Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Howell design"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (fix formatting)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
1) every element of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103307.png" /> occurs in precisely one cell of each row and each column;
 
1) every element of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103307.png" /> occurs in precisely one cell of each row and each column;
  
2) every unordered pair of elements from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103308.png" /> is in at most one cell of the array. It follows immediately from the definition of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103309.png" /> that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033010.png" />. An example of a Howell design is the following <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033011.png" />:''''''<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:black;"> <tr><td> <table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" style="background-color:black;"> <tbody> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033012.png" /> 0</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1 3</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033013.png" /> 2</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2 3</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033014.png" /> 1</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033015.png" /> 0</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033016.png" /> 3</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033017.png" /> 2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">0 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033018.png" /> 1</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">0 2</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033019.png" /> 3</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
+
2) every unordered pair of elements from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103308.png" /> is in at most one cell of the array. It follows immediately from the definition of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h1103309.png" /> that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033010.png" />. An example of a Howell design is the following <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033011.png" />:
 +
 
 +
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:black;"> <tr><td> <table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4" style="background-color:black;"> <tbody> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033012.png" /> 0</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">1 3</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033013.png" /> 2</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">2 3</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033014.png" /> 1</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033015.png" /> 0</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033016.png" /> 3</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033017.png" /> 2</td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">0 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> </tr> <tr> <td colname="1" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033018.png" /> 1</td> <td colname="2" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1">0 2</td> <td colname="3" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"></td> <td colname="4" style="background-color:white;" colspan="1"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033019.png" /> 3</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
  
 
</td></tr> </table>
 
</td></tr> </table>
Line 11: Line 13:
 
An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033029.png" /> is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033030.png" /> in which there is a subset <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033031.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033032.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033033.png" />, such that no pair of elements from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033034.png" /> appears in the design. <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033036.png" />-designs are quite useful in recursive constructions. There exist <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033037.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033038.png" /> even, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033039.png" />, with two exceptions: there is no <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033040.png" /> and there is no <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033041.png" /> [[#References|[a1]]]. The existence of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033042.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033043.png" /> odd remains open, see [[#References|[a5]]]. The only known case where an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033044.png" /> exists but an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033045.png" /> does not is for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033046.png" />.
 
An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033029.png" /> is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033030.png" /> in which there is a subset <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033031.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033032.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033033.png" />, such that no pair of elements from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033034.png" /> appears in the design. <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033036.png" />-designs are quite useful in recursive constructions. There exist <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033037.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033038.png" /> even, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033039.png" />, with two exceptions: there is no <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033040.png" /> and there is no <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033041.png" /> [[#References|[a1]]]. The existence of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033042.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033043.png" /> odd remains open, see [[#References|[a5]]]. The only known case where an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033044.png" /> exists but an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033045.png" /> does not is for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033046.png" />.
  
The pairs of elements in the cells of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033047.png" /> can be thought of as the edges of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033048.png" />-regular [[Graph|graph]] on the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033049.png" />-set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033050.png" />, the underlying graph of the Howell design. The existence of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033051.png" /> is equivalent to the existence of a pair of orthogonal one-factorizations of the underlying graph of the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033052.png" /> (cf. [[One-factorization|One-factorization]]). The underlying graph of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033053.png" /> is the complete graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033054.png" />, and the underlying graph of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033055.png" /> is the cocktail party graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033056.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033057.png" /> is a [[One-factor|one-factor]]. An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033058.png" /> with underlying graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033059.png" /> is equivalent to a pair of mutually [[Orthogonal Latin squares|orthogonal Latin squares]] of order <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033060.png" />. The general problem of determining which graphs are the underlying graphs of a Howell design remains open (1996), see [[#References|[a3]]].
+
The pairs of elements in the cells of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033047.png" /> can be thought of as the edges of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033048.png" />-regular [[Graph|graph]] on the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033049.png" />-set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033050.png" />, the underlying graph of the Howell design. The existence of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033051.png" /> is equivalent to the existence of a pair of orthogonal one-factorizations of the underlying graph of the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033052.png" /> (cf. [[One-factorization|One-factorization]]). The underlying graph of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033053.png" /> is the complete graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033054.png" />, and the underlying graph of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033055.png" /> is the [[cocktail party graph]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033056.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033057.png" /> is a [[One-factor|one-factor]]. An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033058.png" /> with underlying graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033059.png" /> is equivalent to a pair of mutually [[Orthogonal Latin squares|orthogonal Latin squares]] of order <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033060.png" />. The general problem of determining which graphs are the underlying graphs of a Howell design remains open (1996), see [[#References|[a3]]].
  
