Difference between revisions of "Buchberger algorithm"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | b1109801.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 112 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 112 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/B110/B.1100980 Buchberger algorithm | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian ring]] $ R $ | |
+ | is called effective if its elements and ring operations can be described effectively as well as the problem of finding all solutions to a linear equation $ \sum _ {i} a _ {i} x _ {i} = b $ | ||
+ | with $ a _ {i} ,b \in R $ | ||
+ | and unknown $ x _ {i} \in R $( | ||
+ | in terms of a particular solution and a finite set of generators for the module of all homogeneous solutions). Examples are the rings of integers and of rational numbers, algebraic number fields, and finite rings. For such a ring $ R $, | ||
+ | the Buchberger algorithm (cf. [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a4]]]) solves the following problem concerning the polynomial ring $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | in the variables $ {\mathcal X} = \{ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} \} $: | ||
− | + | 1) Provide algorithms turning $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | |
+ | into an effective ring. | ||
− | + | If $ R $ | |
+ | is a [[Field|field]], the algorithm also solves the following two problems: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2) Given a finite set of polynomial equations over $ R $ | ||
+ | in the variables $ {\mathcal X} $, | ||
+ | produce an "upper triangular form" of the equations, thus providing solutions by elimination of variables. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) Given a finite subset $ B $ | ||
+ | of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, | ||
+ | produce an effectively computable $ R $- | ||
+ | linear projection mapping onto a complement in $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | of $ ( B ) $, | ||
+ | the ideal of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | generated by $ B $. | ||
==Monomials.== | ==Monomials.== | ||
− | Denote by | + | Denote by $ {\mathcal M} $ |
+ | the [[Monoid|monoid]] of all monomials of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. | ||
+ | For $ m \in {\mathcal M} $ | ||
+ | there is an $ a \in \mathbf N ^ {n} $ | ||
+ | such that $ m = X ^ {a} = X _ {1} ^ {a _ {1} } \dots X _ {n} ^ {a _ {n} } $. | ||
+ | A total order (cf. also [[Totally ordered set|Totally ordered set]]) on $ {\mathcal M} $ | ||
+ | is called a reduction ordering if, for all $ m,m ^ \prime ,m ^ {\prime \prime } \in {\mathcal M} $, | ||
− | + | $ m \neq 1 $ | |
+ | implies $ 1 < m $; | ||
− | < | + | $ m ^ \prime < m ^ {\prime \prime } $ |
+ | implies $ m m ^ \prime < m m ^ {\prime \prime } $. | ||
− | An important example is the lexicographical ordering (coming from the identification of | + | An important example is the lexicographical ordering (coming from the identification of $ {\mathcal M} $ |
+ | with $ \mathbf N ^ {n} $). | ||
+ | Starting from any reduction ordering $ < $ | ||
+ | and a vector $ c \in \mathbf N $, | ||
+ | a new reduction ordering $ < _ {c} $ | ||
+ | can be obtained by demanding that $ X ^ {a} < X ^ {b} $ | ||
+ | if and only if either $ a \cdot c < b \cdot c $ | ||
+ | or $ a \cdot c = b \cdot c $ | ||
+ | and $ X ^ {a} < X ^ {b} $. | ||
+ | If $ c $ | ||
+ | is the all-one vector, the order refines the partial order by total degree. | ||
− | Termination of the Buchberger algorithm follows from the fact that a reduction ordering on | + | Termination of the Buchberger algorithm follows from the fact that a reduction ordering on $ {\mathcal M} $ |
+ | is well founded. | ||
− | These orderings are used to compare (sets of) polynomials. To single out the highest monomial and coefficient from a non-zero polynomial | + | These orderings are used to compare (sets of) polynomials. To single out the highest monomial and coefficient from a non-zero polynomial $ f \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, |
+ | set | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} = \max \left \{ {m \in {\mathcal M} } : {f _ {m} \neq 0 } \right \} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | { \mathop{\rm lc} } _ {f} = \textrm{ the coefficient of the monomial } { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} \textrm{ of } f, { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} = { \mathop{\rm lc} } _ {f} { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The letters | + | The letters $ { \mathop{\rm lm} } $, |
+ | $ { \mathop{\rm lc} } $, | ||
+ | $ { \mathop{\rm lt} } $ | ||
+ | stand for leading monomial, leading coefficient and leading term, respectively. | ||
==The Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form.== | ==The Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form.== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ R $ |
+ | be a field and $ B $ | ||
+ | a finite subset of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. | ||
+ | Let $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ | ||
+ | denote a remainder of $ f $ | ||
+ | with respect to $ B $, | ||
+ | that is, the result of iteratively replacing $ f $ | ||
+ | by a polynomial of the form $ f - ( { {{ \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } / { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {b} } } ) b $ | ||
