Difference between revisions of "Linear system"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | l0594701.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 72 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 72 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L059/L.0509470 Linear system | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
A family of effective linearly equivalent divisors (cf. [[Divisor (algebraic geometry)]]) on an [[Algebraic variety|algebraic variety]], parametrized by projective space. | A family of effective linearly equivalent divisors (cf. [[Divisor (algebraic geometry)]]) on an [[Algebraic variety|algebraic variety]], parametrized by projective space. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ X $ |
+ | be a non-singular algebraic variety over a field $ k $, | ||
+ | $ {\mathcal L} $ | ||
+ | an [[Invertible sheaf|invertible sheaf]] on $ X $, | ||
+ | $ \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) $ | ||
+ | the space of global sections of $ {\mathcal L} $, | ||
+ | and $ L \subset \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) $ | ||
+ | a finite-dimensional subspace. If $ \mathop{\rm dim} L > 0 $, | ||
+ | then the divisors determined by zero sections of $ L $ | ||
+ | are linearly equivalent and effective. A linear system is the projective space $ | L | = P ( L) $ | ||
+ | of one-dimensional subspaces of $ L $ | ||
+ | that parametrizes these divisors. If $ \mathop{\rm dim} \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) < \infty $, | ||
+ | then the linear system $ | \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) | $ | ||
+ | is said to be complete; it is denoted by $ | L | $. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ s _ {0} \dots s _ {n} $ |
+ | be a basis of $ L $. | ||
+ | It defines a [[Rational mapping|rational mapping]] $ \phi _ {L} : X \rightarrow P ^ {n} $ | ||
+ | by the formula | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | x \mapsto ( s _ {0} ( x) \dots s _ {n} ( x) ) ,\ \ | ||
+ | x \in X . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | One usually says that | + | One usually says that $ \phi _ {L} $ |
+ | is defined by the linear system $ | L | $. | ||
+ | The image $ \phi _ {L} ( X) $ | ||
+ | does not lie in any hyperplane of $ P ^ {n} $( | ||
+ | see [[#References|[2]]]). Conversely, every rational mapping $ \psi : X \rightarrow P ^ {m} $ | ||
+ | having this property is defined by some linear system. | ||
− | A fixed component of a linear system | + | A fixed component of a linear system $ | L | $ |
+ | is an effective divisor $ D ^ {*} $ | ||
+ | on $ X $ | ||
+ | such that $ D = D ^ \prime + D ^ {*} $ | ||
+ | for any $ D \in | L | $, | ||
+ | where $ D ^ \prime $ | ||
+ | is an effective divisor. When $ D $ | ||
+ | runs through $ | L | $, | ||
+ | the divisors $ D ^ \prime $ | ||
+ | form a linear system $ | L ^ \prime | $ | ||
+ | of the same dimension as $ | L | $. | ||
+ | The mapping $ \phi _ {L ^ \prime } $ | ||
+ | coincides with $ \phi _ {L} $. | ||
+ | Therefore, in considering $ \phi _ {L} $ | ||
+ | one may assume that $ | L | $ | ||
+ | does not have fixed components. In this case $ \phi _ {L} $ | ||
+ | is not defined exactly on the [[Basic set|basic set]] of $ | L | $. | ||
===Examples.=== | ===Examples.=== | ||
+ | 1) Let $ X = P ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | and $ L = {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) $, | ||
+ | $ d \geq 1 $; | ||
+ | then the sections of $ \Gamma ( P ^ {2} , {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) ) $ | ||
+ | can be identified with forms of degree $ d $ | ||
+ | on $ P ^ {2} $, | ||
+ | and the complete linear system $ ( {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) ) $ | ||
+ | can be identified with the set of all curves of order $ d $. | ||
− | + | 2) The standard quadratic transformation $ \tau : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $( | |
+ | see [[Cremona transformation|Cremona transformation]]) is defined by the linear system of conics passing through the points $ ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) $, | ||
+ | $ ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) $, | ||
+ | $ ( 1 , 0 , 0 ) $. | ||
− | + | 3) The Geiser involution $ \alpha : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $ | |
+ | is defined by the linear system of curves of order 8 passing with multiplicity 3 through 7 points in general position (cf. [[Point in general position|Point in general position]]). | ||
− | + | 4) The Bertini involution $ \beta : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $ | |
− | + | is defined by the linear system of curves of order 17 passing with multiplicity 6 through 8 points in general position. | |
