Difference between revisions of "Adams–Hilton model"
m (link) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | a1103001.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 52 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 52 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/A110/A.1100300 Adams\ANDHilton model | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Pontryagin algebra $ H _ {*} \Omega X $( | ||
+ | cf. also [[Pontryagin invariant|Pontryagin invariant]]; [[Pontryagin class|Pontryagin class]]) of a [[Topological space|topological space]] $ X $ | ||
+ | is an important [[Homotopy|homotopy]] invariant (cf. also [[Homotopy type|Homotopy type]]). It is, in general, quite difficult to calculate the homology $ H _ {*} \Omega X $ | ||
+ | directly from the chain complex $ C _ {*} \Omega X $. | ||
+ | An algorithm that associates to a space $ X $ | ||
+ | a [[differential graded algebra]] whose homology is relatively easy to calculate and isomorphic as an algebra to $ H _ {*} \Omega X $ | ||
+ | is therefore of great value. | ||
In 1955, J.F. Adams and P.J. Hilton invented such an algorithm for the class of simply-connected CW-complexes [[#References|[a1]]]. Presented here in a somewhat more modern incarnation, due to S. Halperin, Y. Félix and J.-C. Thomas [[#References|[a5]]], the work of Adams and Hilton can be summarized as follows. | In 1955, J.F. Adams and P.J. Hilton invented such an algorithm for the class of simply-connected CW-complexes [[#References|[a1]]]. Presented here in a somewhat more modern incarnation, due to S. Halperin, Y. Félix and J.-C. Thomas [[#References|[a5]]], the work of Adams and Hilton can be summarized as follows. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ X $ |
+ | be a [[CW-complex|CW-complex]] such that $ X $ | ||
+ | has exactly one $ 0 $- | ||
+ | cell and no $ 1 $- | ||
+ | cells and such that every attaching mapping is based with respect to the unique $ 0 $- | ||
+ | cell of $ X $. | ||
+ | There exists a morphism of differential graded algebras inducing an isomorphism on homology (a quasi-isomorphism) | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | {\theta _ {X} } : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega X } | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | such that $ \theta _ {X} $ | ||
+ | restricts to quasi-isomorphisms $ ( TV _ {\leq n } ,d ) \rightarrow C _ {*} \Omega X _ {n + 1 } $, | ||
+ | where $ X _ {n + 1 } $ | ||
+ | denotes the $ ( n + 1 ) $- | ||
+ | skeleton of $ X $, | ||
+ | $ TV $ | ||
+ | denotes the free (tensor) algebra on a free graded $ \mathbf Z $- | ||
+ | module $ V $, | ||
+ | and $ \Omega X $ | ||
+ | is the space of Moore loops on $ X $. | ||
+ | The morphism $ \theta _ {X} $ | ||
+ | is called an Adams–Hilton model of $ X $ | ||
+ | and satisfies the following properties. | ||
− | + | $ ( TV,d ) $ | |
+ | is unique up to isomorphism; | ||
− | + | if $ X = * \cup \cup _ {\alpha \in A } e ^ {n _ \alpha + 1 } $, | |
+ | then $ V $ | ||
+ | has a degree-homogeneous basis $ \{ {v _ \alpha } : {\alpha \in A } \} $ | ||
+ | such that $ { \mathop{\rm deg} } v _ \alpha = n ^ \alpha $; | ||
− | + | if $ {f _ \alpha } : {S ^ {n _ \alpha } } \rightarrow {X _ {n _ \alpha } } $ | |
+ | is the attaching mapping of the cell $ e ^ {n _ \alpha + 1 } $, | ||
+ | then $ [ \theta ( dv _ \alpha ) ] = {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } [ f _ \alpha ] $. | ||
+ | Here, $ {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } $ | ||
+ | is defined so that | ||
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | \begin{array}{ccc} | |
+ | \pi _ {n _ \alpha } X _ {n _ \alpha } & \mathop \rightarrow \limits ^ { \approx } &\Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } \\ | ||
+ | {} _ { {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } } \downarrow &{} &\downarrow _ {h} \\ | ||
+ | H _ {n _ \alpha - 1 } \Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } & = &H _ {n _ \alpha - 1 } \Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
− | + | $$ | |
− | commutes, where | + | commutes, where $ h $ |
+ | denotes the Hurewicz homomorphism (cf. [[Homotopy group|Homotopy group]]). | ||
− | The Adams–Hilton model has proved to be a powerful tool for calculating the Pontryagin algebra of CW-complexes. Many common spaces have Adams–Hilton models that are relatively simple and thus well-adapted to computations. For example, with respect to its usual CW-decomposition, the Adams–Hilton model of | + | The Adams–Hilton model has proved to be a powerful tool for calculating the Pontryagin algebra of CW-complexes. Many common spaces have Adams–Hilton models that are relatively simple and thus well-adapted to computations. For example, with respect to its usual CW-decomposition, the Adams–Hilton model of $ \mathbf C P ^ {n} $ |
