Difference between revisions of "Conformal invariants"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018026.png" /></td> </tr></table> | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018026.png" /></td> </tr></table> | ||
− | on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018027.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018028.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018029.png" /> is the signature of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018030.png" />. A manifold is (locally) conformally flat if it is locally conformally equivalent to a flat manifold; the modifier | + | on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018027.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018028.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018029.png" /> is the signature of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018030.png" />. A manifold is (locally) conformally flat if it is locally conformally equivalent to a flat manifold; the modifier "locally" is a tacit part of the definition, normally omitted. Clearly, conformally flat manifolds have no non-trivial conformal invariants. |
For any smooth manifold <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018031.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018032.png" /> be the ring of smooth real-valued functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018033.png" /> (regarded as an algebra over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018034.png" />), let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018035.png" /> be the usual <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018036.png" />-module of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018037.png" />-forms over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018038.png" />, and for any <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018039.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018040.png" /> denote the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018041.png" />-fold tensor product <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018042.png" /> over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018043.png" />. In particular, the non-degenerate symmetric form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018044.png" /> of a Riemannian manifold will be regarded as a symmetric element of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018045.png" />, as above. The conformal invariance condition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018046.png" /> is entirely local, so that one may as well assume that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018047.png" /> is itself an open set in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018048.png" />. One finds that the signature is of little interest in the construction of conformal invariants, since strategically placed <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018049.png" /> signs turn constructions for the strictly Riemannian case <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018050.png" /> into corresponding constructions for the general case. Hence the existence of conformal invariants depends only on the dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018051.png" />. | For any smooth manifold <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018031.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018032.png" /> be the ring of smooth real-valued functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018033.png" /> (regarded as an algebra over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018034.png" />), let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018035.png" /> be the usual <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018036.png" />-module of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018037.png" />-forms over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018038.png" />, and for any <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018039.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018040.png" /> denote the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018041.png" />-fold tensor product <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018042.png" /> over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018043.png" />. In particular, the non-degenerate symmetric form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018044.png" /> of a Riemannian manifold will be regarded as a symmetric element of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018045.png" />, as above. The conformal invariance condition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018046.png" /> is entirely local, so that one may as well assume that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018047.png" /> is itself an open set in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018048.png" />. One finds that the signature is of little interest in the construction of conformal invariants, since strategically placed <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018049.png" /> signs turn constructions for the strictly Riemannian case <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018050.png" /> into corresponding constructions for the general case. Hence the existence of conformal invariants depends only on the dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c12018051.png" />. | ||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Bach, "Zur Weylschen Relativitätstheorie und der Weylschen Erweiterung des Krümmungstensorbegriffs" ''Math. Z.'' , '''9''' (1921) pp. 110–135 (Also: Jahrbuch 48, 1035) {{MR|1544454}} {{ZBL|48.1035.01}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.N. Bailey, M.G. Eastwood, C.R. Graham, "Invariant theory for conformal and CR geometry" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''139''' : 2 (1994) pp. 491–552 {{MR|1283869}} {{ZBL|0814.53017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> T.N. Bailey, A.R. Gover, "Exceptional invariants in the parabolic invariant theory of conformal geometry" ''Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''123''' (1995) pp. 2535–2543 {{MR|1243161}} {{ZBL|0844.53008}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.S. Chern, "An elementary proof of the existence of isothermal parameters on a surface" ''Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''6''' (1955) pp. 771–782 {{MR|0074856}} {{ZBL|0066.15402}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.S. Chern, "On a conformal invariant of three-dimensional manifolds" , ''Aspects of Math. and its Appl.'' , North-Holland (1986) pp. 245–252 {{MR|0849555}} {{ZBL|0589.53011}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.S. Chern, J. Simons, "Characteristic forms and geometric invariants" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''99''' (1974) pp. 48–69 {{MR|0353327}} {{ZBL|0283.53036}} {{ZBL|0591.53050}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Cotton, "Sur les variétes à trois dimensions" ''Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse'' , '''1''' (1899) pp. 385–438 (Also: Jahrbuch 30, 538-539) {{MR|1508211}} {{ZBL|30.0538.01}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Fefferman, C.R. Graham, "Conformal invariants" , ''The Mathematical Heritage of Élie Cartan (Lyon, 1984)'' , ''Astérisque'' (1985) pp. 95–116 {{MR|0837196}} {{ZBL|0602.53007}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Korn, "Zwei Anwendungen der Methode der sukzessiven Anwendungen" ''Schwarz Festschrift'' (1914) pp. 215–229 (Also: Jahrbuch 45, 568) {{MR|}} {{ZBL|45.0568.01}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Lichtenstein, "Zur Theorie der konformen Abbildungen nichtanalytischer, singularitätenfreier Flächenstücke auf ebene Gebiete" ''Bull. Internat. Acad. Sci. Gracovie, Cl. Sci. Math. Nat. Ser. A.'' (1916) pp. 192–217 (Also: Jahrbuch 46, 547)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Osborn, "Affine connection complexes" ''Acta Applic. Math.'' (to appear) {{MR|1741659}} {{ZBL|0956.53014}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a12]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.A. Schouten, "Über die konforme Abbildung <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c120/c120180/c120180509.png" />-dimensionaler Mannigfaltigkeiten mit quadratischer Maß bestimmung auf eine Mannigfaltigkeit mit euklidischer Maß bestimmung" ''Math. Z.'' , '''11''' (1921) pp. 58–88 (Also: Jahrbuch 48, 857-858)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a13]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.A. Schouten, J. Haantjes, "Beitgräge zur allgemeinen (gekrümmten) konformen Differentialgeometrie I–II" ''Math. Ann.'' , '''112/113''' (1936) pp. 594–629; 568–583</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a14]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Weyl, "Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie" ''Math. Z.'' , '''2''' (1918) pp. 384–411 (Also: Jahrbuch 46, 1301) {{MR|1544327}} {{ZBL|46.1301.01}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a15]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Weyl, "The classical groups" , Princeton Univ. Press (1939) (Reprint: 1946) {{MR|0000255}} {{ZBL|0020.20601}} {{ZBL|65.0058.02}} </TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 10:54, 1 April 2012
Let be any Riemannian manifold, consisting of a smooth manifold
and a non-degenerate symmetric form
on the tangent bundle of
, not necessarily positive-definite. By definition, for any strictly positive smooth function
the Riemannian manifold
is conformally equivalent to
(cf. also Conformal mapping), and a tensor
(cf. also Tensor analysis) constructed from
and its covariant derivatives is a conformal invariant if and only if for some fixed weight
the tensor
is independent of
. The tensor
is itself a trivial conformal invariant of weight
, and the dimension of
and signature of
can be regarded as trivial conformal invariants, of weight
. However, there are many non-trivial conformal invariants of Riemannian manifolds of dimension
, and non-trivial scalar conformal invariants have been the subject of much recent work, sketched below. One can also extend the definition to include conformal invariants that are not tensors; these will not be considered below.
An -dimensional Riemannian manifold
is flat in a neighbourhood
of a point
if there are coordinate functions
,
such that
![]() |
![]() |
on , where
and
is the signature of
. A manifold is (locally) conformally flat if it is locally conformally equivalent to a flat manifold; the modifier "locally" is a tacit part of the definition, normally omitted. Clearly, conformally flat manifolds have no non-trivial conformal invariants.
For any smooth manifold , let
be the ring of smooth real-valued functions
(regarded as an algebra over
), let
be the usual
-module of
-forms over
, and for any
, let
denote the
-fold tensor product
over
. In particular, the non-degenerate symmetric form
of a Riemannian manifold will be regarded as a symmetric element of
, as above. The conformal invariance condition
is entirely local, so that one may as well assume that
is itself an open set in
. One finds that the signature is of little interest in the construction of conformal invariants, since strategically placed
signs turn constructions for the strictly Riemannian case
into corresponding constructions for the general case. Hence the existence of conformal invariants depends only on the dimension
.
In the next few paragraphs the discussion of conformal invariants is organized by dimension ; at the end the discussion centres exclusively on recent work concerning scalar conformal invariants for the cases
.
Dimension one.
Any -dimensional Riemannian manifold
is trivially conformally flat, so that there are no non-trivial conformal invariants in dimension
.
Dimension two.
