Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
m (fixing spaces)
m (fixing mathop)
 
Line 34: Line 34:
 
The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series 
 
The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series    \sum _ {h \geq  0 }  a _ {h} X  ^ {h}
 
representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set    \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \}
 
representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set    \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \}
is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. [[Arithmetic progression|Arithmetic progression]]), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [[#References|[a6]]], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial  $  a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 }  ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) { \mathop{\rm exp} } ( z { \mathop{\rm log} } \alpha _ {i} ) $
+
is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. [[Arithmetic progression|Arithmetic progression]]), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [[#References|[a6]]], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial    a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 }  ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) \exp ( z \log \alpha _ {i} )
 
is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions    \sin  { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } .
 
is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions    \sin  { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } .
  
 
Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [[#References|[a1]]] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes    p
 
Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [[#References|[a1]]] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes    p
 
so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field    \mathbf Q _ {p}
 
so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field    \mathbf Q _ {p}
of    p -adic rationals) one has  $  \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( { \mathop{\rm mod} } p ) $
+
of    p -adic rationals) one has  $  \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( \mod p ) $
 
for each root. Then, for    0 \leq  r < p - 1 ,  
 
for each root. Then, for    0 \leq  r < p - 1 ,  
 
each of the    p - 1
 
each of the    p - 1
different    p -adic exponential polynomials  $  a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 }  ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i}  ^ {r} { \mathop{\rm exp} } ( t { \mathop{\rm log} } \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } ) $
+
different    p -adic exponential polynomials    a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 }  ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i}  ^ {r} \exp ( t \log \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } )
 
is a    p -adic analytic function in the disc    \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} .  
 
is a    p -adic analytic function in the disc    \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} .  
 
It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as    n
 
It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as    n

Latest revision as of 06:04, 12 July 2022


A recurrence sequence ( a _ {h} ) of order n is a solution to a linear homogeneous recurrence relation with constant coefficients

a _ {h + n } = s _ {1} a _ {h + n - 1 } + \dots + s _ {n} a _ {h} ( h = 0,1, \dots ) .

Thus, the generating function \sum _ {h \geq 0 } a _ {h} X ^ {h} of a recurrence is a rational function { {r ( X ) } / {s ( X ) } } where s ( X ) = 1 - s _ {1} X - \dots - s _ {n} X ^ {n} = \prod _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} ( 1 - \alpha _ {i} X ) ^ {n _ {i} } , say; the polynomial r of degree less than n is determined by the initial values a _ {0}, \dots, a _ {n - 1 } . If so, the distinct complex numbers \alpha _ {i} are called the roots of the recurrence, and the n _ {i} their multiplicities. It follows that the a _ {h} are given by a generalized power sum a _ {h} = a ( h ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( h ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {h} ( h = 0,1, \dots ); the polynomial coefficients A _ {i} are respectively of degree n _ {i} - 1 .

The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series \sum _ {h \geq 0 } a _ {h} X ^ {h} representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \} is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. Arithmetic progression), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [a6], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) \exp ( z \log \alpha _ {i} ) is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions \sin { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } .

Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [a1] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes p so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field \mathbf Q _ {p} of p -adic rationals) one has \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( \mod p ) for each root. Then, for 0 \leq r < p - 1 , each of the p - 1 different p -adic exponential polynomials a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {r} \exp ( t \log \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } ) is a p -adic analytic function in the disc \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} . It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as n zeros [a3]) in the unit disc, then it must vanish identically, yielding the theorem with arithmetic progressions with common difference d = p - 1 . It follows that a recurrence sequence can have infinitely many zeros only if it is degenerate, that is, some quotient { {\alpha _ {i} } / {\alpha _ {j} } } of its distinct roots is a root of unity.

The theorem is provable without visible appeal to p -adic analysis [a2]. But a generalization, whereby if two recurrence sequences have infinitely many elements in common then they coincide along certain of their arithmetic subprogressions (see [a4]), as yet, (1996) relies on a p -adic generalization of Schmidt's subspace theorem. A different generalization, Shapiro's conjecture, according to which two exponential polynomials with infinitely many complex common zeros must have a common exponential polynomial factor, is still (1996) mostly conjecture [a5].

A general reference surveying this and other relevant material is [a7].

References

[a1] J.W.S. Cassels, "An embedding theorem for fields" Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. , 14 (1976) pp. 193–198 (Addendum: 14 (1976), 479–480)
[a2] G. Hansel, "Une démonstration simple du théorème de Skolem–Mahler–Lech" Theor. Comput. Sci. , 43 (1986) pp. 91–98
[a3] A.J. van der Poorten, R.S. Rumely, "Zeros of -adic exponential polynomials II" J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 36 (1987) pp. 1–15
[a4] A.J. van der Poorten, H.-P. Schlickewei, "Additive relations in fields" J. Austral. Math. Soc. , 51 (1991) pp. 154–170
[a5] A.J. van der Poorten, R. Tijdeman, "On common zeros of exponential polynomials" L'Enseign. Math. Série , 21 (1975) pp. 57–67
[a6] J.F. Ritt, "On the zeros of exponential polynomials" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 31 (1929) pp. 680–686
[a7] A.J. van der Poorten, "Some facts that should be better known; especially about rational functions" R.A. Mollin (ed.) , Number Theory and Applications , NATO ASI , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1989) pp. 497–528
How to Cite This Entry:
Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Skolem-Mahler-Lech_theorem&oldid=52490
This article was adapted from an original article by A.J. van der Poorten (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article