+ | is $ ( T ( a _ {1} \dots a _ {n} ) ,d ) $, | ||
+ | where $ { \mathop{\rm deg} } a _ {i} = 2i - 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ da _ {i} = \sum _ {j + k = i - 1 } a _ {j} a _ {k} $. | ||
− | Given a cellular mapping | + | Given a cellular mapping $ f : X \rightarrow Y $ |
+ | between CW-complexes, it is possible to use the Adams–Hilton model to compute the induced homomorphism of Pontryagin algebras. If $ {\theta _ {X} } : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega X } $ | ||
+ | and $ {\theta _ {Y} } : {( TW,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega Y } $ | ||
+ | are Adams–Hilton models, then there exists a unique homotopy class of morphisms $ \phi : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {( TW,d ) } $ | ||
+ | such that $ C _ {*} \Omega g \circ \theta _ {X} $ | ||
+ | is homotopic to $ \theta _ {Y} \circ \phi $. | ||
+ | Any representative $ \phi $ | ||
+ | of this homotopy class can be said to be an Adams–Hilton model of $ g $. | ||
+ | In this context, "homotopy" means homotopy in the category of differential graded algebras (see [[#References|[a2]]] or [[#References|[a5]]] for more details). | ||
− | One can say, for example, that an Adams–Hilton model of a cellular co-fibration of CW-complexes, i.e., an inclusion of CW-complexes, is a free extension of differential graded algebras. Furthermore, the Adams–Hilton model of the amalgamated sum of an inclusion of CW-complexes, | + | One can say, for example, that an Adams–Hilton model of a cellular co-fibration of CW-complexes, i.e., an inclusion of CW-complexes, is a free extension of differential graded algebras. Furthermore, the Adams–Hilton model of the amalgamated sum of an inclusion of CW-complexes, $ \iota $, |
+ | and any other cellular mapping $ g $ | ||
+ | is given by the amalgamated sum of the free extension modelling $ \iota $ | ||
+ | and an Adams–Hilton model of $ g $. | ||
Examples of problems to which Adams–Hilton models have been applied to great advantage include the study of the holonomy action in fibrations [[#References|[a4]]] and the study of the effect on the Pontryagin algebra of the attachment of a cell to a CW-complex [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. | Examples of problems to which Adams–Hilton models have been applied to great advantage include the study of the holonomy action in fibrations [[#References|[a4]]] and the study of the effect on the Pontryagin algebra of the attachment of a cell to a CW-complex [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 1 April 2020
The Pontryagin algebra $ H _ {*} \Omega X $(
cf. also Pontryagin invariant; Pontryagin class) of a topological space $ X $
is an important homotopy invariant (cf. also Homotopy type). It is, in general, quite difficult to calculate the homology $ H _ {*} \Omega X $
directly from the chain complex $ C _ {*} \Omega X $.
An algorithm that associates to a space $ X $
a differential graded algebra whose homology is relatively easy to calculate and isomorphic as an algebra to $ H _ {*} \Omega X $
is therefore of great value.
In 1955, J.F. Adams and P.J. Hilton invented such an algorithm for the class of simply-connected CW-complexes [a1]. Presented here in a somewhat more modern incarnation, due to S. Halperin, Y. Félix and J.-C. Thomas [a5], the work of Adams and Hilton can be summarized as follows.
Let $ X $ be a CW-complex such that $ X $ has exactly one $ 0 $- cell and no $ 1 $- cells and such that every attaching mapping is based with respect to the unique $ 0 $- cell of $ X $. There exists a morphism of differential graded algebras inducing an isomorphism on homology (a quasi-isomorphism)
$$ {\theta _ {X} } : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega X } $$
such that $ \theta _ {X} $ restricts to quasi-isomorphisms $ ( TV _ {\leq n } ,d ) \rightarrow C _ {*} \Omega X _ {n + 1 } $, where $ X _ {n + 1 } $ denotes the $ ( n + 1 ) $- skeleton of $ X $, $ TV $ denotes the free (tensor) algebra on a free graded $ \mathbf Z $- module $ V $, and $ \Omega X $ is the space of Moore loops on $ X $. The morphism $ \theta _ {X} $ is called an Adams–Hilton model of $ X $ and satisfies the following properties.