If is a Riemannian manifold of dimension
, let
![]() |
![]() |
in some neighbourhood of any point . The question of conformal flatness of
breaks into two cases, as follows.
i) If the usual method of factoring
into a product of two linear homogeneous factors leads to a product
of linearly independent
-forms, whose symmetric part is
. Since
, there are smooth functions
,
,
,
in a neighbourhood of
such that
and
, so that
. By setting
and
, one then has
in a neighbourhood of
; hence
is conformally flat.
ii) The case is the classical problem of finding isothermal coordinates for a Riemann surface, first solved by C.F. Gauss in a more restricted setting. More recent treatments of the same problem are given in [a9], [a10], [a4]; these results are easily adapted to the smooth case to show that any (smooth) Riemannian surface
with a positive-definite (or negative-definite) metric
is conformally flat. It follows from i) and ii) that there are no non-trivial conformal invariants in dimension
.
Dimension at least three.
Some classical conformal invariants in dimensions are as follows (their constructions will be sketched later):
In 1899, E. Cotton [a7] assigned a tensor to any Riemannian manifold
of any dimension
; it is conformally invariant of weight
only in the special case
, and J.A. Schouten [a12] showed that in this case
is conformally flat if and only if
.
In 1918, H. Weyl [a14] constructed a tensor for any Riemannian manifold
of dimension
, conformally invariant of weight
for all dimensions
although it vanishes identically for
. Schouten [a12] showed that a Riemannian manifold
of dimension
is conformally flat if and only if
, and
is now known as the Weyl curvature tensor (cf. also Weyl tensor).
The remaining classical tensor was constructed by R. Bach [a1] in 1921; although
exists in any dimension
, it is conformally invariant, of weight
, only for Riemannian manifolds
of dimension
, and in this dimension
if and only if
is conformally equivalent to an Einstein manifold (see below).
Algebraic background.
The primarily algebraic background needed to describe these three classical conformal invariants is also needed to sketch the more recent construction of the scalar conformal invariants, mentioned earlier. Let be any commutative ring with unit that is also an algebra over the real numbers; the ring
will later be
for a smooth manifold
. Let
be an
-module, let
, let
, and assume that the natural homomorphism from
to its double dual
is an isomorphism
; the
-module
will later be the
-module of
-forms on
, and
will be the
-module of smooth vector fields on
. As before, for any
let
denote the
-fold tensor product over
, later the
-module of contravariant tensors of degree
over
.
If is the
-module isomorphism that interchanges the two factors
, an element
is symmetric if
. Let
be the submodule of symmetric elements; it consists of
-linear combinations of products of the form
. One can regard any
as a homomorphism
, so that there is an induced homomorphism
such that
for any
. The isomorphism
permits one to regard
as a homomorphism
, and
is non-degenerate if
is an isomorphism. In this case the inverse
provides a unique element
that can be regarded as a homomorphism
with values
for any
. One easily verifies that
is itself non-degenerate.
For any , let
be an unordered pair of distinct elements in
and let
be non-degenerate. Then one can evaluate
on the tensor product
of the
th and
th factors of
to obtain a well-defined
-linear contraction
. The symmetry of
guarantees that
does not require an ordering of
. Similarly, if
is any unordered subset of
, there is a well-defined
-linear contraction
, where
.
An element is alternating if
, and there is a submodule
that consists of all such alternating elements. If
is the ring
for a Riemannian manifold
, and if
is the
-module of
-forms on
, then the classical Riemannian curvature tensor of
(cf. also Curvature tensor; Riemann tensor) is a symmetric element
, for the submodule
; a construction is sketched below. The corresponding Ricci curvature is the contraction
, and the corresponding scalar curvature is the contraction
. In case
is of dimension
, there is a nameless tensor
![]() |
that is used to construct all three classical conformal invariants.
The construction of the Weyl curvature tensor uses a
-module homomorphism from the submodule
to the submodule of symmetric elements in
. If
, let
be the isomorphism that permutes the
th factor
in
to the left of the first
factors
in
, so that
is cyclic in the usual sense that
, and
simply places the first factor into the
th slot; in particular,
is the identity, and
interchanges the first two factors as before. For any
, set
![]() |
By looking at the special cases , for any
and
, one obtains
![]() |
![]() |
these cases induce the announced homomorphism .
