Difference between revisions of "Zassenhaus conjecture"
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 86 formulas out of 89 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.) |
m (fix tex) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | ||
was used. | was used. | ||
| − | |||
Out of 89 formulas, 86 were replaced by TEX code.--> | Out of 89 formulas, 86 were replaced by TEX code.--> | ||
| − | {{TEX| | + | {{TEX|done}} |
| − | Just as the only roots of unity in a [[Cyclotomic field|cyclotomic field]] $\mathbf{Q} ( \zeta )$ are of the form $\pm \zeta ^ { | + | Just as the only roots of unity in a [[Cyclotomic field|cyclotomic field]] $\mathbf{Q} ( \zeta )$ are of the form $\pm \zeta ^ { i }$, there is the classical theorem of G. Higman stating that the torsion units in the integral group ring ${\bf Z} G$ of a finite [[Abelian group|Abelian group]] are of the form $\pm g$, $g \in G$. Of course, if $G$ is non-Abelian, then any conjugate of $\pm g$ is also of finite order; however, these are not all the torsion units in ${\bf Z} G$. The famous Zassenhaus conjecture says that for a [[Finite group|finite group]] $G$ all torsion units of ${\bf Z} G$ are rationally conjugate to $\pm g$, $g \in G$: |
ZC1) Let $u \in {\bf Z} G$, $u ^ { n } = 1$ for some $n$; then $u = \pm x ^ { - 1 } g x$ for some $g \in G$ and some unit $x \in \mathbf{Q} G$. This conjecture was proved to be true by A. Weiss, first for $p$-groups [[#References|[a16]]] and then for nilpotent groups [[#References|[a17]]] (cf. also [[Nilpotent group|Nilpotent group]]). In fact, Weiss proved the following stronger Zassenhaus conjecture for nilpotent groups: | ZC1) Let $u \in {\bf Z} G$, $u ^ { n } = 1$ for some $n$; then $u = \pm x ^ { - 1 } g x$ for some $g \in G$ and some unit $x \in \mathbf{Q} G$. This conjecture was proved to be true by A. Weiss, first for $p$-groups [[#References|[a16]]] and then for nilpotent groups [[#References|[a17]]] (cf. also [[Nilpotent group|Nilpotent group]]). In fact, Weiss proved the following stronger Zassenhaus conjecture for nilpotent groups: | ||
| Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
This result has been strengthened to ZC3) [[#References|[a15]]]. | This result has been strengthened to ZC3) [[#References|[a15]]]. | ||
| − | There are several useful and interesting extensions of the above conjectures. Suppose that $A$ is a [[Normal subgroup|normal subgroup]] of index $n$ in $G$. Then ${\bf Z} G$ can be represented by $( n \times n )$-matrices over $\mathbf{Z} A$. Any torsion unit $u$ of ${\bf Z} G$ that is mapped by the natural homomorphism $G \rightarrow G / A$ to $1 \in \mathbf{Z }( G / A )$ gives rise to a torsion matrix $U \in \text{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} A )$. Here, $SGL_n( \mathbf{Z} A )$ denotes the subgroup of the [[General linear group|general linear group]] $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Z} A )$ consisting of the matrices $U$ that are mapped by the augmentation homomorphism $\mathbf{Z} A \rightarrow Z$, when applied to each entry, to the identity matrix. Thus, ZC1) translates to the question about diagonalization of $U$ in $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Q} A )$: Is a torsion matrix $U \in \operatorname{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} G )$, where $G$ is a finite group, conjugate in | + | There are several useful and interesting extensions of the above conjectures. Suppose that $A$ is a [[Normal subgroup|normal subgroup]] of index $n$ in $G$. Then ${\bf Z} G$ can be represented by $( n \times n )$-matrices over $\mathbf{Z} A$. Any torsion unit $u$ of ${\bf Z} G$ that is mapped by the natural homomorphism $G \rightarrow G / A$ to $1 \in \mathbf{Z }( G / A )$ gives rise to a torsion matrix $U \in \text{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} A )$. Here, $SGL_n( \mathbf{Z} A )$ denotes the subgroup of the [[General linear group|general linear group]] $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Z} A )$ consisting of the matrices $U$ that are mapped by the augmentation homomorphism $\mathbf{Z} A \rightarrow Z$, when applied to each entry, to the identity matrix. Thus, ZC1) translates to the question about diagonalization of $U$ in $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Q} A )$: Is a torsion matrix $U \in \operatorname{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} G )$, where $G$ is a finite group, conjugate in $\mathbf{Q}G_{n\times n}$ to a matrix of the form $\operatorname{diag} (g_1, \dots , g _ { n } )$, $g_i \in G$? |