$ ( TV,d ) $ is unique up to isomorphism;
if $ X = * \cup \cup _ {\alpha \in A } e ^ {n _ \alpha + 1 } $, then $ V $ has a degree-homogeneous basis $ \{ {v _ \alpha } : {\alpha \in A } \} $ such that $ { \mathop{\rm deg} } v _ \alpha = n ^ \alpha $;
if $ {f _ \alpha } : {S ^ {n _ \alpha } } \rightarrow {X _ {n _ \alpha } } $ is the attaching mapping of the cell $ e ^ {n _ \alpha + 1 } $, then $ [ \theta ( dv _ \alpha ) ] = {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } [ f _ \alpha ] $. Here, $ {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } $ is defined so that
$$ \begin{array}{ccc} \pi _ {n _ \alpha } X _ {n _ \alpha } & \mathop \rightarrow \limits ^ { \approx } &\Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } \\ {} _ { {\mathcal K} _ {n _ \alpha } } \downarrow &{} &\downarrow _ {h} \\ H _ {n _ \alpha - 1 } \Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } & = &H _ {n _ \alpha - 1 } \Omega X _ {n _ \alpha } \\ \end{array} $$
commutes, where $ h $ denotes the Hurewicz homomorphism (cf. Homotopy group).
The Adams–Hilton model has proved to be a powerful tool for calculating the Pontryagin algebra of CW-complexes. Many common spaces have Adams–Hilton models that are relatively simple and thus well-adapted to computations. For example, with respect to its usual CW-decomposition, the Adams–Hilton model of $ \mathbf C P ^ {n} $ is $ ( T ( a _ {1} \dots a _ {n} ) ,d ) $, where $ { \mathop{\rm deg} } a _ {i} = 2i - 1 $ and $ da _ {i} = \sum _ {j + k = i - 1 } a _ {j} a _ {k} $.
Given a cellular mapping $ f : X \rightarrow Y $ between CW-complexes, it is possible to use the Adams–Hilton model to compute the induced homomorphism of Pontryagin algebras. If $ {\theta _ {X} } : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega X } $ and $ {\theta _ {Y} } : {( TW,d ) } \rightarrow {C _ {*} \Omega Y } $ are Adams–Hilton models, then there exists a unique homotopy class of morphisms $ \phi : {( TV,d ) } \rightarrow {( TW,d ) } $ such that $ C _ {*} \Omega g \circ \theta _ {X} $ is homotopic to $ \theta _ {Y} \circ \phi $. Any representative $ \phi $ of this homotopy class can be said to be an Adams–Hilton model of $ g $. In this context, "homotopy" means homotopy in the category of differential graded algebras (see [a2] or [a5] for more details).
One can say, for example, that an Adams–Hilton model of a cellular co-fibration of CW-complexes, i.e., an inclusion of CW-complexes, is a free extension of differential graded algebras. Furthermore, the Adams–Hilton model of the amalgamated sum of an inclusion of CW-complexes, $ \iota $, and any other cellular mapping $ g $ is given by the amalgamated sum of the free extension modelling $ \iota $ and an Adams–Hilton model of $ g $.
Examples of problems to which Adams–Hilton models have been applied to great advantage include the study of the holonomy action in fibrations [a4] and the study of the effect on the Pontryagin algebra of the attachment of a cell to a CW-complex [a3], [a6].
References
[a1] | J.F. Adams, P.J. Hilton, "On the chain algebra of a loop space" Comment. Math. Helv. , 30 (1955) pp. 305–330 |
[a2] | D.J. Anick, "Hopf algebras up to homotopy" J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 2 (1989) pp. 417–453 |
[a3] | Y. Félix, J.-M. Lemaire, "On the Pontrjagin algebra of the loops on a space with a cell attached" Internat. J. Math. , 2 (1991) |
[a4] | Y. Félix, J.-C. Thomas, "Module d'holonomie d'une fibration" Bull. Soc. Math. France , 113 (1985) pp. 255–258 |
[a5] | S. Halperin, Y. Félix, J.-C. Thomas, "Rational homotopy theory" , Univ. Toronto (1996) (Preprint) |
[a6] | K. Hess, J.-M- Lemaire, "Nice and lazy cell attachments" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 112 (1996) pp. 29–39 |
Adams–Hilton model. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Adams%E2%80%93Hilton_model&oldid=45020