+ | with $ b \in B $ | ||
+ | such that $ { {{ \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {b} } \mid { { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} } } $ | ||
+ | as often as possible. This is effective because $ < $ | ||
+ | is well founded. The result is not uniquely determined by $ < $. | ||
+ | Given $ f,g \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, | ||
+ | their $ S $- | ||
+ | polynomial is | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | S ( f,g ) = 0 \textrm{ if } f = 0 \textrm{ or } g = 0, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | S ( f,g ) = { | ||
+ | \frac{ { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {g} }{ { \mathop{\rm gcd} } ( { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} , { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {g} ) } | ||
+ | } f - { | ||
+ | \frac{ { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} }{ { \mathop{\rm gcd} } ( { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} , { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {g} ) } | ||
+ | } g \textrm{ otherwise } . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
The following routine is the Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form. | The following routine is the Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form. | ||
− | + | $ { \mathop{\rm GroebnerBasis} } ( B ) = $ | |
− | + | $ {\mathcal P} = \{ \textrm{ unordered pairs } \textrm{ _ } { } B \} $; | |
− | while | + | |
+ | while $ {\mathcal P} \neq \emptyset $ | ||
+ | do | ||
− | choose | + | choose $ \{ f,g \} \in {\mathcal P} $; |
− | + | $ {\mathcal P} = {\mathcal P} \setminus \{ \{ f,g \} \} $; | |
− | + | $ c = { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B, S ( f,g ) ) $; | |
− | if | + | |
+ | if $ c \neq0 $ | ||
+ | then | ||
− | + | $ {\mathcal P} = {\mathcal P} \cup \{ {\{ b,c \} } : {b \in B } \} $; | |
− | + | $ B = B \cup \{ c \} $; | |
− | fi; | + | |
+ | fi; | ||
− | od; return | + | od; return $ B $. |
− | It terminates because the sequence of consecutive sets | + | It terminates because the sequence of consecutive sets $ \{ { { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {b} } : {b \in B } \} $, |
+ | produced in the course of the algorithm, descends with respect to $ < $. | ||
− | Note that | + | Note that $ ( B ) $ |
+ | is an invariant of the algorithm. Consequently, if $ C $ | ||
+ | is the output resulting from input $ B $, | ||
+ | then $ ( C ) = ( B ) $. | ||
+ | The output $ C $ | ||
+ | has the following characteristic property: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | ( \left \{ { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } : {f \in ( C ) } \right \} ) = ( \left \{ { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } : {f \in C } \right \} ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | A subset | + | A subset $ C $ |
+ | of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | with this property is called a Gröbner basis. Equivalently, a subset $ B $ | ||
+ | of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | is a Gröbner basis if and only if, for all $ f,g \in B $, | ||
+ | one has $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,S ( f,g ) ) =0 $. | ||
− | Suppose that | + | Suppose that $ B $ |
+ | is a Gröbner basis. Then $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ | ||
+ | is uniquely determined for each $ f \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. | ||
+ | A monomial is called standard with respect to an ideal $ I $ | ||
+ | if it is not of the form $ { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} $ | ||
+ | for some $ f \in I $. | ||
+ | The mapping $ f \mapsto { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ | ||
+ | is an effectively computable projection onto the $ R $- | ||
+ | span of all standard monomials with respect to $ ( B ) $, | ||
+ | which is a complement as in Problem 3) above. | ||
− | A reduction ordering < | + | A reduction ordering $ < $ |
+ | with $ X _ {1} < \dots < X _ {n} $ | ||
+ | is called an elimination ordering if $ X _ {i} ^ {j} < X _ {i + 1 } $ | ||
+ | for $ j \in \mathbf N $ | ||
+ | and $ i = 1 \dots n - 1 $. | ||
+ | If $ C $ | ||
+ | is a Gröbner basis with respect to an elimination ordering, then $ ( C ) \cap R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $ | ||
+ | is the ideal of $ R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $ | ||
+ | generated by $ C \cap R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $. | ||
+ | This is the key to solving Problem 2. | ||
− | The Buchberger algorithm can be generalized to arbitrary effective rings | + | The Buchberger algorithm can be generalized to arbitrary effective rings $ R $. |
+ | By keeping track of intermediate results in the algorithms, it is possible to express the Gröbner basis $ C $ | ||
+ | coming from input $ B $ | ||
+ | as an $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $- | ||
+ | linear combination of $ B $. | ||
+ | Using this, one can find a particular solution, as well as a finite generating set for all homogeneous solutions to an $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $- | ||
+ | linear equation, and hence a solution to Problem 1. | ||
