Difference between revisions of "Lovász local lemma"
(Category:Combinatorics) |
m (→References: expand bibliodata) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''LLL'' | ''LLL'' | ||
A central technique in the probabilistic method. It is used to prove the existence of a "good" object even when the random object is almost certainly "bad" . It is applicable in situations in which the bad events are mostly independent. It sieves the bad events to find the rare good one. | A central technique in the probabilistic method. It is used to prove the existence of a "good" object even when the random object is almost certainly "bad" . It is applicable in situations in which the bad events are mostly independent. It sieves the bad events to find the rare good one. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $B_\alpha$, $\alpha \in I$, be a finite family of "bad" events. A [[graph]] $G$ on $I$ as vertex set is called a ''dependency graph'' for the events if each $B_\alpha$ is mutually independent of those $B_\beta$ with $\alpha, \beta$ not adjacent (cf. also [[Independence]]). |
==Symmetric case of the Lovász local lemma.== | ==Symmetric case of the Lovász local lemma.== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $B_\alpha$, $G$ be as above. Suppose all $\mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] \le p$. Suppose all $\alpha \in I$ are adjacent to at most $d$ other $\beta \in I$. Suppose $4dp < 1$. Then $\wedge_I \bar B_\alpha \neq \emptyset$. |
− | Here, the number of events, | + | Here, the number of events, $|I|$, may be arbitrarily large, giving the Lovász local lemma much of its strength. In most applications the underlying probability space is generated by mutually independent choices, each event $B_\alpha$ depends on a set $X_\alpha$ of choices, and $\alpha, \beta$ are adjacent when $X_\alpha,\,X_\beta$ overlap. |
===Example.=== | ===Example.=== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $A_\alpha$, $\alpha \in I$, be sets of size ten in some universe $\Omega$, where every $\omega \in \Omega$ lies in at most ten such sets. Then there is a red-blue colouring of $\Omega$ so that no $X_\alpha$ is monochromatic. The underlying space is a random red-blue colouring of $\Omega$. The bad event $B_\alpha$ is that $X_\alpha$ has been coloured monochromatically. Each $\mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] = 2^{-9} = p$. Each $A_\alpha$ overlaps at most $90$ other $A_\beta$, so $d = 90$. The Lovász local lemma gives the existence of a colouring. |
The lemma was discovered by L. Lovász (see [[#References|[a3]]] for an original application) in 1975. It ushered in a new era for the probabilistic method. | The lemma was discovered by L. Lovász (see [[#References|[a3]]] for an original application) in 1975. It ushered in a new era for the probabilistic method. | ||
==General case of the Lovász local lemma.== | ==General case of the Lovász local lemma.== | ||
− | Let | + | Let $B_\alpha$, $G$ be as above. If there exist an $x_\alpha \in (0,1)$ with |
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | \mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] \le x_\alpha \prod (1-x_\beta)\,, | |
− | + | $$ | |
− | the product over those | + | the product over those $\beta$ adjacent to $\alpha$, then $\wedge_I \bar B_\alpha \neq \emptyset$. |
− | Application of the general case generally requires mild analytic skill in choosing the | + | Application of the general case generally requires mild analytic skill in choosing the $x_a$. |
− | The proof of the Lovász local lemma (in either case) requires only elementary (albeit ingenious) [[ | + | The proof of the Lovász local lemma (in either case) requires only elementary (albeit ingenious) [[probability theory]] and takes less than a page. |
A breakthrough in algorithmic implementation was given by J. Beck [[#References|[a2]]] in 1991. He showed that in certain (though not all) situations where the Lovász local lemma guarantees the existence of an object, that object can be found by a polynomial-time algorithm. Proofs, applications and algorithmic implementation are explored in [[#References|[a1]]] and elsewhere. | A breakthrough in algorithmic implementation was given by J. Beck [[#References|[a2]]] in 1991. He showed that in certain (though not all) situations where the Lovász local lemma guarantees the existence of an object, that object can be found by a polynomial-time algorithm. Proofs, applications and algorithmic implementation are explored in [[#References|[a1]]] and elsewhere. | ||
− | The acronym LLL is also used for the Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovász algorithm (see [[ | + | The acronym LLL is also used for the Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovász algorithm (see [[LLL basis reduction method]]). |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table> | <table> | ||
− | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Alon, J. Spencer, "The probabilistic method" , Wiley (2000) (Edition: Second)</TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Alon, J. Spencer, "The probabilistic method" , Wiley (2000) (Edition: Second) {{ZBL|0996.05001}}</TD></TR> |
− | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Beck, "An algorithmic approach to the Lovász local lemma, I" , ''Random Structures and Algorithms'' , '''2''' (1991) pp. 343–365</TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Beck, "An algorithmic approach to the Lovász local lemma, I" , ''Random Structures and Algorithms'' , '''2''' (1991) pp. 343–365 {{ZBL|0756.05080}}</TD></TR> |
− | <TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Erdős, L. Lovász, "Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions" A. Hajnal (ed.) et al. (ed.) , ''Infinite and Finite Sets'' , North-Holland (1975) pp. 609–628</TD></TR> | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Erdős, L. Lovász, "Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions" A. Hajnal (ed.) et al. (ed.) , ''Infinite and Finite Sets'' , North-Holland (1975) pp. 609–628 {{ZBL|0315.05117}}</TD></TR> |
</table> | </table> | ||
[[Category:Combinatorics]] | [[Category:Combinatorics]] |
Latest revision as of 19:47, 18 December 2014
LLL
A central technique in the probabilistic method. It is used to prove the existence of a "good" object even when the random object is almost certainly "bad" . It is applicable in situations in which the bad events are mostly independent. It sieves the bad events to find the rare good one.
