Difference between revisions of "Three-dimensional manifold"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A [[Topological space|topological space]] each point of which has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to three-dimensional real space | + | <!-- |
+ | t0927301.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 50 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 50 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/T092/T.0902730 Three\AAhdimensional manifold | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | A [[Topological space|topological space]] each point of which has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to three-dimensional real space $ \mathbf R ^ {3} $ | ||
+ | or to the closed half-space $ \mathbf R _ {+} ^ {3} $. | ||
+ | This definition is usually supplemented by the requirement that a three-dimensional manifold as a topological space be Hausdorff and have a countable base. The boundary of a three-dimensional manifold, that is, its set of points that only have neighbourhoods of the second, rather than the first, of the above types, is a [[Two-dimensional manifold|two-dimensional manifold]] without boundary. Methods of the topology of three-dimensional manifolds are very specific and therefore occupy a special place in the [[Topology of manifolds|topology of manifolds]]. | ||
Examples. Some properties of three-dimensional manifolds that, in general, do not hold in higher dimensions are: an orientable three-dimensional manifold is always parallelizable; a closed three-dimensional manifold bounds some four-dimensional manifold; one can always introduce into a three-dimensional manifold piecewise-linear and differentiable structures, and any homeomorphism between two three-dimensional manifolds can be approximated by a piecewise-linear homeomorphism as well as by a diffeomorphism. | Examples. Some properties of three-dimensional manifolds that, in general, do not hold in higher dimensions are: an orientable three-dimensional manifold is always parallelizable; a closed three-dimensional manifold bounds some four-dimensional manifold; one can always introduce into a three-dimensional manifold piecewise-linear and differentiable structures, and any homeomorphism between two three-dimensional manifolds can be approximated by a piecewise-linear homeomorphism as well as by a diffeomorphism. | ||
− | One of the most widespread methods of describing a three-dimensional manifold is the use of Heegaard decompositions and the Heegaard diagrams closely related to them (cf. [[Heegaard decomposition|Heegaard decomposition]]; [[Heegaard diagram|Heegaard diagram]]). The essence of this method is that any closed oriented three-dimensional manifold | + | One of the most widespread methods of describing a three-dimensional manifold is the use of Heegaard decompositions and the Heegaard diagrams closely related to them (cf. [[Heegaard decomposition|Heegaard decomposition]]; [[Heegaard diagram|Heegaard diagram]]). The essence of this method is that any closed oriented three-dimensional manifold $ M $ |
+ | can be decomposed into two submanifolds with a common boundary, each of which is homeomorphic to a standard complete pretzel (or handlebody, cf. [[Handle theory|Handle theory]]) $ V $ | ||
+ | of some genus $ n $. | ||
+ | In other words, a three-dimensional manifold $ M $ | ||
+ | can be obtained by glueing two copies of a complete pretzel $ V $ | ||
+ | along their boundaries by some homeomorphism. This fact enables one to reduce many problems in the topology of three-dimensional manifolds to those in the topology of surfaces. The smallest possible number $ n $ | ||
+ | is called the genus of the three-dimensional manifold $ M $. | ||
+ | Another useful method of describing a three-dimensional manifold is based on the existence of a close connection between three-dimensional manifolds and links in $ S ^ {3} $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Knot theory|Knot theory]]): Any closed oriented three-dimensional manifold $ M $ | ||
+ | can be represented in the form $ M = \partial W $, | ||
+ | where the four-dimensional manifold $ W $ | ||
+ | is obtained from the $ 4 $- | ||
+ | ball $ B ^ {4} $ | ||
+ | by attaching handles of index 2 along the components of some framed link $ L $ | ||
+ | in $ S ^ {3} = \partial B ^ {4} $. | ||
+ | Equivalently, a three-dimensional manifold $ M $ | ||
+ | can be obtained from the sphere $ S ^ {3} $ | ||
+ | by spherical [[Surgery|surgery]]. It may be required in addition that all the components of the link $ L $ | ||
+ | have even framings, and then the manifold $ W $ | ||
+ | thus obtained is parallelizable. Often one uses the representation of a three-dimensional manifold as the space of a ramified covering of $ S ^ {3} $. | ||
+ | If $ L $ | ||
+ | is a link in $ S ^ {3} $, | ||
+ | then any finitely-sheeted covering space of $ S _ {3} /L $ | ||
+ | can be compactified by certain circles to give a closed three-dimensional manifold $ M $. | ||
+ | The natural projection $ p: M \rightarrow S ^ {3} $, | ||
+ | which is locally homeomorphic outside $ p ^ {-} 1 ( L) $, | ||
+ | is called the ramified covering of $ S ^ {3} $ | ||
+ | with ramification along $ L $. | ||
