Difference between revisions of "Carathéodory-Toeplitz extension problem"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (moved Caratheodory-Toeplitz extension problem to Carathéodory-Toeplitz extension problem: accented title) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | c1100801.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 44 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 44 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/C110/C.1100080 Carath\Aeeodory\ANDToeplitz extension problem | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | Let $ a _ {0} \dots a _ {p} $ | |
+ | be given complex numbers. The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem is to find (if possible) a function $ g $, | ||
+ | analytic on the open unit disc $ | z | < 1 $( | ||
+ | cf. also [[Analytic function|Analytic function]]), such that | ||
− | + | a) $ g ( z ) = a _ {0} + 2a _ {1} z + \dots + 2a _ {p} z ^ {p} + O ( z ^ {p + 1 } ) $, | |
+ | $ | z | < 1 $; | ||
− | + | b) $ { \mathop{\rm Re} } g ( z ) \geq 0 $ | |
+ | for all $ | z | < 1 $. | ||
+ | Put $ a _ {- j } = {\overline{ {a _ {j} }}\; } $ | ||
+ | for $ j = 1 \dots p $. | ||
+ | The problem is solvable if and only if the [[Toeplitz matrix|Toeplitz matrix]] | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a1 } | |
+ | \Gamma = \left ( | ||
− | + | \begin{array}{cccc} | |
+ | a _ {0} &a _ {- 1 } &\dots &a _ {- p } \\ | ||
+ | a _ {1} &a _ {0} &\dots &a _ {- p + 1 } \\ | ||
+ | \vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\vdots \\ | ||
+ | a _ {p} &a _ {p -1 } &\dots &a _ {0} \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
− | + | \right ) | |
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | is positive semi-definite, and its solution is unique if and only if, in addition, $ \Gamma $ | |
+ | is singular (cf. also [[Degenerate matrix|Degenerate matrix]]). The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem can be restated as a [[Carathéodory–Schur extension problem|Carathéodory–Schur extension problem]]. The Levinson algorithm from filtering theory provides a recursive method to compute the solutions of the problem. For these and related results, see [[#References|[a1]]], Chapt. 2. | ||
− | + | Instead of functions $ g $ | |
+ | satisfying a) and b), one may also seek functions $ f $, | ||
+ | $ f ( \zeta ) = \sum _ {k = - \infty } ^ \infty f _ {k} \zeta ^ {k} $, | ||
+ | in the Wiener algebra $ {\mathcal W} $ | ||
+ | with the property $ f ( \zeta ) \geq 0 $ | ||
+ | for every $ \zeta \in \mathbf T $. | ||
+ | (The Wiener algebra is defined as the [[Banach algebra|Banach algebra]] of complex-valued functions on the unit disc having a [[Fourier series|Fourier series]] | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | f ( z ) = \sum _ {n = - \infty } ^ \infty {a _ {n} z ^ {n} } , \quad \sum _ {n = - \infty } ^ \infty \left | {a _ {n} } \right | < \infty, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | using [[pointwise multiplication]]. The phrase "Wiener algebra" is also used for $ L _ {1} ( \mathbf R ) $ | |
+ | with convolution as multiplication. There are also weighted versions; cf. [[#References|[a2]]].) | ||
− | + | In this case, $ g ( \zeta ) = f _ {0} + 2 \sum _ {k = 0 } ^ \infty f _ {k} \zeta ^ {k} $ | |
+ | satisfies conditions a) and b). The Wiener algebra version of the problem is of particular interest if the solution $ f $ | ||
+ | is required to be strictly positive on the unit circle $ \mathbf T $. | ||
+ | The latter version of the problem is solvable if and only if the Toeplitz matrix $ \Gamma $ | ||
+ | in (a1) is positive definite, and in that case there are infinitely many solutions $ f $, | ||
+ | given by | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \tag{a2 } | ||
+ | f ( \zeta ) = { | ||
+ | \frac{1 - \left | {h ( \zeta ) } \right | ^ {2} }{\left | {u ( \zeta ) + h ( \zeta ) v ( \zeta ) } \right | ^ {2} } | ||
+ | } . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here, $ h $ | ||
+ | is an arbitrary function in the Wiener algebra $ {\mathcal W} $ | ||
+ | with $ | {h ( \zeta ) } | < 1 $ | ||
+ | for every $ \zeta \in \mathbf T $, | ||
+ | and the functions $ u $ | ||
+ | and $ v $ | ||
+ | are uniquely determined by the data in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | u ( \zeta ) = ( x _ {0} + \zeta x _ {1} + \dots + \zeta ^ {p} x _ {p} ) x _ {0} ^ {- {1 / 2 } } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | v ( \zeta ) = ( y _ {0} + \zeta ^ {-1 } y _ {-1 } + \dots + \zeta ^ {- p } y _ {- p } ) y _ {0} ^ {- { | ||
+ | \frac{1}{2} | ||
+ | } } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
where | where | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \left ( | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | x _ {0} \\ | ||
