Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Lewy operator and Mizohata operator"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (latex detail)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In the mid 1950s, B. Malgrange and L. Ehrenpreis showed that one can solve all linear constant-coefficients partial differential equations on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200801.png" /> (cf. also [[Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem|Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem]]; [[Linear partial differential equation|Linear partial differential equation]]). The question of solvability for variable coefficients was posed (avoiding singular points, as needed even in the theory of ordinary differential equations). H. Lewy [[#References|[a5]]] found the following example, which at the time (1956) was astonishing. In <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200802.png" /> variables <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200803.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200804.png" /> be the operator (called the Lewy operator):
+
<!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article,  
 +
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist
 +
was used.
 +
If the TeX and formula formatting is correct and if all png images have been replaced by TeX code, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category.
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200805.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
Out of 52 formulas, 51 were replaced by TEX code.-->
  
The [[Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem|Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem]] applies to this operator. So, if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200806.png" /> is a real-analytic function (cf. [[Class of differentiability|Class of differentiability]]) defined (say) near <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200807.png" />, then the equation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200808.png" /> can be solved near <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200809.png" />, with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008010.png" /> real analytic. But, there exists a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008011.png" />-function <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008012.png" /> such that the equation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008013.png" /> cannot be solved in any neighbourhood of (say) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008014.png" />, even with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008015.png" /> a distribution (cf. also [[Generalized function|Generalized function]]).
+
{{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|part}}
 +
In the mid 1950s, B. Malgrange and L. Ehrenpreis showed that one can solve all linear constant-coefficients partial differential equations on ${\bf R} ^ { n }$ (cf. also [[Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem|Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem]]; [[Linear partial differential equation|Linear partial differential equation]]). The question of solvability for variable coefficients was posed (avoiding singular points, as needed even in the theory of ordinary differential equations). H. Lewy [[#References|[a5]]] found the following example, which at the time (1956) was astonishing. In $3$ variables $( x , y , t )$, let $L$ be the operator (called the Lewy operator):
  
Later, it was noticed that the same phenomenon occurs, near any point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008016.png" />, for the even simpler (embarrassingly simple!) operator, in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008017.png" /> variables (called the Mizohata operator):
+
\begin{equation*} L = \frac { \partial } { \partial x } + i \frac { \partial } { \partial y } - 2 i ( x + i y ) \frac { \partial } { \partial t }. \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008018.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
The [[Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem|Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem]] applies to this operator. So, if $g$ is a real-analytic function (cf. [[Class of differentiability|Class of differentiability]]) defined (say) near $0$, then the equation $L ( u ) = g$ can be solved near $0$, with $u$ real analytic. But, there exists a $C ^ { \infty }$-function $g$ such that the equation $L ( u ) = g$ cannot be solved in any neighbourhood of (say) $0$, even with $u$ a distribution (cf. also [[Generalized function|Generalized function]]).
 +
 
 +
Later, it was noticed that the same phenomenon occurs, near any point $( 0 , y )$, for the even simpler (embarrassingly simple!) operator, in $2$ variables (called the Mizohata operator):
 +
 
 +
\begin{equation*} M = \frac { \partial } { \partial x } + i x \frac { \partial } { \partial y }. \end{equation*}
  
 
Both operator have clear connections with complex analysis (cf. [[Functions of a complex variable, theory of|Functions of a complex variable, theory of]]).
 
Both operator have clear connections with complex analysis (cf. [[Functions of a complex variable, theory of|Functions of a complex variable, theory of]]).
  
The Lewy operator is the tangential Cauchy–Riemann operator (cf. [[Bergman kernel function|Bergman kernel function]]) on the "Heisenberg group" , the hypersurface in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008019.png" /> parametrized by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008020.png" />. This simply means that the functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008021.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008022.png" /> are in the kernel of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008023.png" />. So, in other coordinates, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008024.png" /> is the Cauchy–Riemann vector field on the unit sphere in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008025.png" /> (the tangential operator characterizing holomorphic functions). An earlier paper by Lewy was [[#References|[a4]]]!
+
The Lewy operator is the tangential Cauchy–Riemann operator (cf. [[Bergman kernel function|Bergman kernel function]]) on the "Heisenberg group" , the hypersurface in $\mathbf{C} ^ { 2 }$ parametrized by $( x , y , t ) \mapsto ( z , w ) = ( x + i y , t + i | z | ^ { 2 } )$. This simply means that the functions $z$ and $w$ are in the kernel of $L$. So, in other coordinates, $L$ is the Cauchy–Riemann vector field on the unit sphere in $\mathbf{C} ^ { 2 }$ (the tangential operator characterizing holomorphic functions). An earlier paper by Lewy was [[#References|[a4]]]!
  
