Difference between revisions of "Poincaré return theorem"
(Importing text file) |
(latex details) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | p0731001.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 78 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 78 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/P073/P.0703100 Poincar\Aee return theorem | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
One of the basic theorems in the general theory of dynamical systems with an [[Invariant measure|invariant measure]] (cf. also [[Ergodic theory|Ergodic theory]]). | One of the basic theorems in the general theory of dynamical systems with an [[Invariant measure|invariant measure]] (cf. also [[Ergodic theory|Ergodic theory]]). | ||
Let the motion of a system be described by the differential equations | Let the motion of a system be described by the differential equations | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
− | + | \frac{d x _ {i} }{dt} | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | X _ {i} ( x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} ) ,\ i = 1 \dots n , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | where the single-valued functions $ X _ {i} ( x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} ) $ | |
+ | satisfy the condition | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \sum _ {i=1} ^ { n } \frac{\partial ( M X _ {i} ) }{\partial x _ {i} } | ||
+ | = 0 ,\ \ | ||
+ | M > 0 , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | so that equations (1) admit a positive [[integral invariant]] | |
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | \int\limits _ { V } M d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | It is also assumed that if there exists a certain domain $ V $ | |
+ | of finite volume such that if a moving point $ P $ | ||
+ | with coordinates $ x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} $ | ||
+ | is found inside $ V $ | ||
+ | at the initial moment of time $ t _ {0} $, | ||
+ | then it will remain inside this domain for an arbitrary long time and | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \int\limits _ { V } M d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} < \infty . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | In other words, if the initial conditions are not exceptional in the sense indicated, then the point | + | The Poincaré return theorem: If one considers a domain $ U _ {0} $ |
+ | contained in $ V $, | ||
+ | then there is an infinite choice of initial positions of the point $ P $ | ||
+ | such that the trajectory of $ P $ | ||
+ | intersects the domain $ U _ {0} $ | ||
+ | an infinite number of times. If this choice of the initial position is made at random inside $ U _ {0} $, | ||
+ | then the probability that the point $ P $ | ||
+ | does not intersect the domain $ U _ {0} $ | ||
+ | an infinite number of times will be infinitely small. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In other words, if the initial conditions are not exceptional in the sense indicated, then the point $ P $ | ||
+ | passes infinitely often arbitrarily near to its initial position. | ||
H. Poincaré called a motion in which the system returns an infinite number of times to a neighbourhood of the initial state stable in the sense of Poisson (see [[Poisson stability|Poisson stability]]). The Poincaré return theorem was first established by Poincaré (see [[#References|[1]]] and [[#References|[2]]]) and its proof was improved by C. Carathéodory [[#References|[3]]]. | H. Poincaré called a motion in which the system returns an infinite number of times to a neighbourhood of the initial state stable in the sense of Poisson (see [[Poisson stability|Poisson stability]]). The Poincaré return theorem was first established by Poincaré (see [[#References|[1]]] and [[#References|[2]]]) and its proof was improved by C. Carathéodory [[#References|[3]]]. | ||
− | Carathéodory used four axioms to introduce the abstract concept of the measure | + | Carathéodory used four axioms to introduce the abstract concept of the measure $ \mu A $ |
+ | of any set $ A \subset R $ | ||
+ | of a metric space $ R $, | ||
+ | and considered a dynamical system $ f ( p , t ) $( | ||
+ | $ p = P $ | ||
+ | for $ t = 0 $) | ||
+ | in $ R $; | ||
+ | he then called the measure invariant with respect to the system $ f ( p , t ) $ | ||
+ | if for any $ \mu $- | ||
