Difference between revisions of "Frommer method"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
m (fixing spaces) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
are analytic functions at $ O $ | are analytic functions at $ O $ | ||
with no common analytic factor that vanishes at $ O $. | with no common analytic factor that vanishes at $ O $. | ||
− | The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all $ TO $- | + | The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all $ TO $-curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to $ O $ |
− | curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to $ O $ | + | along a definite direction. Every $ TO $-curve of (1) not lying on the axis $ x = 0 $ |
− | along a definite direction. Every $ TO $- | + | is an $ O $-curve of the equation |
− | curve of (1) not lying on the axis $ x = 0 $ | ||
− | is an $ O $- | ||
− | curve of the equation | ||
$$ \tag{2 } | $$ \tag{2 } | ||
Line 69: | Line 66: | ||
$$ | $$ | ||
− | then it has a unique $ O $- | + | then it has a unique $ O $-curve in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
− | curve in the domain $ x > 0 $ | ||
for $ a < 0 $; | for $ a < 0 $; | ||
the domain $ x > 0 $, | the domain $ x > 0 $, | ||
$ x ^ {2} + y ^ {2} < r ^ {2} $, | $ x ^ {2} + y ^ {2} < r ^ {2} $, | ||
where $ r $ | where $ r $ | ||
− | is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for $ a > 0 $( | + | is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for $ a > 0 $ (cf. [[Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations|Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations]]). Otherwise, to exhibit the $ O $-curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
− | cf. [[Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations|Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations]]). Otherwise, to exhibit the $ O $- | + | one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every $ O $-curve (3) of equation (2), $ \phi ( x) \not\equiv 0 $, |
− | curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ | ||
− | one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every $ O $- | ||
− | curve (3) of equation (2), $ \phi ( x) \not\equiv 0 $, | ||
has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, | has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, | ||
namely, it can be represented in the form | namely, it can be represented in the form | ||
Line 110: | Line 103: | ||
which is called its measure of curvature at $ O $. | which is called its measure of curvature at $ O $. | ||
− | Here the $ O $- | + | Here the $ O $-curve $ y = 0 $, |
− | curve $ y = 0 $, | ||
$ x \in ( 0, \delta ) $, | $ x \in ( 0, \delta ) $, | ||
is assigned the order of curvature $ \nu = + \infty $. | is assigned the order of curvature $ \nu = + \infty $. | ||
− | The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature $ \nu $( | + | The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature $ \nu $ (there is always a finite number of them), and for each order $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ |
− | there is always a finite number of them), and for each order $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ | + | all possible measures of curvature for $ O $-curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has $ O $-curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number $ ( \geq 0) $ |
− | all possible measures of curvature for $ O $- | ||
− | curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has $ O $- | ||
− | curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number $ ( \geq 0) $ | ||
of so-called characteristic pairs $ ( \nu , \gamma ) $. | of so-called characteristic pairs $ ( \nu , \gamma ) $. | ||
For each of these $ \nu = r/s $, | For each of these $ \nu = r/s $, | ||
Line 128: | Line 117: | ||
$ y = ( \gamma + y _ {1} ) x _ {1} ^ {r} $ | $ y = ( \gamma + y _ {1} ) x _ {1} ^ {r} $ | ||
transforms (2) into a derived equation $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ | transforms (2) into a derived equation $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ | ||
− | of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has $ O $- | + | of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has $ O $-curves with order of curvature $ \nu $ |
− | curves with order of curvature $ \nu $ | ||
and measure of curvature $ \gamma $ | and measure of curvature $ \gamma $ | ||
into the question of whether $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ | into the question of whether $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ | ||
− | has $ O $- | + | has $ O $-curves in the domain $ x _ {1} > 0 $. |
− | curves in the domain $ x _ {1} > 0 $. | ||
− | If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all $ O $- | + | If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all $ O $-curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
− | curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ | ||
have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs. | have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs. | ||
− | Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all $ TO $- | + | Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all $ TO $-curves of (1) in the domain $ x > 0 $, |
− | curves of (1) in the domain $ x > 0 $, | ||
along with their asymptotic behaviour at $ O $. | along with their asymptotic behaviour at $ O $. | ||
Changing $ x $ | Changing $ x $ | ||
Line 146: | Line 131: | ||
in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain $ x < 0 $, | in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain $ x < 0 $, | ||
and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis $ x = 0 $ | and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis $ x = 0 $ | ||
− | are $ TO $- | + | are $ TO $-curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of $ O $ |
− | curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of $ O $ | ||
can be determined on the basis of this information as follows. | can be determined on the basis of this information as follows. | ||
− | If the system (1) has no $ TO $- | + | If the system (1) has no $ TO $-curves, then $ O $ |
− | curves, then $ O $ | ||
is a centre (cf. [[Centre of a topological dynamical system|Centre of a topological dynamical system]]), a [[Focus|focus]] or a [[Centro-focus|centro-focus]] for it. If the set $ H $ | is a centre (cf. [[Centre of a topological dynamical system|Centre of a topological dynamical system]]), a [[Focus|focus]] or a [[Centro-focus|centro-focus]] for it. If the set $ H $ | ||
− | of all $ TO $- | + | of all $ TO $-curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at $ O $ |
− | curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at $ O $ | ||
obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split $ H $ | obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split $ H $ | ||
− | into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of $ TO $- | + | into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of $ TO $-curves: $ H _ {1} \dots H _ {k} $, |
− | curves: $ H _ {1} \dots H _ {k} $, | ||
$ k \geq 2 $, | $ k \geq 2 $, | ||
− | each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single $ TO $- | + | each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single $ TO $-curve. The representatives $ l _ {1} \dots l _ {k} $ |
− | curve. The representatives $ l _ {1} \dots l _ {k} $ | ||
of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, | of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, | ||
which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round $ O $ | which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round $ O $ | ||
Line 171: | Line 151: | ||
Suppose that the sector $ S _ {i} $, | Suppose that the sector $ S _ {i} $, | ||
$ i \in \{ 1 \dots k \} $, | $ i \in \{ 1 \dots k \} $, | ||
− | has as its lateral edges the $ TO $- | + | has as its lateral edges the $ TO $-curves $ l _ {i} $ |
− | curves $ l _ {i} $ | ||
and $ l _ {i + 1 } $, | and $ l _ {i + 1 } $, | ||
where $ l _ {k + 1 } $ | where $ l _ {k + 1 } $ | ||
Line 183: | Line 162: | ||
Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point $ O $, | Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point $ O $, | ||
and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of $ O $, | and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of $ O $, | ||
− | or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at $ O $( | + | or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at $ O $ (cf. [[Centre and focus problem|Centre and focus problem]]). |
− | cf. [[Centre and focus problem|Centre and focus problem]]). | ||
An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [[#References|[1]]]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems. | An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [[#References|[1]]]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems. |
Latest revision as of 01:42, 23 June 2022
A method for investigating the singular points of an autonomous system of second-order ordinary differential equations
$$ \tag{1 } \dot{p} = f ( p),\ \ p = ( x, y),\ \ f = ( X, Y): G \rightarrow \mathbf R ^ {2} , $$
where $ f $ is an analytic or a sufficiently smooth function in the domain $ G $.
Suppose that $ O = ( 0, 0) $ is a singular point of the system (1), that is, $ f ( O) = 0 $, and that $ X $ and $ Y $ are analytic functions at $ O $ with no common analytic factor that vanishes at $ O $. The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all $ TO $-curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to $ O $ along a definite direction. Every $ TO $-curve of (1) not lying on the axis $ x = 0 $ is an $ O $-curve of the equation
$$ \tag{2 } y ^ \prime = \frac{Y ( x, y) }{X ( x, y) } $$
(that is, can be represented near $ O $ in the form
$$ \tag{3 } y = \phi ( x),\ \ \phi ( x) \rightarrow 0 \ \ \textrm{ as } x \rightarrow 0, $$
where $ \phi : I \rightarrow \mathbf R $ is a solution of (2), $ I = ( 0, \delta ) $ or $ (- \delta , 0) $, $ \delta > 0 $, $ \phi ( x) \equiv 0 $ or $ \phi ( x) \neq 0 $ for every $ x \in I $), and conversely.
