Difference between revisions of "Strong topology"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | s0906101.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 49 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 49 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/S090/S.0900610 Strong topology | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A dual pair of vector spaces $ ( L, M) $ | |
+ | over a field $ k $ | ||
+ | is a pair of vector spaces $ L $, | ||
+ | $ M $ | ||
+ | together with a non-degenerate bilinear form over $ k $, | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \phi : L \times M \rightarrow k. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | I.e. $ \phi ( a _ {1} l _ {1} + a _ {2} l _ {2} , m)= a _ {1} \phi ( l _ {1} , m)+ a _ {2} \phi ( l _ {2} , m) $, | |
+ | $ \phi ( l, b _ {1} m _ {1} + b _ {2} m _ {2} ) = b _ {1} \phi ( l, m _ {1} )+ b _ {2} \phi ( l, m _ {2} ) $; | ||
+ | $ \phi ( l, m)= 0 $ | ||
+ | for all $ m \in M $ | ||
+ | implies $ l= 0 $; | ||
+ | $ \phi ( l, m)= 0 $ | ||
+ | for all $ l \in L $ | ||
+ | implies $ m= 0 $. | ||
− | The | + | The [[Weak topology|weak topology]] on $ L $ |
+ | defined by the dual pair $ ( L, M) $( | ||
+ | given a topology on $ k $) | ||
+ | is the weakest topology such that all the functionals $ \psi _ {m} : L \rightarrow k $, | ||
+ | $ \psi _ {m} ( l) = \phi ( l, m) $, | ||
+ | are continuous. More precisely, if $ k = \mathbf R $ | ||
+ | or $ \mathbf C $ | ||
+ | with the usual topology, this defines the weak topology on $ L $( | ||
+ | and $ M $). | ||
+ | If $ k $ | ||
+ | is an arbitrary field with the discrete topology, this defines the so-called linear weak topology. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | be a collection of bounded subsets of $ L $( | ||
+ | for the weak topology, i.e. every $ A \in \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | is weakly bounded, meaning that for every open subset $ U $ | ||
+ | of $ 0 $ | ||
+ | in the weak topology on $ L $ | ||
+ | there is a $ \rho > 0 $ | ||
+ | such that $ \rho A \subset U $). | ||
+ | The topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ | ||
+ | on $ M $ | ||
+ | is defined by the system of semi-norms $ \{ \rho _ {A} \} $, | ||
+ | $ A \in \mathfrak M $, | ||
+ | where $ \rho _ {A} ( x) = \sup _ {m \in A } | \phi ( m, x) | $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Semi-norm|Semi-norm]]). This topology is locally convex if and only if $ \cup \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | is a total set, i.e. it generates (in $ L $ | ||
+ | as a vector space) all of $ L $. | ||
+ | The topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ | ||
+ | is called the topology of uniform convergence on the sets of $ \mathfrak M $. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The finest topology on $ M $ | ||
+ | which can be defined in terms of the dual pairs $ ( L, M) $ | ||
+ | is the topology of uniform convergence on weakly bounded subsets of $ L $. | ||
+ | This is the topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ | ||
+ | where $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | is the collection of all weakly bounded subsets of $ L $, | ||
+ | and it is called the strong topology on $ M $, | ||
+ | for brevity. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Köthe, "Topological vector spaces" , '''1''' , Springer (1969)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Köthe, "Topological vector spaces" , '''1''' , Springer (1969)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 08:24, 6 June 2020
A dual pair of vector spaces $ ( L, M) $
over a field $ k $
is a pair of vector spaces $ L $,
$ M $
together with a non-degenerate bilinear form over $ k $,
$$ \phi : L \times M \rightarrow k. $$
I.e. $ \phi ( a _ {1} l _ {1} + a _ {2} l _ {2} , m)= a _ {1} \phi ( l _ {1} , m)+ a _ {2} \phi ( l _ {2} , m) $, $ \phi ( l, b _ {1} m _ {1} + b _ {2} m _ {2} ) = b _ {1} \phi ( l, m _ {1} )+ b _ {2} \phi ( l, m _ {2} ) $; $ \phi ( l, m)= 0 $ for all $ m \in M $ implies $ l= 0 $; $ \phi ( l, m)= 0 $ for all $ l \in L $ implies $ m= 0 $.
The weak topology on $ L $ defined by the dual pair $ ( L, M) $( given a topology on $ k $) is the weakest topology such that all the functionals $ \psi _ {m} : L \rightarrow k $, $ \psi _ {m} ( l) = \phi ( l, m) $, are continuous. More precisely, if $ k = \mathbf R $ or $ \mathbf C $ with the usual topology, this defines the weak topology on $ L $( and $ M $). If $ k $ is an arbitrary field with the discrete topology, this defines the so-called linear weak topology.
Let $ \mathfrak M $ be a collection of bounded subsets of $ L $( for the weak topology, i.e. every $ A \in \mathfrak M $ is weakly bounded, meaning that for every open subset $ U $ of $ 0 $ in the weak topology on $ L $ there is a $ \rho > 0 $ such that $ \rho A \subset U $). The topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ on $ M $ is defined by the system of semi-norms $ \{ \rho _ {A} \} $, $ A \in \mathfrak M $, where $ \rho _ {A} ( x) = \sup _ {m \in A } | \phi ( m, x) | $( cf. Semi-norm). This topology is locally convex if and only if $ \cup \mathfrak M $ is a total set, i.e. it generates (in $ L $ as a vector space) all of $ L $. The topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ is called the topology of uniform convergence on the sets of $ \mathfrak M $.
The finest topology on $ M $ which can be defined in terms of the dual pairs $ ( L, M) $ is the topology of uniform convergence on weakly bounded subsets of $ L $. This is the topology $ \tau _ {\mathfrak M } $ where $ \mathfrak M $ is the collection of all weakly bounded subsets of $ L $, and it is called the strong topology on $ M $, for brevity.
References
[a1] | G. Köthe, "Topological vector spaces" , 1 , Springer (1969) |
Strong topology. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Strong_topology&oldid=11766