Difference between revisions of "Theta-function"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | t0926002.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 120 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 120 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/T092/T.0902600 Theta\AAhfunction, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | '' $ \theta $- | |
+ | function, of one complex variable'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | A quasi-doubly-periodic [[Entire function|entire function]] of a complex variable $ z $, | ||
+ | that is, a function $ \theta ( z) $ | ||
+ | having, apart from a period $ \omega $, | ||
+ | also a quasi-period $ \omega \tau $, | ||
+ | $ \mathop{\rm Im} \tau > 0 $, | ||
+ | the addition of which to the argument multiplies the value of the function by a certain factor. In other words, one has the identities (in $ z $): | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \theta ( z + \omega ) = \theta ( z),\ \ | ||
+ | \theta ( z + \omega \tau ) = \phi ( z) \theta ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
As a periodic entire function, a theta-function can always be represented by a series | As a periodic entire function, a theta-function can always be represented by a series | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | \theta ( z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z } | ||
+ | c _ {n} \mathop{\rm exp} \left ( { | ||
+ | \frac{2 \pi in } \omega | ||
+ | } z \right ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where the coefficients | + | where the coefficients $ c _ {n} $ |
+ | must be chosen so as to ensure convergence. The series (1) is called a theta-series (because of the original notation). Other representations of theta-functions, for example as infinite products, are also possible. | ||
In applications one usually restricts oneself to multipliers of the form | In applications one usually restricts oneself to multipliers of the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \phi ( z) = q \mathop{\rm exp} (- 2 \pi ikz), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ k $ |
+ | is a natural number, called the order or the weight of the theta-function, and $ q $ | ||
+ | is a number. Convergence is ensured, for example, by using coefficients of the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | c _ {n} = \mathop{\rm exp} ( an ^ {2} + 2bn + c),\ \ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm Re} a < 0. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
In many problems it is convenient to take the theta-functions that satisfy the conditions | In many problems it is convenient to take the theta-functions that satisfy the conditions | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | \theta ( z + 1) = \theta ( z), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta ( z + \tau ) = \mathop{\rm exp} (- 2 \pi ikz) \cdot \theta ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | All theta-functions of the form (2) of the same order | + | All theta-functions of the form (2) of the same order $ k $ |
+ | form a vector space of dimension $ k $. | ||
+ | A basis for this vector space can be written in the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ {r} ( z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {s \in \mathbf Z } | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi i \tau s ( k ( s - 1) + 2r) | ||
+ | + 2 \pi i ( ks + r) z], | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | r = 0 \dots k - 1. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Individual examples of theta-functions are already encountered in the work of J. Bernoulli (1713), L. Euler, and in the theory of heat conduction of J. Fourier. C.G.J. Jacobi subjected theta-functions to a systematic investigation, and picked out four special theta-functions, which formed the basis of his theory of elliptic functions (cf. [[Jacobi elliptic functions|Jacobi elliptic functions]]). | Individual examples of theta-functions are already encountered in the work of J. Bernoulli (1713), L. Euler, and in the theory of heat conduction of J. Fourier. C.G.J. Jacobi subjected theta-functions to a systematic investigation, and picked out four special theta-functions, which formed the basis of his theory of elliptic functions (cf. [[Jacobi elliptic functions|Jacobi elliptic functions]]). | ||
