Potential theory, abstract
The theory of potentials on abstract topological spaces. Abstract potential theory arose in the middle of the 20th century from the efforts to create a unified axiomatic method for treating a vast diversity of properties of the different potentials that are applied to solve problems of the theory of partial differential equations. The first sufficiently complete description of the axiomatics of "harmonic" functions (i.e. solutions of an admissible class of partial differential equations) and the corresponding potentials was given by M. Brelot (1957–1958, see [1]), but it was concerned only with elliptic equations. The extension of the theory to a wide class of parabolic equations was obtained by H. Bauer (1960–1963, see [3]). The probabilistic approach to abstract potential theory, the origins of which could be found already in the works of P. Lévy, J. Doob, G. Hunt, and others, turned out to be very fruitful.
To expose abstract potential theory, the notion of a harmonic space is of great help. Let be a locally compact topological space. A sheaf of functions on
is a mapping
defined on the family of all open sets of
such that
1) , for any open set
, is a family of functions
;
2) if two open sets are such that
, then the restriction of any function from
to
belongs to
;
3) if for any family ,
, of open sets
the restrictions to
of some function
defined on
belong, for any
, to
, then
.
A sheaf of functions on
is called a harmonic sheaf if for any open set
the family
is a real vector space of continuous functions on
. A function
defined on some set
containing the open set
is called an
-function if the restriction
belongs to
. A harmonic sheaf is non-degenerate at a point
if in a neighbourhood of
there exists an
-function
such that
.
The real distinctions between the axiomatics of Bauer, Brelot and Doob can be characterized by the convergence properties of -functions.
a) Bauer's convergence property states that if an increasing sequence of -functions is locally bounded on some open set
, then the limit function
is an
-function.
b) Doob's convergence property states that if a limit function is finite on some dense set
, then
is an
-function.
c) Brelot's convergence property states that if the limit function of an increasing sequence of
-functions on some domain
is finite at a point
, then
is an
-function.
If the space is locally connected, the implications c)
b)
a) hold.
A sheaf of functions on
is called a hyperharmonic sheaf if for any open set
the family
is a convex cone of lower semi-continuous functions
; a
-function is defined in a similar way as an
-function. The mapping
is a harmonic sheaf, denoted by
and generated by the sheaf
; hereafter, only this harmonic sheaf will be used.
Let on the boundary of an open set
a continuous function
with compact support be given. The hyperharmonic sheaf
allows one to construct a generalized solution of the Dirichlet problem for certain open sets in the class of corresponding
-functions by the Perron method. Let
be a family of lower semi-continuous
-functions
, bounded from below on
, positive outside some compact set and such that
![]() |
define by
. Now, let,
![]() |
and let if
. Similarly,
![]() |
or . A function is called resolutive if for this function
and
coincide,
, and if
is an
-function; this function
is a generalized solution of the Dirichlet problem in the class of
-functions. An open set
is resolutive with respect to
if every finite continuous function with compact support on
is resolutive. For a resolutive set
the mapping
is a positive linear functional, hence it determines a positive measure
,
, which is called the harmonic measure on
(or on
) at the point
(with respect to
).
A locally compact space with a hyperharmonic sheaf
turns into a harmonic space if the four corresponding axioms (see Harmonic space) hold; moreover, in the convergence axiom the property is understood in the sense of Bauer.
Often (it is like this in classical examples) one takes as a basis the harmonic sheaf , and the axiom of completeness serves then as a definition of a hyperharmonic sheaf. For instance, the Euclidean space
,
, together with the sheaf of classical solutions of the Laplace equation or of the heat equation as
, is a harmonic space. A harmonic space is locally connected, does not contain isolated points and has a basis consisting of connected resolutive sets (resolutive domains).
An open set in a harmonic space
with the restriction
as hyperharmonic sheaf is a harmonic subspace of
. A hyperharmonic function
on
is called a superharmonic function if for any relatively compact resolutive set
with
, the greatest minorant
is harmonic,
. Many properties of classical superharmonic functions (see Subharmonic function) also hold in this case. A potential is a positive superharmonic function
such that its greatest harmonic minorant on
is identically equal to zero. A harmonic space
is called a
-harmonic (or
-harmonic) space if for any point
there exists a positive superharmonic function
(a potential
, respectively) on
such that
. Any open set in a
-harmonic space is resolutive.
