Difference between revisions of "Logical matrix"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | l0607401.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 28 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 28 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L060/L.0600740 Logical matrix | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
A system | A system | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mathfrak M = \langle M ; D , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ M $ |
+ | is a non-empty set; $ D \subseteq M $; | ||
+ | $ \& , \lor , \supset $ | ||
+ | are [[binary operation]]s; and $ \neg $ | ||
+ | is a [[unary operation]] on $ M $. | ||
+ | Any formula of propositional logic, constructed from propositional variables $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ | ||
+ | by means of the logical connectives $ \& , \lor , \supset , \neg $, | ||
+ | can be regarded as an $ n $- | ||
+ | place function on $ M $ | ||
+ | if $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ | ||
+ | are assumed to be variables with range of values $ M $ | ||
+ | and the logical connectives are interpreted as the corresponding operations of the logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $. | ||
+ | A formula $ \mathfrak A $ | ||
+ | is said to be generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | if for any values of the variables in $ M $ | ||
+ | the value of $ \mathfrak A $ | ||
+ | belongs to $ D $. | ||
+ | A logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | is said to be characteristic for a propositional calculus $ K $ | ||
+ | if the formulas that are generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | are exactly those that are deducible in $ K $. | ||
+ | An example of a logical matrix is the system | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \langle \{ 0 , 1 \} ; \{ 1 \} , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
where | where | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | x \& y = \min \{ x , y \} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | x \lor y = \max \{ x , y \} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | x \supset y = \max \{ 1 - x , y \} , | |
− | + | $$ | |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \neg x = 1 - x . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | This logical matrix is characteristic for the classical propositional calculus. t logic','../p/p110060.htm','Set theory','../s/s084750.htm','Syntax','../s/s091900.htm','Undecidability','../u/u095140.htm','Unsolvability','../u/u095800.htm','ZFC','../z/z130100.htm')" style="background-color:yellow;">K. Gödel proved that it is impossible to construct a logical matrix with a finite set $ M $ | ||
+ | that is characteristic for the intuitionistic propositional calculus. | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 04:11, 6 June 2020
A system
$$ \mathfrak M = \langle M ; D , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , $$
where $ M $ is a non-empty set; $ D \subseteq M $; $ \& , \lor , \supset $ are binary operations; and $ \neg $ is a unary operation on $ M $. Any formula of propositional logic, constructed from propositional variables $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ by means of the logical connectives $ \& , \lor , \supset , \neg $, can be regarded as an $ n $- place function on $ M $ if $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ are assumed to be variables with range of values $ M $ and the logical connectives are interpreted as the corresponding operations of the logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $. A formula $ \mathfrak A $ is said to be generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ if for any values of the variables in $ M $ the value of $ \mathfrak A $ belongs to $ D $. A logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $ is said to be characteristic for a propositional calculus $ K $ if the formulas that are generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ are exactly those that are deducible in $ K $. An example of a logical matrix is the system
$$ \langle \{ 0 , 1 \} ; \{ 1 \} , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , $$
where
$$ x \& y = \min \{ x , y \} , $$
$$ x \lor y = \max \{ x , y \} , $$
$$ x \supset y = \max \{ 1 - x , y \} , $$
$$ \neg x = 1 - x . $$
This logical matrix is characteristic for the classical propositional calculus. t logic','../p/p110060.htm','Set theory','../s/s084750.htm','Syntax','../s/s091900.htm','Undecidability','../u/u095140.htm','Unsolvability','../u/u095800.htm','ZFC','../z/z130100.htm')" style="background-color:yellow;">K. Gödel proved that it is impossible to construct a logical matrix with a finite set $ M $ that is characteristic for the intuitionistic propositional calculus.
Comments
References
[a1] | R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988) |
Logical matrix. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Logical_matrix&oldid=47709