Let $B_\alpha$, $\alpha \in I$, be a finite family of "bad" events. A graph $G$ on $I$ as vertex set is called a dependency graph for the events if each $B_\alpha$ is mutually independent of those $B_\beta$ with $\alpha, \beta$ not adjacent (cf. also Independence).
Symmetric case of the Lovász local lemma.
Let $B_\alpha$, $G$ be as above. Suppose all $\mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] \le p$. Suppose all $\alpha \in I$ are adjacent to at most $d$ other $\beta \in I$. Suppose $4dp < 1$. Then $\wedge_I \bar B_\alpha \neq \emptyset$.
Here, the number of events, $|I|$, may be arbitrarily large, giving the Lovász local lemma much of its strength. In most applications the underlying probability space is generated by mutually independent choices, each event $B_\alpha$ depends on a set $X_\alpha$ of choices, and $\alpha, \beta$ are adjacent when $X_\alpha,\,X_\beta$ overlap.
Example.
Let $A_\alpha$, $\alpha \in I$, be sets of size ten in some universe $\Omega$, where every $\omega \in \Omega$ lies in at most ten such sets. Then there is a red-blue colouring of $\Omega$ so that no $X_\alpha$ is monochromatic. The underlying space is a random red-blue colouring of $\Omega$. The bad event $B_\alpha$ is that $X_\alpha$ has been coloured monochromatically. Each $\mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] = 2^{-9} = p$. Each $A_\alpha$ overlaps at most $90$ other $A_\beta$, so $d = 90$. The Lovász local lemma gives the existence of a colouring.
The lemma was discovered by L. Lovász (see [a3] for an original application) in 1975. It ushered in a new era for the probabilistic method.
General case of the Lovász local lemma.
Let $B_\alpha$, $G$ be as above. If there exist an $x_\alpha \in (0,1)$ with $$ \mathbf{P}[B_\alpha] \le x_\alpha \prod (1-x_\beta)\,, $$ the product over those $\beta$ adjacent to $\alpha$, then $\wedge_I \bar B_\alpha \neq \emptyset$.
Application of the general case generally requires mild analytic skill in choosing the $x_a$.
The proof of the Lovász local lemma (in either case) requires only elementary (albeit ingenious) probability theory and takes less than a page.
A breakthrough in algorithmic implementation was given by J. Beck [a2] in 1991. He showed that in certain (though not all) situations where the Lovász local lemma guarantees the existence of an object, that object can be found by a polynomial-time algorithm. Proofs, applications and algorithmic implementation are explored in [a1] and elsewhere.
The acronym LLL is also used for the Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovász algorithm (see LLL basis reduction method).
References
[a1] | N. Alon, J. Spencer, "The probabilistic method" , Wiley (2000) (Edition: Second) Zbl 0996.05001 |
[a2] | J. Beck, "An algorithmic approach to the Lovász local lemma, I" , Random Structures and Algorithms , 2 (1991) pp. 343–365 Zbl 0756.05080 |
[a3] | P. Erdős, L. Lovász, "Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions" A. Hajnal (ed.) et al. (ed.) , Infinite and Finite Sets , North-Holland (1975) pp. 609–628 Zbl 0315.05117 |
Lovász local lemma. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lov%C3%A1sz_local_lemma&oldid=33977