− | Theta-functions of several complex variables arise as a natural generalization of theta-functions of one complex variable. They are constructed in the following way. Let | + | Theta-functions of several complex variables arise as a natural generalization of theta-functions of one complex variable. They are constructed in the following way. Let $ z = ( z _ {1} \dots z _ {p} ) $ |
+ | be a row-matrix of $ p $ | ||
+ | complex variables, $ p \geq 1 $, | ||
+ | let $ e _ \mu $ | ||
+ | be the $ \mu $- | ||
+ | th row of the identity matrix $ E $ | ||
+ | of order $ p $, | ||
+ | let $ n = ( n _ {1} \dots n _ {p} ) $ | ||
+ | be an integer row-matrix, and let $ A = \| a _ {\mu \nu } \| $ | ||
+ | be a symmetric complex matrix of order $ p $ | ||
+ | such that the matrix $ \mathop{\rm Im} A = \| \mathop{\rm Im} a _ {\mu \nu } \| $ | ||
+ | gives rise to a positive-definite quadratic form $ n ( \mathop{\rm Im} A) n ^ {T} $. | ||
+ | (Here $ n ^ {T} $ | ||
+ | is the transpose of the matrix $ n $.) | ||
+ | The multiple theta-series | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{3 } | |
+ | \theta ( z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z } | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi ( nAn ^ {T} + 2nz ^ {T} ) ] | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | converges absolutely and uniformly on compacta in | + | converges absolutely and uniformly on compacta in $ \mathbf C ^ {p} $, |
+ | and hence defines an entire transcendental function of $ p $ | ||
+ | complex variables $ z _ {1} \dots z _ {p} $, | ||
+ | called a theta-function of order $ 1 $. | ||
+ | The individual elements of the matrix $ A $ | ||
+ | are called moduli, or parameters, of the theta-function $ \theta ( z) $. | ||
+ | The number of moduli is equal to $ p ( p + 1)/2 $. | ||
+ | A theta-function $ \theta ( z) $ | ||
+ | of the first order satisfies the following basic identities (in $ z $): | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{4 } | |
+ | \left . | ||
− | where | + | where $ \mu , \nu = 1 \dots p $, |
+ | and $ \delta _ {\mu \nu } = 1 $ | ||
+ | for $ \mu = \nu $ | ||
+ | and $ \delta _ {\mu \nu } = 0 $ | ||
+ | for $ \mu \neq \nu $. | ||
+ | The $ ( p \times 2p) $- | ||
+ | matrix $ S = ( E, A) $ | ||
+ | is the moduli system or system of periods and quasi-periods of $ \theta ( z) $. | ||
+ | If $ m = ( m _ {1} \dots m _ {p} ) $, | ||
+ | $ m ^ \prime = ( m _ {1} ^ \prime \dots m _ {p} ^ \prime ) $ | ||
+ | are arbitrary integer row-matrices, then the periodicity property of theta-functions can be written in its most general form as | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta ( z + m ^ \prime + mA) = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} [- \pi ( mAm) ^ {T} + 2m ( z + m ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ] \cdot \theta ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ \gamma = ( \gamma _ {1} \dots \gamma _ {p} ) $, |
+ | $ \gamma ^ \prime = ( \gamma _ {1} ^ \prime \dots \gamma _ {p} ^ \prime ) $ | ||
+ | be arbitrary complex row-matrices, and let $ \Gamma $ | ||
+ | be the $ ( 2 \times p) $- | ||
+ | matrix | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \left \| | ||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | \gamma \\ | ||
+ | \gamma ^ \prime | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \ | ||
+ | \right \| . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Then the formula | Then the formula | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ \Gamma ( z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z ^ {p} } | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi ( n + \gamma ) A ( n + \gamma ) ^ {T} + | ||
+ | 2 ( n + \gamma ) ( z + \gamma ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ] = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi i ( \gamma A \gamma ^ {T} + 2 \gamma ( z + \gamma | ||
+ | ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ) ] \cdot \theta ( z + \gamma ^ \prime + \gamma A) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | defines a theta-function of order | + | defines a theta-function of order $ 1 $ |
+ | with characteristic (in general form) $ \Gamma $. | ||
+ | In this terminology the theta-function (3) has characteristic 0. The matrix $ \Gamma $ | ||
