Difference between revisions of "Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem"
m (fixing spaces) |
m (fixing mathop) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series | The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series \sum _ {h \geq 0 } a _ {h} X ^ {h} | ||
representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \} | representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \} | ||
− | is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. [[Arithmetic progression|Arithmetic progression]]), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [[#References|[a6]]], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial $ a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) | + | is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. [[Arithmetic progression|Arithmetic progression]]), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [[#References|[a6]]], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) \exp ( z \log \alpha _ {i} ) |
is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions \sin { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } . | is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions \sin { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } . | ||
Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [[#References|[a1]]] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes p | Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [[#References|[a1]]] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes p | ||
so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field \mathbf Q _ {p} | so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field \mathbf Q _ {p} | ||
− | of p -adic rationals) one has $ \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( | + | of p -adic rationals) one has $ \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( \mod p ) $ |
for each root. Then, for 0 \leq r < p - 1 , | for each root. Then, for 0 \leq r < p - 1 , | ||
each of the p - 1 | each of the p - 1 | ||
− | different p -adic exponential polynomials $ a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {r} | + | different p -adic exponential polynomials a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {r} \exp ( t \log \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } ) |
is a p -adic analytic function in the disc \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} . | is a p -adic analytic function in the disc \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} . | ||
It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as n | It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as n |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 12 July 2022
A recurrence sequence ( a _ {h} )
of order n
is a solution to a linear homogeneous recurrence relation with constant coefficients
a _ {h + n } = s _ {1} a _ {h + n - 1 } + \dots + s _ {n} a _ {h} ( h = 0,1, \dots ) .
Thus, the generating function \sum _ {h \geq 0 } a _ {h} X ^ {h} of a recurrence is a rational function { {r ( X ) } / {s ( X ) } } where s ( X ) = 1 - s _ {1} X - \dots - s _ {n} X ^ {n} = \prod _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} ( 1 - \alpha _ {i} X ) ^ {n _ {i} } , say; the polynomial r of degree less than n is determined by the initial values a _ {0}, \dots, a _ {n - 1 } . If so, the distinct complex numbers \alpha _ {i} are called the roots of the recurrence, and the n _ {i} their multiplicities. It follows that the a _ {h} are given by a generalized power sum a _ {h} = a ( h ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( h ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {h} ( h = 0,1, \dots ); the polynomial coefficients A _ {i} are respectively of degree n _ {i} - 1 .
The theorem of Skolem–Mahler–Lech asserts that if a recurrence (equivalently, a generalized power sum) has infinitely many zeros, then those zeros occur periodically. That is, given a power series \sum _ {h \geq 0 } a _ {h} X ^ {h} representing a rational function with infinitely many zero Taylor coefficients, the set \{ h : {a _ {h} = 0 } \} is a finite union of complete arithmetic progressions (cf. Arithmetic progression), plus (a pre-period of) finitely many isolated zeros. By virtue of Ritt's quotient theorem [a6], it is equivalent that an infinitude of integer zeros of a complex exponential polynomial a ( z ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( z ) \exp ( z \log \alpha _ {i} ) is accounted for by it being divisible (in the ring of exponential polynomials) by functions \sin { {2 \pi ( z - r ) } / d } .
Skolem's argument was generalized by K. Mahler to algebraic number fields, and eventually to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero by C. Lech and by Mahler. The elegant argument of J.W.S. Cassels [a1] bypasses the technical complications in the chain of successive generalizations. In brief, one observes that there are rational primes p so that (technically, after embedding the data in the field \mathbf Q _ {p} of p -adic rationals) one has \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } \equiv 1 ( \mod p ) for each root. Then, for 0 \leq r < p - 1 , each of the p - 1 different p -adic exponential polynomials a ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ {m} A _ {i} ( r + t ( p - 1 ) ) \alpha _ {i} ^ {r} \exp ( t \log \alpha _ {i} ^ {p - 1 } ) is a p -adic analytic function in the disc \{ {t \in \mathbf Q _ {p} } : {| t | _ {p} < p ^ {1 - {1 / {( p - 1 ) } } } } \} . It follows that if any one of these functions has infinitely many zeros (it turns out, as few as n zeros [a3]) in the unit disc, then it must vanish identically, yielding the theorem with arithmetic progressions with common difference d = p - 1 . It follows that a recurrence sequence can have infinitely many zeros only if it is degenerate, that is, some quotient { {\alpha _ {i} } / {\alpha _ {j} } } of its distinct roots is a root of unity.
The theorem is provable without visible appeal to p -adic analysis [a2]. But a generalization, whereby if two recurrence sequences have infinitely many elements in common then they coincide along certain of their arithmetic subprogressions (see [a4]), as yet, (1996) relies on a p -adic generalization of Schmidt's subspace theorem. A different generalization, Shapiro's conjecture, according to which two exponential polynomials with infinitely many complex common zeros must have a common exponential polynomial factor, is still (1996) mostly conjecture [a5].
A general reference surveying this and other relevant material is [a7].
References
[a1] | J.W.S. Cassels, "An embedding theorem for fields" Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. , 14 (1976) pp. 193–198 (Addendum: 14 (1976), 479–480) |
[a2] | G. Hansel, "Une démonstration simple du théorème de Skolem–Mahler–Lech" Theor. Comput. Sci. , 43 (1986) pp. 91–98 |
[a3] | A.J. van der Poorten, R.S. Rumely, "Zeros of ![]() |
[a4] | A.J. van der Poorten, H.-P. Schlickewei, "Additive relations in fields" J. Austral. Math. Soc. , 51 (1991) pp. 154–170 |
[a5] | A.J. van der Poorten, R. Tijdeman, "On common zeros of exponential polynomials" L'Enseign. Math. ![]() |
[a6] | J.F. Ritt, "On the zeros of exponential polynomials" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 31 (1929) pp. 680–686 |
[a7] | A.J. van der Poorten, "Some facts that should be better known; especially about rational functions" R.A. Mollin (ed.) , Number Theory and Applications , NATO ASI , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1989) pp. 497–528 |
Skolem-Mahler-Lech theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Skolem-Mahler-Lech_theorem&oldid=52490