Difference between revisions of "Noetherian ring"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (Undo revision 47979 by Ulf Rehmann (talk)) Tag: Undo |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | n0668501.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 27 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 27 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/N066/N.0606850 Noetherian ring, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''left (right)'' | ''left (right)'' | ||
− | A [[Ring|ring]] | + | A [[Ring|ring]] $ A $ |
+ | satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions: | ||
− | 1) | + | 1) $ A $ |
+ | is a left (or right) [[Noetherian module|Noetherian module]] over itself; | ||
− | 2) every left (or right) ideal in | + | 2) every left (or right) ideal in $ A $ |
+ | has a finite generating set; | ||
− | 3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in | + | 3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in $ A $ |
+ | breaks off after finitely many terms. | ||
An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator. | An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator. | ||
Line 13: | Line 29: | ||
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions). | Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions). | ||
− | A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let | + | A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let $ A $ |
+ | be the ring of matrices of the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \left \| | ||
+ | \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | a &\alpha \\ | ||
+ | 0 &\beta \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right \| , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ a $ |
+ | is a rational integer and $ \alpha $ | ||
+ | and $ \beta $ | ||
+ | are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then $ A $ | ||
+ | is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \left \| | ||
+ | \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | 0 &\alpha \\ | ||
+ | 0 & 0 \\ | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right \| | ||
+ | $$ | ||
does not have a finite generating set. | does not have a finite generating set. | ||
Line 25: | Line 60: | ||
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian. | Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian. | ||
− | If | + | If $ A $ |
+ | is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring $ A [ X ] $. | ||
+ | The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form $ K [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $ | ||
+ | or $ \mathbf Z [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $, | ||
+ | where $ K $ | ||
+ | is a field and $ \mathbf Z $ | ||
+ | the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $ | ||
+ | relative to some multiplicative system $ S $ | ||
+ | is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $, | ||
+ | $ \mathfrak m $ | ||
+ | is an ideal such that no element of the form $ 1 + m $, | ||
+ | where $ m \in \mathfrak m $, | ||
+ | is a divisor of zero, then $ \cap _ {k=} 1 ^ \infty \mathfrak m ^ {k} = 0 $. | ||
+ | This means that any such ideal $ \mathfrak m $ | ||
+ | defines on $ A $ | ||
+ | a separable $ \mathfrak m $- | ||
+ | adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 14:54, 7 June 2020
left (right)
A ring $ A $ satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions:
1) $ A $ is a left (or right) Noetherian module over itself;
2) every left (or right) ideal in $ A $ has a finite generating set;
3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in $ A $ breaks off after finitely many terms.
An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator.
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions).
A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let $ A $ be the ring of matrices of the form
$$ \left \| \begin{array}{cc} a &\alpha \\ 0 &\beta \\ \end{array} \right \| , $$
where $ a $ is a rational integer and $ \alpha $ and $ \beta $ are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then $ A $ is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form
$$ \left \| \begin{array}{cc} 0 &\alpha \\ 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right \| $$
does not have a finite generating set.
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian.
If $ A $ is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring $ A [ X ] $. The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form $ K [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $ or $ \mathbf Z [ X _ {1} \dots X _ {n} ] $, where $ K $ is a field and $ \mathbf Z $ the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every Artinian ring is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $ relative to some multiplicative system $ S $ is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring $ A $, $ \mathfrak m $ is an ideal such that no element of the form $ 1 + m $, where $ m \in \mathfrak m $, is a divisor of zero, then $ \cap _ {k=} 1 ^ \infty \mathfrak m ^ {k} = 0 $. This means that any such ideal $ \mathfrak m $ defines on $ A $ a separable $ \mathfrak m $- adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined.
References
[1] | B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , 1–2 , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German) |
[2] | S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974) |
[3] | C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , 1 , Springer (1973) |
Noetherian ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Noetherian_ring&oldid=49490