+ | is also called the periodicity characteristic of the matrix $ \gamma ^ \prime + \gamma A $. | ||
+ | One always has $ \theta _ {- \Gamma } (- z) = \theta _ \Gamma ( z) $. | ||
+ | Property (4) generalizes to theta-functions of characteristic $ \Gamma $: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{5 } | |
+ | \left . | ||
− | The characteristic is said to be normal if < | + | The characteristic is said to be normal if $ 0 \leq \gamma _ {i} , \gamma _ {i} ^ \prime < 1 $ |
+ | for $ i = 1 \dots p $. | ||
− | The most commonly used are fractional characteristics, where all the | + | The most commonly used are fractional characteristics, where all the $ \gamma _ {i} $ |
+ | and $ \gamma _ {i} ^ \prime $ | ||
+ | are non-negative proper fractions with common denominator $ \delta $. | ||
+ | The simplest and most important case is of semi-integer or half characteristics, where $ \delta = 2 $. | ||
+ | A semi-integer characteristic | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | H = \ | ||
+ | \left \| | ||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | h \\ | ||
+ | h ^ \prime | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \ | ||
+ | \right \| | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | can be thought of as being made up of the numbers 0 and 1 (usually a "theta-characteristictheta-characteristic" is used to mean just such a characteristic). For a theta-function with characteristic | + | can be thought of as being made up of the numbers 0 and 1 (usually a "theta-characteristictheta-characteristic" is used to mean just such a characteristic). For a theta-function with characteristic $ H $ |
+ | equations (5) take the form | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ {H} ( z + e _ \mu ) = \ | ||
+ | (- 1) ^ {h _ \mu } \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ {H} ( z + e _ \mu A) = (- 1) ^ {h _ \mu ^ \prime } \mathop{\rm exp} | ||
+ | [- \pi i ( a _ {\mu \mu } + 2z _ \mu )] \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | A theta-characteristic | + | A theta-characteristic $ H $ |
+ | is called even or odd, depending on whether the theta-function $ \theta _ {H} ( z) $ | ||
+ | is even or odd. In other words, the theta-characteristic $ H $ | ||
+ | is even or odd, depending on whether the number $ h ^ \prime h ^ {T} $ | ||
+ | is even or odd, since | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ {H} (- z) = \ | ||
+ | (- 1) ^ {h ^ \prime h ^ {T} } | ||
+ | \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | There are | + | There are $ 2 ^ {2p} $ |
+ | distinct theta-characteristics, of which $ 2 ^ {p - 1 } ( 2 ^ {p} + 1) $ | ||
+ | are even and $ 2 ^ {p - 1 } ( 2 ^ {p} - 1) $ | ||
+ | are odd. The theta-function $ \theta _ {H} ( z) $ | ||
+ | takes the value zero at those points $ ( g ^ \prime + gA)/2 $ | ||
+ | whose theta-characteristic | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | G = \ | ||
+ | \left \| | ||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | g \\ | ||
+ | g ^ \prime | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \ | ||
+ | \right \| | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | yields an odd theta-characteristic when added to | + | yields an odd theta-characteristic when added to $ H $. |
+ | Jacobi used theta-functions with semi-integer characteristics in his theory of elliptic functions, except that his had period $ \pi i $ | ||
+ | rather than 1. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ k $ |
+ | be a natural number. An entire transcendental function $ \theta _ \Gamma ( z) $ | ||
+ | is called a theta-function of order $ k $ | ||
+ | with characteristic $ \Gamma $ | ||
+ | if it satisfies the identities | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ \Gamma ( z + e _ \mu ) = \ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} ( 2 \pi i \gamma _ \mu ) \cdot \theta _ \Gamma ( z), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \theta _ \Gamma ( z + e _ \mu A) = \mathop{\rm exp} [- \pi i ( ka _ {\mu \mu } + 2kz _ \mu - 2 \gamma _ \mu ^ \prime )] \cdot \theta _ \Gamma ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | For example, the product of | + | For example, the product of $ k $ |
+ | theta-functions of order 1 is a theta-function of order $ k $. | ||