This was answered positively in [[#References|[a16]]] for $p$-groups (cf. also [[P-group|$p$-group]]). See [[#References|[a1]]] for an explicit example of a matrix $U \in v\operatorname{SGL} _ { 6 } ( \mathbf Z ( C _ { 6 } \times C _ { 6 } ) )$ that cannot be diagonalized but for which $U ^ { 6 } = I$. Such a matrix $U$ exists for a finite nilpotent group $G$ and some $n$ if and only if $G$ has at least two non-cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroups [[#References|[a1]]] (cf. also [[Sylow subgroup|Sylow subgroup]]). | This was answered positively in [[#References|[a16]]] for $p$-groups (cf. also [[P-group|$p$-group]]). See [[#References|[a1]]] for an explicit example of a matrix $U \in v\operatorname{SGL} _ { 6 } ( \mathbf Z ( C _ { 6 } \times C _ { 6 } ) )$ that cannot be diagonalized but for which $U ^ { 6 } = I$. Such a matrix $U$ exists for a finite nilpotent group $G$ and some $n$ if and only if $G$ has at least two non-cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroups [[#References|[a1]]] (cf. also [[Sylow subgroup|Sylow subgroup]]). | ||
| − | However, it was proved in [[#References|[a6]]] that if $n = 2$ and $G$ is finite Abelian, then $U$ is conjugate in | + | However, it was proved in [[#References|[a6]]] that if $n = 2$ and $G$ is finite Abelian, then $U$ is conjugate in $\mathbf{Q}G_{2\times 2}$ to $\operatorname{diag} (g_1, g_2 )$. This has been extended to $n \leq 5$ in [[#References|[a8]]], bridging the gap between $2$ and $6$. |
The Zassenhaus conjectures and the isomorphism problem have also been studied for infinite groups $\Gamma$. The statements remain the same and the group $\Gamma$ is arbitrary. A counterexample to ZC1) was provided in [[#References|[a9]]]. Conjecture ZC2) also does not hold for infinite groups, as shown by S.K. Sehgal and A.E. Zalesskii (see [[#References|[a14]]], p. 279). | The Zassenhaus conjectures and the isomorphism problem have also been studied for infinite groups $\Gamma$. The statements remain the same and the group $\Gamma$ is arbitrary. A counterexample to ZC1) was provided in [[#References|[a9]]]. Conjecture ZC2) also does not hold for infinite groups, as shown by S.K. Sehgal and A.E. Zalesskii (see [[#References|[a14]]], p. 279). | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 26 January 2021
Just as the only roots of unity in a cyclotomic field $\mathbf{Q} ( \zeta )$ are of the form $\pm \zeta ^ { i }$, there is the classical theorem of G. Higman stating that the torsion units in the integral group ring ${\bf Z} G$ of a finite Abelian group are of the form $\pm g$, $g \in G$. Of course, if $G$ is non-Abelian, then any conjugate of $\pm g$ is also of finite order; however, these are not all the torsion units in ${\bf Z} G$. The famous Zassenhaus conjecture says that for a finite group $G$ all torsion units of ${\bf Z} G$ are rationally conjugate to $\pm g$, $g \in G$:
ZC1) Let $u \in {\bf Z} G$, $u ^ { n } = 1$ for some $n$; then $u = \pm x ^ { - 1 } g x$ for some $g \in G$ and some unit $x \in \mathbf{Q} G$. This conjecture was proved to be true by A. Weiss, first for $p$-groups [a16] and then for nilpotent groups [a17] (cf. also Nilpotent group). In fact, Weiss proved the following stronger Zassenhaus conjecture for nilpotent groups:
ZC3) If $H$ is a finite subgroup of units of augmentation one in ${\bf Z} G$, then there exists a unit $x \in \mathbf{Q} G$ such that $x ^ { - 1 } H x \subseteq G$. A special case of this is the following conjecture:
ZC2) If $H$ is a subgroup of ${\bf Z} G$ of augmentation one of order $| G |$ such that ${\bf Z} G = {\bf Z} H$, then there exists a unit $x \in \mathbf{Q} G$ with $x ^ { - 1 } H x = G$. This last conjecture was earlier proved by K. Roggenkamp and L.R. Scott [a12] for nilpotent groups. Subsequently, they also gave a counterexample to ZC2) (unpublished), which appears in a modified form in [a5].
