); 7) $ R $ is left and right self-injective and each of its right ideals is an annihilator of some finite set in $ R $; 8) $ R $ is right perfect and every finitely-generated left $ R $- module is contained in a projective module; 9) $ R $ is coherent (cf. Coherent ring), right perfect, and $ \mathop{\rm Ext} _ {R} ( M , R ) = 0 $ for all finitely-presented left $ R $- modules $ M $; 10) $ R $ satisfies the maximum condition for left annihilators and $ \mathop{\rm Ext} _ {R} ( M , R ) = 0 $ for all finitely-presented left $ R $- modules $ M $; 11) $ R $ is left and right Artinian and for every finitely-generated left $ R $- module $ M $ the lengths of the modules $ M $ and $ \mathop{\rm Hom} _ {R} ( M , R ) $ are the same; 12) the ring of endomorphisms of each free left $ R $- module is left self-injective; or 13) finitely-generated one-sided ideals of the ring of endomorphisms of a projective generator (injective co-generator) of the category of left $ R $- modules are annihilators.
Injective modules over a quasi-Frobenius ring split into a direct sum of cyclic modules. For commutative rings the converse is also true. If the Jacobson radical $ J $ of a ring $ R $ is transfinitely nilpotent (that is, $ J ^ \alpha = 0 $ for some transfinite number $ \alpha $, where $ J ^ {1} = J $, $ J ^ \alpha = J ^ {\alpha - 1 } J $ and $ J ^ \alpha = \cap _ {\beta < \alpha } J ^ \beta $ for a limit ordinal number $ \alpha $), then $ R $ is a quasi-Frobenius ring if and only if $ R $ is left self-injective and all its one-sided ideals are annihilators. A left module over a quasi-Frobenius ring $ R $ is faithful if and only if it is a generator of the category of left $ R $- modules. The group ring $ R G $ is a quasi-Frobenius ring and if and only if $ G $ is a finite group and $ R $ is a quasi-Frobenius ring.
Certain generalizations of quasi-Frobenius rings have also been studied; a left QF- $ 3 $- ring $ R $ is defined by the requirement that there exists a faithful left $ R $- module that is contained as a direct summand in any faithful left $ R $- module; a left QF- $ 3 ^ \prime $- ring $ R $ is defined by the requirement that the injective hull of the left $ R $- module $ R $ can be imbedded in the direct product of some set of copies of $ R $. A left pseudo-Frobenius ring (or left PF-ring) is defined by each of the following properties: a) $ R $ is an injective co-generator of the category of left $ R $- modules; b) every faithful left $ R $- module is a generator of the category of left $ R $- modules; or c) $ R $ is a left QF- $ 3 $- ring and the annihilator of any right ideal different from $ R $ is non-zero.
References
[1] | C.W. Curtis, I. Reiner, "Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras" , Interscience (1962) |
[2] | T.S. Tol'skaya, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and their generalizations" L.A. Skornyakov (ed.) A.V. Mikhalev (ed.) , Modules , 2 , Novosibirsk (1973) pp. 42–48 (In Russian) |
[3] | C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , 1 , Springer (1973) |
Comments
References
[a1] | F. Kasch, "Modules and rings" , Acad. Press (1982) (Translated from German) |
[a2] | H. Tachikawa, "Quasi-Frobenius rings and generalizations, QF-3 and QF-1 rings" , Lect. notes in math. , 351 , Springer (1973) |
Quasi-Frobenius ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Quasi-Frobenius_ring&oldid=39563