For any Riemannian manifold of dimension
, the Weyl curvature tensor is the difference
, which is a non-trivial conformal invariant of weight
whenever
. Although the principal feature of
is that
if and only if the Riemannian manifold
of dimension
is conformally flat, it also provides a basic tool for constructing other conformal invariants for manifolds of dimensions
. For example, for any
, let
be the tensor product of
copies of
, and let
as unordered sets. Then the contraction
![]() |
is a non-trivial scalar conformal invariant of weight
for any Riemannian manifold
of dimension
.
The curvatures ,
,
, and the tensor
assigned to any Riemannian manifold
are all constructed via the Levi-Civita connection associated to
, defined below, so that
depends implicitly upon the Levi-Civita connection. The remaining classical conformal invariants
and
, for Riemannian manifolds of dimensions
and
, respectively, as well as most of the scalar conformal invariants that will be introduced below, will be constructed explicitly via a version of the Levi-Civita connection that is sketched in the next two paragraphs; more details of this version appear in [a11].
Levi-Civita connection.
For any smooth manifold with
-module
of
-forms as before, a connection (cf. also Connections on a manifold) is a sequence of real linear homomorphisms
such that the complex
covers the classical de Rham complex
(cf. also Differential form); that is, the diagram
![]() |
commutes for the usual projections from tensor products to exterior products over
, where
is the quotient of
by the two-sided ideal generated by
. Furthermore, if
and if
is the permutation with parity
that moves the
st factor
to the left of the first
factors
, then
![]() |
![]() |
for any and
; the product rule is
![]() |
for . It follows that the covering
of
also preserves products. If
is a Riemannian manifold, with metric
as usual, there is a unique connection
such that
; this is the Levi-Civita connection associated to
(cf. also Levi-Civita connection).
One useful property of any connection for any smooth manifold
is that for any
the composition
![]() |
is -linear, where
interchanges the first two factors
of
and
is the identity isomorphism; for any
the homomorphism
is the curvature operator
. In particular, for any Riemannian manifold
and corresponding Levi-Civita connection, the tensor product of
and the identity isomorphism
restricts to a
-linear mapping
, and the image
of the metric
itself is the Riemannian curvature tensor
, lying in the submodule
.
Even though the Levi-Civita connection of a Riemannian manifold
is defined in part by the requirement that
for the Riemannian metric
, observe that the definition
of the Riemannian curvature is obtained by applying the curvature operator
only to the first factor of
. Consequently,
,
,
, and
all require the first two derivatives of
, in the obvious sense. The same remark applies to the Weyl curvature tensor
.
Cotton tensor.
Let be any Riemannian manifold of dimension
, with
as before, let
![]() |
be the Levi-Civita connection, which restricts to , and let
be the cyclic permutation of the factors
that moves the third factor
to the left of the first two factors
. The Cotton tensor is
![]() |
which visibly depends on third derivatives of ; this is equivalent to the original definition of E. Cotton [a7], and it has the evident cyclic symmetry
. Furthermore,
is a conformal invariant if
is of dimension
, and Schouten [a12] showed in this case that
if and only if
is conformally flat, as noted earlier.
Closed oriented
-dimensional Riemannian manifolds.
If one considers closed oriented -dimensional Riemannian manifolds
, the Chern–Simons invariant
is shown in [a6] to depend only on the conformal equivalence class
of
, and
is a critical value if and only if
is conformally flat. S.S. Chern [a5] gave a simplified proof of this result by using the criterion
of the preceding paragraph.
Bach tensor.
For any Riemannian manifold of dimension
, the Bach tensor is
![]() |
![]() |
for the Levi-Civita connection
![]() |
one easily verifies that the Bach tensor is an element of . It is conformally invariant only in the special case
, and in that case one has
if and only if
is conformally equivalent to a Riemannian manifold
such that the Ricci curvature
is a constant multiple of the metric
itself. Riemannian manifolds with the latter property are known as Einstein manifolds.
Recall that for any the contractions
![]() |
![]() |
of the -fold tensor product of the Weyl curvature tensor
are scalar conformal invariants of weight
, and observe that any
-linear combination of such contractions is also a scalar conformal invariant of weight
. Such scalar conformal invariants involve the Riemannian metric
and its first and second order derivatives. However, the derivative
is not itself conformally invariant if
, so that in general one cannot expect contractions of products
to produce conformal invariants if
. The following observations suggest a reasonable modification of the construction.
