Difference between revisions of "Distributive lattice"
(links) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | d0335701.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 39 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 39 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/D033/D.0303570 Distributive lattice | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
A [[lattice]] in which the [[distributive law]] | A [[lattice]] in which the [[distributive law]] | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | ( a + b ) c = a c + b c | ||
+ | $$ | ||
holds. This equation is equivalent to the dual distributive law | holds. This equation is equivalent to the dual distributive law | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | a b + c = ( a + c ) ( b + c ) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
and to the property | and to the property | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | ( a + b ) ( a + c ) ( b + c ) = a b + a c + b c . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Distributive lattices are characterized by the fact that all their convex sublattices can occur as congruence classes. Any distributive lattice is isomorphic to a lattice of (not necessarily all) subsets of some set. An important special case of such lattices are Boolean algebras (cf. [[Boolean algebra|Boolean algebra]]). For any finite set | + | Distributive lattices are characterized by the fact that all their convex sublattices can occur as congruence classes. Any distributive lattice is isomorphic to a lattice of (not necessarily all) subsets of some set. An important special case of such lattices are Boolean algebras (cf. [[Boolean algebra|Boolean algebra]]). For any finite set $ I $ |
+ | in a distributive lattice the following equalities are valid: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | a \sum _ {i \in I } b _ {i} = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {i \in I } a b _ {i} $$ | ||
and | and | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | a + \prod _ {i \in I } b _ {i} = \prod _ | ||
+ | {i \in I } ( a + b _ {i} ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
as well as | as well as | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \prod _ {i \in I } \sum _ {j \in J ( i) } | ||
+ | a _ {ij} = \sum _ {\phi \in \Phi } \prod _ {i \in I } | ||
+ | a _ {i \phi ( i) } | ||
+ | $$ | ||
and | and | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \sum _ {i \in I } \prod _ {j \in J ( i) } | ||
+ | a _ {ij} = \prod _ {\phi \in \Phi } \sum _ {i \in I } | ||
+ | a _ {i \phi ( i) } . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Here the | + | Here the $ J ( i) $ |
+ | are finite sets and $ \Phi $ | ||
+ | is the set of all single-valued functions $ \phi $ | ||
+ | from $ I $ | ||
+ | into $ \cup J ( i) $ | ||
+ | such $ \phi ( i) \in J ( i) $ | ||
+ | for each $ i \in I $. | ||
+ | In a complete lattice the above equations also have a meaning if the sets $ I $ | ||
+ | and $ J ( i) $ | ||
+ | are infinite. However, they do not follow from the distributive law. Distributive complete lattices (cf. [[Complete lattice]]) which satisfy the two last-mentioned identities for all sets $ I $ | ||
+ | and $ J ( i) $ | ||
+ | are called completely distributive. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
Line 35: | Line 78: | ||
<TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Grätzer, "General lattice theory" , Birkhäuser (1978) (Original: Lattice theory. First concepts and distributive lattices. Freeman, 1978)</TD></TR> | <TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Grätzer, "General lattice theory" , Birkhäuser (1978) (Original: Lattice theory. First concepts and distributive lattices. Freeman, 1978)</TD></TR> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The distributive property of lattices may be characterized by the presence of enough prime filters: A lattice | + | The distributive property of lattices may be characterized by the presence of enough prime filters: A lattice $ A $ |
+ | is distributive if and only if its prime filters separate its points, or, equivalently, if, given $ a \leq b $ | ||
+ | in $ A $, | ||
+ | there exists a lattice homomorphism $ f : A \rightarrow \{ 0 , 1 \} $ | ||
+ | with $ f ( a) = 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ f ( b) = 0 $, | ||
+ | [[#References|[a1]]]. In the study of distributive lattices, their topological representation plays an important role; this was first established by M.H. Stone [[#References|[a2]]], and reformulated in more convenient terms by H.A. Priestley [[#References|[a3]]] — both versions generalize the Stone duality for Boolean algebras (cf. also [[Stone space|Stone space]]). To describe Priestley's version, let $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ | ||
+ | denote the set of prime filters of a distributive lattice $ A $, | ||
+ | partially ordered by inclusion and topologized by declaring the sets | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | U ( a) = \{ {X \in \mathop{\rm spec} A } : {x \in X } \} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | and their complements to be subbasic open sets. Then the assignment | + | and their complements to be subbasic open sets. Then the assignment $ a \mapsto U ( a) $ |
+ | is a lattice-isomorphism from $ A $ | ||
+ | to the set of clopen (i.e. closed and open) subsets of $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ | ||
+ | which are upward closed in the partial order. Moreover, the partially ordered spaces which occur as $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ | ||
+ | for some $ A $ | ||
+ | are precisely the compact spaces in which, given $ x \leq y $, | ||
+ | there exists a clopen upward-closed set containing $ x $ | ||
