Difference between revisions of "Recurrent point"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
m (→References: zbl link) |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Furstenberg, "Recurrence in ergodic theory and combinatorial number theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1981)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.H. Gottschalk, G.A. Hedlund, "Topological dynamics" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1955)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K.S. [K.S. Sibirskii] Sibirsky, "Introduction to topological dynamics" , Noordhoff (1975) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | + | <table> |
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Furstenberg, "Recurrence in ergodic theory and combinatorial number theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1981) {{ZBL|0459.28023}}</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.H. Gottschalk, G.A. Hedlund, "Topological dynamics" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1955)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K.S. [K.S. Sibirskii] Sibirsky, "Introduction to topological dynamics" , Noordhoff (1975) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | </table> |
Latest revision as of 07:09, 22 March 2023
of a dynamical system
A point $ x $ of a dynamical system $ f ^ { t } $( also denoted by $ f( t, \cdot ) $, see [2]) in a metric space $ S $ that satisfies the following condition: For any $ \epsilon > 0 $ there exists a $ T > 0 $ such that all points of the trajectory $ f ^ { t } x $ are contained in an $ \epsilon $- neighbourhood of any arc of time length $ T $ of this trajectory (in other words, with any $ \tau \in \mathbf R $, the $ \epsilon $- neighbourhood of the set
$$ \{ {f ^ { t } x } : {t \in [ \tau , \tau + T ] } \} $$
contains all of the trajectory $ f ^ { t } x $). In this case $ f ^ { t } x $ is called a recurrent trajectory.
Birkhoff's theorem: If the space $ S $ is complete (e.g. $ S = \mathbf R ^ {n} $), then: 1) for a point to be recurrent it is necessary and sufficient that the closure of its trajectory be a compact minimal set; and 2) for the existence of a recurrent point it is sufficient that there be a point that is stable according to Lagrange (see Lagrange stability).
A recurrent point is stable according to Poisson (see Poisson stability), and if the space $ S $ is complete, also stable according to Lagrange (see Lagrange stability). An almost-periodic (in particular, a fixed or periodic) point of a dynamical system is recurrent. In general, any point of a strictly ergodic dynamical system (in a complete space) is recurrent, but the restriction of a dynamical system to the closure of a recurrent trajectory (a minimal set) need not be a strictly ergodic dynamical system (Markov's example, see [2]).
References
[1] | G.D. Birkhoff, "Dynamical systems" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1927) |
[2] | V.V. Nemytskii, V.V. Stepanov, "Qualitative theory of differential equations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1960) (Translated from Russian) |
Comments
An almost-periodic point of a dynamical system $ f ^ { t } $ on a metric space $ ( S , \rho ) $ is a point $ x \in G $ with the following property: For every $ \epsilon > 0 $ the set
$$ AP ( x, \epsilon ) = \{ {t \in \mathbf R } : { \rho ( f ^ { s+ t } ( x), f ^ { s } ( x) ) < \epsilon \ \textrm{ for all } s \in \mathbf R } \} $$
is relatively dense in $ \mathbf R $, i.e., there exists a length $ l ( \epsilon ) $ such that every interval in $ \mathbf R $ with length $ h \geq l ( \epsilon ) $ contains a point of $ AP( x, \epsilon ) $. (Thus, one might say that the function $ t \mapsto f ^ { t } ( x) : \mathbf R \rightarrow S $ is almost-periodic; cf. Almost-period.)
Another important notion is that of an almost-recurrent point: A point $ x \in S $ such that for every $ \epsilon > 0 $ the set
$$ R( x , U _ \epsilon ) = \ \{ {t \in \mathbf R } : {f ^ { t } ( x) \in U _ \epsilon } \} $$
is relatively dense in $ \mathbf R $, where $ U _ \epsilon $ is the open $ \epsilon $- ball around $ x $. (This definition can easily be generalized to the case of a flow or a cascade on an arbitrary topological space.) The relationship of these notions with that of a recurrent point, Birkhoff's theorem and a number of other implications can be visualized as follows:
Figure: r080190a
Here the implication indicated by the dotted arrow holds only in a complete space, and $ \Sigma _ {x} $ denotes the closure of the trajectory of $ x $. The property "Sx is Lyapunov stable rel(ative) Sx" means that the family $ \{ f ^ { t } \mid _ {\Sigma _ {x} } \} _ {t \in \mathbf R } $ of functions from $ \Sigma _ {x} $ into $ \Sigma _ {x} $ is equicontinuous on $ \Sigma _ {x} $( see Lyapunov stability). For a refinement of this diagram (including the notions of a pseudo-recurrent point and a uniformly Poisson-stable trajectory) see [a3].
In the literature on topological dynamics (in particular, in the literature directly or indirectly influenced by [a2]) another terminology is in use:
<tbody> </tbody>
|
(To be precise, in [a1] "recurrent" means positive Poisson stable, i.e., $ x $ belongs only to the $ \omega $- limit set of its own trajectory.)
References
[a1] | H. Furstenberg, "Recurrence in ergodic theory and combinatorial number theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1981) Zbl 0459.28023 |
[a2] | W.H. Gottschalk, G.A. Hedlund, "Topological dynamics" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1955) |
[a3] | K.S. [K.S. Sibirskii] Sibirsky, "Introduction to topological dynamics" , Noordhoff (1975) (Translated from Russian) |
Recurrent point. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Recurrent_point&oldid=53071