Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Störmer method"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
m (tex encoded by computer)
(latex details)
 
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 1 - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-} =  h  ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = 0 } ^ { k }  u _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n- \lambda }  ,\ \  
+
y _ {n+1} - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-1} =  h  ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = 0 } ^ { k }  u _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n- \lambda }  ,\ \  
 
f _ {n}  =  f( x _ {n} , y _ {n} ),
 
f _ {n}  =  f( x _ {n} , y _ {n} ),
 
$$
 
$$
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 1 - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-} 1 = \
+
y _ {n+1} - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-1}  = h  ^ {2} \sum_{p=0}^ { k }  \beta _ {p} \nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n} ,
h  ^ {2} \sum _ { p= } 0 ^ { k }  \beta _ {p} \nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n} ,
 
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 44: Line 43:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
\nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n}  =  \nabla ( \nabla  ^ {p-} 1 f _ {n} )  = \
+
\nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n}  =  \nabla ( \nabla  ^ {p-1} f _ {n} )  = \nabla  ^ {p-1} f _ {n} - \nabla  ^ {p-1} f _ {n-1} ,
\nabla  ^ {p-} 1 f _ {n} - \nabla  ^ {p-} 1 f _ {n-} 1 ,
 
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 56: Line 54:
 
$$  
 
$$  
 
+ \left .
 
+ \left .
\int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { - } 1 (- 1- t) t \dots ( t+( p- 1))  dt \right ) ,\  p = 0 \dots k,
+
\int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { - 1} (- 1- t) t \dots ( t+( p- 1))  dt \right ) ,\  p = 0 \dots k,
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 71: Line 69:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 1 - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-} 1 =  h  ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = - 1 } ^ { k }  v _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n- \lambda }  
+
y _ {n+1} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1}  =  h  ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = - 1 } ^ { k }  v _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n- \lambda }  
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 77: Line 75:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 1 - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-} 1 =  h _ {2} \sum _ { p= } 0 ^ { k }  \gamma _ {p} \nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n+} 1 ,
+
y _ {n+1} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1}  =  h _ {2} \sum_{p=0}^ { k }  \gamma _ {p} \nabla  ^ {p} f _ {n+1} ,
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 90: Line 88:
 
$$  
 
$$  
 
+ \left .
 
+ \left .
\int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { - } 1 (- 1- t)( t- 1) t \dots ( t+( p- 2))  dt \right ) ,
+
\int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { -1} (- 1- t)( t- 1) t \dots ( t+( p- 2))  dt \right ) ,
 
$$
 
$$
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
v _ {- \lambda }  =  \sum _ {p= \lambda } ^ { k+ } 1
+
v _ {- \lambda }  =  \sum _ {p= \lambda } ^ {k+1}
 
\left ( \begin{array}{l}
 
\left ( \begin{array}{l}
 
p \\
 
p \\
Line 140: Line 138:
  
 
For one and the same  $  k $,  
 
For one and the same  $  k $,  
formula b) is more accurate, but requires the solution of a non-linear system of equations to obtain the value  $  y _ {n+} 1 $.  
+
formula b) is more accurate, but requires the solution of a non-linear system of equations to obtain the value  $  y _ {n+1} $.  
In practice, one first obtains an approximation for the solution  $  y _ {n+} 1 $
+
In practice, one first obtains an approximation for the solution  $  y _ {n+1} $
 
by formula a), and then makes it more precise by applying the formula
 
by formula a), and then makes it more precise by applying the formula
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 1 ^ {(} i+ 1) - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-} 1 =
+
y _ {n+1}  ^ {(i+1)} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1} =
 
$$
 
$$
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
 
= \  
 
= \  
h  ^ {2} \left ( v _ {1} f _ {n+} 1 ^ { ( i) } + \sum _ {\lambda
+
h  ^ {2} \left ( v _ {1} f _ {n+1} ^ { ( i) } + \sum _ {\lambda
 
= 0 } ^ { k }  v _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n - \lambda }  \right ) ,\  i = 0, 1, 2,
 
