Difference between revisions of "Ramification theory of valued fields"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | r1100201.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 117 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 117 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/R110/R.1100020 Ramification theory of valued fields | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | of | + | A branch of [[Commutative algebra|commutative algebra]] and [[Number theory|number theory]] in which certain distinguished intermediate fields of algebraic extensions of fields equipped with a [[Valuation|valuation]] are considered. Let $ L \mid K $ |
+ | be a (not necessarily finite) algebraic extension of fields, and let $ w $ | ||
+ | be a valuation of $ L $ | ||
+ | with valuation ring $ {\mathcal O} _ {w} $ | ||
+ | and extending a valuation $ v $ | ||
+ | of $ K $. | ||
+ | Assume that the extension $ L \mid K $ | ||
+ | is normal (cf. [[Extension of a field|Extension of a field]]) and that $ G = G ( L \mid K ) $ | ||
+ | is its [[Galois group|Galois group]]. The subgroup | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | G _ {Z} = \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a ) = w ( a ) \textrm{ for all } a \in L } \right \} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | of | + | of $ G $ |
+ | is called the decomposition group of $ w \mid v $, | ||
+ | and its fixed field $ Z $ | ||
+ | the decomposition field. The subgroup | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | G _ {T} = \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) > 0 \textrm{ for all } a \in {\mathcal O} _ {w} } \right \} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | of $ G _ {Z} $ | |
+ | is called the inertia group, and its fixed field $ T $ | ||
+ | the inertia field. The subgroup | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | G _ {V} = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = | ||
+ | \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) > w ( a ) \textrm{ for all } a \in L, a \neq 0 } \right \} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | of $ G _ {T} $ | |
+ | is called the ramification group, and its fixed field $ V $ | ||
+ | the ramification field. If $ {\mathcal M} _ {w} $ | ||
+ | denotes the (unique) maximal [[Ideal|ideal]] of $ {\mathcal O} _ {w} $, | ||
+ | then the condition $ w ( \sigma a - a ) > 0 $ | ||
+ | is equivalent to $ \sigma a - a \in {\mathcal M} _ {w} $, | ||
+ | and $ w ( \sigma a - a ) > w ( a ) $ | ||
+ | is equivalent to | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{\sigma a }{a} | ||
+ | } - 1 \in {\mathcal M} _ {w} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | In number theory, also the higher ramification groups (cf. [[Ramified prime ideal|Ramified prime ideal]]) play a role; see [[#References|[a2]]]. If the value group $ wL $ | ||
+ | is a subgroup of the real numbers and $ s \geq - 1 $ | ||
+ | is a real number, then the $ s $ | ||
+ | th ramification group is defined to be | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) \geq s + 1 \textrm{ for all } a \in {\mathcal O} _ {w} } \right \} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
==Basic properties.== | ==Basic properties.== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ p $ |
+ | denote the characteristic of the residue field $ Lw $ | ||
+ | if it is a positive prime number; otherwise, set $ p = 1 $. | ||
+ | For simplicity, denote the restriction of $ w $ | ||
+ | to the intermediate fields again by $ w $. | ||
+ | Then $ G _ {V} $ | ||
+ | is a [[Pro-p group|pro- $ p $- | ||
+ | group]]; in particular, $ L = V $ | ||
+ | if the characteristic of $ Lw $ | ||
+ | is $ 0 $. | ||
+ | The quotient group $ wL/wV $ | ||
+ | of the respective value groups is a [[P-group| $ p $- | ||
+ | group]], and the extension $ Lw \mid Vw $ | ||
+ | of the respective residue fields is [[Purely inseparable extension|purely inseparable]] . $ G _ {V} $ | ||