Clearly, ZC3) implies ZC1) and ZC2). Also, ZC2) implies that if two group rings ${\bf Z} G$ and $\mathbf{Z}H$ are isomorphic, then the groups $G$ and $H$ are isomorphic. This isomorphism problem was proposed in [a3]:
\begin{equation} \tag{a1} \mathbf{Z} G \simeq \mathbf{Z} H \Rightarrow G \simeq H. \end{equation}
Of course, then, (a1) is true for nilpotent groups. Moreover, it was proved by A. Whitcomb [a18] that (a1) is true for metabelian groups. M. Hertweck [a2] has given a counterexample to (a1).
Conjecture ZC1) was disproved in 2018 [a19]. Besides nilpotent groups, it is known to be true for certain split metacyclic groups [a10]: If $G = \langle a \rangle \rtimes \langle b \rangle$ is the semi-direct product of two cyclic groups $\langle a \rangle$ and $( b )$ of relative prime orders, then ZC1) holds for $G$.
This result has been strengthened to ZC3) [a15].
There are several useful and interesting extensions of the above conjectures. Suppose that $A$ is a normal subgroup of index $n$ in $G$. Then ${\bf Z} G$ can be represented by $( n \times n )$-matrices over $\mathbf{Z} A$. Any torsion unit $u$ of ${\bf Z} G$ that is mapped by the natural homomorphism $G \rightarrow G / A$ to $1 \in \mathbf{Z }( G / A )$ gives rise to a torsion matrix $U \in \text{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} A )$. Here, $SGL_n( \mathbf{Z} A )$ denotes the subgroup of the general linear group $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Z} A )$ consisting of the matrices $U$ that are mapped by the augmentation homomorphism $\mathbf{Z} A \rightarrow Z$, when applied to each entry, to the identity matrix. Thus, ZC1) translates to the question about diagonalization of $U$ in $\operatorname{GL} _ { n } ( {\bf Q} A )$: Is a torsion matrix $U \in \operatorname{SGL} _ { n } ( \mathbf{Z} G )$, where $G$ is a finite group, conjugate in $\mathbf{Q}G_{n\times n}$ to a matrix of the form $\operatorname{diag} (g_1, \dots , g _ { n } )$, $g_i \in G$?
This was answered positively in [a16] for $p$-groups (cf. also $p$-group). See [a1] for an explicit example of a matrix $U \in v\operatorname{SGL} _ { 6 } ( \mathbf Z ( C _ { 6 } \times C _ { 6 } ) )$ that cannot be diagonalized but for which $U ^ { 6 } = I$. Such a matrix $U$ exists for a finite nilpotent group $G$ and some $n$ if and only if $G$ has at least two non-cyclic Sylow $p$-subgroups [a1] (cf. also Sylow subgroup).
