Difference between revisions of "Weil cohomology"
m (→References: latexify) |
(latex details) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{TEX|done}} | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | Cohomology of algebraic varieties with coefficients in a field of characteristic zero, with formal properties required to obtain the [[Lefschetz formula|Lefschetz formula]] for the number of fixed points. The necessity for such a theory was pointed out by A. Weil [[#References|[1]]], who showed that the rationality of the [[ | + | Cohomology of algebraic varieties with coefficients in a field of characteristic zero, with formal properties required to obtain the [[Lefschetz formula|Lefschetz formula]] for the number of fixed points. The necessity for such a theory was pointed out by A. Weil [[#References|[1]]], who showed that the rationality of the [[zeta-function]] and L - |
function of a variety over a finite field follow from the Lefschetz formula, whereas the remaining hypotheses about the zeta-function can naturally be formulated in cohomological terms. Let the variety X | function of a variety over a finite field follow from the Lefschetz formula, whereas the remaining hypotheses about the zeta-function can naturally be formulated in cohomological terms. Let the variety X | ||
be a projective smooth connected scheme over a fixed algebraically closed field k | be a projective smooth connected scheme over a fixed algebraically closed field k | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | H ^ {i} ( X) \times H ^ {2n-} | + | H ^ {i} ( X) \times H ^ {2n-i} ( X) \rightarrow H ^ {2n} ( X) , |
$$ | $$ | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | \langle u \cdot \Delta \rangle = \ | + | \langle u \cdot \Delta \rangle = \sum_{i=0}^ { 2n } (- 1) ^ {i} \mathop{\rm Tr} ( u _ {i} ) |
$$ | $$ | ||
Latest revision as of 08:12, 21 January 2024
Cohomology of algebraic varieties with coefficients in a field of characteristic zero, with formal properties required to obtain the Lefschetz formula for the number of fixed points. The necessity for such a theory was pointed out by A. Weil [1], who showed that the rationality of the zeta-function and L -
function of a variety over a finite field follow from the Lefschetz formula, whereas the remaining hypotheses about the zeta-function can naturally be formulated in cohomological terms. Let the variety X
be a projective smooth connected scheme over a fixed algebraically closed field k
and let K
be a field of characteristic zero. Then Weil cohomology with coefficient field K
is a contravariant functor X \rightarrow H ^ {*} ( X)
from the category of varieties into the category of finite-dimensional graded anti-commutative K -
algebras, which satisfies the following conditions:
1) If n= { \mathop{\rm dim} } ( X) , then H ^ {2n} ( X) is isomorphic to K , and the mapping
H ^ {i} ( X) \times H ^ {2n-i} ( X) \rightarrow H ^ {2n} ( X) ,
defined by the multiplication in H ^ {*} ( X) , is non-degenerate for all i ;
2) H ^ {*} ( X) \otimes _ {K} H ^ {*} ( Y) \widetilde \rightarrow H ^ {*} ( X \times Y) ( Künneth formula);
3) Mapping of cycles. There exists a functorial homomorphism \gamma _ {X} from the group C ^ {p} ( X) of algebraic cycles in X of codimension p into H ^ {2p} ( X) which maps the direct product of cycles to the tensor product and is non-trivial in the sense that, for a point P , \gamma _ {P} becomes the canonical imbedding of \mathbf Z into K . The number
b _ {i} ( X) = \mathop{\rm dim} _ {K} H ^ {i} ( X)
is known as the i - th Betti number of the variety X .
Examples. If k = \mathbf C , classical cohomology of complex manifolds with coefficients in \mathbf C is a Weil cohomology. If l is a prime number distinct from the characteristic of the field k , then étale l - adic cohomology
X \mapsto \left [ \lim\limits _ {\\vec{nu} } H _ {et} ^ {*} ( X, \mathbf Z / l ^ \nu \mathbf Z ) \right ] \otimes _ {\mathbf Z _ {l} } \mathbf Q _ {l}
is a Weil cohomology with coefficients in the field \mathbf Q _ {l} .
The Lefschetz formula
\langle u \cdot \Delta \rangle = \sum_{i=0}^ { 2n } (- 1) ^ {i} \mathop{\rm Tr} ( u _ {i} )
is valid for Weil cohomology. In the above formula, \langle u \cdot \Delta \rangle is the intersection index in X \times X of the graph \Gamma of the morphism u : X \rightarrow X with the diagonal \Delta \subset X \times X , which may also be interpreted as the number of fixed points of the endomorphism u , while { \mathop{\rm Tr} } ( u _ {i} ) is the trace of the endomorphism u _ {i} which is induced by u in H ^ {i} ( X) . Moreover, this formula is also valid for correspondences, i.e. elements u \in H ^ {2n} ( X \times X) .
References
[1] | A. Weil, "Numbers of solutions of equations in finite fields" Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 55 (1949) pp. 497–508 MR0029393 Zbl 0032.39402 |
[2] | S.L. Kleiman, "Algebraic cycles and the Weil conjectures" A. Grothendieck (ed.) J. Giraud (ed.) et al. (ed.), Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas , North-Holland & Masson (1968) pp. 359–386 MR0292838 Zbl 0198.25902 |
[a1] | A. Grothendieck, "The cohomology theory of abstract algebraic varieties" J.A. Todd (ed.) , Proc. Internat. Congress Mathematicians (Edinburgh, 1958) , Cambridge Univ. Press (1960) pp. 103–118 MR0130879 Zbl 0119.36902 |
[a2] | A. Grothendieck, I. Bucur, C. Honzel, L. Illusie, J.-P. Jouanolou, J.-P. Serre, "Cohomologie \ell-adique et fonctions L. SGA 5" , Lect. notes in math. , 589 , Springer (1977) MR491704 |
[a3] | J.S. Milne, "Etale cohomology" , Princeton Univ. Press (1980) MR0559531 Zbl 0433.14012 |
[a4] | E. Freitag, R. Kiehl, "Étale cohomology and the Weil conjecture" , Springer (1988) MR0926276 Zbl 0643.14012 |
[a5] | R. Hartshorne, "Algebraic geometry" , Springer (1977) pp. 272 MR0463157 Zbl 0367.14001 |
Weil cohomology. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Weil_cohomology&oldid=53648