− | 4) The Bertini involution | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.R. Shafarevich, "Algebraic surfaces" ''Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.'' , '''75''' (1967) ''Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov.'' , '''75''' (1965) {{MR|1392959}} {{MR|1060325}} {{ZBL|0830.00008}} {{ZBL|0733.14015}} {{ZBL|0832.14026}} {{ZBL|0509.14036}} {{ZBL|0492.14024}} {{ZBL|0379.14006}} {{ZBL|0253.14006}} {{ZBL|0154.21001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface" , Princeton Univ. Press (1966) {{MR|0209285}} {{ZBL|0187.42701}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Zariski, "Algebraic surfaces" , Springer (1971) {{MR|0469915}} {{ZBL|0219.14020}} </TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.R. Shafarevich, "Algebraic surfaces" ''Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.'' , '''75''' (1967) ''Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov.'' , '''75''' (1965) {{MR|1392959}} {{MR|1060325}} {{ZBL|0830.00008}} {{ZBL|0733.14015}} {{ZBL|0832.14026}} {{ZBL|0509.14036}} {{ZBL|0492.14024}} {{ZBL|0379.14006}} {{ZBL|0253.14006}} {{ZBL|0154.21001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface" , Princeton Univ. Press (1966) {{MR|0209285}} {{ZBL|0187.42701}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Zariski, "Algebraic surfaces" , Springer (1971) {{MR|0469915}} {{ZBL|0219.14020}} </TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
In classical (elementary) projective and analytic geometry one speaks of linear systems of curves, surfaces, quadrics, etc. These are families of curves, surfaces, etc. of the form | In classical (elementary) projective and analytic geometry one speaks of linear systems of curves, surfaces, quadrics, etc. These are families of curves, surfaces, etc. of the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \lambda _ {1} F _ {1} + \dots + \lambda _ {m} F _ {m} = 0 , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where the | + | where the $ F _ {i} = 0 $ |
+ | define individual curves, surfaces, etc. If the family is one-dimensional (i.e. through a point in general position passes one member of the family), one speaks of a pencil; a two-dimensional family (i.e. two different members of the family pass through a point in general position) is called a net; and a three- (or higher-) dimensional family is called a web, [[#References|[a1]]]. Instead of "net" the term "bundlebundle" is also occasionally used and instead of "web" one also sometimes finds "net" . | ||
− | Quite generally, if | + | Quite generally, if $ U $ |
+ | is an open subset of $ \mathbf R ^ {n} $, | ||
+ | a codimension $ k $ | ||
+ | $ d $- | ||
+ | web on $ U $ | ||
+ | is defined by $ d $ | ||
+ | foliations of codimension $ k $ | ||
+ | on $ U $ | ||
+ | such that for each $ x \in U $ | ||
+ | the $ d $ | ||
+ | leaves passing through $ x $ | ||
+ | are in general position. Cf. also [[Web|Web]]. Especially in the case of a codimension $ ( n - 1) $ | ||
+ | $ n $- | ||
+ | web, i.e. an $ n $- | ||
+ | web of curves, on $ U \subset \mathbf R ^ {n} $( | ||
+ | same $ n $) | ||
+ | the word [[Net|net]] is often used. | ||
The phrase "linear system" of course also occurs (as an abbreviation) in many other parts of mathematics. E.g. in differential equation theory: for system of linear differential equations, and in control and systems theory: for linear input/output systems, linear dynamical systems or linear control system. | The phrase "linear system" of course also occurs (as an abbreviation) in many other parts of mathematics. E.g. in differential equation theory: for system of linear differential equations, and in control and systems theory: for linear input/output systems, linear dynamical systems or linear control system. |
Latest revision as of 22:17, 5 June 2020
A family of effective linearly equivalent divisors (cf. Divisor (algebraic geometry)) on an algebraic variety, parametrized by projective space.
Let $ X $ be a non-singular algebraic variety over a field $ k $, $ {\mathcal L} $ an invertible sheaf on $ X $, $ \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) $ the space of global sections of $ {\mathcal L} $, and $ L \subset \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) $ a finite-dimensional subspace. If $ \mathop{\rm dim} L > 0 $, then the divisors determined by zero sections of $ L $ are linearly equivalent and effective. A linear system is the projective space $ | L | = P ( L) $ of one-dimensional subspaces of $ L $ that parametrizes these divisors. If $ \mathop{\rm dim} \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) < \infty $, then the linear system $ | \Gamma ( X , {\mathcal L} ) | $ is said to be complete; it is denoted by $ | L | $.
