In 1937, I.M. Vinogradov [a9] proved the odd case of the Goldbach conjecture (cf. also Goldbach problem); i.e., he proved that every sufficiently large odd number can be written as a sum of three prime numbers (cf. also Vinogradov method). The essential new element of his proof was a non-trivial estimate for an exponential sum involving prime numbers (cf. also Exponential sum estimates). Let denote and let , where runs over the prime numbers. By simply observing that for all , and using the prime number theorem (cf. de la Vallée-Poussin theorem), one immediately sees that . Vinogradov was able to improve on this estimate on the "minor arcs" ; in other words, he obtained a better estimate for those values of that could not be well approximated by a rational number with a small denominator. Vinogradov's estimate used the sieve of Eratosthenes (cf. also Eratosthenes, sieve of; Sieve method) to decompose the sum into subsums of the form
and of the form
The sums have become known as sums of type I and type II, respectively.
Vinogradov's method is quite powerful and can be adapted to general sums of the form . However, the technical details of his method are formidable and, consequently, the method was neither widely used nor widely understood. In 1977, R.C. Vaughan [a6] found a much simpler approach to sums over prime numbers.
Vaughan's identity is most easily understood in the context of Dirichlet series. Suppose that
are both absolutely convergent in the half-plane . Then
in this same half-plane. One of the simplest and most useful Dirichlet series is the Riemann zeta-function (cf. also Zeta-function), which is defined as for complex numbers with real part exceeding . The Euler product formula states that
where the product is over all prime numbers . Taking the reciprocal of the Euler product, one sees that
where is the Möbius function defined by
By looking at the coefficients of , one obtains the useful identity
By taking the logarithmic derivative of the Euler product formula, one sees that
where the coefficients are defined as
This is the Mangoldt function. By computing the product
in two different ways, one sees that
For technical reasons, it is often simpler to work with sums of the form than with sums of the form , and estimates for the latter sum can usually be easily derived from estimates for the former.
Let , be arbitrary real numbers, both exceeding , and define
Thus, and are partial sums of and respectively. In particular,
Now consider the Dirichlet series identity
Comparing coefficients of on both sides of the equation, one sees that if , then
If one multiplies this equation by and sums over , one obtains the Vaughan identity:
In general, the first and second sums can be treated as type-I sums, and the third sum can be treated as a type-II sum. The logarithm factor in the first sum is easily finessed with partial summation. In some applications, it is useful to divide the second sum into subsums with and , where the first subsum is treated as type-I and the second subsum as type-II.
For a brief and very accessible account of how Vaughan's identity is applied, see Vaughan's original article [a6]. There, he proves that
whenever . Another self-contained account of this can be found in [a1].
There are many applications of Vaughan's identity in the literature. Vaughan [a7] used it to obtain new estimates on the distribution of , and he also used it to give an elegant proof of the Bombieri–Vinogradov theorem on prime numbers in arithmetic progressions [a8]. H.L. Montgomery and Vaughan [a5] obtained a new estimate for the error term in the formula for the number of square-free integers up to , conditional on the Riemann hypothesis (cf. Riemann hypotheses). This requires a slightly different form of Vaughan's identity. In this case, let be as before, but take
From the equation
one can obtain an identity for sums of the form . D.R. Heath-Brown and S.J. Patterson [a3] used Vaughan's identity to prove a long-standing conjecture of E. Kummer about distribution of cubic Gauss sums (cf. also Kummer hypothesis; Gauss sum). Heath-Brown [a2] developed a more general and more flexible version of Vaughan's identity, and G. Harman [a4] has developed an alternative treatment that returns to Vinogradov's original idea of using the sieve of Eratosthenes (cf. also Eratosthenes, sieve of).
|[a1]||H. Davenport, "Multiplicative number theory" , Springer (1980) (Edition: Second)|
|[a2]||D.R. Heath-Brown, "Prime numbers in short intervals and a generalized Vaughan identity" Canad. J. Math. , 34 (1982) pp. 1365–1377|
|[a3]||D.R. Heath-Brown, S.J. Patterson, "The distribution of Kummer sums at prime arguments" J. Reine Angew. Math. , 310 (1979) pp. 110–130|
|[a4]||G. Harman, "Eratosthenes, Legendre, Vinogradov, and beyond" G.R.H. Greaves (ed.) G. Harman (ed.) M.N. Huxley (ed.) , Sieve Methods, Exponential Sums, and their Applications in Number Theory , London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes , 237 , Cambridge Univ. Press (1996)|
|[a5]||H.L. Montgomery, R.C. Vaughan, "On the distribution of square-free numbers" H. Halberstam (ed.) C. Hooley (ed.) , Recent Progress in Analytic Number Theory , 1 (1981) pp. 247–256|
|[a6]||R.C. Vaughan, "Sommes trigonométriques sur les nombres premiers" C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A , 285 (1977) pp. 981–983|
|[a7]||R.C. Vaughan, "On the distribution of modulo one" Mathematika , 24 (1977) pp. 135–141|
|[a8]||R.C. Vaughan, "An elementary method in prime number theory" Acta Arith. , 37 (1980) pp. 111–115|
|[a9]||I.M. Vinogradov, "A new estimation of a certain sum containing primes" Mat. Sb. , 44 (1937) pp. 783–791 (In Russian)|
|[a10]||I.M. Vinogradov, "The method of trigonometric sums in the theory of numbers" , Wiley/Interscience (1954) (In Russian)|
Vaughan identity. S.W. Graham (originator), Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Vaughan_identity&oldid=17846