+ | Any three-dimensional manifold of genus 2 is a double covering of the sphere with ramification along some link, while in the case of a three-dimensional manifold of arbitrary genus one can only guarantee the existence of a triple covering with ramification along some knot. This circumstance is the main cause why the three-dimensional Poincaré conjecture and the problem of the algorithmic recognition of a sphere have so far (1984) only been solved in the class of three-dimensional manifolds of genus 2. | ||
− | The main problem in the topology of three-dimensional manifolds is that of their classification. A three-dimensional manifold | + | The main problem in the topology of three-dimensional manifolds is that of their classification. A three-dimensional manifold $ M $ |
+ | is said to be simple if $ M = M _ {1} \# M _ {2} $ | ||
+ | implies that exactly one of the manifolds $ M _ {1} $, | ||
+ | $ M _ {2} $ | ||
+ | is a sphere. Every compact three-dimensional manifold decomposes into a connected sum of a finite number of simple three-dimensional manifolds. This decomposition is unique in the orientable case and is unique up to replacement of the direct product by $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $ | ||
+ | in the non-orientable case. Instead of the notion of a simple three-dimensional manifold, it is often more useful to use the notion of an irreducible three-dimensional manifold, that is, a manifold in which every $ 2 $- | ||
+ | sphere bounds a ball. The class of irreducible three-dimensional manifolds differs from that of simple three-dimensional manifolds by just three manifolds: $ S ^ {3} $, | ||
+ | $ S ^ {2} \times S ^ {1} $ | ||
+ | and $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $. | ||
+ | Here the manifold $ S ^ {3} $ | ||
+ | is irreducible, but is usually not considered to be simple, while the manifolds $ S ^ {2} \times S ^ {1} $ | ||
+ | and $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $ | ||
+ | are simple but not irreducible. Irreducible three-dimensional manifolds with boundary have been fairly well studied. For example, any homotopy equivalence of pairs $ f: ( M, \partial M) \rightarrow ( M, \partial N) $, | ||
+ | where $ M $, | ||
+ | $ N $ | ||
+ | are compact oriented irreducible three-dimensional manifolds with boundary, can be deformed into a homeomorphism. In the closed case it suffices for this that in addition the three-dimensional manifold $ M $ | ||
+ | is sufficiently large, i.e. that it contains some two-sided incompressible surface. Here, a surface $ F \subset M $, | ||
+ | $ F \neq S ^ {2} $, | ||
+ | is said to be incompressible if the group homomorphism from $ \pi _ {1} ( F ) $ | ||
+ | into $ \pi _ {1} ( M) $ | ||
+ | induced by the imbedding is injective. If the first homology group of a compact irreducible three-dimensional manifold is infinite, then such a surface always exists. Any compact oriented irreducible sufficiently large three-dimensional manifold whose fundamental group contains an infinite cyclic normal subgroup is a [[Seifert manifold|Seifert manifold]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Hempel, "3-manifolds" , Princeton Univ. Press (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Waldhausen, "On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''87''' (1968) pp. 56–88</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.H. Jaco, "Lectures on three-manifold topology" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1980)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Hempel, "3-manifolds" , Princeton Univ. Press (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Waldhausen, "On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large" ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''87''' (1968) pp. 56–88</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.H. Jaco, "Lectures on three-manifold topology" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1980)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.E. Moise, "Geometric topology in dimensions 2 and 3" , Springer (1977)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.E. Moise, "Geometric topology in dimensions 2 and 3" , Springer (1977)</TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 08:25, 6 June 2020
A topological space each point of which has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to three-dimensional real space $ \mathbf R ^ {3} $
or to the closed half-space $ \mathbf R _ {+} ^ {3} $.
This definition is usually supplemented by the requirement that a three-dimensional manifold as a topological space be Hausdorff and have a countable base. The boundary of a three-dimensional manifold, that is, its set of points that only have neighbourhoods of the second, rather than the first, of the above types, is a two-dimensional manifold without boundary. Methods of the topology of three-dimensional manifolds are very specific and therefore occupy a special place in the topology of manifolds.
Examples. Some properties of three-dimensional manifolds that, in general, do not hold in higher dimensions are: an orientable three-dimensional manifold is always parallelizable; a closed three-dimensional manifold bounds some four-dimensional manifold; one can always introduce into a three-dimensional manifold piecewise-linear and differentiable structures, and any homeomorphism between two three-dimensional manifolds can be approximated by a piecewise-linear homeomorphism as well as by a diffeomorphism.