Taking a harmonic sheaf as basis and defining the corresponding hyperharmonic sheaf
by the axiom of completeness, one obtains the Bauer space, which coincides with the harmonic space for
. If the harmonic sheaf
, for any open set
, consists of the solutions
of the heat equation
, then
has the Doob convergence property and
together with this sheaf
is a (Bauer)
-space. Here,
is a superharmonic function of class
if and only if
.
A Brelot space is characterized by the following conditions: does not have isolated points and is locally connected; the regular sets with respect to
form a base of
(regularity means resolutivity of the classical Dirichlet problem in the class
); and
has the Brelot convergence property. The Brelot spaces form a proper subclass of the so-called elliptic harmonic spaces (see [4]), i.e. the elliptic Bauer spaces. If the harmonic sheaf
, for any open set
,
, consists of the solutions
of the Laplace equation
, then
together with this sheaf is a Brelot
-space, and
for
is a Brelot
-space. Here,
is a hyperharmonic function of class
if and only if
.
A point of the boundary
of a resolutive set
is called a regular boundary point if for any finite continuous function
on
the following limit relation holds:
![]() |
otherwise is called an irregular boundary point. Let
be a filter on
converging to
. A strictly-positive hyperharmonic function
defined on the intersection of
with some neighbourhood of
and converging to
along
is called a barrier of the filter
. If for a relatively compact resolutive set
in a
-harmonic space all filters that converge to points
have barriers, then
is a regular set, i.e. all its boundary points are regular. If
is a relatively compact open set in a
-harmonic space on which there exists a strictly-positive hyperharmonic function converging to
at each point
, then
is a regular set.
Besides studies concerning resolutivity and regularity in the Dirichlet problem, the following problems are of major interest in abstract potential theory: the theory of capacity of point sets in harmonic spaces ; the theory of balayage (see Balayage method) for functions and measures on
; and the theory of integral representations of positive superharmonic functions on
generalizing the Martin representations (see Martin boundary in potential theory).
Already at the beginning of the 20th century it became evident that potential theory is closely related to certain concepts of probability theory such as Brownian motion; Wiener process; and Markov process. For instance, the probability that the trajectory of a Brownian motion in a domain starting at the point
will hit for the first time the boundary
on a (Borel) set
is exactly the harmonic measure of
at
; the polar sets (cf. Polar set) on
are the sets that are almost-certainly not hit by the trajectory. Later on, probabilistic methods contributed to a more profound understanding of certain ideas from potential theory and led to a series of new results; on the other hand, the potential-theoretic approach led to a better understanding of the results of probability theory and also leads to new results in it.
Let be a locally compact space with a countable base, let
and
be the classes of finite continuous functions on
, respectively, with compact support and convergent to zero at infinity. A measure kernel
is a (Borel) function in
for every relatively compact (Borel) set
. Using
, to each function
,
, corresponds a potential function
![]() |
and to a measure corresponds a potential measure
![]() |
The identity kernel vanishes when
and is equal to
when
, it changes neither
nor
. For instance, in the Euclidean space
the kernel
![]() |
determines the Newton potential with density
, and
is the measure with density equal to the density of the Newton potential of the measure
(see Potential theory).
A product kernel has the form
![]() |
A family of kernels ,
, with the composition law
is a one-parameter semi-group. A kernel
satisfies the complete maximum principle if for any
from
and
the inequality
on the set where
leads to this inequality everywhere on
. The principal theorem in this theory is Hunt's theorem, which in its simplest version is the following: If the image of
under a transformation
is dense in
and if
satisfies the complete maximum principle, then there exists a semi-group
,
, such that
![]() |
(a Feller semi-group); moreover, transforms
into
;
is the identity kernel;
,
, locally uniform; and
. A measurable function
is called an excessive function with respect to the semi-group
if always
and if
; if
, then
is called an invariant function. The corresponding formulas are also valid for the potential measure
.
The theory of Hunt (1957–1958) outlined above has a direct probabilistic sense. Let on be given some
-algebra
of Borel sets and a probability measure
. A random variable
is a
-measurable mapping of
into the state space
. The family of random variables
,
, is a Markov process (for which
is the trajectory of a point
) if for any
,
, there exists a probability measure
on
such that a)
; b)
,
, is a Borel function of
; and c) the form of a trajectory passing through
at a moment
, for
, is independent of the positions of the points preceding it. In such Markov processes the semi-groups
are interpreted as semi-groups of measures
![]() |
Studies of excessive and invariant functions with respect to the semi-groups are of great importance.