− | Using theta-functions of order | + | Using theta-functions of order $ 1 $ |
+ | with semi-integer characteristics one can construct meromorphic Abelian functions with $ 2p $ | ||
+ | periods. The periods of an arbitrary Abelian function in $ p $ | ||
+ | complex variables satisfy the Riemann–Frobenius relations, which yield convergence for the series defining the theta-functions with the corresponding system of moduli. According to a theorem formulated by K. Weierstrass and proved by H. Poincaré, an Abelian function can be represented as a quotient of entire theta-functions with corresponding moduli system. For the solution of the [[Jacobi inversion problem|Jacobi inversion problem]] on Abelian integrals, one constructs a special [[Riemann theta-function|Riemann theta-function]], whose argument is a system of points $ w _ {1} \dots w _ {p} $ | ||
+ | on a Riemann surface. | ||
See also [[Theta-series|Theta-series]]. | See also [[Theta-series|Theta-series]]. | ||
Line 97: | Line 273: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt. 9 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Hurwitz, R. Courant, "Vorlesungen über allgemeine Funktionentheorie und elliptische Funktionen" , '''1''' , Springer (1964) pp. Chapt.8 {{MR|0173749}} {{ZBL|0135.12101}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Krazer, "Lehrbuch der Theta-Funktionen" , Chelsea, reprint (1970)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Conforto, "Abelsche Funktionen und algebraische Geometrie" , Springer (1956) {{MR|0079316}} {{ZBL|0074.36601}} </TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt. 9 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Hurwitz, R. Courant, "Vorlesungen über allgemeine Funktionentheorie und elliptische Funktionen" , '''1''' , Springer (1964) pp. Chapt.8 {{MR|0173749}} {{ZBL|0135.12101}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Krazer, "Lehrbuch der Theta-Funktionen" , Chelsea, reprint (1970)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Conforto, "Abelsche Funktionen und algebraische Geometrie" , Springer (1956) {{MR|0079316}} {{ZBL|0074.36601}} </TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The conditions on the matrix | + | The conditions on the matrix $ A $ |
+ | used in the construction of a theta-function in $ p $ | ||
+ | variables (3) are precisely those needed in order that the lattice $ L $ | ||
+ | defined by the matrix $ ( I _ {p} A) $ | ||
+ | in $ \mathbf C ^ {p} $ | ||
+ | be such that $ \mathbf C ^ {p} / L $ | ||
+ | be an [[Abelian variety|Abelian variety]]. All Abelian varieties over $ \mathbf C $ | ||
+ | arise this way. Thus, there is a theta-function attached to any Abelian variety. | ||
In particular, the conditions are satisfied by the canonical period matrix for Abelian differentials of the first kind on a Riemann surface (cf. [[Abelian differential|Abelian differential]]), thus determining the [[Jacobi variety|Jacobi variety]] of the Riemann surface and an associated theta-function. | In particular, the conditions are satisfied by the canonical period matrix for Abelian differentials of the first kind on a Riemann surface (cf. [[Abelian differential|Abelian differential]]), thus determining the [[Jacobi variety|Jacobi variety]] of the Riemann surface and an associated theta-function. | ||
− | For a not necessarily canonical period matrix | + | For a not necessarily canonical period matrix $ ( B, A) $ |
+ | these relations are $ A ^ {T} B - B ^ {T} A = 0 $( | ||
+ | Riemann's equality, which becomes symmetry for $ A $ | ||
+ | in the canonical case when $ B = I _ {p} $) | ||
+ | and $ i B ^ {T} \overline{A}\; - i A ^ {T} \overline{B}\; $ | ||
+ | is positive-definite Hermitean (Riemann's inequality, which becomes positive definiteness of the imaginary part of $ A $ | ||
+ | in the canonical case (using the symmetry of $ A $)), | ||
