Difference between revisions of "Kontsevich integral"
m (convert png to latex) |
(details) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
1) The real numbers $t_\text{min}$ and $t_\text{max}$ are the minimum and the maximum of the function $t$ on $K$. | 1) The real numbers $t_\text{min}$ and $t_\text{max}$ are the minimum and the maximum of the function $t$ on $K$. | ||
− | 2) The integration domain $T$ is the $m$-dimensional simplex $t _ { \operatorname { min } } | + | 2) The integration domain $T$ is the $m$-dimensional simplex $t _ { \operatorname { min } } < t _ { 1 } < \ldots < t _ { m } < t _ { \operatorname { max } }$ divided by the critical values into a certain number of connected components; $T = \{ ( t _ { 1 } , \dots , t _ { m } ) : t _ { \operatorname { min } } < t _ { 1 } < \ldots < t _ { m } < t _ { \operatorname { max } } ,\; t_{j} \text{non critical} \}$. |
3) The number of summands in the integrand is constant in each connected component of the integration domain, but can be different for different components. Each plane $\{ t = t _ { j } \} \subset \mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ intersects the knot $K$ in some number, say $n_j$, of points. The numbers $n_j$ are constants if $( t _ { 1 } , \dots , t _ { m } )$ belongs to a fixed connected component of the integration domain, but in general they can be different for different components. Choose one of $\left( \begin{array} { c } { n_j } \\ { 2 } \end{array} \right)$ unordered pairs of distinct points $( z _ { j } , t _ { j } )$ and $( z _ { j } ^ { \prime } , t _ { j } )$ on $\{ t = t_j \} \cup K$ for each $j$. Denote by $P = \{ ( z _ { j } , z _ { j } ^ { \prime } ) \}$ a set of such pairs for all $j = 1 , \ldots , m$. The integrand is the sum over all choices $P$. | 3) The number of summands in the integrand is constant in each connected component of the integration domain, but can be different for different components. Each plane $\{ t = t _ { j } \} \subset \mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ intersects the knot $K$ in some number, say $n_j$, of points. The numbers $n_j$ are constants if $( t _ { 1 } , \dots , t _ { m } )$ belongs to a fixed connected component of the integration domain, but in general they can be different for different components. Choose one of $\left( \begin{array} { c } { n_j } \\ { 2 } \end{array} \right)$ unordered pairs of distinct points $( z _ { j } , t _ { j } )$ and $( z _ { j } ^ { \prime } , t _ { j } )$ on $\{ t = t_j \} \cup K$ for each $j$. Denote by $P = \{ ( z _ { j } , z _ { j } ^ { \prime } ) \}$ a set of such pairs for all $j = 1 , \ldots , m$. The integrand is the sum over all choices $P$. | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
<tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> V.A. Vassiliev, "Theory of singularities and its applications" V.I. Arnol'd) (ed.) , ''Advances in Soviet Math.'' , '''1''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1990) pp. 23 –69</td></tr> | <tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> V.A. Vassiliev, "Theory of singularities and its applications" V.I. Arnol'd) (ed.) , ''Advances in Soviet Math.'' , '''1''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1990) pp. 23 –69</td></tr> | ||
<tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top"> D. Bar-Natan, S. Garoufalidis, L. Rozansky, D. Thurston, "Wheels, wheeling, and the Kontsevich integral of the unknot" ''preprint'' , '''March''' (1997) pp. q–alg/9703025 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0964.57010}} </td></tr></table> | <tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top"> D. Bar-Natan, S. Garoufalidis, L. Rozansky, D. Thurston, "Wheels, wheeling, and the Kontsevich integral of the unknot" ''preprint'' , '''March''' (1997) pp. q–alg/9703025 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|0964.57010}} </td></tr></table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{OldImage}} |
Latest revision as of 19:05, 23 January 2024
An integral giving the universal Vassiliev knot invariant. Any Vassiliev knot invariant [a6] can be derived from it. The integral is defined for a knot $K$ (cf. also Knot theory) embedded in the three-dimensional space $ \mathbf{R} ^ { 3 } = \mathbf{C} _ { z } \times \mathbf{R} _ { t }$ in such a way that the coordinate $t$ is a Morse function on $K$ (all critical points are non-degenerate and all critical levels are different). Its values belong to the graded completion $\overline{\mathcal{A}}$ of the algebra of chord diagrams $\mathcal{A}$ defined below.
