Difference between revisions of "Adaptive Runge–Kutta method"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 1 formulas out of 1 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <!-- | + | <!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article, |
− | + | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | |
− | + | was used. | |
− | + | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | Out of 1 formulas, 1 were replaced by TEX code.--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|done}} | ||
{{TEX|auto}} | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
{{TEX|done}} | {{TEX|done}} | ||
Line 97: | Line 96: | ||
By the corresponding choice of stability functions $ R _ {0} ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( z ) $, | By the corresponding choice of stability functions $ R _ {0} ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( z ) $, | ||
− | adaptive Runge–Kutta methods are A- or L-stable and therefore well suited for stiff systems (cf. [[Stiff differential system|Stiff differential system]]). Furthermore, they can be easily adapted to the numerical solution of partitioned systems, where only a subsystem of dimension $ n _ {s} | + | adaptive Runge–Kutta methods are A- or L-stable and therefore well suited for stiff systems (cf. [[Stiff differential system|Stiff differential system]]). Furthermore, they can be easily adapted to the numerical solution of partitioned systems, where only a subsystem of dimension $ n _ {s} < n $ |
is stiff. Here, by a corresponding choice of $ T $ | is stiff. Here, by a corresponding choice of $ T $ | ||
the dimension of the linear systems to be solved can be reduced to $ n _ {s} $[[#References|[a1]]]. | the dimension of the linear systems to be solved can be reduced to $ n _ {s} $[[#References|[a1]]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table>< | + | <table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> K. Strehmel, R. Weiner, "Partitioned adaptive Runge–Kutta methods and their stability" ''Numer. Math.'' , '''45''' (1984) pp. 283–300</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> K. Strehmel, R. Weiner, "$B$-convergence results for linearly implicit one step methods" ''BIT'' , '''27''' (1987) pp. 264–281</td></tr></table> |
Revision as of 17:00, 1 July 2020
ARK method
An $ s $- stage adaptive Runge–Kutta method for the computation of approximations $ u _ {m} $ for the solution $ y ( t _ {m} ) $ of an initial-value problem
$$ y ^ \prime = f ( t,y ) , y ( t _ {0} ) = y _ {0} , t \in [ t _ {0} ,t _ {e} ] , $$
is given by
$$ u _ {m + 1 } ^ {( 1 ) } = u _ {m} , $$
$$ u _ {m + 1 } ^ {( i ) } = R _ {0} ^ {( i ) } ( c _ {i} hT ) u _ {m} + $$
$$ + h \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { {i } - 1 } A _ {ij } ( hT ) \left [ f ( t _ {m} + c _ {j} h,u _ {m + 1 } ^ {( j ) } ) - Tu _ {m + 1 } ^ {( j ) } \right ] , $$
$$ i = 2 \dots s, $$
$$ u _ {m + 1 } = R _ {0} ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( hT ) u _ {m} + $$
$$ + h \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { s } B _ {j} ( hT ) \left [ f ( t _ {m} + c _ {j} h,u _ {m + 1 } ^ {( j ) } ) - Tu _ {m + 1 } ^ {( j ) } \right ] . $$
Here, $ T $ is an arbitrary matrix, for stability reasons usually $ T \approx f _ {y} ( t _ {m} ,u _ {m} ) $. For $ T = 0 $ the method reduces to an explicit Runge–Kutta method. The $ c _ {i} $ are real parameters and $ R _ {0} ^ {( i ) } ( z ) $, $ z \in \mathbf C $, are rational approximations to $ e ^ {z} $ for $ z \rightarrow 0 $. The rational matrix functions $ A _ {ij } $, $ B _ {j} $ are defined by
$$ A _ {ij } ( z ) = \sum _ {l = 0 } ^ { \rho _ {i} } R _ {l + 1 } ^ {( i ) } ( c _ {i} z ) c _ {i} ^ {l + 1 } \lambda _ {lj } ^ {( i ) } , $$
$$ B _ {j} ( z ) = \sum _ {l = 0 } ^ { \rho _ {s + 1 } } R _ {l + 1 } ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( z ) \lambda _ {lj } ^ {( s + 1 ) } , $$
with $ \lambda _ {lj } ^ {( i ) } \in \mathbf R $ and
$$ R _ {1} ^ {( i ) } ( z ) = { \frac{R _ {0} ^ {( i ) } ( z ) - 1 }{z} } , $$
$$ R _ {l + 1 } ^ {( i ) } ( z ) = { \frac{lR _ {l} ^ {( i ) } ( z ) - 1 }{z} } . $$
The computation of $ u _ {m + 1 } $ requires the solution of linear systems of algebraic equations only. The coefficients $ \lambda _ {lj } ^ {( i ) } $ are determined to give a high order of consistency or B-consistency ([a2]). Applied to the test equation of A-stability, $ y ^ \prime = \lambda y $ with $ { \mathop{\rm Re} } \lambda \leq 0 $, an adaptive Runge–Kutta method with $ T = \lambda $ yields
$$ u _ {m + 1 } = R _ {0} ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( h \lambda ) u _ {m} . $$
By the corresponding choice of stability functions $ R _ {0} ^ {( s + 1 ) } ( z ) $, adaptive Runge–Kutta methods are A- or L-stable and therefore well suited for stiff systems (cf. Stiff differential system). Furthermore, they can be easily adapted to the numerical solution of partitioned systems, where only a subsystem of dimension $ n _ {s} < n $ is stiff. Here, by a corresponding choice of $ T $ the dimension of the linear systems to be solved can be reduced to $ n _ {s} $[a1].
References
[a1] | K. Strehmel, R. Weiner, "Partitioned adaptive Runge–Kutta methods and their stability" Numer. Math. , 45 (1984) pp. 283–300 |
[a2] | K. Strehmel, R. Weiner, "$B$-convergence results for linearly implicit one step methods" BIT , 27 (1987) pp. 264–281 |
Adaptive Runge–Kutta method. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Adaptive_Runge%E2%80%93Kutta_method&oldid=50359