Difference between revisions of "Equivariant cohomology"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
m (fix tex) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+} | + | H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+1} ( K , L ) ,\ \ |
L \subseteq K , | L \subseteq K , | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
{} \dots \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K , L ) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) \rightarrow \ | {} \dots \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K , L ) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) \rightarrow \ | ||
− | H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+} | + | H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+1} ( K , L ) \rightarrow \dots . |
$$ | $$ | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
that is, the quotient space $ E _ {G} \times K $ | that is, the quotient space $ E _ {G} \times K $ | ||
under the action of $ G $ | under the action of $ G $ | ||
− | given by $ g ( l , k ) = ( l g ^ {-} | + | given by $ g ( l , k ) = ( l g ^ {-1} , g k ) $). |
Then the functors $ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) = H ^ {n} ( K _ {G} ) $ | Then the functors $ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) = H ^ {n} ( K _ {G} ) $ | ||
yield an equivariant cohomology theory; here $ H ^ {n} $ | yield an equivariant cohomology theory; here $ H ^ {n} $ | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Carlsson, "Equivariant stable homotopy and Segal's Burnside ring conjecture" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''120''' (1984) pp. 189–224</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.G. Lewis, J.P. May, M. Steinberger, "Equivariant stable homotopy theory" , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''1213''' , Springer (1986) (With contributions by J.E. McClure)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Petrie, J.D. Randall, "Transformation groups on manifolds" , M. Dekker (1984)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. tom Dieck, "Transformation groups and representation theory" , Springer (1979)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Petrie, "Pseudoequivalences of | + | <table> |
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Carlsson, "Equivariant stable homotopy and Segal's Burnside ring conjecture" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''120''' (1984) pp. 189–224</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.G. Lewis, J.P. May, M. Steinberger, "Equivariant stable homotopy theory" , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''1213''' , Springer (1986) (With contributions by J.E. McClure)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Petrie, J.D. Randall, "Transformation groups on manifolds" , M. Dekker (1984)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. tom Dieck, "Transformation groups and representation theory" , Springer (1979)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T. Petrie, "Pseudoequivalences of $G$-manifolds" R.J. Milgram (ed.) , ''Algebraic and geometric topology'' , '''33.1''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1978) pp. 169–210</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Lashof, M. Rothenberg, "$G$-smoothing theory" R.J. Milgram (ed.) , ''Algebraic and geometric topology'' , '''33.1''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1978) pp. 211–266</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Browder, F. Quinn, "A surgery theory for $G$-manifolds and stratified sets" , ''Manifolds (Tokyo)'' , Univ. Tokyo Press (1973) pp. 27–36</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 11:12, 20 January 2021
A cohomology that takes the action of some group into account. More precisely, an equivariant cohomology in the category of $ G $-
spaces (that is, topological spaces on which the continuous action of a group $ G $
is defined) and equivariant mappings is a sequence of contravariant functors $ H _ {G} ^ {n} $(
taking values in the category of Abelian groups) and natural transformations
$$ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+1} ( K , L ) ,\ \ L \subseteq K , $$
with the following properties: a) equivariantly-homotopic mappings of pairs induce identity homomorphisms of the groups $ H _ {G} ^ {n} $; b) an inclusion of the form
$$ ( K , K \cap L ) \subseteq ( K \cup L , L ) $$
induces an isomorphism
$$ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K \cup L , L ) \cong \ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K , K \cap L ) ; $$
and c) for every pair $ ( K , L ) $ the following cohomology sequence is exact:
$$ {} \dots \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K , L ) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) \rightarrow \ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( L) \rightarrow H _ {G} ^ {n+1} ( K , L ) \rightarrow \dots . $$
Let $ \pi : E _ {G} \rightarrow B _ {G} $ be a universal $ G $- fibration and let $ K _ {G} $ be the space associated with the universal fibre space $ \pi $ with fibre $ K $( that is, the quotient space $ E _ {G} \times K $ under the action of $ G $ given by $ g ( l , k ) = ( l g ^ {-1} , g k ) $). Then the functors $ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( K) = H ^ {n} ( K _ {G} ) $ yield an equivariant cohomology theory; here $ H ^ {n} $ is an arbitrary cohomology theory.
For any fixed group $ G $ the collection of groups $ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( G / F ) $ together with all possible homomorphisms induced by inclusions $ F _ {1} \subseteq F _ {2} $ of subgroups of $ G $ is usually called the system of coefficients for the $ H _ {G} ^ {*} $- theory. In some cases the functors $ H _ {G} ^ {n} $ are uniquely defined by their systems of coefficients (for example, when $ G $ is finite and $ H _ {G} ^ {n} ( G / F ) = 0 $ for $ n > 0 $).
References
[1] | G.E. Bredon, "Equivariant cohomology theories" , Springer (1967) |
[2] | W.Y. Hsiang, "Cohomology theory of topological transformation groups" , Springer (1975) |
Comments
The principal use of equivariant cohomology is in equivariant obstruction theory and in such problems of equivariant (stable) homotopy theory as the solution of the Segal conjecture by G. Carlsson [a1] (see also [a2] and Homotopy).
Quite generally, in many parts of mathematics it is useful to consider also family and equivariant versions of various constructions and results. The various family (relative) and equivariant versions of parts of mathematics are then often also important tools in the non-equivariant and non-family settings. An example of this is the use of equivariant $ K $- theory in proofs of the Atiyah–Singer index and fixed-points theorems, cf., e.g., [a3].
Thus, many theories, e.g. cohomology theories, have equivariant versions, e.g. equivariant (stable) homotopy theory [a1], equivariant $ K $- theory [a3], [a4], equivariant cobordism [a5], [a7]. And there are equivariant versions of many theorems and constructions such as equivariant surgery [a1], [a7], equivariant smoothing [a6] and equivariant transversality [a7].
References
[a1] | G. Carlsson, "Equivariant stable homotopy and Segal's Burnside ring conjecture" Ann. of Math. , 120 (1984) pp. 189–224 |
[a2] | L.G. Lewis, J.P. May, M. Steinberger, "Equivariant stable homotopy theory" , Lect. notes in math. , 1213 , Springer (1986) (With contributions by J.E. McClure) |
[a3] | T. Petrie, J.D. Randall, "Transformation groups on manifolds" , M. Dekker (1984) |
[a4] | T. tom Dieck, "Transformation groups and representation theory" , Springer (1979) |
[a5] | T. Petrie, "Pseudoequivalences of $G$-manifolds" R.J. Milgram (ed.) , Algebraic and geometric topology , 33.1 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1978) pp. 169–210 |
[a6] | R. Lashof, M. Rothenberg, "$G$-smoothing theory" R.J. Milgram (ed.) , Algebraic and geometric topology , 33.1 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1978) pp. 211–266 |
[a7] | W. Browder, F. Quinn, "A surgery theory for $G$-manifolds and stratified sets" , Manifolds (Tokyo) , Univ. Tokyo Press (1973) pp. 27–36 |
Equivariant cohomology. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equivariant_cohomology&oldid=51449