+ | [[#References|[a8]]], p. 27. Together these two relations are sometimes known as the Riemann bilinear relations. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.L. Siegel, "Topics in complex function theory" , '''2''' , Wiley (Interscience) (1971) {{MR|1013364}} {{MR|1008931}} {{MR|1008930}} {{MR|0476762}} {{MR|0257326}} {{ZBL|0719.11028}} {{ZBL|0635.30003}} {{ZBL|0635.30002}} {{ZBL|0257.32002}} {{ZBL|0184.11201}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.A. Griffiths, J.E. Harris, "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978) {{MR|0507725}} {{ZBL|0408.14001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Tata lectures on Theta" , '''1–2''' , Birkhäuser (1983–1984) {{MR|2352717}} {{MR|2307769}} {{MR|2307768}} {{MR|1116553}} {{MR|0742776}} {{MR|0688651}} {{ZBL|1124.14043}} {{ZBL|1112.14003}} {{ZBL|1112.14002}} {{ZBL|0744.14033}} {{ZBL|0549.14014}} {{ZBL|0509.14049}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties I" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''1''' (1966) pp. 287–354 {{MR|0204427}} {{ZBL|0219.14024}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties II-III" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''3''' (1967) pp. 71–135; 215–244</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1985) {{MR|2514037}} {{MR|1083353}} {{MR|0352106}} {{MR|0441983}} {{MR|0282985}} {{MR|0248146}} {{MR|0219542}} {{MR|0219541}} {{MR|0206003}} {{MR|0204427}} {{ZBL|0583.14015}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-i. Igusa, "Theta functions" , Springer (1972) {{MR|0325625}} {{ZBL|0251.14016}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.C. Gunning, "Riemann surfaces and generalized theta functions" , Springer (1976) {{MR|0457787}} {{ZBL|0341.14013}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.D. Fay, "Theta functions on Riemann surfaces" , Springer (1973) {{MR|0335789}} {{ZBL|0281.30013}} </TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.L. Siegel, "Topics in complex function theory" , '''2''' , Wiley (Interscience) (1971) {{MR|1013364}} {{MR|1008931}} {{MR|1008930}} {{MR|0476762}} {{MR|0257326}} {{ZBL|0719.11028}} {{ZBL|0635.30003}} {{ZBL|0635.30002}} {{ZBL|0257.32002}} {{ZBL|0184.11201}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.A. Griffiths, J.E. Harris, "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978) {{MR|0507725}} {{ZBL|0408.14001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Tata lectures on Theta" , '''1–2''' , Birkhäuser (1983–1984) {{MR|2352717}} {{MR|2307769}} {{MR|2307768}} {{MR|1116553}} {{MR|0742776}} {{MR|0688651}} {{ZBL|1124.14043}} {{ZBL|1112.14003}} {{ZBL|1112.14002}} {{ZBL|0744.14033}} {{ZBL|0549.14014}} {{ZBL|0509.14049}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties I" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''1''' (1966) pp. 287–354 {{MR|0204427}} {{ZBL|0219.14024}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties II-III" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''3''' (1967) pp. 71–135; 215–244</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1985) {{MR|2514037}} {{MR|1083353}} {{MR|0352106}} {{MR|0441983}} {{MR|0282985}} {{MR|0248146}} {{MR|0219542}} {{MR|0219541}} {{MR|0206003}} {{MR|0204427}} {{ZBL|0583.14015}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.-i. Igusa, "Theta functions" , Springer (1972) {{MR|0325625}} {{ZBL|0251.14016}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.C. Gunning, "Riemann surfaces and generalized theta functions" , Springer (1976) {{MR|0457787}} {{ZBL|0341.14013}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.D. Fay, "Theta functions on Riemann surfaces" , Springer (1973) {{MR|0335789}} {{ZBL|0281.30013}} </TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 08:25, 6 June 2020
$ \theta $-
function, of one complex variable
A quasi-doubly-periodic entire function of a complex variable $ z $, that is, a function $ \theta ( z) $ having, apart from a period $ \omega $, also a quasi-period $ \omega \tau $, $ \mathop{\rm Im} \tau > 0 $, the addition of which to the argument multiplies the value of the function by a certain factor. In other words, one has the identities (in $ z $):
$$ \theta ( z + \omega ) = \theta ( z),\ \ \theta ( z + \omega \tau ) = \phi ( z) \theta ( z). $$
As a periodic entire function, a theta-function can always be represented by a series
$$ \tag{1 } \theta ( z) = \ \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z } c _ {n} \mathop{\rm exp} \left ( { \frac{2 \pi in } \omega } z \right ) , $$
where the coefficients $ c _ {n} $ must be chosen so as to ensure convergence. The series (1) is called a theta-series (because of the original notation). Other representations of theta-functions, for example as infinite products, are also possible.