Consider equation (2) first in the domain $ x > 0 $. If it is a simple Bendixson equation, that is, if it satisfies the conditions
$$ X ( x, y) \equiv x ^ {h} ,\ \ h \geq 1,\ \ Y _ {y} ^ \prime ( 0, 0) = \ a \neq 0, $$
then it has a unique $ O $-curve in the domain $ x > 0 $ for $ a < 0 $; the domain $ x > 0 $, $ x ^ {2} + y ^ {2} < r ^ {2} $, where $ r $ is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for $ a > 0 $ (cf. Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations). Otherwise, to exhibit the $ O $-curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every $ O $-curve (3) of equation (2), $ \phi ( x) \not\equiv 0 $, has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, namely, it can be represented in the form
$$ y = x ^ {v ( x) } \ \mathop{\rm sign} \phi ( x), $$
and admits a finite or infinite limit
$$ \nu = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } v ( x) = \ \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \ \frac{ \mathop{\rm ln} | \phi ( x) | }{ \mathop{\rm ln} x } \in \ [ 0, + \infty ], $$
which is called its order of curvature at $ O $, and for $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ it also admits a finite or infinite limit
$$ \gamma = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \ \phi ( x) x ^ {- \nu } \in \ [- \infty , + \infty ], $$
which is called its measure of curvature at $ O $. Here the $ O $-curve $ y = 0 $, $ x \in ( 0, \delta ) $, is assigned the order of curvature $ \nu = + \infty $.
The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature $ \nu $ (there is always a finite number of them), and for each order $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ all possible measures of curvature for $ O $-curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has $ O $-curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number $ ( \geq 0) $ of so-called characteristic pairs $ ( \nu , \gamma ) $. For each of these $ \nu = r/s $, where $ r $ and $ s $ are natural numbers, and $ 0 < | \gamma | < + \infty $. Therefore the substitution $ x = x _ {1} ^ {s} $, $ y = ( \gamma + y _ {1} ) x _ {1} ^ {r} $ transforms (2) into a derived equation $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has $ O $-curves with order of curvature $ \nu $ and measure of curvature $ \gamma $ into the question of whether $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ has $ O $-curves in the domain $ x _ {1} > 0 $.
If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all $ O $-curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs.
Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all $ TO $-curves of (1) in the domain $ x > 0 $, along with their asymptotic behaviour at $ O $. Changing $ x $ to $ - x $ in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain $ x < 0 $, and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis $ x = 0 $ are $ TO $-curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of $ O $ can be determined on the basis of this information as follows.
If the system (1) has no $ TO $-curves, then $ O $ is a centre (cf. Centre of a topological dynamical system), a focus or a centro-focus for it. If the set $ H $ of all $ TO $-curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at $ O $ obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split $ H $ into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of $ TO $-curves: $ H _ {1} \dots H _ {k} $, $ k \geq 2 $, each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single $ TO $-curve. The representatives $ l _ {1} \dots l _ {k} $ of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round $ O $ along a circle $ C $ of small radius $ r $, and they divide the disc bounded by $ C $ into $ k $ sectors $ S _ {1} \dots S _ {k} $.
Suppose that the sector $ S _ {i} $, $ i \in \{ 1 \dots k \} $, has as its lateral edges the $ TO $-curves $ l _ {i} $ and $ l _ {i + 1 } $, where $ l _ {k + 1 } $ is the same as $ l _ {1} $. Then $ S _ {i} $ is: a) elliptic, b) hyperbolic or c) parabolic, according to whether the bundles $ H _ {i} $ and $ H _ {i + 1 } $ are respectively a) both open, b) both "closed" or c) of different types.
Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point $ O $, and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of $ O $, or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at $ O $ (cf. Centre and focus problem).
An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [1]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems.
References
[1] | M. Frommer, "Die Integralkurven einer gewöhnlichen Differentialgleichung erster Ordnung in der Umgebung rationaler Unbestimmtheitsstellen" Math. Ann. , 99 (1928) pp. 222–272 |
[2] | A.F. Andreev, "Singular points of differential equations" , Minsk (1979) (In Russian) |
Comments
References
[a1] | P. Hartman, "Ordinary differential equations" , Birkhäuser (1982) pp. 220–227 |
Frommer method. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Frommer_method&oldid=52473