One of the most widespread methods of describing a three-dimensional manifold is the use of Heegaard decompositions and the Heegaard diagrams closely related to them (cf. Heegaard decomposition; Heegaard diagram). The essence of this method is that any closed oriented three-dimensional manifold $ M $ can be decomposed into two submanifolds with a common boundary, each of which is homeomorphic to a standard complete pretzel (or handlebody, cf. Handle theory) $ V $ of some genus $ n $. In other words, a three-dimensional manifold $ M $ can be obtained by glueing two copies of a complete pretzel $ V $ along their boundaries by some homeomorphism. This fact enables one to reduce many problems in the topology of three-dimensional manifolds to those in the topology of surfaces. The smallest possible number $ n $ is called the genus of the three-dimensional manifold $ M $. Another useful method of describing a three-dimensional manifold is based on the existence of a close connection between three-dimensional manifolds and links in $ S ^ {3} $( cf. Knot theory): Any closed oriented three-dimensional manifold $ M $ can be represented in the form $ M = \partial W $, where the four-dimensional manifold $ W $ is obtained from the $ 4 $- ball $ B ^ {4} $ by attaching handles of index 2 along the components of some framed link $ L $ in $ S ^ {3} = \partial B ^ {4} $. Equivalently, a three-dimensional manifold $ M $ can be obtained from the sphere $ S ^ {3} $ by spherical surgery. It may be required in addition that all the components of the link $ L $ have even framings, and then the manifold $ W $ thus obtained is parallelizable. Often one uses the representation of a three-dimensional manifold as the space of a ramified covering of $ S ^ {3} $. If $ L $ is a link in $ S ^ {3} $, then any finitely-sheeted covering space of $ S _ {3} /L $ can be compactified by certain circles to give a closed three-dimensional manifold $ M $. The natural projection $ p: M \rightarrow S ^ {3} $, which is locally homeomorphic outside $ p ^ {-} 1 ( L) $, is called the ramified covering of $ S ^ {3} $ with ramification along $ L $. Any three-dimensional manifold of genus 2 is a double covering of the sphere with ramification along some link, while in the case of a three-dimensional manifold of arbitrary genus one can only guarantee the existence of a triple covering with ramification along some knot. This circumstance is the main cause why the three-dimensional Poincaré conjecture and the problem of the algorithmic recognition of a sphere have so far (1984) only been solved in the class of three-dimensional manifolds of genus 2.
The main problem in the topology of three-dimensional manifolds is that of their classification. A three-dimensional manifold $ M $ is said to be simple if $ M = M _ {1} \# M _ {2} $ implies that exactly one of the manifolds $ M _ {1} $, $ M _ {2} $ is a sphere. Every compact three-dimensional manifold decomposes into a connected sum of a finite number of simple three-dimensional manifolds. This decomposition is unique in the orientable case and is unique up to replacement of the direct product by $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $ in the non-orientable case. Instead of the notion of a simple three-dimensional manifold, it is often more useful to use the notion of an irreducible three-dimensional manifold, that is, a manifold in which every $ 2 $- sphere bounds a ball. The class of irreducible three-dimensional manifolds differs from that of simple three-dimensional manifolds by just three manifolds: $ S ^ {3} $, $ S ^ {2} \times S ^ {1} $ and $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $. Here the manifold $ S ^ {3} $ is irreducible, but is usually not considered to be simple, while the manifolds $ S ^ {2} \times S ^ {1} $ and $ S ^ {2} \widetilde \times S ^ {1} $ are simple but not irreducible. Irreducible three-dimensional manifolds with boundary have been fairly well studied. For example, any homotopy equivalence of pairs $ f: ( M, \partial M) \rightarrow ( M, \partial N) $, where $ M $, $ N $ are compact oriented irreducible three-dimensional manifolds with boundary, can be deformed into a homeomorphism. In the closed case it suffices for this that in addition the three-dimensional manifold $ M $ is sufficiently large, i.e. that it contains some two-sided incompressible surface. Here, a surface $ F \subset M $, $ F \neq S ^ {2} $, is said to be incompressible if the group homomorphism from $ \pi _ {1} ( F ) $ into $ \pi _ {1} ( M) $ induced by the imbedding is injective. If the first homology group of a compact irreducible three-dimensional manifold is infinite, then such a surface always exists. Any compact oriented irreducible sufficiently large three-dimensional manifold whose fundamental group contains an infinite cyclic normal subgroup is a Seifert manifold.
References
[1] | J. Hempel, "3-manifolds" , Princeton Univ. Press (1976) |
[2] | F. Waldhausen, "On irreducible 3-manifolds which are sufficiently large" Ann. of Math. , 87 (1968) pp. 56–88 |
[3] | W.H. Jaco, "Lectures on three-manifold topology" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1980) |
Comments
References
[a1] | E.E. Moise, "Geometric topology in dimensions 2 and 3" , Springer (1977) |
Three-dimensional manifold. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Three-dimensional_manifold&oldid=11377