− | General introductions to the Buchberger algorithm can be found in [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. More advanced applications can be found in [[#References|[a7]]], which also contains an indication of the badness of the complexity of finding Gröbner bases. Buchberger algorithms over more general coefficient domains | + | General introductions to the Buchberger algorithm can be found in [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. More advanced applications can be found in [[#References|[a7]]], which also contains an indication of the badness of the complexity of finding Gröbner bases. Buchberger algorithms over more general coefficient domains $ R $ |
+ | are dealt with in [[#References|[a8]]], and generalizations from $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ | ||
+ | to particular non-commutative algebras (e.g., the universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra) in [[#References|[a2]]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.W. Adam, P. Loustaunau, "An introduction to Gröbner bases" , ''Graduate Studies in Math.'' , '''3''' , Amer. Math. Soc. and Oxford Univ. Press (1994) {{MR|1287608}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Apel, W. Lassner, "An extension of Buchberger's algorithm and calculations in enveloping fields of Lie algebras" ''J. Symb. Comp.'' , '''6''' (1988) pp. 361–370 {{MR|988423}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Buchberger, "An algorithmic criterion for the solvability of algebraic systems of equations" ''Aequationes Math.'' , '''4''' (1965) pp. 374–383 (This paper is a published version of the author's Ph.D. Thesis (Innsbruck, 1965) under the advice of Prof. W. Gröbner)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Buchberger, "Gröbner bases: an algorithmic method in polynomial ideal theory" N.K. Bose (ed.) , ''Recent Trends in Multidimensional System Theory'' , Reidel (1985) pp. 184–232 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0587.13009}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Cox, J. Little, D. O'Shea, "Ideals, varieties, and algorithms" , Springer (1992) {{MR|1189133}} {{ZBL|0756.13017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Eisenbud, "Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry" , ''GTM'' , '''150''' , Springer (1995) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0819.13001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. (ed.) Robbiano, "Computational aspects of commutative algebra" ''J. Symb. Comp.'' , '''special issue''' (1989) {{MR|1262830}} {{ZBL|0796.00017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Trinks, "Über B. Buchbergers Verfahren, Systeme algebraischer Gleichungen zu lösen" ''J. Number Th.'' , '''10''' (1978) pp. 475–488 {{MR|0515056}} {{ZBL|0404.13004}} </TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.W. Adam, P. Loustaunau, "An introduction to Gröbner bases" , ''Graduate Studies in Math.'' , '''3''' , Amer. Math. Soc. and Oxford Univ. Press (1994) {{MR|1287608}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Apel, W. Lassner, "An extension of Buchberger's algorithm and calculations in enveloping fields of Lie algebras" ''J. Symb. Comp.'' , '''6''' (1988) pp. 361–370 {{MR|988423}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Buchberger, "An algorithmic criterion for the solvability of algebraic systems of equations" ''Aequationes Math.'' , '''4''' (1965) pp. 374–383 (This paper is a published version of the author's Ph.D. Thesis (Innsbruck, 1965) under the advice of Prof. W. Gröbner)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Buchberger, "Gröbner bases: an algorithmic method in polynomial ideal theory" N.K. Bose (ed.) , ''Recent Trends in Multidimensional System Theory'' , Reidel (1985) pp. 184–232 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0587.13009}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Cox, J. Little, D. O'Shea, "Ideals, varieties, and algorithms" , Springer (1992) {{MR|1189133}} {{ZBL|0756.13017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Eisenbud, "Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry" , ''GTM'' , '''150''' , Springer (1995) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0819.13001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. (ed.) Robbiano, "Computational aspects of commutative algebra" ''J. Symb. Comp.'' , '''special issue''' (1989) {{MR|1262830}} {{ZBL|0796.00017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Trinks, "Über B. Buchbergers Verfahren, Systeme algebraischer Gleichungen zu lösen" ''J. Number Th.'' , '''10''' (1978) pp. 475–488 {{MR|0515056}} {{ZBL|0404.13004}} </TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 06:29, 30 May 2020
A Noetherian ring $ R $
is called effective if its elements and ring operations can be described effectively as well as the problem of finding all solutions to a linear equation $ \sum _ {i} a _ {i} x _ {i} = b $
with $ a _ {i} ,b \in R $
and unknown $ x _ {i} \in R $(
in terms of a particular solution and a finite set of generators for the module of all homogeneous solutions). Examples are the rings of integers and of rational numbers, algebraic number fields, and finite rings. For such a ring $ R $,
the Buchberger algorithm (cf. [a3], [a4]) solves the following problem concerning the polynomial ring $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $
in the variables $ {\mathcal X} = \{ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} \} $:
1) Provide algorithms turning $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ into an effective ring.