Let $ s _ {0} \dots s _ {n} $ be a basis of $ L $. It defines a rational mapping $ \phi _ {L} : X \rightarrow P ^ {n} $ by the formula
$$ x \mapsto ( s _ {0} ( x) \dots s _ {n} ( x) ) ,\ \ x \in X . $$
One usually says that $ \phi _ {L} $ is defined by the linear system $ | L | $. The image $ \phi _ {L} ( X) $ does not lie in any hyperplane of $ P ^ {n} $( see [2]). Conversely, every rational mapping $ \psi : X \rightarrow P ^ {m} $ having this property is defined by some linear system.
A fixed component of a linear system $ | L | $ is an effective divisor $ D ^ {*} $ on $ X $ such that $ D = D ^ \prime + D ^ {*} $ for any $ D \in | L | $, where $ D ^ \prime $ is an effective divisor. When $ D $ runs through $ | L | $, the divisors $ D ^ \prime $ form a linear system $ | L ^ \prime | $ of the same dimension as $ | L | $. The mapping $ \phi _ {L ^ \prime } $ coincides with $ \phi _ {L} $. Therefore, in considering $ \phi _ {L} $ one may assume that $ | L | $ does not have fixed components. In this case $ \phi _ {L} $ is not defined exactly on the basic set of $ | L | $.
Examples.
1) Let $ X = P ^ {2} $ and $ L = {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) $, $ d \geq 1 $; then the sections of $ \Gamma ( P ^ {2} , {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) ) $ can be identified with forms of degree $ d $ on $ P ^ {2} $, and the complete linear system $ ( {\mathcal O} _ {P ^ {2} } ( d) ) $ can be identified with the set of all curves of order $ d $.
2) The standard quadratic transformation $ \tau : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $( see Cremona transformation) is defined by the linear system of conics passing through the points $ ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) $, $ ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) $, $ ( 1 , 0 , 0 ) $.
3) The Geiser involution $ \alpha : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $ is defined by the linear system of curves of order 8 passing with multiplicity 3 through 7 points in general position (cf. Point in general position).
4) The Bertini involution $ \beta : P ^ {2} \rightarrow P ^ {2} $ is defined by the linear system of curves of order 17 passing with multiplicity 6 through 8 points in general position.
References
[1] | I.R. Shafarevich, "Algebraic surfaces" Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. , 75 (1967) Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. , 75 (1965) MR1392959 MR1060325 Zbl 0830.00008 Zbl 0733.14015 Zbl 0832.14026 Zbl 0509.14036 Zbl 0492.14024 Zbl 0379.14006 Zbl 0253.14006 Zbl 0154.21001 |
[2] | D. Mumford, "Lectures on curves on an algebraic surface" , Princeton Univ. Press (1966) MR0209285 Zbl 0187.42701 |
[3] | O. Zariski, "Algebraic surfaces" , Springer (1971) MR0469915 Zbl 0219.14020 |
Comments
In classical (elementary) projective and analytic geometry one speaks of linear systems of curves, surfaces, quadrics, etc. These are families of curves, surfaces, etc. of the form
$$ \lambda _ {1} F _ {1} + \dots + \lambda _ {m} F _ {m} = 0 , $$
where the $ F _ {i} = 0 $ define individual curves, surfaces, etc. If the family is one-dimensional (i.e. through a point in general position passes one member of the family), one speaks of a pencil; a two-dimensional family (i.e. two different members of the family pass through a point in general position) is called a net; and a three- (or higher-) dimensional family is called a web, [a1]. Instead of "net" the term "bundlebundle" is also occasionally used and instead of "web" one also sometimes finds "net" .
Quite generally, if $ U $ is an open subset of $ \mathbf R ^ {n} $, a codimension $ k $ $ d $- web on $ U $ is defined by $ d $ foliations of codimension $ k $ on $ U $ such that for each $ x \in U $ the $ d $ leaves passing through $ x $ are in general position. Cf. also Web. Especially in the case of a codimension $ ( n - 1) $ $ n $- web, i.e. an $ n $- web of curves, on $ U \subset \mathbf R ^ {n} $( same $ n $) the word net is often used.
The phrase "linear system" of course also occurs (as an abbreviation) in many other parts of mathematics. E.g. in differential equation theory: for system of linear differential equations, and in control and systems theory: for linear input/output systems, linear dynamical systems or linear control system.
References
[a1] | J.A. Todd, "Projective and analytical geometry" , Pitman (1947) pp. Chapt. VI MR1527119 MR0024624 Zbl 0031.06701 |
Linear system. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Linear_system&oldid=47664