+ | and $ G _ {T} $ | ||
+ | are normal subgroups of $ G _ {Z} $, | ||
+ | and $ G _ {V} $ | ||
+ | is a [[Normal subgroup|normal subgroup]] of $ G _ {T} $. | ||
− | The [[ | + | The [[Galois group]] $ G _ {T} /G _ {V} $ |
+ | of the normal separable extension $ V \mid T $ | ||
+ | is isomorphic to the character group $ { \mathop{\rm Hom} } ( wL/vK,Lw ^ \times ) $, | ||
+ | which is (non-canonically) isomorphic to $ wV/wT $ | ||
+ | if this group is finite. One has $ Vw = Tw $, | ||
+ | and the group $ wV/wT $ | ||
+ | is $ p $- | ||
+ | prime, i.e., no element has an order divisible by $ p $. | ||
+ | Every finite quotient of the [[Profinite group|profinite group]] $ G _ {T} /G _ {V} $ | ||
+ | is $ p $- | ||
+ | prime. | ||
− | The Galois group | + | The Galois group $ G _ {Z} /G _ {T} $ |
+ | of the normal separable extension $ T \mid Z $ | ||
+ | is isomorphic to the Galois group of the normal extensions $ Lw \mid Kv $( | ||
+ | which is $ Tw \mid Zw $). | ||
+ | Furthermore, $ Tw \mid Zw $ | ||
+ | is separable, and $ wT = wZ $. | ||
+ | The extension of $ w $ | ||
+ | from $ Z $ | ||
+ | to $ L $ | ||
+ | is unique. The extension $ Zw \mid Kv $ | ||
+ | is purely inseparable, and $ wZ/vK $ | ||
+ | is a $ p $- | ||
+ | group. | ||
− | For many applications, it is more convenient to define the decomposition, inertia and ramification field to be the fixed field of the corresponding group in the maximal separable subextension of | + | For many applications, it is more convenient to define the decomposition, inertia and ramification field to be the fixed field of the corresponding group in the maximal separable subextension of $ L \mid K $. |
+ | Then one obtains the following additional properties: $ wZ = vK $; | ||
+ | $ Zw = Kv $; | ||
+ | $ Z $ | ||
+ | is the minimal subextension which admits a unique extension of $ w $ | ||
+ | to $ L $; | ||
+ | $ Tw \mid Kv $ | ||
+ | is the maximal separable subextension of $ Lw \mid Kv $; | ||
+ | and $ wV $ | ||
+ | is the maximal of all subgroups $ \Gamma $ | ||
+ | of $ wL $ | ||
+ | for which $ \Gamma/vK $ | ||
+ | is $ p $- | ||
+ | prime. | ||
==Absolute ramification theory.== | ==Absolute ramification theory.== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ K $ |
+ | be any field with a valuation $ v $, | ||
+ | and let $ v ^ {s} $ | ||
+ | be some extension of $ v $ | ||
+ | to the separable-algebraic closure $ K ^ {s} $ | ||
+ | of $ K $. | ||
+ | Then the intermediate fields $ Z,T,V $ | ||
+ | are called the absolute decomposition field, the absolute inertia field and the absolute ramification field, respectively. Since all extensions of $ v $ | ||
+ | to $ K ^ {s} $ | ||
+ | are conjugate, that is, of the form $ v \circ \sigma $ | ||
+ | for $ \sigma \in G ( K ^ {s} \mid K ) $, | ||
+ | it follows that these fields are independent of the choice of the extension $ v ^ {s} $, | ||
+ | up to isomorphism over $ K $. | ||
+ | The absolute ramification field is the Henselization of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | inside $ ( K ^ {s} ,v ^ {s} ) $( | ||
+ | see [[Henselization of a valued field|Henselization of a valued field]]); it coincides with $ K $ | ||
+ | if and only if the extension of $ v $ | ||
+ | from $ K $ | ||
+ | to every algebraic extension field is unique. | ||
==Tame extensions and defectless fields.== | ==Tame extensions and defectless fields.== | ||
− | An extension | + | An extension $ ( L,w ) $ |
+ | of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is called tamely ramified if $ wL/vK $ | ||
+ | is $ p $- | ||
+ | prime and $ Lw \mid Kv $ | ||
+ | is separable. Let $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | be Henselian. Then an extension of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is called a tame extension if it is algebraic, tamely ramified and the [[Defect|defect]] of every finite subextension is trivial, that is, equal to $ 1 $. | ||