If $ R $ is a field, the algorithm also solves the following two problems:
2) Given a finite set of polynomial equations over $ R $ in the variables $ {\mathcal X} $, produce an "upper triangular form" of the equations, thus providing solutions by elimination of variables.
3) Given a finite subset $ B $ of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, produce an effectively computable $ R $- linear projection mapping onto a complement in $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ of $ ( B ) $, the ideal of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ generated by $ B $.
Monomials.
Denote by $ {\mathcal M} $ the monoid of all monomials of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. For $ m \in {\mathcal M} $ there is an $ a \in \mathbf N ^ {n} $ such that $ m = X ^ {a} = X _ {1} ^ {a _ {1} } \dots X _ {n} ^ {a _ {n} } $. A total order (cf. also Totally ordered set) on $ {\mathcal M} $ is called a reduction ordering if, for all $ m,m ^ \prime ,m ^ {\prime \prime } \in {\mathcal M} $,
$ m \neq 1 $ implies $ 1 < m $;
$ m ^ \prime < m ^ {\prime \prime } $ implies $ m m ^ \prime < m m ^ {\prime \prime } $.
An important example is the lexicographical ordering (coming from the identification of $ {\mathcal M} $ with $ \mathbf N ^ {n} $). Starting from any reduction ordering $ < $ and a vector $ c \in \mathbf N $, a new reduction ordering $ < _ {c} $ can be obtained by demanding that $ X ^ {a} < X ^ {b} $ if and only if either $ a \cdot c < b \cdot c $ or $ a \cdot c = b \cdot c $ and $ X ^ {a} < X ^ {b} $. If $ c $ is the all-one vector, the order refines the partial order by total degree.
Termination of the Buchberger algorithm follows from the fact that a reduction ordering on $ {\mathcal M} $ is well founded.
These orderings are used to compare (sets of) polynomials. To single out the highest monomial and coefficient from a non-zero polynomial $ f \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, set
$$ { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} = \max \left \{ {m \in {\mathcal M} } : {f _ {m} \neq 0 } \right \} , $$
$$ { \mathop{\rm lc} } _ {f} = \textrm{ the coefficient of the monomial } { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} \textrm{ of } f, { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} = { \mathop{\rm lc} } _ {f} { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} . $$
The letters $ { \mathop{\rm lm} } $, $ { \mathop{\rm lc} } $, $ { \mathop{\rm lt} } $ stand for leading monomial, leading coefficient and leading term, respectively.
The Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form.
Let $ R $ be a field and $ B $ a finite subset of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. Let $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ denote a remainder of $ f $ with respect to $ B $, that is, the result of iteratively replacing $ f $ by a polynomial of the form $ f - ( { {{ \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } / { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {b} } } ) b $ with $ b \in B $ such that $ { {{ \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {b} } \mid { { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} } } $ as often as possible. This is effective because $ < $ is well founded. The result is not uniquely determined by $ < $. Given $ f,g \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $, their $ S $- polynomial is
$$ S ( f,g ) = 0 \textrm{ if } f = 0 \textrm{ or } g = 0, $$
$$ S ( f,g ) = { \frac{ { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {g} }{ { \mathop{\rm gcd} } ( { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} , { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {g} ) } } f - { \frac{ { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} }{ { \mathop{\rm gcd} } ( { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} , { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {g} ) } } g \textrm{ otherwise } . $$
The following routine is the Buchberger algorithm in its simplest form.
$ { \mathop{\rm GroebnerBasis} } ( B ) = $
$ {\mathcal P} = \{ \textrm{ unordered pairs } \textrm{ _ } { } B \} $;
while $ {\mathcal P} \neq \emptyset $
do
choose $ \{ f,g \} \in {\mathcal P} $;
$ {\mathcal P} = {\mathcal P} \setminus \{ \{ f,g \} \} $;
$ c = { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B, S ( f,g ) ) $;
if $ c \neq0 $
then
$ {\mathcal P} = {\mathcal P} \cup \{ {\{ b,c \} } : {b \in B } \} $;
$ B = B \cup \{ c \} $;
fi;
od; return $ B $.