First, observe that if and
are Riemannian manifolds for which there is an embedding
with
, then any scalar conformal invariant of
restricts to the corresponding scalar conformal invariant of
. Since the construction of conformal invariants is an entirely local question, it suffices to consider embeddings of open sets
into open sets
, for example. The hypotheses can be weakened if the conformal equivalence class of
has a real-analytic representative with coordinates
. One can then assign a coordinate
and use power series about
to describe the Riemannian metric
of an embedding, knowing that only the restrictions of the derivatives
to the submanifold
are of any interest, the inclusion being
![]() |
The second observation is a classical result, not directly related to conformal invariants. Given any Riemannian manifold , with Levi-Civita connection
and Riemannian curvature
, if
is an even number, then the contractions
involve derivatives of
of order up to
; furthermore, such contractions are visibly coordinate-free. Results in [a15] imply that if
is locally real-analytic, then any coordinate-free polynomial combination of
and the components of the derivatives
is a
-linear combination of such contractions, which are known as Weyl invariants.
The third observation is that if is a Ricci-flat Riemannian manifold, in the sense that
, then
so that
; in this case the Riemannian curvature tensor itself is a classical conformal invariant:
. Even though one cannot expect the derivatives
nor contractions of products of such derivatives to be conformal invariants, the identifications
suggest that the contractions
may be of value in the Ricci-flat case, whenever
is an even number.
General construction of scalar conformal invariants.
The preceding observations lead to a general construction of scalar conformal invariants of , with a dimensional restriction that will be specified later. One first covers
by sufficiently small coordinate neighbourhoods
and writes
for each resulting Riemannian manifold
. For each
C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham [a8] use a technique that appeared independently in [a13] to introduce a codimension-
embedding
, described later, and to devise a Cauchy problem whose solution provides a Ricci-flat manifold
with
. A further feature of the construction guarantees that any Weyl invariant in
restricts to a conformal invariant of
, of weight
. Since
-linear combinations of scalar conformal invariants of weight
are also scalar conformal invariants of weight
, for any fixed
-tuple
of non-negative integers with an even sum one can use a smooth partition of unity subordinate to the covering of
by the coordinate neighbourhoods
to obtain a scalar conformal invariant of
itself, known as a Weyl conformal invariant.
T.N. Bailey, M.G. Eastwood and Graham [a2] completed the proof of the following Fefferman–Graham conjecture [a8], which depends upon the parity of : If
is a Riemannian manifold of odd dimension
, then every scalar conformal invariant of
is a Weyl conformal invariant. If
is a Riemannian manifold of even dimension
, then the preceding statement is true only for scalar conformal invariants of weight
, and there is a conformally invariant element in
of weight
that serves as an obstruction to finding a formal power series solution of the Cauchy problems used to construct the ambient manifolds
; the obstruction vanishes if
is conformally equivalent to an Einstein manifold; if
the obstruction is the Bach conformal invariant
.
There are some exceptional scalar conformal invariants for even dimensions and weight
, first observed in [a2]; the catalogue of all such exceptional invariants was completed in [a3].
Fefferman–Graham method.
This method, introduced in [a8], allows one to construct the codimension- embeddings
of the Riemannian manifolds
, and to formulate the Cauchy problems whose solutions turn each ambient space
into a Ricci-flat manifold
with the desired properties.
One starts with the fibration over in which the fibre over each
consists of positive multiples
of the metric
at
; one may as well suppose that
. The multiplicative group
of real numbers
acts on the fibres by mapping
into
, and this permits one to regard the fibration as a fibre bundle with structure group
(cf. also Principal fibre bundle). Clearly, any section of the fibre bundle can be regarded as a Riemannian manifold that is conformally equivalent to
.