The Mizohata operator can be obtained (up to a factor) by pulling back the standard Cauchy–Riemann operator on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008026.png" /> via the singular change of variables: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008027.png" />. Notice that indeed <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008028.png" />.
+
The Mizohata operator can be obtained (up to a factor) by pulling back the standard Cauchy–Riemann operator on $\mathbf{C}$ via the singular change of variables: $( x , y ) \mapsto ( x ^ { 2 } / 2 + i y )$. Notice that indeed $L ( x ^ { 2 } / 2 + i y ) = 0$.
  
 
This connection with complex analysis allows simple, and transparent, proofs of the non-local solvability (in particular, via the obvious non-propagation of singularities for the adjoint operators).
 
This connection with complex analysis allows simple, and transparent, proofs of the non-local solvability (in particular, via the obvious non-propagation of singularities for the adjoint operators).
  
If one decomposes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008029.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008030.png" /> into real part and imaginary part <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008031.png" />, the commutator of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008032.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008033.png" /> does not belong to the linear span of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008034.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008035.png" /> (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008036.png" /> in case of the Mizohata operator). L.V. Hörmander understood that this fact was crucial and he showed that, more generally, a similar condition on the commutator of the higher-order terms for general linear differential operators implies non-local solvability. See [[#References|[a3]]], Chap. 6.
+
If one decomposes $L$ or $M$ into real part and imaginary part $X + i Y$, the commutator of $X$ and $Y$ does not belong to the [[linear span]] of $X$ and $Y$ (for $x = 0$ in case of the Mizohata operator). L.V. Hörmander understood that this fact was crucial and he showed that, more generally, a similar condition on the commutator of the higher-order terms for general linear differential operators implies non-local solvability. See [[#References|[a3]]], Chap. 6.
  
However, real operators may also be "without solutions" , since as pointed out by F. Treves in 1962, the operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008037.png" /> is a real operator (and so is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008038.png" />).
+
However, real operators may also be "without solutions" , since as pointed out by F. Treves in 1962, the operator $L \overline{L} \overline{L} L$ is a real operator (and so is $M\overline{M}\overline{M}M$).
  
The question of local solvability for vector fields is totally understood thanks to L. Nirenberg and Treves (condition P), [[#References|[a8]]], [[#References|[a11]]], Chap. VIII. In <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008039.png" />, the operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008040.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008041.png" />, is locally solvable at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008042.png" /> if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008043.png" /> is even. Again, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008044.png" /> (see [[#References|[a6]]], Appendix) is related to the Cauchy–Riemann operator via the mapping <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008045.png" /> which is one-to-one if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008046.png" /> is even. The kernel of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008047.png" /> consists of functions which are holomorphic functions of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008048.png" />, and this can be taken as the beginning of a whole theory, the theory of hypo-analytic structures initiated by M.S. Baouendi and Treves [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a11]]].
+
The question of local solvability for vector fields is totally understood thanks to L. Nirenberg and Treves (condition P), [[#References|[a8]]], [[#References|[a11]]], Chap. VIII. In $\mathbf{R} ^ { 2 }$, the operator $M _ { k } = \partial / \partial x + i x ^ { k } \partial / \partial y$, $k \in \mathbf{N}$, is locally solvable at $0$ if and only if $k$ is even. Again, $M _ { k }$ (see [[#References|[a6]]], Appendix) is related to the Cauchy–Riemann operator via the mapping $( x , y ) \mapsto ( x ^ { k + 1 } / ( k + 1 ) + i y )$ which is one-to-one if $k$ is even. The kernel of $M _ { k }$ consists of functions which are holomorphic functions of $( x ^ { k + 1 } / ( k + 1 ) + i y )$, and this can be taken as the beginning of a whole theory, the theory of hypo-analytic structures initiated by M.S. Baouendi and Treves [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a11]]].
  
 
The Lewy operator and the Mizohata operator are much more similar than it may look. Indeed, they are micro-locally equivalent ([[#References|[a2]]], Sect. 9, [[#References|[a10]]], Chap. IX), and in fact they serve as micro-local model for non-Levi degenerate CR-structures.
 