= 0 } ^ { k }  v _ {- \lambda }  f _ {n - \lambda }  \right ) ,\  i = 0, 1, 2,
 
$$
 
$$
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
f _ {n+} 1 ^ { ( i) }  =  f \left ( x _ {n+} 1 , y _ {n+} 1
+
f _ {n+1} ^ { ( i) }  =  f \left ( x _ {n+1} , y _ {n+1}
  ^ {(} i) \right ) ,\  y _ {n+} 1 =  y _ {n+} 1 ^ {(} 3) .
+
  ^ {(} i) \right ) ,\  y _ {n+1}  =  y _ {n+1}  ^ {(} 3) .
 
$$
 
$$
  
Line 164: Line 162:
  
 
Störmer's formulas with  $  k $
 
Störmer's formulas with  $  k $
terms on the right-hand side have an error of order  $  O( h  ^ {k+} 1 ) $.  
+
terms on the right-hand side have an error of order  $  O( h  ^ {k+1} ) $.  
 
The estimate of the error is similar to the corresponding estimate for the [[Adams method|Adams method]]. One can show that for any  $  k $
 
The estimate of the error is similar to the corresponding estimate for the [[Adams method|Adams method]]. One can show that for any  $  k $
there are stable formulas with an error of order  $  O( h  ^ {k+} 1 ) $.
+
there are stable formulas with an error of order  $  O( h  ^ {k+1} ) $.
  
 
In practice, one usually uses formulas with  $  k = 4, 5, 6 $.  
 
In practice, one usually uses formulas with  $  k = 4, 5, 6 $.  
Line 172: Line 170:
  
 
$$  
 
$$  
y _ {n+} 2 - 2y _ {n+} 1 + y _ {n}  =   
+
y _ {n+2} - 2 y _ {n+1} + y _ {n}  =   
 
\frac{h  ^ {2} }{12}
 
\frac{h  ^ {2} }{12}
  ( f _ {n+} 2 + 10f _ {n+} 1 + f _ {n} ).
+
  ( f _ {n+2} + 10 f _ {n+1} + f _ {n} ).
 
$$
 
$$
  

Latest revision as of 14:32, 13 January 2024


A finite-difference method for finding a solution to the Cauchy problem for a system of second-order ordinary differential equations not containing the first derivative of the unknown function:

$$ y ^ {\prime\prime} = f( x, y),\ \ y( x _ {0} ) = y _ {0} ,\ \ y ^ \prime ( x _ {0} ) = y _ {0} ^ \prime . $$

Integrating over a grid with a constant step $ x _ {n} = x _ {0} + nh $, $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ gives the following computational formulas:

a) extrapolation:

$$ y _ {n+1} - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-1} = h ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = 0 } ^ { k } u _ {- \lambda } f _ {n- \lambda } ,\ \ f _ {n} = f( x _ {n} , y _ {n} ), $$

$$ n = 0, 1 \dots $$

or (in difference form)

$$ y _ {n+1} - 2 {y _ {n} } + y _ {n-1} = h ^ {2} \sum_{p=0}^ { k } \beta _ {p} \nabla ^ {p} f _ {n} , $$

where

$$ \nabla ^ {p} f _ {n} = \nabla ( \nabla ^ {p-1} f _ {n} ) = \nabla ^ {p-1} f _ {n} - \nabla ^ {p-1} f _ {n-1} , $$

$$ \beta _ {p} = \frac{1}{p!} \left ( \int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } ( 1- t) t( t+ 1) \dots ( t+( p- 1)) dt\right . + $$

$$ + \left . \int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { - 1} (- 1- t) t \dots ( t+( p- 1)) dt \right ) ,\ p = 0 \dots k, $$

$$ u _ {- \lambda } = \sum _ {p= \lambda } ^ { k } \left ( \begin{array}{l} p \\ \lambda \end{array} \right ) \beta _ {p} ,\ \lambda = 0 \dots k; $$

b) interpolation:

$$ y _ {n+1} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1} = h ^ {2} \sum _ {\lambda = - 1 } ^ { k } v _ {- \lambda } f _ {n- \lambda } $$

or (in difference form)

$$ y _ {n+1} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1} = h _ {2} \sum_{p=0}^ { k } \gamma _ {p} \nabla ^ {p} f _ {n+1} , $$

where

$$ \gamma _ {p} = \frac{1}{p!} \left ( \int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } ( 1- t)( t- 1) t \dots ( t+( p- 2)) dt\right . + $$

$$ + \left . \int\limits _ { 0 } ^ { -1} (- 1- t)( t- 1) t \dots ( t+( p- 2)) dt \right ) , $$

$$ v _ {- \lambda } = \sum _ {p= \lambda } ^ {k+1} \left ( \begin{array}{l} p \\ \lambda \end{array} \right ) \gamma _ {p} ,\ \lambda = - 1 , 0 \dots k. $$