+ | The absolute ramification field is the unique maximal tame extension of $ ( K,v ) $. | ||
+ | If it is algebraically closed, or equivalently, if all algebraic extensions of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | are tame extensions, then $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is called a tame field; see also [[Model theory of valued fields|Model theory of valued fields]]. From the fact that every finite subextension in the absolute ramification field is defectless it follows that a non-trivial defect can only appear between the absolute ramification field and the algebraic closure of $ K $. | ||
+ | Since every finite subextension of this extension has as degree a power of $ p $, | ||
+ | the defect must be a power of $ p $. | ||
+ | This is the content of the Ostrowski lemma. In particular, the defect is always trivial if $ p = 1 $, | ||
+ | that is, if the characteristic of $ Kv $ | ||
+ | is $ 0 $. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Endler, "Valuation theory" , Springer (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.P. Serre, "Corps locaux" , Hermann (1962)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Endler, "Valuation theory" , Springer (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.P. Serre, "Corps locaux" , Hermann (1962)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 08:09, 6 June 2020
A branch of commutative algebra and number theory in which certain distinguished intermediate fields of algebraic extensions of fields equipped with a valuation are considered. Let $ L \mid K $
be a (not necessarily finite) algebraic extension of fields, and let $ w $
be a valuation of $ L $
with valuation ring $ {\mathcal O} _ {w} $
and extending a valuation $ v $
of $ K $.
Assume that the extension $ L \mid K $
is normal (cf. Extension of a field) and that $ G = G ( L \mid K ) $
is its Galois group. The subgroup
$$ G _ {Z} = \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a ) = w ( a ) \textrm{ for all } a \in L } \right \} $$
of $ G $ is called the decomposition group of $ w \mid v $, and its fixed field $ Z $ the decomposition field. The subgroup
$$ G _ {T} = \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) > 0 \textrm{ for all } a \in {\mathcal O} _ {w} } \right \} $$
of $ G _ {Z} $ is called the inertia group, and its fixed field $ T $ the inertia field. The subgroup
$$ G _ {V} = $$
$$ = \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) > w ( a ) \textrm{ for all } a \in L, a \neq 0 } \right \} $$
of $ G _ {T} $ is called the ramification group, and its fixed field $ V $ the ramification field. If $ {\mathcal M} _ {w} $ denotes the (unique) maximal ideal of $ {\mathcal O} _ {w} $, then the condition $ w ( \sigma a - a ) > 0 $ is equivalent to $ \sigma a - a \in {\mathcal M} _ {w} $, and $ w ( \sigma a - a ) > w ( a ) $ is equivalent to
$$ { \frac{\sigma a }{a} } - 1 \in {\mathcal M} _ {w} . $$
In number theory, also the higher ramification groups (cf. Ramified prime ideal) play a role; see [a2]. If the value group $ wL $ is a subgroup of the real numbers and $ s \geq - 1 $ is a real number, then the $ s $ th ramification group is defined to be
$$ \left \{ {\sigma \in G } : {w ( \sigma a - a ) \geq s + 1 \textrm{ for all } a \in {\mathcal O} _ {w} } \right \} . $$
Basic properties.
Let $ p $ denote the characteristic of the residue field $ Lw $ if it is a positive prime number; otherwise, set $ p = 1 $. For simplicity, denote the restriction of $ w $ to the intermediate fields again by $ w $. Then $ G _ {V} $ is a pro- $ p $- group; in particular, $ L = V $ if the characteristic of $ Lw $ is $ 0 $. The quotient group $ wL/wV $ of the respective value groups is a $ p $- group, and the extension $ Lw \mid Vw $ of the respective residue fields is purely inseparable . $ G _ {V} $ and $ G _ {T} $ are normal subgroups of $ G _ {Z} $, and $ G _ {V} $ is a normal subgroup of $ G _ {T} $.