The Lewy operator and the Mizohata operator are much more similar than it may look. Indeed, they are micro-locally equivalent ([[#References|[a2]]], Sect. 9, [[#References|[a10]]], Chap. IX), and in fact they serve as micro-local model for non-Levi degenerate CR-structures.
  
Perturbations of the Lewy operator and of the Mizohata operator are of interest. See [[#References|[a7]]], Chap. 1. One can construct arbitrary small perturbations of these operators, still as complex vector fields, in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008049.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008050.png" /> respectively, in such a way that the only functions annihilated by these operators will be those which are constant. This gives Nirenberg's example of a strictly pseudo-convex non-embeddable CR-structure (real dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008051.png" />, CR dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008052.png" />).
+
Perturbations of the Lewy operator and of the Mizohata operator are of interest. See [[#References|[a7]]], Chap. 1. One can construct arbitrary small perturbations of these operators, still as complex vector fields, in $\mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ and $\mathbf{R} ^ { 2 }$ respectively, in such a way that the only functions annihilated by these operators will be those which are constant. This gives Nirenberg's example of a strictly pseudo-convex non-embeddable CR-structure (real dimension $3$, CR dimension $1$).
  
 
However the Lewy and the Mizohata operators differ strikingly from the point of view of their small perturbations, for the uniqueness in the Cauchy problem (references, and an elementary exposition, can be found in [[#References|[a9]]]).
 
However the Lewy and the Mizohata operators differ strikingly from the point of view of their small perturbations, for the uniqueness in the Cauchy problem (references, and an elementary exposition, can be found in [[#References|[a9]]]).
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.S Baouendi,   F. Treves,   "A property of the functions and distributions annihilated by a locally integrable system of complex vector fields" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''113''' (1981) pp. 387–421</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Boutet de Monvel,   "A course on pseudo differential operators and their applications" , Duke Univ. (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Hörmander,   "Linear partial differential operators" , ''Grundl. Math. Wissenschaft.'' , '''116''' , Springer (1966)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Lewy,   "On the local character of the solutions of an atypical linear differential equation in three variables and a related problem for regular functions of two complex variables" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''64''' (1956) pp. 514–522</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Lewy,   "An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solution" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''66''' (1957) pp. 155–158</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Mizohata,   "Solutions nulles et solutions non analytiques" ''J. Math. Kyoto Univ.'' , '''1''' (1962) pp. 271–302</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Nirenberg,   "Lectures on linear partial differential equations" , ''CBMS Reg. Conf.'' , '''17''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Nirenberg,   F. Treves,   "Solvability of a first-order linear partial differential equation" ''Commun. Pure Appl. Math.'' , '''16''' (1963) pp. 331–351</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.P. Rosay,   "CR functions vanishing on open sets. (Almost) complex structures and Cohen's example" ''Indag. Math.'' , '''9''' (1998) pp. 289–303</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Treves,   "Introduction to pseudodifferential and Fourier integral operators" , Plenum (1980)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Treves,   "Hypoanalytic structures, local theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1992)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> M.S Baouendi, F. Treves, "A property of the functions and distributions annihilated by a locally integrable system of complex vector fields" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''113''' (1981) pp. 387–421 {{MR|0607899}} {{ZBL|0491.35036}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Boutet de Monvel, "A course on pseudo differential operators and their applications" , Duke Univ. (1976) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0348.35002}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Hörmander, "Linear partial differential operators" , ''Grundl. Math. Wissenschaft.'' , '''116''' , Springer (1966) {{MR|1533716}} {{ZBL|1178.35003}} {{ZBL|1115.35005}} {{ZBL|1062.35004}} {{ZBL|1028.35001}} {{ZBL|0712.35001}} {{ZBL|0687.35002}} {{ZBL|0619.35002}} {{ZBL|0619.35001}} {{ZBL|0612.35001}} {{ZBL|0601.35001}} {{ZBL|0521.35002}} {{ZBL|0521.35001}} {{ZBL|0321.35001}} {{ZBL|0175.39201}} {{ZBL|0131.31804}} {{ZBL|0108.09301}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top"> H. Lewy, "On the local character of the solutions of an atypical linear differential equation in three variables and a related problem for regular functions of two complex variables" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''64''' (1956) pp. 514–522</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top"> H. Lewy, "An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solution" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''66''' (1957) pp. 155–158 {{MR|0088629}} {{ZBL|0078.08104}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> S. Mizohata, "Solutions nulles et solutions non analytiques" ''J. Math. Kyoto Univ.'' , '''1''' (1962) pp. 271–302 {{MR|0142873}} {{ZBL|0106.29601}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Nirenberg, "Lectures on linear partial differential equations" , ''CBMS Reg. Conf.'' , '''17''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) {{MR|0450755}} {{ZBL|0267.35001}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a8]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Nirenberg, F. Treves, "Solvability of a first-order linear partial differential equation" ''Commun. Pure Appl. Math.'' , '''16''' (1963) pp. 331–351 {{MR|0163045}} {{ZBL|0117.06104}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a9]</td> <td valign="top"> J.P. Rosay, "CR functions vanishing on open sets. (Almost) complex structures and Cohen's example" ''Indag. Math.'' , '''9''' (1998) pp. 289–303 {{MR|1691491}} {{ZBL|}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a10]</td> <td valign="top"> F. Treves, "Introduction to pseudodifferential and Fourier integral operators" , Plenum (1980) {{MR|0597145}} {{MR|0597144}} {{ZBL|0453.47027}} </td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a11]</td> <td valign="top"> F. Treves, "Hypoanalytic structures, local theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1992)</td></tr></table>