The first values of the coefficients $ \beta _ {p} $ and $ \gamma _ {p} $ are:

$$ \beta _ {0} = 1 ,\ \beta _ {1} = 0,\ \beta _ {2} = \beta _ {3} = \frac{1}{12} ,\ \beta _ {4} = \frac{19}{240} , $$

$$ \beta _ {5} = \frac{3}{40} , \beta _ {6} = \frac{863}{12096} ; $$

$$ \gamma _ {0} = - \gamma _ {1} = 1, \gamma _ {2} = \frac{1}{12} , \gamma _ {3} = 0, $$

$$ \gamma _ {4} = \gamma _ {5} = - \frac{1}{240} , \gamma _ {6} = - \frac{221}{60480} . $$

For one and the same $ k $, formula b) is more accurate, but requires the solution of a non-linear system of equations to obtain the value $ y _ {n+1} $. In practice, one first obtains an approximation for the solution $ y _ {n+1} $ by formula a), and then makes it more precise by applying the formula

$$ y _ {n+1} ^ {(i+1)} - 2y _ {n} + y _ {n-1} = $$

$$ = \ h ^ {2} \left ( v _ {1} f _ {n+1} ^ { ( i) } + \sum _ {\lambda = 0 } ^ { k } v _ {- \lambda } f _ {n - \lambda } \right ) ,\ i = 0, 1, 2, $$

$$ f _ {n+1} ^ { ( i) } = f \left ( x _ {n+1} , y _ {n+1} ^ {(} i) \right ) ,\ y _ {n+1} = y _ {n+1} ^ {(} 3) . $$

Application of Störmer's method is based on the assumption that the approximate values of the solution at the first $ k $ points of the grid, $ y _ {0} \dots y _ {k} $( supporting values), are already known. These values are either computed by the Runge–Kutta method or by using the Taylor expansion of the solution. The necessity to apply special formulas to compute the values at the beginning of the process and when changing the step of the grid over which the integration is carried out leads to essentially more complicated computer programs.

Störmer's formulas with $ k $ terms on the right-hand side have an error of order $ O( h ^ {k+1} ) $. The estimate of the error is similar to the corresponding estimate for the Adams method. One can show that for any $ k $ there are stable formulas with an error of order $ O( h ^ {k+1} ) $.

In practice, one usually uses formulas with $ k = 4, 5, 6 $. One of Störmer's interpolation methods, called the Numerov method, is widely used:

$$ y _ {n+2} - 2 y _ {n+1} + y _ {n} = \frac{h ^ {2} }{12} ( f _ {n+2} + 10 f _ {n+1} + f _ {n} ). $$

The method was introduced by C. Störmer in 1920.

References

[1] N.S. Bakhvalov, "Numerical methods: analysis, algebra, ordinary differential equations" , MIR (1977) (Translated from Russian)
[2] J.D. Lambert, "Computational methods in ordinary differential equations" , Wiley (1973)
[3] S.G. Mikhlin, Kh.L. Smolitskii, "Approximate methods for solution of differential and integral equations" , American Elsevier (1967) (Translated from Russian)

Comments

References

[a1] F.B. Hildebrand, "Introduction to numerical analysis" , Dover, reprint (1987) pp. 275ff
[a2] C. Störmer, "Méthode d'intégration numérique des équations différentielles ordinaires" , C.R. Congress Internat. Strassbourg 1920 (1921) pp. 243–257
How to Cite This Entry:
Störmer method. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=St%C3%B6rmer_method&oldid=48888
This article was adapted from an original article by S.S. Gaisaryan (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article