However, it was proved in [a6] that if $n = 2$ and $G$ is finite Abelian, then $U$ is conjugate in $\mathbf{Q}G_{2\times 2}$ to $\operatorname{diag} (g_1, g_2 )$. This has been extended to $n \leq 5$ in [a8], bridging the gap between $2$ and $6$.
The Zassenhaus conjectures and the isomorphism problem have also been studied for infinite groups $\Gamma$. The statements remain the same and the group $\Gamma$ is arbitrary. A counterexample to ZC1) was provided in [a9]. Conjecture ZC2) also does not hold for infinite groups, as shown by S.K. Sehgal and A.E. Zalesskii (see [a14], p. 279).
However, one can ask if any torsion unit $U \in \operatorname{SGL} _ { n } ( \Gamma )$ can be stably diagonalized to $\operatorname { diag } ( \gamma _ { 1 } , \ldots , \gamma _ { n } )$, $\gamma _ { i } \in \Gamma$. This has been proved [a7] to be true for $p$-elements $U$ when $\Gamma$ is nilpotent. The isomorphism problem also has a positive answer for finitely-generated nilpotent groups of class $2$, cf. [a11]. In general for nilpotent groups the problem remains open (as of 2000).
References
| [a1] | G. Cliff, A. Weiss, "Finite groups of matrices over group rings" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 352' (2000) pp. 457–475 |
| [a2] | M. Hertweck, "A solution of the isomorphism problem for integral group rings" (to appear) |
| [a3] | G. Higman, "Units in group rings" , D. Phil. Thesis Univ. Oxford (1940) |
| [a4] | G. Higman, "The units of group rings" Proc. London Math. Soc. , 46 (1940) pp. 231–248 |
| [a5] | L. Klingler, "Construction of a counterexample to a conjecture of Zassenhaus" Commun. Algebra , 19 (1991) pp. 2303–2330 |
| [a6] | I.S. Luthar, I.B.S. Passi, "Torsion units in matrix group rings" Commun. Algebra , 20 (1992) pp. 1223–1228 |
| [a7] | Z. Marciniak, S.K. Sehgal, "Finite matrix groups over nilpotent group rings" J. Algebra , 181 (1996) pp. 565–583 |
| [a8] | Z. Marciniak, S.K. Sehgal, "Torsion matrices over abelian group rings" J. Group Th. , 3 (2000) pp. 67–75 |
| [a9] | Z. Marciniak, S.K. Sehgal, "Zassenhaus conjecture and infinite nilpotent groups" J. Algebra , 184 (1996) pp. 207–212 |
| [a10] | C. Polcino Milies, J. Ritter, S.K. Sehgal, "On a conjecture of Zassenhaus on torsion units in integral group rings, II" Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 97 (1986) pp. 201–206 |
| [a11] | J. Ritter, S.K. Sehgal, "Isomorphism of group rings" Archiv Math. , 40 (1983) pp. 32–39 |
| [a12] | K. Roggenkamp, L. Scott, "Isomorphisms for $p$-adic group rings" Ann. Math. , 126 (1987) pp. 593–647 |
| [a13] | S.K. Sehgal, "Topics in group rings" , M. Dekker (1978) |
| [a14] | S.K. Sehgal, "Units in integral group rings" , Longman (1993) |
| [a15] | A. Valenti, "Torsion units in integral group rings" Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 120 (1994) pp. 1–4 |
| [a16] | A. Weiss, "Rigidity of $p$-adic $p$-torsion" Ann. of Math. , 127 (1988) pp. 317–332 |
| [a17] | A. Weiss, "Torsion units in integral group rings" J. Reine Angew. Math. , 415 (1991) pp. 175–187 |
| [a18] | A. Whitcomb, "The group ring problem" PhD Thesis Univ. Chicago (1968) |
| [a19] | F. Eisele, L. Margolis, "A counterexample to the first Zassenhaus conjecture" Advances Math., 339 (2018) pp. 599–641 |
Zassenhaus conjecture. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Zassenhaus_conjecture&oldid=50508