 
Several special types of Howell designs have been studied, including <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033061.png" />-designs, skew designs, complementary designs, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033062.png" />-complementary designs, cyclic Howell designs (used for Howell movements in duplicate bridge), and Howell designs with Howell sub-designs (see [[#References|[a3]]] [[#References|[a4]]]).
 
Several special types of Howell designs have been studied, including <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033061.png" />-designs, skew designs, complementary designs, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h110/h110330/h11033062.png" />-complementary designs, cyclic Howell designs (used for Howell movements in duplicate bridge), and Howell designs with Howell sub-designs (see [[#References|[a3]]] [[#References|[a4]]]).

Revision as of 18:58, 30 December 2015

A Howell design of side and order , or more briefly an , is an -array in which each cell is either empty or contains an unordered pair of distinct elements from some -set such that:

1) every element of occurs in precisely one cell of each row and each column;

2) every unordered pair of elements from is in at most one cell of the array. It follows immediately from the definition of an that . An example of a Howell design is the following :

<tbody> </tbody>
0 1 3 2
2 3 1 0
3 2 0 1
1 0 2 3

An is also called a Room square of side . At the other extreme, the existence of a pair of mutually orthogonal Latin squares implies the existence of an . The existence of Howell designs has been completely determined [a1], [a5]: Let and be positive integers such that . There exists an if and only if or . The proof uses a variety of direct and recursive constructions.

An is an in which there is a subset of , , such that no pair of elements from appears in the design. -designs are quite useful in recursive constructions. There exist for even, , with two exceptions: there is no and there is no [a1]. The existence of for odd remains open, see [a5]. The only known case where an exists but an does not is for .

The pairs of elements in the cells of an can be thought of as the edges of an -regular graph on the -set , the underlying graph of the Howell design. The existence of an is equivalent to the existence of a pair of orthogonal one-factorizations of the underlying graph of the (cf. One-factorization). The underlying graph of an is the complete graph , and the underlying graph of an is the cocktail party graph , where is a one-factor. An with underlying graph is equivalent to a pair of mutually orthogonal Latin squares of order . The general problem of determining which graphs are the underlying graphs of a Howell design remains open (1996), see [a3].

Several special types of Howell designs have been studied, including -designs, skew designs, complementary designs, -complementary designs, cyclic Howell designs (used for Howell movements in duplicate bridge), and Howell designs with Howell sub-designs (see [a3] [a4]).

A -dimensional Howell design, , is a -dimensional array in which every cell either is empty or contains an unordered pair of elements from a -set and such that each two-dimensional projection is an . An is called a Howell cube. An is equivalent to mutually orthogonal one-factorizations of the underlying graph. Let denote the maximum value of such that an exists. Very little is known about upper bounds for . It is easy to see that , and it has been conjectured that . See [a3], [a2] for results on and existence results on .

The survey article [a3] includes results and references on Howell designs.

References

[a1] B.A. Anderson, P.J. Schellenberg, D.R. Stinson, "The existence of Howell designs of even side" J. Combin. Th. A , 36 (1984) pp. 23–55
[a2] J.H. Dinitz, "Howell designs" C.J. Colbourn (ed.) J.H. Dinitz (ed.) , CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs , CRC (1996) pp. 381–385
[a3] J.H. Dinitz, D.R. Stinson, "Room squares and related designs" J.H. Dinitz (ed.) D.R. Stinson (ed.) , Contemporary Design Theory: A Collection of Surveys , Wiley (1992) pp. 137–204
[a4] E.R. Lamken, S.A. Vanstone, "The existence of skew Howell designs of side and order " J. Combin. Th. A , 54 (1990) pp. 20–40
[a5] D.R. Stinson, "The existence of Howell designs of odd side" J. Combin. Th. A , 32 (1982) pp. 53–65
How to Cite This Entry:
Howell design. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Howell_design&oldid=14300
This article was adapted from an original article by E.R. Lamken (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article