Difference between revisions of "Rotations diagram"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
m (links) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | be the [[ | + | be the [[unit quaternion]] defined up to sign, representing this rotation. The set of such [[quaternion]]s parametrized by the points $ M \in F $( |
or $ M ^ {*} \in F ^ { * } $) | or $ M ^ {*} \in F ^ { * } $) | ||
defines a set of points in the elliptic space, which is called the rotations diagram for the isometric surfaces $ F $ | defines a set of points in the elliptic space, which is called the rotations diagram for the isometric surfaces $ F $ |
Latest revision as of 15:08, 19 January 2021
A surface in the elliptic space $ E ^ {3} $
defined by isometric smooth surfaces $ F $
and $ F ^ { * } $
in the Euclidean space $ \mathbf R ^ {3} $
in the same way as the rotation indicatrix is defined for infinitesimal deformations in $ \mathbf R ^ {3} $.
L. Bianchi was the first to mention surfaces in elliptic space coincident with the rotations diagram, in examining the spherical representation of a deformation base for surfaces, where he showed that it coincides with the representation in the sense of Clifford for the asymptotic lines in the rotations diagram.
Let $ F $ and $ F ^ {*,} $ be isometric smooth identically-oriented surfaces. At the points $ M $ and $ M ^ {*} $ corresponding in isometry, the trihedra formed by the tangent vectors $ x _ {u} , x _ {v} $ and $ x _ {u} ^ {*} , x _ {v} ^ {*} $ to the corresponding isometric pairs of curves $ v = \textrm{ const } $ and $ u = \textrm{ const } $ and the normals $ n $ and $ n ^ {*} $ are equal, i.e.
$$ ( x _ {u} ) ^ {2} = ( x _ {u} ^ {*} ) ^ {2} ,\ \ ( x _ {v} ) ^ {2} = ( x _ {v} ^ {*} ) ^ {2} , $$
$$ ( n ^ {*} ) ^ {2} = ( n) ^ {2} = 1,\ ( x _ {u} , x _ {v} ) = ( x _ {u} ^ {*} , x _ {v} ^ {*} ), $$
$$ ( nx _ {u} ) = ( n ^ {*} x _ {u} ^ {*} ) = ( nx _ {v} ) = ( n ^ {*} x _ {v} ^ {*} ) = 0, $$
and therefore one of them is obtained from another by rotation around an axis with direction unit vector $ \dot{V} $ through an angle $ \chi $( defined up to $ 2 \pi $). Let
$$ Q = \cos \frac \chi {2} + \dot{V} \sin \frac \chi {2} $$
be the unit quaternion defined up to sign, representing this rotation. The set of such quaternions parametrized by the points $ M \in F $( or $ M ^ {*} \in F ^ { * } $) defines a set of points in the elliptic space, which is called the rotations diagram for the isometric surfaces $ F $ and $ F ^ { * } $. For example, if $ F $ and $ F ^ { * } $ are isometric pieces of cylinders, then the rotations diagram is a part of a Clifford surface, and a minimal Clifford surface corresponds to circular cylinders. If $ | \chi | < \pi $, there is an elliptic plane outside the rotations diagram, and under a geodesic mapping of the elliptic space into the Euclidean space,
$$ Q = \dot{V} \sin \frac \chi {2} + \cos \frac \chi {2} \rightarrow y = \dot{V} \mathop{\rm tan} \frac \chi {2} , $$
the image of the rotations diagram is the rotation indicatrix for some infinitesimal deformation of the median surface corresponding to $ F $ and $ F ^ { * } $( see Cohn-Vossen transformation) (it is regular if $ | \chi | < \pi $).
The properties of the rotations diagrams for isometric surfaces of positive Gaussian curvature are analogous to those of rotation indicatrices; for example, the specific internal curvature of the rotations diagram is always negative, and therefore it plays the same part as the rotation indicatrix when examining the isometry of convex surfaces.
Comments
References
[a1] | M. Spivak, "A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry" , 1979 , Publish or Perish pp. 1–5 |
[a2] | A.V. Pogorelov, "Intrinsic geometry of surfaces" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) (Translated from Russian) |
[a3] | A.V. Pogorelov, "Extrinsic geometry of convex surfaces" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) (Translated from Russian) |
Rotations diagram. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Rotations_diagram&oldid=51417