Latest revision as of 19:09, 26 March 2023

In the mid 1950s, B. Malgrange and L. Ehrenpreis showed that one can solve all linear constant-coefficients partial differential equations on ${\bf R} ^ { n }$ (cf. also Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem; Linear partial differential equation). The question of solvability for variable coefficients was posed (avoiding singular points, as needed even in the theory of ordinary differential equations). H. Lewy [a5] found the following example, which at the time (1956) was astonishing. In $3$ variables $( x , y , t )$, let $L$ be the operator (called the Lewy operator):

\begin{equation*} L = \frac { \partial } { \partial x } + i \frac { \partial } { \partial y } - 2 i ( x + i y ) \frac { \partial } { \partial t }. \end{equation*}

The Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem applies to this operator. So, if $g$ is a real-analytic function (cf. Class of differentiability) defined (say) near $0$, then the equation $L ( u ) = g$ can be solved near $0$, with $u$ real analytic. But, there exists a $C ^ { \infty }$-function $g$ such that the equation $L ( u ) = g$ cannot be solved in any neighbourhood of (say) $0$, even with $u$ a distribution (cf. also Generalized function).

Later, it was noticed that the same phenomenon occurs, near any point $( 0 , y )$, for the even simpler (embarrassingly simple!) operator, in $2$ variables (called the Mizohata operator):

\begin{equation*} M = \frac { \partial } { \partial x } + i x \frac { \partial } { \partial y }. \end{equation*}

Both operator have clear connections with complex analysis (cf. Functions of a complex variable, theory of).

The Lewy operator is the tangential Cauchy–Riemann operator (cf. Bergman kernel function) on the "Heisenberg group" , the hypersurface in $\mathbf{C} ^ { 2 }$ parametrized by $( x , y , t ) \mapsto ( z , w ) = ( x + i y , t + i | z | ^ { 2 } )$. This simply means that the functions $z$ and $w$ are in the kernel of $L$. So, in other coordinates, $L$ is the Cauchy–Riemann vector field on the unit sphere in $\mathbf{C} ^ { 2 }$ (the tangential operator characterizing holomorphic functions). An earlier paper by Lewy was [a4]!

The Mizohata operator can be obtained (up to a factor) by pulling back the standard Cauchy–Riemann operator on $\mathbf{C}$ via the singular change of variables: $( x , y ) \mapsto ( x ^ { 2 } / 2 + i y )$. Notice that indeed $L ( x ^ { 2 } / 2 + i y ) = 0$.

This connection with complex analysis allows simple, and transparent, proofs of the non-local solvability (in particular, via the obvious non-propagation of singularities for the adjoint operators).

If one decomposes $L$ or $M$ into real part and imaginary part $X + i Y$, the commutator of $X$ and $Y$ does not belong to the linear span of $X$ and $Y$ (for $x = 0$ in case of the Mizohata operator). L.V. Hörmander understood that this fact was crucial and he showed that, more generally, a similar condition on the commutator of the higher-order terms for general linear differential operators implies non-local solvability. See [a3], Chap. 6.