In applications one usually restricts oneself to multipliers of the form
$$ \phi ( z) = q \mathop{\rm exp} (- 2 \pi ikz), $$
where $ k $ is a natural number, called the order or the weight of the theta-function, and $ q $ is a number. Convergence is ensured, for example, by using coefficients of the form
$$ c _ {n} = \mathop{\rm exp} ( an ^ {2} + 2bn + c),\ \ \mathop{\rm Re} a < 0. $$
In many problems it is convenient to take the theta-functions that satisfy the conditions
$$ \tag{2 } \theta ( z + 1) = \theta ( z), $$
$$ \theta ( z + \tau ) = \mathop{\rm exp} (- 2 \pi ikz) \cdot \theta ( z). $$
All theta-functions of the form (2) of the same order $ k $ form a vector space of dimension $ k $. A basis for this vector space can be written in the form
$$ \theta _ {r} ( z) = \ \sum _ {s \in \mathbf Z } \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi i \tau s ( k ( s - 1) + 2r) + 2 \pi i ( ks + r) z], $$
$$ r = 0 \dots k - 1. $$
Individual examples of theta-functions are already encountered in the work of J. Bernoulli (1713), L. Euler, and in the theory of heat conduction of J. Fourier. C.G.J. Jacobi subjected theta-functions to a systematic investigation, and picked out four special theta-functions, which formed the basis of his theory of elliptic functions (cf. Jacobi elliptic functions).
Theta-functions of several complex variables arise as a natural generalization of theta-functions of one complex variable. They are constructed in the following way. Let $ z = ( z _ {1} \dots z _ {p} ) $ be a row-matrix of $ p $ complex variables, $ p \geq 1 $, let $ e _ \mu $ be the $ \mu $- th row of the identity matrix $ E $ of order $ p $, let $ n = ( n _ {1} \dots n _ {p} ) $ be an integer row-matrix, and let $ A = \| a _ {\mu \nu } \| $ be a symmetric complex matrix of order $ p $ such that the matrix $ \mathop{\rm Im} A = \| \mathop{\rm Im} a _ {\mu \nu } \| $ gives rise to a positive-definite quadratic form $ n ( \mathop{\rm Im} A) n ^ {T} $. (Here $ n ^ {T} $ is the transpose of the matrix $ n $.) The multiple theta-series
$$ \tag{3 } \theta ( z) = \ \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z } \mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi ( nAn ^ {T} + 2nz ^ {T} ) ] $$
converges absolutely and uniformly on compacta in $ \mathbf C ^ {p} $, and hence defines an entire transcendental function of $ p $ complex variables $ z _ {1} \dots z _ {p} $, called a theta-function of order $ 1 $. The individual elements of the matrix $ A $ are called moduli, or parameters, of the theta-function $ \theta ( z) $. The number of moduli is equal to $ p ( p + 1)/2 $. A theta-function $ \theta ( z) $ of the first order satisfies the following basic identities (in $ z $):
$$ \tag{4 } \left . where $ \mu , \nu = 1 \dots p $, and $ \delta _ {\mu \nu } = 1 $ for $ \mu = \nu $ and $ \delta _ {\mu \nu } = 0 $ for $ \mu \neq \nu $. The $ ( p \times 2p) $- matrix $ S = ( E, A) $ is the moduli system or system of periods and quasi-periods of $ \theta ( z) $. If $ m = ( m _ {1} \dots m _ {p} ) $, $ m ^ \prime = ( m _ {1} ^ \prime \dots m _ {p} ^ \prime ) $ are arbitrary integer row-matrices, then the periodicity property of theta-functions can be written in its most general form as $$ \theta ( z + m ^ \prime + mA) = $$ $$ = \
\mathop{\rm exp} [- \pi ( mAm) ^ {T} + 2m ( z + m ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ] \cdot \theta ( z).