+ | measurable set $ A $, | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mu f ( A , t ) = \mu A ,\ - \infty < t < + \infty . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | An invariant measure is the natural generalization of the integral invariants (2) for the differential equations (1). Assuming the measure of the whole space | + | An invariant measure is the natural generalization of the integral invariants (2) for the differential equations (1). Assuming the measure of the whole space $ R $ |
+ | to be finite, Carathéodory proved that: | ||
− | 1) if | + | 1) if $ \mu A = m > 0 $, |
+ | then values $ t $ | ||
+ | can be found, $ | t | \geq 1 $, | ||
+ | such that $ \mu [ A \cdot f ( A , t ) ] > 0 $, | ||
+ | where $ A \cdot f ( A , t ) $ | ||
+ | is the set of points belonging simultaneously to the sets $ A $ | ||
+ | and $ f ( A , t ) $; | ||
− | 2) if in a space | + | 2) if in a space $ R $ |
+ | with a countable base, $ \mu R = 1 $ | ||
+ | for the invariant measure $ \mu $, | ||
+ | then almost-all points $ p \in R $( | ||
+ | in the sense of the measure $ \mu $) | ||
+ | are stable in the sense of Poisson. | ||
− | A.Ya. Khinchin [[#References|[5]]] made part 1) of this theorem more precise by proving that for each measurable set | + | A.Ya. Khinchin [[#References|[5]]] made part 1) of this theorem more precise by proving that for each measurable set $ E $, |
+ | $ \mu E = m > 0 $, | ||
+ | and for any $ t $, | ||
+ | $ - \infty < t < + \infty $, | ||
+ | the inequality | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mu ( t) = \mu ( E \cdot f ( E , t ) ) > \lambda m ^ {2} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | is satisfied for a relatively-dense set of values of | + | is satisfied for a relatively-dense set of values of $ t $ |
+ | on the axis $ - \infty < t < + \infty $( | ||
+ | for any $ \lambda < 1 $). | ||
− | N.G. Chetaev (see [[#References|[6]]], [[#References|[7]]]) generalized Poincaré's theorem for the case when the functions | + | N.G. Chetaev (see [[#References|[6]]], [[#References|[7]]]) generalized Poincaré's theorem for the case when the functions $ X _ {i} $ |
+ | in (1) depend also periodically on the time $ t $. | ||
+ | Namely, let a) only real values of variables correspond to the real states of the system; b) the functions $ X _ {i} $ | ||
+ | in the differential equations (1) of the motion be periodic with respect to $ t $ | ||
+ | with a single period $ \tau $ | ||
+ | common to them all; c) throughout its motion, the point $ P $ | ||
+ | does not leave a certain closed domain $ R $ | ||
+ | if its initial position $ P _ {0} $ | ||
+ | is somewhere inside a given domain $ W _ {0} $; | ||
+ | d) $ \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {k} \geq a \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {0} $, | ||
+ | where $ \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {k} = \int _ {W _ {k} } d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} $ | ||
+ | denotes the measure of the set $ W _ {k} $( | ||
+ | volume in the sense of Lebesgue) which consists of those moving points at time $ t = t _ {0} + k \tau $ | ||
+ | which started at time $ t _ {0} $ | ||
+ | from $ W _ {0} $; | ||
+ | $ k $ | ||
+ | is a certain integer, and it is assumed that the constant $ a $ | ||
+ | is not infinitesimally small. Then almost-everywhere in the domain $ W _ {0} $( | ||
+ | apart perhaps on a set of measure zero) the trajectories are stable in the sense of Poisson. | ||
N.M. Krylov and N.N. Bogolyubov [[#References|[8]]] described the structure of the invariant measure with respect to the given dynamical system for a very wide class of dynamical systems (see also [[#References|[4]]]). | N.M. Krylov and N.N. Bogolyubov [[#References|[8]]] described the structure of the invariant measure with respect to the given dynamical system for a very wide class of dynamical systems (see also [[#References|[4]]]). | ||
Line 45: | Line 134: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" ''Acta. Math.'' , '''13''' (1890) pp. 1–270</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" , ''Oeuvres'' , '''XII''' , Gauthier-Villars (1952) pp. 262–479 (in particular, p. 314)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Carathéodory, "Ueber den Wiederkehrsatz von Poincaré" ''Sitz. Ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin'' (1919) pp. 580–584</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.V. Nemytskii, V.V. Stepanov, "Qualitative theory of differential equations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1960) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.Ya. Khinchin, "Eine Verschärfung des Poincaréschen Wiederkehrsatzes" ''Comp. Math.'' , '''1''' (1934) pp. 177–179</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chetaev, "Sur la stabilité à la Poisson" ''C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris'' , '''187''' (1928) pp. 637–638</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chetaev, ''Uchen. Zap. Kazan. Univ.'' , '''89''' : 2 (1929) pp. 199–201</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.N. Krylov, N.N. Bogolyubov, "La théorie de la mesure dans son application à l'etude des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non-linéaire" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''38''' : 1 (1937) pp. 65–113</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" ''Acta. Math.'' , '''13''' (1890) pp. 1–270</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" , ''Oeuvres'' , '''XII''' , Gauthier-Villars (1952) pp. 262–479 (in particular, p. 314)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Carathéodory, "Ueber den Wiederkehrsatz von Poincaré" ''Sitz. Ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin'' (1919) pp. 580–584</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.V. Nemytskii, V.V. Stepanov, "Qualitative theory of differential equations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1960) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.Ya. Khinchin, "Eine Verschärfung des Poincaréschen Wiederkehrsatzes" ''Comp. Math.'' , '''1''' (1934) pp. 177–179</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chetaev, "Sur la stabilité à la Poisson" ''C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris'' , '''187''' (1928) pp. 637–638</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chetaev, ''Uchen. Zap. Kazan. Univ.'' , '''89''' : 2 (1929) pp. 199–201</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.N. Krylov, N.N. Bogolyubov, "La théorie de la mesure dans son application à l'etude des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non-linéaire" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''38''' : 1 (1937) pp. 65–113</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
In the literature the result discussed above is also often called the Poincaré recurrence theorem. | In the literature the result discussed above is also often called the Poincaré recurrence theorem. | ||
− | The set | + | The set $ U _ {0} $ |
+ | in the theorem need not be open: the theorem is true provided only that $ \mu ( U _ {0} ) > 0 $. | ||
+ | The recurrence theorem is valid for volume-preserving flows on Riemannian manifolds $ V $ | ||
+ | of finite volume. The recurrence theorem is also true for a discrete-time dynamical system, e.g. for a mapping $ f $ | ||
+ | of a bounded domain in Euclidean space to itself that preserves Lebesgue measure. See [[#References|[a1]]] for another generalization. | ||
− | There seems to be an incompatibility of the prediction by Poincaré's recurrence theorem (namely, almost surely a system will recur arbitrarily close to its original state) with the conclusions of thermodynamics as the second law and the [[Boltzmann H-theorem|Boltzmann | + | There seems to be an incompatibility of the prediction by Poincaré's recurrence theorem (namely, almost surely a system will recur arbitrarily close to its original state) with the conclusions of thermodynamics as the second law and the [[Boltzmann H-theorem|Boltzmann $ H $- |
+ | theorem]] (increasing entropy). In this respect the following estimation of the expected recurrence time is of interest: it is $ 1/ \mu ( E) $, | ||
+ | where $ E $ | ||
+ | denotes the "event" that recurs $ ( \mu ( E) > 0) $; | ||
+ | for practical situations this time is much larger than the lifetime of the universe (by factors like $ 2 ^ {100} $); | ||
+ | see [[#References|[a2]]]. | ||
The Poincaré recurrence theorem was used by S. Kakutani as the basis for an important construction: that of the induced or derivative transformation of a [[Measure-preserving transformation|measure-preserving transformation]] (with as a reverse construction that of a primitive transformation). See [[#References|[a3]]] or [[#References|[a4]]], pp. 39, 40. | The Poincaré recurrence theorem was used by S. Kakutani as the basis for an important construction: that of the induced or derivative transformation of a [[Measure-preserving transformation|measure-preserving transformation]] (with as a reverse construction that of a primitive transformation). See [[#References|[a3]]] or [[#References|[a4]]], pp. 39, 40. |
Latest revision as of 17:52, 6 January 2024
One of the basic theorems in the general theory of dynamical systems with an invariant measure (cf. also Ergodic theory).