However, real operators may also be "without solutions" , since as pointed out by F. Treves in 1962, the operator $L \overline{L} \overline{L} L$ is a real operator (and so is $M\overline{M}\overline{M}M$).

The question of local solvability for vector fields is totally understood thanks to L. Nirenberg and Treves (condition P), [a8], [a11], Chap. VIII. In $\mathbf{R} ^ { 2 }$, the operator $M _ { k } = \partial / \partial x + i x ^ { k } \partial / \partial y$, $k \in \mathbf{N}$, is locally solvable at $0$ if and only if $k$ is even. Again, $M _ { k }$ (see [a6], Appendix) is related to the Cauchy–Riemann operator via the mapping $( x , y ) \mapsto ( x ^ { k + 1 } / ( k + 1 ) + i y )$ which is one-to-one if $k$ is even. The kernel of $M _ { k }$ consists of functions which are holomorphic functions of $( x ^ { k + 1 } / ( k + 1 ) + i y )$, and this can be taken as the beginning of a whole theory, the theory of hypo-analytic structures initiated by M.S. Baouendi and Treves [a1], [a11].

The Lewy operator and the Mizohata operator are much more similar than it may look. Indeed, they are micro-locally equivalent ([a2], Sect. 9, [a10], Chap. IX), and in fact they serve as micro-local model for non-Levi degenerate CR-structures.

Perturbations of the Lewy operator and of the Mizohata operator are of interest. See [a7], Chap. 1. One can construct arbitrary small perturbations of these operators, still as complex vector fields, in $\mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ and $\mathbf{R} ^ { 2 }$ respectively, in such a way that the only functions annihilated by these operators will be those which are constant. This gives Nirenberg's example of a strictly pseudo-convex non-embeddable CR-structure (real dimension $3$, CR dimension $1$).

However the Lewy and the Mizohata operators differ strikingly from the point of view of their small perturbations, for the uniqueness in the Cauchy problem (references, and an elementary exposition, can be found in [a9]).

References

[a1] M.S Baouendi, F. Treves, "A property of the functions and distributions annihilated by a locally integrable system of complex vector fields" Ann. of Math. , 113 (1981) pp. 387–421 MR0607899 Zbl 0491.35036
[a2] L. Boutet de Monvel, "A course on pseudo differential operators and their applications" , Duke Univ. (1976) Zbl 0348.35002
[a3] L. Hörmander, "Linear partial differential operators" , Grundl. Math. Wissenschaft. , 116 , Springer (1966) MR1533716 Zbl 1178.35003 Zbl 1115.35005 Zbl 1062.35004 Zbl 1028.35001 Zbl 0712.35001 Zbl 0687.35002 Zbl 0619.35002 Zbl 0619.35001 Zbl 0612.35001 Zbl 0601.35001 Zbl 0521.35002 Zbl 0521.35001 Zbl 0321.35001 Zbl 0175.39201 Zbl 0131.31804 Zbl 0108.09301
[a4] H. Lewy, "On the local character of the solutions of an atypical linear differential equation in three variables and a related problem for regular functions of two complex variables" Ann. of Math. , 64 (1956) pp. 514–522
[a5] H. Lewy, "An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solution" Ann. of Math. , 66 (1957) pp. 155–158 MR0088629 Zbl 0078.08104
[a6] S. Mizohata, "Solutions nulles et solutions non analytiques" J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , 1 (1962) pp. 271–302 MR0142873 Zbl 0106.29601
[a7] L. Nirenberg, "Lectures on linear partial differential equations" , CBMS Reg. Conf. , 17 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) MR0450755 Zbl 0267.35001
[a8] L. Nirenberg, F. Treves, "Solvability of a first-order linear partial differential equation" Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 16 (1963) pp. 331–351 MR0163045 Zbl 0117.06104
[a9] J.P. Rosay, "CR functions vanishing on open sets. (Almost) complex structures and Cohen's example" Indag. Math. , 9 (1998) pp. 289–303 MR1691491
[a10] F. Treves, "Introduction to pseudodifferential and Fourier integral operators" , Plenum (1980) MR0597145 MR0597144 Zbl 0453.47027
[a11] F. Treves, "Hypoanalytic structures, local theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1992)
How to Cite This Entry:
Lewy operator and Mizohata operator. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lewy_operator_and_Mizohata_operator&oldid=14993
This article was adapted from an original article by Jean-Pierre Rosay (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article