$$ Let $ \gamma = ( \gamma _ {1} \dots \gamma _ {p} ) $, $ \gamma ^ \prime = ( \gamma _ {1} ^ \prime \dots \gamma _ {p} ^ \prime ) $ be arbitrary complex row-matrices, and let $ \Gamma $ be the $ ( 2 \times p) $- matrix $$ \left \| \begin{array}{c} \gamma \\ \gamma ^ \prime \end{array}
\
\right \| . $$ Then the formula $$ \theta _ \Gamma ( z) = \ \sum _ {n \in \mathbf Z ^ {p} }
\mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi ( n + \gamma ) A ( n + \gamma ) ^ {T} +
2 ( n + \gamma ) ( z + \gamma ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ] = $$ $$ = \
\mathop{\rm exp} [ \pi i ( \gamma A \gamma ^ {T} + 2 \gamma ( z + \gamma ^ \prime ) ^ {T} ) ] \cdot \theta ( z + \gamma ^ \prime + \gamma A)
$$ defines a theta-function of order $ 1 $ with characteristic (in general form) $ \Gamma $. In this terminology the theta-function (3) has characteristic 0. The matrix $ \Gamma $ is also called the periodicity characteristic of the matrix $ \gamma ^ \prime + \gamma A $. One always has $ \theta _ {- \Gamma } (- z) = \theta _ \Gamma ( z) $. Property (4) generalizes to theta-functions of characteristic $ \Gamma $: $$ \tag{5 } \left .
The characteristic is said to be normal if $ 0 \leq \gamma _ {i} , \gamma _ {i} ^ \prime < 1 $ for $ i = 1 \dots p $.
The most commonly used are fractional characteristics, where all the $ \gamma _ {i} $ and $ \gamma _ {i} ^ \prime $ are non-negative proper fractions with common denominator $ \delta $. The simplest and most important case is of semi-integer or half characteristics, where $ \delta = 2 $. A semi-integer characteristic
$$ H = \ \left \| \begin{array}{c} h \\ h ^ \prime \end{array} \ \right \| $$
can be thought of as being made up of the numbers 0 and 1 (usually a "theta-characteristictheta-characteristic" is used to mean just such a characteristic). For a theta-function with characteristic $ H $ equations (5) take the form
$$ \theta _ {H} ( z + e _ \mu ) = \ (- 1) ^ {h _ \mu } \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z), $$
$$ \theta _ {H} ( z + e _ \mu A) = (- 1) ^ {h _ \mu ^ \prime } \mathop{\rm exp} [- \pi i ( a _ {\mu \mu } + 2z _ \mu )] \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z). $$
A theta-characteristic $ H $ is called even or odd, depending on whether the theta-function $ \theta _ {H} ( z) $ is even or odd. In other words, the theta-characteristic $ H $ is even or odd, depending on whether the number $ h ^ \prime h ^ {T} $ is even or odd, since
$$ \theta _ {H} (- z) = \ (- 1) ^ {h ^ \prime h ^ {T} } \cdot \theta _ {H} ( z). $$
There are $ 2 ^ {2p} $ distinct theta-characteristics, of which $ 2 ^ {p - 1 } ( 2 ^ {p} + 1) $ are even and $ 2 ^ {p - 1 } ( 2 ^ {p} - 1) $ are odd. The theta-function $ \theta _ {H} ( z) $ takes the value zero at those points $ ( g ^ \prime + gA)/2 $ whose theta-characteristic
$$ G = \ \left \| \begin{array}{c} g \\ g ^ \prime \end{array} \ \right \| $$
yields an odd theta-characteristic when added to $ H $. Jacobi used theta-functions with semi-integer characteristics in his theory of elliptic functions, except that his had period $ \pi i $ rather than 1.
Let $ k $ be a natural number. An entire transcendental function $ \theta _ \Gamma ( z) $ is called a theta-function of order $ k $ with characteristic $ \Gamma $ if it satisfies the identities
$$ \theta _ \Gamma ( z + e _ \mu ) = \ \mathop{\rm exp} ( 2 \pi i \gamma _ \mu ) \cdot \theta _ \Gamma ( z), $$
$$ \theta _ \Gamma ( z + e _ \mu A) = \mathop{\rm exp} [- \pi i ( ka _ {\mu \mu } + 2kz _ \mu - 2 \gamma _ \mu ^ \prime )] \cdot \theta _ \Gamma ( z). $$
For example, the product of $ k $ theta-functions of order 1 is a theta-function of order $ k $.