The Kontsevich integral $Z ( K )$ is an iterated integral given by the formula:
\begin{equation*} \sum _ { m = 0 } ^ { \infty } \frac { 1 } { ( 2 \pi i ) ^ { m } } \int _ { T } \sum _ { P = \{ ( z _ { j } , z _ { j } ^ { \prime } ) \} } ( - 1 ) ^ { \downarrow } D _ { P } \bigwedge _ { j = 1 } ^ { m } \frac { d z _ { j } - d z _ { j } ^ { \prime } } { z _ { j } - z _ { j } ^ { \prime } }. \end{equation*}
The ingredients of this formula are as follows:
1) The real numbers $t_\text{min}$ and $t_\text{max}$ are the minimum and the maximum of the function $t$ on $K$.
2) The integration domain $T$ is the $m$-dimensional simplex $t _ { \operatorname { min } } < t _ { 1 } < \ldots < t _ { m } < t _ { \operatorname { max } }$ divided by the critical values into a certain number of connected components; $T = \{ ( t _ { 1 } , \dots , t _ { m } ) : t _ { \operatorname { min } } < t _ { 1 } < \ldots < t _ { m } < t _ { \operatorname { max } } ,\; t_{j} \text{non critical} \}$.
3) The number of summands in the integrand is constant in each connected component of the integration domain, but can be different for different components. Each plane $\{ t = t _ { j } \} \subset \mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ intersects the knot $K$ in some number, say $n_j$, of points. The numbers $n_j$ are constants if $( t _ { 1 } , \dots , t _ { m } )$ belongs to a fixed connected component of the integration domain, but in general they can be different for different components. Choose one of $\left( \begin{array} { c } { n_j } \\ { 2 } \end{array} \right)$ unordered pairs of distinct points $( z _ { j } , t _ { j } )$ and $( z _ { j } ^ { \prime } , t _ { j } )$ on $\{ t = t_j \} \cup K$ for each $j$. Denote by $P = \{ ( z _ { j } , z _ { j } ^ { \prime } ) \}$ a set of such pairs for all $j = 1 , \ldots , m$. The integrand is the sum over all choices $P$.
4) For a pairing $P$ the symbol $\downarrow$ denotes the number of points $( z _ { j } , t _ { j } )$ or $( z _ { j } ^ { \prime } , t _ { j } )$ in $P$ where the coordinate $t$ decreases along the orientation of $K$.
5) Fix a pairing $P$. Consider the knot $K$ as an oriented circle and connect the points $( z _ { j } , t _ { j } )$ and $( z _ { j } ^ { \prime } , t _ { j } )$ by a chord. One obtains a chord diagram with $m$ chords. The corresponding element of the algebra $\mathcal{A}$ is denoted by $D _ { P }$. The algebra of chord diagrams $\mathcal{A}$ is the graded algebra $\mathcal{A} = \mathcal{A} _ { 0 } \oplus \mathcal{A} _ { 1 } \oplus \ldots$. The linear space $\mathcal{A} _ { m }$ is generated over $\mathbf{C}$ by all chord diagrams with $m$ chords considered modulo the relations of the following two types:
One-term relations:
Figure: k120100a
(here and below, the dotted arcs suggest that there might be further chords attached to their points, while on the solid portions of the circle all the endpoints are explicitly shown); and
Four-term relations:
Figure: k120100b
for an arbitrary fixed position of $( n - 2 )$ chords (which are not drawn here) and the two additional chords positioned as shown in the picture.
The multiplication in $\mathcal{A}$ is defined by the connected sum of chord diagrams, which is well-defined thanks to the four-term relations. In fact $\mathcal{A}$ is even a Hopf algebra but the co-multiplication is not needed here.
6) Over each connected component, $z_j$ and $z _ { j } ^ { \prime }$ are smooth functions in $t_j$. With some abuse of notation,
\begin{equation*} \bigwedge _ { j = 1 } ^ { m } \frac { d z _ { j } - d z _ { j } ^ { \prime } } { z _ { j } - z _ { j } ^ { \prime } } \end{equation*}
is to be interpreted as the pullback of this form to the integration domain of variables $t _ { 1 } , \ldots , t _ { m }$. The integration domain is considered with the positive orientation of the space $\mathbf{R} ^ { m }$ defined by the natural order of the coordinates $t _ { 1 } , \ldots , t _ { m }$.
