Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Noetherian ring"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
m (tex encoded by computer)
(latex details)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
''left (right)''
 
''left (right)''
  
A [[Ring|ring]] $ A $
+
A [[ring]] $A$ satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions:
satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions:
 
  
1) $ A $
+
1) $A$ is a left (or right) [[Noetherian module]] over itself;
is a left (or right) [[Noetherian module|Noetherian module]] over itself;
 
  
2) every left (or right) ideal in $ A $
+
2) every left (or right) ideal in $A$ has a finite generating set;
has a finite generating set;
 
  
3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in  $ A $
+
3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in  $A$
 
breaks off after finitely many terms.
 
breaks off after finitely many terms.
  
Line 29: Line 26:
 
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions).
 
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions).
  
A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let $ A $
+
A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let $A$
 
be the ring of matrices of the form
 
be the ring of matrices of the form
  
Line 42: Line 39:
  
 
where  $  a $
 
where  $  a $
is a rational integer and $ \alpha $
+
is a rational integer and $\alpha$
and $ \beta $
+
and $\beta$
are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then $ A $
+
are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then $A$
 
is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form
 
is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form
  
Line 60: Line 57:
 
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian.
 
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian.
  
If $ A $
+
If $A$
is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring $ A [ X ] $.  
+
is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring $A[X]$.  
The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form  $ K [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $
+
The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form  $K[X_{1} \dots X _ {n}] $
 
or  $  \mathbf Z [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $,  
 
or  $  \mathbf Z [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $,  
where  $ K $
+
where  $K$
is a field and $ \mathbf Z $
+
is a field and $\mathbf Z$
the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $
+
the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every [[Artinian ring]] is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring $A$
relative to some multiplicative system $ S $
+
relative to some multiplicative system $S$
is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $,  
+
is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring $A$,  
 
$  \mathfrak m $
 
$  \mathfrak m $
 
is an ideal such that no element of the form  $  1 + m $,  
 
is an ideal such that no element of the form  $  1 + m $,  
 
where  $  m \in \mathfrak m $,  
 
where  $  m \in \mathfrak m $,  
is a divisor of zero, then  $  \cap _ {k=} 1 ^  \infty  \mathfrak m  ^ {k} = 0 $.  
+
is a divisor of zero, then  $  \cap _ {k=1}  ^  \infty  \mathfrak m  ^ {k} = 0 $.  
 
This means that any such ideal  $  \mathfrak m $
 
This means that any such ideal  $  \mathfrak m $
 
defines on  $  A $
 
defines on  $  A $
Line 79: Line 76:
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden,   "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer  (1967–1971)  (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang,   "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley  (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith,   "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer  (1973)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer  (1967–1971)  (Translated from German)</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley  (1974)</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer  (1973)</TD></TR>
 +
</table>

Latest revision as of 18:51, 3 April 2024


left (right)

A ring $A$ satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions:

1) $A$ is a left (or right) Noetherian module over itself;

2) every left (or right) ideal in $A$ has a finite generating set;

3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in $A$ breaks off after finitely many terms.

An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator.

Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions).

A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let $A$ be the ring of matrices of the form

$$ \left \| \begin{array}{cc} a &\alpha \\ 0 &\beta \\ \end{array} \right \| , $$

where $ a $ is a rational integer and $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then $A$ is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form

$$ \left \| \begin{array}{cc} 0 &\alpha \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right \| $$

does not have a finite generating set.

Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian.

If $A$ is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring $A[X]$. The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form $K[X_{1} \dots X _ {n}] $ or $ \mathbf Z [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $, where $K$ is a field and $\mathbf Z$ the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every Artinian ring is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring $A$ relative to some multiplicative system $S$ is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring $A$, $ \mathfrak m $ is an ideal such that no element of the form $ 1 + m $, where $ m \in \mathfrak m $, is a divisor of zero, then $ \cap _ {k=1} ^ \infty \mathfrak m ^ {k} = 0 $. This means that any such ideal $ \mathfrak m $ defines on $ A $ a separable $ \mathfrak m $- adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined.

References

[1] B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , 1–2 , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German)
[2] S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)
[3] C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , 1 , Springer (1973)
How to Cite This Entry:
Noetherian ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Noetherian_ring&oldid=49490
This article was adapted from an original article by L.V. Kuz'min (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article