+ | x _ {1} \\ | ||
+ | \vdots \\ | ||
+ | x _ {p} \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \right ) = \Gamma ^ {- 1 } \left ( | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | 1 \\ | ||
+ | 0 \\ | ||
+ | \vdots \\ | ||
+ | 0 \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \right ) , \quad \left ( | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | y _ {- p } \\ | ||
+ | \vdots \\ | ||
+ | y _ {- 1 } \\ | ||
+ | y _ {0} \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \right ) = \Gamma ^ {- 1 } \left ( | ||
+ | |||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | y _ {0} \\ | ||
+ | \vdots \\ | ||
+ | 0 \\ | ||
+ | 1 \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | |||
+ | \right ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The central solution | + | The central solution $ f _ {\textrm{ cen } } ( \zeta ) = | {u ( \zeta ) } | ^ {-2 } $, |
+ | which appears when the free parameter $ h $ | ||
+ | in (a2) is set to zero, is the unique solution $ f $ | ||
+ | with the additional property that the $ j $ | ||
+ | th Fourier coefficient of $ f ^ {- 1 } $ | ||
+ | is equal to zero for $ | j | > p $, | ||
+ | and for this reason the central solution is also referred to as the band extension. The central solution $ f _ {\textrm{ cen } } $ | ||
+ | is also the unique solution $ f $ | ||
+ | that maximizes the entropy integral | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{1}{2 \pi } | ||
+ | } \int\limits _ {- \pi } ^ \pi { { \mathop{\rm log} } f ( e ^ {it } ) } {dt } . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Proofs of the above results may derived by applying the [[Band method|band method]] (see [[#References|[a2]]], Sect. XXXV.3), which is a general scheme for dealing with a variety of positive and contractive (operator) extension problems from a unified point of view. (The word "band" refers to a decomposition of an algebra with involution, reminiscent of the use of bands as in the theory of [[Decomposition|decomposition]] or Riesz spaces (cf. [[Riesz space|Riesz space]]). It refers, in fact, to a "band pattern" , i.e. a band in a matrix | + | Proofs of the above results may derived by applying the [[Band method|band method]] (see [[#References|[a2]]], Sect. XXXV.3), which is a general scheme for dealing with a variety of positive and contractive (operator) extension problems from a unified point of view. (The word "band" refers to a decomposition of an algebra with involution, reminiscent of the use of bands as in the theory of [[Decomposition|decomposition]] or Riesz spaces (cf. [[Riesz space|Riesz space]]). It refers, in fact, to a "band pattern" , i.e. a band in a matrix $ \{ {( i,j ) } : {| {i - j } | \leq m } \} $, |
+ | cf. also [[Partially specified matrices, completion of|Partially specified matrices, completion of]].) | ||
The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem has natural generalizations for matrix- and operator-valued functions. The problem also has a continuous analogue (with the role of the open unit disc being replaced by the upper half-plane) and non-stationary versions for finite or infinite operator matrices. | The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem has natural generalizations for matrix- and operator-valued functions. The problem also has a continuous analogue (with the role of the open unit disc being replaced by the upper half-plane) and non-stationary versions for finite or infinite operator matrices. |
Latest revision as of 11:06, 30 May 2020
Let $ a _ {0} \dots a _ {p} $
be given complex numbers. The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem is to find (if possible) a function $ g $,
analytic on the open unit disc $ | z | < 1 $(
cf. also Analytic function), such that
a) $ g ( z ) = a _ {0} + 2a _ {1} z + \dots + 2a _ {p} z ^ {p} + O ( z ^ {p + 1 } ) $, $ | z | < 1 $;
b) $ { \mathop{\rm Re} } g ( z ) \geq 0 $ for all $ | z | < 1 $. Put $ a _ {- j } = {\overline{ {a _ {j} }}\; } $ for $ j = 1 \dots p $. The problem is solvable if and only if the Toeplitz matrix
$$ \tag{a1 } \Gamma = \left ( \begin{array}{cccc} a _ {0} &a _ {- 1 } &\dots &a _ {- p } \\ a _ {1} &a _ {0} &\dots &a _ {- p + 1 } \\ \vdots &\vdots &\vdots &\vdots \\ a _ {p} &a _ {p -1 } &\dots &a _ {0} \\ \end{array} \right ) $$
is positive semi-definite, and its solution is unique if and only if, in addition, $ \Gamma $ is singular (cf. also Degenerate matrix). The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem can be restated as a Carathéodory–Schur extension problem. The Levinson algorithm from filtering theory provides a recursive method to compute the solutions of the problem. For these and related results, see [a1], Chapt. 2.