7) By convention, the term in the Kontsevich integral corresponding to $m = 0$ is the (only) chord diagram of order $0$ (without chords) with coefficient one. It represents the unit of the algebra $\mathcal{A}$.
The Kontsevich integral is convergent thanks to the one-term relations. It is invariant under deformations of a knot $K$ in the class of Morse knots. Unfortunately, the Kontsevich integral is not invariant under deformations that change the number of critical points of the function $t$. However, the following formula shows how the integral changes under such deformations:
Figure: k120100c
Here, the first and the third pictures depict an arbitrary knot, differing only in the fragment shown, while the second picture represents the unknot embedded in $\mathbf{R} ^ { 3 }$ in the specified way and the product is the product in the completed algebra $\overline{\mathcal{A}}$ of chord diagrams. The last equality allows one to define the universal Vassiliev invariant by the formula
Figure: k120100d
Here, $c$ denotes the number of critical points of $K$ and the quotient means division in the algebra $\overline{\mathcal{A}}$:
\begin{equation*} ( 1 + a ) ^ { - 1 } = 1 - a + a ^ { 2 } - a ^ { 3 } +\dots . \end{equation*}
The universal Vassiliev invariant $\tilde{Z} ( K )$ is invariant under an arbitrary deformation of $K$.
Consider a function $w$ on the set of chord diagrams with $m$ chords satisfying one- and four-term relations. Applying this function to the universal Vassiliev invariant $w ( \widetilde{Z} ( K ) )$, one obtains a numerical knot invariant. This invariant will be a Vassiliev invariant of order $m$ and any Vassiliev invariant can be obtained in this way. The Kontsevich integral is extremely complicated. For a long time even the Kontsevich integral of the unknot
Figure: k120100e
was unknown. The conjecture about it appeared only recently [a7]. D. Bar-Natan, T. Le and D. Thurston proved the conjecture but the preprint is still in preparation (1999).
The Kontsevich integral behaves in a nice way with respect to the natural operations on knots, such as mirror reflection, changing the orientation of the knot, and mutation of knots. It is multiplicative under the connected sum of knots (because it is a group-like element in the Hopf algebra $\overline{\mathcal{A}}$). The claim that the coefficients of $Z ( K )$ are rational, [a5], was proved in [a4].
The Kontsevich integral was invented by M. Kontsevich [a5]. See [a1], [a2], [a3] for detailed expositions of the relevant theory.
References
[a1] | V.I. Arnol'd, "Vassiliev's theory of discriminants and knots" , First European Congress of Mathematicians (Paris) , Birkhäuser (1992) pp. 3–29 Zbl 0869.57006 |
[a2] | D. Bar-Natan, "On the Vassiliev knot invariants" Topology , 34 (1995) pp. 423–472 Zbl 0898.57001 |
[a3] | S.V. Chmutov, S.V. Duzhin, "The Kontsevich integral" Acta Applic. Math. (to appear) (available via anonymous ftp: pier.botik.ru, file: pub/local/zmr/ki.ps.gz) MR1837618 Zbl 0980.57006 |
[a4] | T.Q.T. Le, J. Murakami, "The universal Vassiliev-Kontsevich invariant for framed oriented links" Compositio Math. , 102 (1996) pp. 42–64 MR1394520 Zbl 0851.57007 |
[a5] | M. Kontsevich, "Vassiliev's knot invariants" Adv. Soviet Math. , 16 (1993) pp. 137–150 MR1237836 |
[a6] | V.A. Vassiliev, "Theory of singularities and its applications" V.I. Arnol'd) (ed.) , Advances in Soviet Math. , 1 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1990) pp. 23 –69 |
[a7] | D. Bar-Natan, S. Garoufalidis, L. Rozansky, D. Thurston, "Wheels, wheeling, and the Kontsevich integral of the unknot" preprint , March (1997) pp. q–alg/9703025 Zbl 0964.57010 |
Kontsevich integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Kontsevich_integral&oldid=52853