Let the motion of a system be described by the differential equations
$$ \tag{1 } \frac{d x _ {i} }{dt} = \ X _ {i} ( x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} ) ,\ i = 1 \dots n , $$
where the single-valued functions $ X _ {i} ( x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} ) $ satisfy the condition
$$ \sum _ {i=1} ^ { n } \frac{\partial ( M X _ {i} ) }{\partial x _ {i} } = 0 ,\ \ M > 0 , $$
so that equations (1) admit a positive integral invariant
$$ \tag{2 } \int\limits _ { V } M d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} . $$
It is also assumed that if there exists a certain domain $ V $ of finite volume such that if a moving point $ P $ with coordinates $ x _ {1} \dots x _ {n} $ is found inside $ V $ at the initial moment of time $ t _ {0} $, then it will remain inside this domain for an arbitrary long time and
$$ \int\limits _ { V } M d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} < \infty . $$
The Poincaré return theorem: If one considers a domain $ U _ {0} $ contained in $ V $, then there is an infinite choice of initial positions of the point $ P $ such that the trajectory of $ P $ intersects the domain $ U _ {0} $ an infinite number of times. If this choice of the initial position is made at random inside $ U _ {0} $, then the probability that the point $ P $ does not intersect the domain $ U _ {0} $ an infinite number of times will be infinitely small.
In other words, if the initial conditions are not exceptional in the sense indicated, then the point $ P $ passes infinitely often arbitrarily near to its initial position.
H. Poincaré called a motion in which the system returns an infinite number of times to a neighbourhood of the initial state stable in the sense of Poisson (see Poisson stability). The Poincaré return theorem was first established by Poincaré (see [1] and [2]) and its proof was improved by C. Carathéodory [3].
Carathéodory used four axioms to introduce the abstract concept of the measure $ \mu A $ of any set $ A \subset R $ of a metric space $ R $, and considered a dynamical system $ f ( p , t ) $( $ p = P $ for $ t = 0 $) in $ R $; he then called the measure invariant with respect to the system $ f ( p , t ) $ if for any $ \mu $- measurable set $ A $,
$$ \mu f ( A , t ) = \mu A ,\ - \infty < t < + \infty . $$
An invariant measure is the natural generalization of the integral invariants (2) for the differential equations (1). Assuming the measure of the whole space $ R $ to be finite, Carathéodory proved that:
1) if $ \mu A = m > 0 $, then values $ t $ can be found, $ | t | \geq 1 $, such that $ \mu [ A \cdot f ( A , t ) ] > 0 $, where $ A \cdot f ( A , t ) $ is the set of points belonging simultaneously to the sets $ A $ and $ f ( A , t ) $;
2) if in a space $ R $ with a countable base, $ \mu R = 1 $ for the invariant measure $ \mu $, then almost-all points $ p \in R $( in the sense of the measure $ \mu $) are stable in the sense of Poisson.
A.Ya. Khinchin [5] made part 1) of this theorem more precise by proving that for each measurable set $ E $, $ \mu E = m > 0 $, and for any $ t $, $ - \infty < t < + \infty $, the inequality
$$ \mu ( t) = \mu ( E \cdot f ( E , t ) ) > \lambda m ^ {2} $$
is satisfied for a relatively-dense set of values of $ t $ on the axis $ - \infty < t < + \infty $( for any $ \lambda < 1 $).