Instead of functions $ g $ satisfying a) and b), one may also seek functions $ f $, $ f ( \zeta ) = \sum _ {k = - \infty } ^ \infty f _ {k} \zeta ^ {k} $, in the Wiener algebra $ {\mathcal W} $ with the property $ f ( \zeta ) \geq 0 $ for every $ \zeta \in \mathbf T $. (The Wiener algebra is defined as the Banach algebra of complex-valued functions on the unit disc having a Fourier series
$$ f ( z ) = \sum _ {n = - \infty } ^ \infty {a _ {n} z ^ {n} } , \quad \sum _ {n = - \infty } ^ \infty \left | {a _ {n} } \right | < \infty, $$
using pointwise multiplication. The phrase "Wiener algebra" is also used for $ L _ {1} ( \mathbf R ) $ with convolution as multiplication. There are also weighted versions; cf. [a2].)
In this case, $ g ( \zeta ) = f _ {0} + 2 \sum _ {k = 0 } ^ \infty f _ {k} \zeta ^ {k} $ satisfies conditions a) and b). The Wiener algebra version of the problem is of particular interest if the solution $ f $ is required to be strictly positive on the unit circle $ \mathbf T $. The latter version of the problem is solvable if and only if the Toeplitz matrix $ \Gamma $ in (a1) is positive definite, and in that case there are infinitely many solutions $ f $, given by
$$ \tag{a2 } f ( \zeta ) = { \frac{1 - \left | {h ( \zeta ) } \right | ^ {2} }{\left | {u ( \zeta ) + h ( \zeta ) v ( \zeta ) } \right | ^ {2} } } . $$
Here, $ h $ is an arbitrary function in the Wiener algebra $ {\mathcal W} $ with $ | {h ( \zeta ) } | < 1 $ for every $ \zeta \in \mathbf T $, and the functions $ u $ and $ v $ are uniquely determined by the data in the following way:
$$ u ( \zeta ) = ( x _ {0} + \zeta x _ {1} + \dots + \zeta ^ {p} x _ {p} ) x _ {0} ^ {- {1 / 2 } } , $$
$$ v ( \zeta ) = ( y _ {0} + \zeta ^ {-1 } y _ {-1 } + \dots + \zeta ^ {- p } y _ {- p } ) y _ {0} ^ {- { \frac{1}{2} } } , $$
where
$$ \left ( \begin{array}{c} x _ {0} \\ x _ {1} \\ \vdots \\ x _ {p} \\ \end{array} \right ) = \Gamma ^ {- 1 } \left ( \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \\ \vdots \\ 0 \\ \end{array} \right ) , \quad \left ( \begin{array}{c} y _ {- p } \\ \vdots \\ y _ {- 1 } \\ y _ {0} \\ \end{array} \right ) = \Gamma ^ {- 1 } \left ( \begin{array}{c} y _ {0} \\ \vdots \\ 0 \\ 1 \\ \end{array} \right ) . $$
The central solution $ f _ {\textrm{ cen } } ( \zeta ) = | {u ( \zeta ) } | ^ {-2 } $, which appears when the free parameter $ h $ in (a2) is set to zero, is the unique solution $ f $ with the additional property that the $ j $ th Fourier coefficient of $ f ^ {- 1 } $ is equal to zero for $ | j | > p $, and for this reason the central solution is also referred to as the band extension. The central solution $ f _ {\textrm{ cen } } $ is also the unique solution $ f $ that maximizes the entropy integral
$$ { \frac{1}{2 \pi } } \int\limits _ {- \pi } ^ \pi { { \mathop{\rm log} } f ( e ^ {it } ) } {dt } . $$
Proofs of the above results may derived by applying the band method (see [a2], Sect. XXXV.3), which is a general scheme for dealing with a variety of positive and contractive (operator) extension problems from a unified point of view. (The word "band" refers to a decomposition of an algebra with involution, reminiscent of the use of bands as in the theory of decomposition or Riesz spaces (cf. Riesz space). It refers, in fact, to a "band pattern" , i.e. a band in a matrix $ \{ {( i,j ) } : {| {i - j } | \leq m } \} $, cf. also Partially specified matrices, completion of.)
The Carathéodory–Toeplitz extension problem has natural generalizations for matrix- and operator-valued functions. The problem also has a continuous analogue (with the role of the open unit disc being replaced by the upper half-plane) and non-stationary versions for finite or infinite operator matrices.
References
[a1] | C. Foias, A.E. Frazho, "The commutant lifting approach to interpolation problems" , Operator Theory: Advances and Applications , 44 , Birkhäuser (1990) |
[a2] | I. Gohberg, S. Goldberg, M.A. Kaashoek, "Classes of linear operators" , II , Birkhäuser (1993) |
Carathéodory-Toeplitz extension problem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Carath%C3%A9odory-Toeplitz_extension_problem&oldid=23228