+ | but not $ y $— | ||
+ | such spaces are sometimes called Priestley spaces. Note that a Priestley space $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ | ||
+ | is discretely ordered if and only if every prime filter of $ A $ | ||
+ | is maximal, if and only if $ A $ | ||
+ | is a Boolean algebra. Other important classes of distributive lattices can similarly be characterized by order-theoretic and/or topological properties of their Priestley spaces (see [[#References|[a4]]]). | ||
In addition to the general references [[#References|[1]]]–[[#References|[3]]] above, [[#References|[a5]]] may also be recommended as a general account of distributive lattice theory. | In addition to the general references [[#References|[1]]]–[[#References|[3]]] above, [[#References|[a5]]] may also be recommended as a general account of distributive lattice theory. |
Latest revision as of 19:36, 5 June 2020
A lattice in which the distributive law
$$ ( a + b ) c = a c + b c $$
holds. This equation is equivalent to the dual distributive law
$$ a b + c = ( a + c ) ( b + c ) $$
and to the property
$$ ( a + b ) ( a + c ) ( b + c ) = a b + a c + b c . $$
Distributive lattices are characterized by the fact that all their convex sublattices can occur as congruence classes. Any distributive lattice is isomorphic to a lattice of (not necessarily all) subsets of some set. An important special case of such lattices are Boolean algebras (cf. Boolean algebra). For any finite set $ I $ in a distributive lattice the following equalities are valid:
$$ a \sum _ {i \in I } b _ {i} = \ \sum _ {i \in I } a b _ {i} $$
and
$$ a + \prod _ {i \in I } b _ {i} = \prod _ {i \in I } ( a + b _ {i} ) , $$
as well as
$$ \prod _ {i \in I } \sum _ {j \in J ( i) } a _ {ij} = \sum _ {\phi \in \Phi } \prod _ {i \in I } a _ {i \phi ( i) } $$
and
$$ \sum _ {i \in I } \prod _ {j \in J ( i) } a _ {ij} = \prod _ {\phi \in \Phi } \sum _ {i \in I } a _ {i \phi ( i) } . $$
Here the $ J ( i) $ are finite sets and $ \Phi $ is the set of all single-valued functions $ \phi $ from $ I $ into $ \cup J ( i) $ such $ \phi ( i) \in J ( i) $ for each $ i \in I $. In a complete lattice the above equations also have a meaning if the sets $ I $ and $ J ( i) $ are infinite. However, they do not follow from the distributive law. Distributive complete lattices (cf. Complete lattice) which satisfy the two last-mentioned identities for all sets $ I $ and $ J ( i) $ are called completely distributive.
References
[1] | G. Birkhoff, "Lattice theory" , Colloq. Publ. , 25 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) |
[2] | L.A. Skornyakov, "Elements of lattice theory" , Hindushtan Publ. Comp. (1977) (Translated from Russian) |
[3] | G. Grätzer, "General lattice theory" , Birkhäuser (1978) (Original: Lattice theory. First concepts and distributive lattices. Freeman, 1978) |
Comments
The distributive property of lattices may be characterized by the presence of enough prime filters: A lattice $ A $ is distributive if and only if its prime filters separate its points, or, equivalently, if, given $ a \leq b $ in $ A $, there exists a lattice homomorphism $ f : A \rightarrow \{ 0 , 1 \} $ with $ f ( a) = 1 $ and $ f ( b) = 0 $, [a1]. In the study of distributive lattices, their topological representation plays an important role; this was first established by M.H. Stone [a2], and reformulated in more convenient terms by H.A. Priestley [a3] — both versions generalize the Stone duality for Boolean algebras (cf. also Stone space). To describe Priestley's version, let $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ denote the set of prime filters of a distributive lattice $ A $, partially ordered by inclusion and topologized by declaring the sets
$$ U ( a) = \{ {X \in \mathop{\rm spec} A } : {x \in X } \} $$
and their complements to be subbasic open sets. Then the assignment $ a \mapsto U ( a) $ is a lattice-isomorphism from $ A $ to the set of clopen (i.e. closed and open) subsets of $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ which are upward closed in the partial order. Moreover, the partially ordered spaces which occur as $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ for some $ A $ are precisely the compact spaces in which, given $ x \leq y $, there exists a clopen upward-closed set containing $ x $ but not $ y $— such spaces are sometimes called Priestley spaces. Note that a Priestley space $ \mathop{\rm spec} A $ is discretely ordered if and only if every prime filter of $ A $ is maximal, if and only if $ A $ is a Boolean algebra. Other important classes of distributive lattices can similarly be characterized by order-theoretic and/or topological properties of their Priestley spaces (see [a4]).
In addition to the general references [1]–[3] above, [a5] may also be recommended as a general account of distributive lattice theory.
For completely distributive lattices see Completely distributive lattice.
References
[a1] | G. Birkhoff, "On the combination of subalgebras" Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. , 29 (1933) pp. 441–464 |
[a2] | M.H. Stone, "Topological representation of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics" Časopis Pešt. Mat. Fys. , 67 (1937) pp. 1–25 |
[a3] | H.A. Priestley, "Ordered topological spaces and the representation of distributive lattices" Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 24 (1972) pp. 507–530 |
[a4] | H.A. Priestley, "Ordered sets and duality for distributive lattices" , Orders: Description and Roles , Ann. Discrete Math. , 23 , North-Holland (1984) pp. 39–60 |
[a5] | R. Balbes, P. Dwinger, "Distributive lattices" , Univ. Missouri Press (1974) |
Distributive lattice. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Distributive_lattice&oldid=37637