On the other hand, if is a
-harmonic space with a countable base, then one can always choose on it a potential kernel to meet the requirements of Hunt's theorem; in this case the excessive functions of the associated semi-group are precisely the non-negative hyperharmonic functions. Hunt's theorem can be also generalized for some types of Bauer spaces (see [4], [7]).
Other concepts from abstract potential theory, such as, for example, balayage, polar and thin sets, also have their probabilistic interpretation within the framework of the general theory of random processes; this facilitates studies of the latter. On the other hand, the potential-theoretic approach to a series of concepts, such as, for example, martingales, which are beyond the limits of Markov processes, turned out to be of great importance.
References
[1] | M. Brélot, "Lectures on potential theory" , Tata Inst. (1960) |
[2] | M. Brelot, "Les étapes et les aspects multiples de la théorie du potentiel" Enseign. Math. , 18 : 1 (1972) pp. 1–36 |
[3] | H. Bauer, "Harmonische Räume und ihre Potentialtheorie" , Springer (1966) |
[4] | C. Constantinescu, A. Cornea, "Potential theory on harmonic spaces" , Springer (1972) |
[5] | P.A. Meyer, "Probability and potentials" , Blaisdell (1966) |
[6a] | G.A. Hunt, "Markov processes and potentials, I" Illinois J. Math. , 1 (1957) pp. 44–93 |
[6b] | G.A. Hunt, "Markov processes and potentials, II" Illinois J. Math. , 1 (1957) pp. 316–362 |
[6c] | G.A. Hunt, "Markov processes and potentials, III" Illinois J. Math. , 2 (1958) pp. 151–213 |
[7] | R.M. Blumenthal, R.K. Getoor, "Markov processes and potential theory" , Acad. Press (1968) |
Comments
Abstract potential theory is also called axiomatic potential theory.
A measure kernel is also defined as a (
-additive, non-negative) measure in
, and
can be defined whenever
is Borel and non-negative; in the article above,
is assumed finite if
. By definition, a Feller semi-group
transforms
to
,
is the identity kernel and for
the transformation
is continuous at 0 for the uniform topology. If
and
are related by Hunt's theorem,
is called the potential kernel of the Feller semi-group
, and for any non-negative Borel function
the potential
of
is an excessive function with respect to the semi-group
. One can define analogously excessive measures and potential measures, and their study is also of great importance. The passage in the article on the definition of a Markov process is somewhat misleading: the
equipped with the
-algebra
has to be replaced by an extraneous measurable space, say
, and the state space
by the locally compact space
where the Hunt kernel
is defined, so that in the equality
one has
and
(and Borel). See Markov process.
Around 1959, A. Beurling and J. Deny introduced another branch of abstract potential theory: the notion of Dirichlet space, an axiomatization of the theory of the Dirichlet integral. See [a3].
Several abstract theories have been introduced, aimed at a unification of different branches of potential theory, e.g. the theory of balayage spaces, cf. [a2], and the theory of -cones, cf. [a1]. Both concepts use a convex cone of functions (the positive hyperharmonic functions, e.g.), satisfying some convergence properties, a Riesz property and a separation property as their main tool. See also [a4] for short surveys.
References
[a1] | N. Boboc, Gh. Bucur, A. Cornea, "Order and convexity in potential theory: ![]() |
[a2] | J. Bliedtner, W. Hansen, "Potential theory. An analytic and probabilistic approach to balayage" , Springer (1986) |
[a3] | M. Fukushima, "Dirichlet forms and Markov processes" , North-Holland (1980) |
[a4] | J. Král (ed.) J. Lukeš (ed.) J. Veselý (ed.) , Potential theory. Survey and problems (Prague, 1987) , Lect. notes in math. , 1344 , Springer (1988) |
[a5] | M. Brelot (ed.) H. Bauer (ed.) J.-M. Bony (ed.) J. Deny (ed.) G. Mokobodzki (ed.) , Potential theory (CIME, Stresa, 1969) , Cremonese (1970) |
[a6] | C. Dellacherie, P.A. Meyer, "Probabilities and potential" , C , North-Holland (1988) (Translated from French) |
[a7] | F.Y. Maeda, "Dirichlet integrals on harmonic spaces" , Lect. notes in math. , 803 , Springer (1980) |
[a8] | M. Röckner, "Markov property of generalized fields and axiomatic potential theory" Math. Ann. , 264 (1983) pp. 153–177 |
Potential theory, abstract. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Potential_theory,_abstract&oldid=14793