Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Coalitional game"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
(TeX done)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A game in which the coalitions of actions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227601.png" /> and the coalitions of interests <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227602.png" /> are different (generally, intersecting) families of subsets of the set of players <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227603.png" /> and in which the preference for each of the coalitions of interests <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227604.png" /> is described by its pay-off function <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227605.png" /> (see [[Games, theory of|Games, theory of]]). Only the case <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227606.png" /> has been investigated.
+
A game in which the coalitions of actions $\mathcal{K}_A$ and the coalitions of interests $\mathcal{K}_I$ are different (generally, intersecting) families of subsets of the set of players $P$ and in which the preference for each of the coalitions of interests $K \in \mathcal{K}_I$ is described by its pay-off function $H_K$ (see [[Games, theory of]]). Only the case $\mathcal{K}_I \subseteq \mathcal{K}_A$ has been investigated.
  
It is natural to consider <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227607.png" /> as a simplicial complex with vertex set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227608.png" />. Certain topological properties of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c0227609.png" /> have a game-theoretic sense; in particular, if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276010.png" /> is zero-dimensional, then the game turns out to be a non-cooperative game.
+
It is natural to consider $\mathcal{K}_A$ as a simplicial complex with vertex set $P$. Certain topological properties of $\mathcal{K}_A$ have a game-theoretic sense; in particular, if $\mathcal{K}_A$ is zero-dimensional, then the game turns out to be a [[non-cooperative game]].
  
The play of a coalitional game can be interpreted as a coordinated choice of coalitional strategies (cf. [[Strategy (in game theory)|Strategy (in game theory)]]) by the players (at the  "coalition conference" ) for each coalition of action after which, in the situation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276011.png" /> thus formed, each coalition of interests <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276012.png" /> receives the pay-off <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276013.png" />.
+
The play of a coalitional game can be interpreted as a coordinated choice of coalitional strategies (cf. [[Strategy (in game theory)]]) by the players (at the  "coalition conference" ) for each coalition of action after which, in the situation $s$ thus formed, each coalition of interests $K$ receives the pay-off $H_K(s)$.
  
Optimality in a coalitional game can, in its own way, be regarded as a  "localization of conflicts" , that is, as a stability of the situation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276014.png" /> in the sense that conditions of the following form prevail: The coalition of interests <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276015.png" /> is not interested in the departure from its coalition strategy in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276016.png" />, even if some coalition of action <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/c/c022/c022760/c02276017.png" /> departs from its strategy. Equilibrium in the sense of Nash is covered by this principle.
+
Optimality in a coalitional game can, in its own way, be regarded as a  "localization of conflicts" , that is, as a stability of the situation $s$ in the sense that conditions of the following form prevail: The coalition of interests $K$ is not interested in the departure from its coalition strategy in $s$, even if some coalition of action $K'$ departs from its strategy. Equilibrium in the sense of Nash is covered by this principle.
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.N. Vorob'ev,  "Coalitional games"  ''Teor. Veroyatn. Primenen.'' , '''12''' :  2  (1967)  pp. 289–306  (In Russian)  (English summary)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.N. Vorob'ev,  "Coalitional games"  ''Teor. Veroyatn. Primenen.'' , '''12''' :  2  (1967)  pp. 289–306  (In Russian)  (English summary)</TD></TR>
 +
</table>
  
  
Line 14: Line 16:
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
 
The notions explained in the article above do not occur in the Western literature and are particular to the author and his school.
 
The notions explained in the article above do not occur in the Western literature and are particular to the author and his school.
 +
 +
{{TEX|done}}

Latest revision as of 16:35, 9 April 2016

A game in which the coalitions of actions $\mathcal{K}_A$ and the coalitions of interests $\mathcal{K}_I$ are different (generally, intersecting) families of subsets of the set of players $P$ and in which the preference for each of the coalitions of interests $K \in \mathcal{K}_I$ is described by its pay-off function $H_K$ (see Games, theory of). Only the case $\mathcal{K}_I \subseteq \mathcal{K}_A$ has been investigated.

It is natural to consider $\mathcal{K}_A$ as a simplicial complex with vertex set $P$. Certain topological properties of $\mathcal{K}_A$ have a game-theoretic sense; in particular, if $\mathcal{K}_A$ is zero-dimensional, then the game turns out to be a non-cooperative game.

The play of a coalitional game can be interpreted as a coordinated choice of coalitional strategies (cf. Strategy (in game theory)) by the players (at the "coalition conference" ) for each coalition of action after which, in the situation $s$ thus formed, each coalition of interests $K$ receives the pay-off $H_K(s)$.

Optimality in a coalitional game can, in its own way, be regarded as a "localization of conflicts" , that is, as a stability of the situation $s$ in the sense that conditions of the following form prevail: The coalition of interests $K$ is not interested in the departure from its coalition strategy in $s$, even if some coalition of action $K'$ departs from its strategy. Equilibrium in the sense of Nash is covered by this principle.

References

[1] N.N. Vorob'ev, "Coalitional games" Teor. Veroyatn. Primenen. , 12 : 2 (1967) pp. 289–306 (In Russian) (English summary)


Comments

The notions explained in the article above do not occur in the Western literature and are particular to the author and his school.

How to Cite This Entry:
Coalitional game. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Coalitional_game&oldid=13048
This article was adapted from an original article by N.N. Vorob'ev (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article