The Galois group $ G _ {T} /G _ {V} $ of the normal separable extension $ V \mid T $ is isomorphic to the character group $ { \mathop{\rm Hom} } ( wL/vK,Lw ^ \times ) $, which is (non-canonically) isomorphic to $ wV/wT $ if this group is finite. One has $ Vw = Tw $, and the group $ wV/wT $ is $ p $- prime, i.e., no element has an order divisible by $ p $. Every finite quotient of the profinite group $ G _ {T} /G _ {V} $ is $ p $- prime.
The Galois group $ G _ {Z} /G _ {T} $ of the normal separable extension $ T \mid Z $ is isomorphic to the Galois group of the normal extensions $ Lw \mid Kv $( which is $ Tw \mid Zw $). Furthermore, $ Tw \mid Zw $ is separable, and $ wT = wZ $. The extension of $ w $ from $ Z $ to $ L $ is unique. The extension $ Zw \mid Kv $ is purely inseparable, and $ wZ/vK $ is a $ p $- group.
For many applications, it is more convenient to define the decomposition, inertia and ramification field to be the fixed field of the corresponding group in the maximal separable subextension of $ L \mid K $. Then one obtains the following additional properties: $ wZ = vK $; $ Zw = Kv $; $ Z $ is the minimal subextension which admits a unique extension of $ w $ to $ L $; $ Tw \mid Kv $ is the maximal separable subextension of $ Lw \mid Kv $; and $ wV $ is the maximal of all subgroups $ \Gamma $ of $ wL $ for which $ \Gamma/vK $ is $ p $- prime.
Absolute ramification theory.
Let $ K $ be any field with a valuation $ v $, and let $ v ^ {s} $ be some extension of $ v $ to the separable-algebraic closure $ K ^ {s} $ of $ K $. Then the intermediate fields $ Z,T,V $ are called the absolute decomposition field, the absolute inertia field and the absolute ramification field, respectively. Since all extensions of $ v $ to $ K ^ {s} $ are conjugate, that is, of the form $ v \circ \sigma $ for $ \sigma \in G ( K ^ {s} \mid K ) $, it follows that these fields are independent of the choice of the extension $ v ^ {s} $, up to isomorphism over $ K $. The absolute ramification field is the Henselization of $ ( K,v ) $ inside $ ( K ^ {s} ,v ^ {s} ) $( see Henselization of a valued field); it coincides with $ K $ if and only if the extension of $ v $ from $ K $ to every algebraic extension field is unique.
Tame extensions and defectless fields.
An extension $ ( L,w ) $ of $ ( K,v ) $ is called tamely ramified if $ wL/vK $ is $ p $- prime and $ Lw \mid Kv $ is separable. Let $ ( K,v ) $ be Henselian. Then an extension of $ ( K,v ) $ is called a tame extension if it is algebraic, tamely ramified and the defect of every finite subextension is trivial, that is, equal to $ 1 $. The absolute ramification field is the unique maximal tame extension of $ ( K,v ) $. If it is algebraically closed, or equivalently, if all algebraic extensions of $ ( K,v ) $ are tame extensions, then $ ( K,v ) $ is called a tame field; see also Model theory of valued fields. From the fact that every finite subextension in the absolute ramification field is defectless it follows that a non-trivial defect can only appear between the absolute ramification field and the algebraic closure of $ K $. Since every finite subextension of this extension has as degree a power of $ p $, the defect must be a power of $ p $. This is the content of the Ostrowski lemma. In particular, the defect is always trivial if $ p = 1 $, that is, if the characteristic of $ Kv $ is $ 0 $.
References
[a1] | O. Endler, "Valuation theory" , Springer (1972) |
[a2] | J.P. Serre, "Corps locaux" , Hermann (1962) |
Ramification theory of valued fields. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Ramification_theory_of_valued_fields&oldid=14401