N.G. Chetaev (see [6], [7]) generalized Poincaré's theorem for the case when the functions $ X _ {i} $ in (1) depend also periodically on the time $ t $. Namely, let a) only real values of variables correspond to the real states of the system; b) the functions $ X _ {i} $ in the differential equations (1) of the motion be periodic with respect to $ t $ with a single period $ \tau $ common to them all; c) throughout its motion, the point $ P $ does not leave a certain closed domain $ R $ if its initial position $ P _ {0} $ is somewhere inside a given domain $ W _ {0} $; d) $ \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {k} \geq a \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {0} $, where $ \mathop{\rm mes} W _ {k} = \int _ {W _ {k} } d x _ {1} \dots d x _ {n} $ denotes the measure of the set $ W _ {k} $( volume in the sense of Lebesgue) which consists of those moving points at time $ t = t _ {0} + k \tau $ which started at time $ t _ {0} $ from $ W _ {0} $; $ k $ is a certain integer, and it is assumed that the constant $ a $ is not infinitesimally small. Then almost-everywhere in the domain $ W _ {0} $( apart perhaps on a set of measure zero) the trajectories are stable in the sense of Poisson.
N.M. Krylov and N.N. Bogolyubov [8] described the structure of the invariant measure with respect to the given dynamical system for a very wide class of dynamical systems (see also [4]).
References
[1] | H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" Acta. Math. , 13 (1890) pp. 1–270 |
[2] | H. Poincaré, "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique" , Oeuvres , XII , Gauthier-Villars (1952) pp. 262–479 (in particular, p. 314) |
[3] | C. Carathéodory, "Ueber den Wiederkehrsatz von Poincaré" Sitz. Ber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (1919) pp. 580–584 |
[4] | V.V. Nemytskii, V.V. Stepanov, "Qualitative theory of differential equations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1960) (Translated from Russian) |
[5] | A.Ya. Khinchin, "Eine Verschärfung des Poincaréschen Wiederkehrsatzes" Comp. Math. , 1 (1934) pp. 177–179 |
[6] | N.G. Chetaev, "Sur la stabilité à la Poisson" C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris , 187 (1928) pp. 637–638 |
[7] | N.G. Chetaev, Uchen. Zap. Kazan. Univ. , 89 : 2 (1929) pp. 199–201 |
[8] | N.N. Krylov, N.N. Bogolyubov, "La théorie de la mesure dans son application à l'etude des systèmes dynamiques de la mécanique non-linéaire" Ann. of Math. , 38 : 1 (1937) pp. 65–113 |
Comments
In the literature the result discussed above is also often called the Poincaré recurrence theorem.
The set $ U _ {0} $ in the theorem need not be open: the theorem is true provided only that $ \mu ( U _ {0} ) > 0 $. The recurrence theorem is valid for volume-preserving flows on Riemannian manifolds $ V $ of finite volume. The recurrence theorem is also true for a discrete-time dynamical system, e.g. for a mapping $ f $ of a bounded domain in Euclidean space to itself that preserves Lebesgue measure. See [a1] for another generalization.
There seems to be an incompatibility of the prediction by Poincaré's recurrence theorem (namely, almost surely a system will recur arbitrarily close to its original state) with the conclusions of thermodynamics as the second law and the Boltzmann $ H $- theorem (increasing entropy). In this respect the following estimation of the expected recurrence time is of interest: it is $ 1/ \mu ( E) $, where $ E $ denotes the "event" that recurs $ ( \mu ( E) > 0) $; for practical situations this time is much larger than the lifetime of the universe (by factors like $ 2 ^ {100} $); see [a2].
The Poincaré recurrence theorem was used by S. Kakutani as the basis for an important construction: that of the induced or derivative transformation of a measure-preserving transformation (with as a reverse construction that of a primitive transformation). See [a3] or [a4], pp. 39, 40.
References
[a1] | P.R. Halmos, "Invariant measures" Ann. of Math. , 48 (1947) pp. 735–754 |
[a2] | M. Kac, "On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes" Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 53 (1947) pp. 1002–1010 |
[a3] | S. Kakutani, "Induced measure preserving transformations" Proc. Japan. Acad. , 19 (1943) pp. 635–641 |
[a4] | K. Petersen, "Ergodic theory" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1983) pp. 39 |
Poincaré return theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Poincar%C3%A9_return_theorem&oldid=12573