Let be the corresponding principal fibre bundle, and observe that since
, the pullback
of the metric
over
needs at least one additional term to serve as a Riemannian metric over
. It is useful to replace
by another
-bundle
with
, and to try to construct a (non-degenerate) metric
on
such that
1) the restriction is
;
2) the group elements map
into
over all of
;
3) is Ricci-flat, with the consequence
noted earlier. There is an implicit additional assumption, that the conformal equivalence class containing
is real-analytic in the sense that there is a representative
of the conformal class of
for which one can choose coordinates
in
such that
, for coefficients
that are real-analytic functions of
; one may as well assume that
itself has this property.
The Fefferman–Graham method [a8] leads to a metric of the form
![]() |
![]() |
that satisfies 1)–3) for all (
), for real-analytic functions
of
that satisfy the initial condition 1),
as formal power series about
; convergence is obtained in some neighbourhood of
. Observe that the metric
trivially satisfies the homogeneity condition 2) over all of
. The Riemannian curvature
is itself conformally invariant by the consequence
of condition 3), and the homogeneity condition implies that any Weyl invariant
restricts over the section
of
to a Weyl conformal invariant in
, as required.
References
[a1] | R. Bach, "Zur Weylschen Relativitätstheorie und der Weylschen Erweiterung des Krümmungstensorbegriffs" Math. Z. , 9 (1921) pp. 110–135 (Also: Jahrbuch 48, 1035) MR1544454 Zbl 48.1035.01 |
[a2] | T.N. Bailey, M.G. Eastwood, C.R. Graham, "Invariant theory for conformal and CR geometry" Ann. of Math. , 139 : 2 (1994) pp. 491–552 MR1283869 Zbl 0814.53017 |
[a3] | T.N. Bailey, A.R. Gover, "Exceptional invariants in the parabolic invariant theory of conformal geometry" Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 123 (1995) pp. 2535–2543 MR1243161 Zbl 0844.53008 |
[a4] | S.S. Chern, "An elementary proof of the existence of isothermal parameters on a surface" Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 6 (1955) pp. 771–782 MR0074856 Zbl 0066.15402 |
[a5] | S.S. Chern, "On a conformal invariant of three-dimensional manifolds" , Aspects of Math. and its Appl. , North-Holland (1986) pp. 245–252 MR0849555 Zbl 0589.53011 |
[a6] | S.S. Chern, J. Simons, "Characteristic forms and geometric invariants" Ann. of Math. , 99 (1974) pp. 48–69 MR0353327 Zbl 0283.53036 Zbl 0591.53050 |
[a7] | E. Cotton, "Sur les variétes à trois dimensions" Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse , 1 (1899) pp. 385–438 (Also: Jahrbuch 30, 538-539) MR1508211 Zbl 30.0538.01 |
[a8] | C. Fefferman, C.R. Graham, "Conformal invariants" , The Mathematical Heritage of Élie Cartan (Lyon, 1984) , Astérisque (1985) pp. 95–116 MR0837196 Zbl 0602.53007 |
[a9] | A. Korn, "Zwei Anwendungen der Methode der sukzessiven Anwendungen" Schwarz Festschrift (1914) pp. 215–229 (Also: Jahrbuch 45, 568) Zbl 45.0568.01 |
[a10] | L. Lichtenstein, "Zur Theorie der konformen Abbildungen nichtanalytischer, singularitätenfreier Flächenstücke auf ebene Gebiete" Bull. Internat. Acad. Sci. Gracovie, Cl. Sci. Math. Nat. Ser. A. (1916) pp. 192–217 (Also: Jahrbuch 46, 547) |
[a11] | H. Osborn, "Affine connection complexes" Acta Applic. Math. (to appear) MR1741659 Zbl 0956.53014 |
[a12] | J.A. Schouten, "Über die konforme Abbildung ![]() |
[a13] | J.A. Schouten, J. Haantjes, "Beitgräge zur allgemeinen (gekrümmten) konformen Differentialgeometrie I–II" Math. Ann. , 112/113 (1936) pp. 594–629; 568–583 |
[a14] | H. Weyl, "Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie" Math. Z. , 2 (1918) pp. 384–411 (Also: Jahrbuch 46, 1301) MR1544327 Zbl 46.1301.01 |
[a15] | H. Weyl, "The classical groups" , Princeton Univ. Press (1939) (Reprint: 1946) MR0000255 Zbl 0020.20601 Zbl 65.0058.02 |
Conformal invariants. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Conformal_invariants&oldid=13909