Using theta-functions of order $ 1 $ with semi-integer characteristics one can construct meromorphic Abelian functions with $ 2p $ periods. The periods of an arbitrary Abelian function in $ p $ complex variables satisfy the Riemann–Frobenius relations, which yield convergence for the series defining the theta-functions with the corresponding system of moduli. According to a theorem formulated by K. Weierstrass and proved by H. Poincaré, an Abelian function can be represented as a quotient of entire theta-functions with corresponding moduli system. For the solution of the Jacobi inversion problem on Abelian integrals, one constructs a special Riemann theta-function, whose argument is a system of points $ w _ {1} \dots w _ {p} $ on a Riemann surface.
See also Theta-series.
References
[1] | N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt. 9 (In Russian) |
[2] | A. Hurwitz, R. Courant, "Vorlesungen über allgemeine Funktionentheorie und elliptische Funktionen" , 1 , Springer (1964) pp. Chapt.8 MR0173749 Zbl 0135.12101 |
[3] | A. Krazer, "Lehrbuch der Theta-Funktionen" , Chelsea, reprint (1970) |
[4] | F. Conforto, "Abelsche Funktionen und algebraische Geometrie" , Springer (1956) MR0079316 Zbl 0074.36601 |
Comments
The conditions on the matrix $ A $ used in the construction of a theta-function in $ p $ variables (3) are precisely those needed in order that the lattice $ L $ defined by the matrix $ ( I _ {p} A) $ in $ \mathbf C ^ {p} $ be such that $ \mathbf C ^ {p} / L $ be an Abelian variety. All Abelian varieties over $ \mathbf C $ arise this way. Thus, there is a theta-function attached to any Abelian variety.
In particular, the conditions are satisfied by the canonical period matrix for Abelian differentials of the first kind on a Riemann surface (cf. Abelian differential), thus determining the Jacobi variety of the Riemann surface and an associated theta-function.
For a not necessarily canonical period matrix $ ( B, A) $ these relations are $ A ^ {T} B - B ^ {T} A = 0 $( Riemann's equality, which becomes symmetry for $ A $ in the canonical case when $ B = I _ {p} $) and $ i B ^ {T} \overline{A}\; - i A ^ {T} \overline{B}\; $ is positive-definite Hermitean (Riemann's inequality, which becomes positive definiteness of the imaginary part of $ A $ in the canonical case (using the symmetry of $ A $)), [a8], p. 27. Together these two relations are sometimes known as the Riemann bilinear relations.
References
[a1] | C.L. Siegel, "Topics in complex function theory" , 2 , Wiley (Interscience) (1971) MR1013364 MR1008931 MR1008930 MR0476762 MR0257326 Zbl 0719.11028 Zbl 0635.30003 Zbl 0635.30002 Zbl 0257.32002 Zbl 0184.11201 |
[a2] | P.A. Griffiths, J.E. Harris, "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978) MR0507725 Zbl 0408.14001 |
[a3] | D. Mumford, "Tata lectures on Theta" , 1–2 , Birkhäuser (1983–1984) MR2352717 MR2307769 MR2307768 MR1116553 MR0742776 MR0688651 Zbl 1124.14043 Zbl 1112.14003 Zbl 1112.14002 Zbl 0744.14033 Zbl 0549.14014 Zbl 0509.14049 |
[a4] | D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties I" Invent. Math. , 1 (1966) pp. 287–354 MR0204427 Zbl 0219.14024 |
[a5] | D. Mumford, "On the equations defining abelian varieties II-III" Invent. Math. , 3 (1967) pp. 71–135; 215–244 |
[a6] | D. Mumford, "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1985) MR2514037 MR1083353 MR0352106 MR0441983 MR0282985 MR0248146 MR0219542 MR0219541 MR0206003 MR0204427 Zbl 0583.14015 |
[a7] | J.-i. Igusa, "Theta functions" , Springer (1972) MR0325625 Zbl 0251.14016 |
[a8] | R.C. Gunning, "Riemann surfaces and generalized theta functions" , Springer (1976) MR0457787 Zbl 0341.14013 |
[a9] | J.D. Fay, "Theta functions on Riemann surfaces" , Springer (1973) MR0335789 Zbl 0281.30013 |
Theta-function. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Theta-function&oldid=48963