Difference between revisions of "Exact endomorphism"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | e0367301.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 22 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 22 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/E036/E.0306730 Exact endomorphism | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | Exact endomorphisms have strong ergodic properties analogous to those of | + | ''of a Lebesgue space $ ( X , \mu ) $'' |
+ | |||
+ | An endomorphism $ T $ | ||
+ | of $ ( X , \mu ) $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Metric isomorphism|Metric isomorphism]]) such that the only [[Measurable decomposition|measurable decomposition]] $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $ | ||
+ | that is coarser $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $ | ||
+ | than all $ T ^ {-} n \epsilon $, | ||
+ | where $ \epsilon $ | ||
+ | is the decomposition into points, is the trivial decomposition with as only element all of $ X $. | ||
+ | An equivalent definition is: There is no measurable decomposition that is invariant (in older terminology — totally invariant) under $ T $( | ||
+ | i.e. is such that $ T ^ {-} 1 \xi = \xi $ | ||
+ | $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $). | ||
+ | Examples of such endomorphisms are a one-sided Bernoulli shift and an [[Expanding mapping|expanding mapping]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Exact endomorphisms have strong ergodic properties analogous to those of $ K $- | ||
+ | systems (to which they are related: there is a construction associating an automorphism to some endomorphism — its natural extension; for an exact endomorphism the latter is a $ K $- | ||
+ | automorphism). Cf. [[K-system(2)| $ K $- | ||
+ | system]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.A. Rokhlin, "Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space" ''Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.'' , '''25''' : 4 (1961) pp. 499–530 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd, S.V. Fomin, Ya.G. Sinai, "Ergodic theory" , Springer (1982) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.A. Rokhlin, "Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space" ''Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat.'' , '''25''' : 4 (1961) pp. 499–530 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd, S.V. Fomin, Ya.G. Sinai, "Ergodic theory" , Springer (1982) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Instead of "(measurable) decomposition" one also uses (measurable) partition. | Instead of "(measurable) decomposition" one also uses (measurable) partition. | ||
− | The usual definition is as follows: An [[Endomorphism|endomorphism]] | + | The usual definition is as follows: An [[Endomorphism|endomorphism]] $ T $ |
+ | of a [[Lebesgue space|Lebesgue space]] $ ( X , \mu ) $ | ||
+ | is said to be exact whenever $ \cap _ {n=} 0 ^ \infty T ^ {-} n {\mathcal B} = {\mathcal N} $, | ||
+ | where $ {\mathcal B} $ | ||
+ | is the given $ \sigma $- | ||
+ | algebra of $ ( X , \mu ) $ | ||
+ | and $ {\mathcal N} $ | ||
+ | is the $ \sigma $- | ||
+ | algebra of subsets of measure 0 or 1. For a proof that expanding mappings are exact with respect to some measure, see e.g. [[#References|[a1]]], Sect. III.1. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Mañé, "Ergodic theory and differentiable dynamics" , Springer (1987)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Mañé, "Ergodic theory and differentiable dynamics" , Springer (1987)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 5 June 2020
of a Lebesgue space $ ( X , \mu ) $
An endomorphism $ T $ of $ ( X , \mu ) $( cf. Metric isomorphism) such that the only measurable decomposition $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $ that is coarser $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $ than all $ T ^ {-} n \epsilon $, where $ \epsilon $ is the decomposition into points, is the trivial decomposition with as only element all of $ X $. An equivalent definition is: There is no measurable decomposition that is invariant (in older terminology — totally invariant) under $ T $( i.e. is such that $ T ^ {-} 1 \xi = \xi $ $ \mathop{\rm mod} 0 $). Examples of such endomorphisms are a one-sided Bernoulli shift and an expanding mapping.
Exact endomorphisms have strong ergodic properties analogous to those of $ K $- systems (to which they are related: there is a construction associating an automorphism to some endomorphism — its natural extension; for an exact endomorphism the latter is a $ K $- automorphism). Cf. $ K $- system.
References
[1] | V.A. Rokhlin, "Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space" Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. , 25 : 4 (1961) pp. 499–530 (In Russian) |
[2] | I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd, S.V. Fomin, Ya.G. Sinai, "Ergodic theory" , Springer (1982) (Translated from Russian) |
Comments
Instead of "(measurable) decomposition" one also uses (measurable) partition.
The usual definition is as follows: An endomorphism $ T $ of a Lebesgue space $ ( X , \mu ) $ is said to be exact whenever $ \cap _ {n=} 0 ^ \infty T ^ {-} n {\mathcal B} = {\mathcal N} $, where $ {\mathcal B} $ is the given $ \sigma $- algebra of $ ( X , \mu ) $ and $ {\mathcal N} $ is the $ \sigma $- algebra of subsets of measure 0 or 1. For a proof that expanding mappings are exact with respect to some measure, see e.g. [a1], Sect. III.1.
References
[a1] | R. Mañé, "Ergodic theory and differentiable dynamics" , Springer (1987) |
Exact endomorphism. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Exact_endomorphism&oldid=15428