It terminates because the sequence of consecutive sets $ \{ { { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {b} } : {b \in B } \} $, produced in the course of the algorithm, descends with respect to $ < $.
Note that $ ( B ) $ is an invariant of the algorithm. Consequently, if $ C $ is the output resulting from input $ B $, then $ ( C ) = ( B ) $. The output $ C $ has the following characteristic property:
$$ ( \left \{ { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } : {f \in ( C ) } \right \} ) = ( \left \{ { { \mathop{\rm lt} } _ {f} } : {f \in C } \right \} ) . $$
A subset $ C $ of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ with this property is called a Gröbner basis. Equivalently, a subset $ B $ of $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ is a Gröbner basis if and only if, for all $ f,g \in B $, one has $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,S ( f,g ) ) =0 $.
Suppose that $ B $ is a Gröbner basis. Then $ { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ is uniquely determined for each $ f \in R [ {\mathcal X} ] $. A monomial is called standard with respect to an ideal $ I $ if it is not of the form $ { \mathop{\rm lm} } _ {f} $ for some $ f \in I $. The mapping $ f \mapsto { \mathop{\rm Reduce} } ( B,f ) $ is an effectively computable projection onto the $ R $- span of all standard monomials with respect to $ ( B ) $, which is a complement as in Problem 3) above.
A reduction ordering $ < $ with $ X _ {1} < \dots < X _ {n} $ is called an elimination ordering if $ X _ {i} ^ {j} < X _ {i + 1 } $ for $ j \in \mathbf N $ and $ i = 1 \dots n - 1 $. If $ C $ is a Gröbner basis with respect to an elimination ordering, then $ ( C ) \cap R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $ is the ideal of $ R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $ generated by $ C \cap R [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {i} ] $. This is the key to solving Problem 2.
The Buchberger algorithm can be generalized to arbitrary effective rings $ R $. By keeping track of intermediate results in the algorithms, it is possible to express the Gröbner basis $ C $ coming from input $ B $ as an $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $- linear combination of $ B $. Using this, one can find a particular solution, as well as a finite generating set for all homogeneous solutions to an $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $- linear equation, and hence a solution to Problem 1.
General introductions to the Buchberger algorithm can be found in [a1], [a5], [a6]. More advanced applications can be found in [a7], which also contains an indication of the badness of the complexity of finding Gröbner bases. Buchberger algorithms over more general coefficient domains $ R $ are dealt with in [a8], and generalizations from $ R [ {\mathcal X} ] $ to particular non-commutative algebras (e.g., the universal enveloping algebra of a Lie algebra) in [a2].
References
[a1] | W.W. Adam, P. Loustaunau, "An introduction to Gröbner bases" , Graduate Studies in Math. , 3 , Amer. Math. Soc. and Oxford Univ. Press (1994) MR1287608 |
[a2] | J. Apel, W. Lassner, "An extension of Buchberger's algorithm and calculations in enveloping fields of Lie algebras" J. Symb. Comp. , 6 (1988) pp. 361–370 MR988423 |
[a3] | B. Buchberger, "An algorithmic criterion for the solvability of algebraic systems of equations" Aequationes Math. , 4 (1965) pp. 374–383 (This paper is a published version of the author's Ph.D. Thesis (Innsbruck, 1965) under the advice of Prof. W. Gröbner) |
[a4] | B. Buchberger, "Gröbner bases: an algorithmic method in polynomial ideal theory" N.K. Bose (ed.) , Recent Trends in Multidimensional System Theory , Reidel (1985) pp. 184–232 Zbl 0587.13009 |
[a5] | D. Cox, J. Little, D. O'Shea, "Ideals, varieties, and algorithms" , Springer (1992) MR1189133 Zbl 0756.13017 |
[a6] | D. Eisenbud, "Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry" , GTM , 150 , Springer (1995) Zbl 0819.13001 |
[a7] | L. (ed.) Robbiano, "Computational aspects of commutative algebra" J. Symb. Comp. , special issue (1989) MR1262830 Zbl 0796.00017 |
[a8] | W. Trinks, "Über B. Buchbergers Verfahren, Systeme algebraischer Gleichungen zu lösen" J. Number Th. , 10 (1978) pp. 475–488 MR0515056 Zbl 0404.13004 |
Buchberger algorithm. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Buchberger_algorithm&oldid=46170