Difference between revisions of "Linearly-regular random process"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <!-- | |
| + | l0595701.png | ||
| + | $#A+1 = 33 n = 0 | ||
| + | $#C+1 = 33 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L059/L.0509570 Linearly\AAhregular random process | ||
| + | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
| + | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
| + | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
| + | --> | ||
| − | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
| + | {{TEX|done}} | ||
| − | + | A [[Stationary stochastic process|stationary stochastic process]] (in the wide sense) $ \xi ( t) $, | |
| + | $ - \infty < t < \infty $, | ||
| + | for which the regularity condition | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \cap _ { t } H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) = 0 | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | is satisfied, where $ H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) $ | ||
| + | is the mean square closed linear hull of the values $ \xi ( s) $, | ||
| + | $ s \leq t $. | ||
| + | (Here it is assumed that $ {\mathsf E} \xi ( t) = 0 $.) | ||
| + | Regularity implies the impossibility of a (linear) prediction of the process $ \xi ( t) $ | ||
| + | in the very distant future; more precisely, if $ \widehat \xi ( t + u ) $ | ||
| + | is the best linear prediction for $ \xi ( t + u ) $ | ||
| + | with respect to the values $ \xi ( s) $, | ||
| + | $ s \leq t $, | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | {\mathsf E} | \xi ( t + u ) - \widehat \xi ( t + u ) | ^ {2} = \ | ||
| + | \min _ {\eta \in H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) } \ | ||
| + | {\mathsf E} | \xi ( t + u ) - \eta | ^ {2} , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
then | then | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \lim\limits _ {u \rightarrow \infty } \widehat \xi ( t + u ) = 0 . | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | A necessary and sufficient condition for regularity of a (one-dimensional) stationary process is the existence of a [[Spectral density|spectral density]] | + | A necessary and sufficient condition for regularity of a (one-dimensional) stationary process is the existence of a [[Spectral density|spectral density]] $ f ( \lambda ) $ |
| + | such that | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \int\limits _ {- \infty } ^ \infty | ||
| − | + | \frac{ \mathop{\rm ln} f ( \lambda ) }{1 + \lambda ^ {2} } | |
| + | d \lambda > - \infty . | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | The analytic conditions for regularity of multi-dimensional and infinite-dimensional stationary processes are more complicated. In the general case, when the spectral density $ f ( \lambda ) $ | |
| + | is a positive operator function in Hilbert space, the regularity condition is equivalent to the fact that $ f ( \lambda ) $ | ||
| + | admits a factorization of the form | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | f ( \lambda ) = \phi ^ {*} ( \lambda ) \phi ( \lambda ) , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | where $ \phi ( \lambda ) $, | |
| + | $ - \infty < \lambda < \infty $, | ||
| + | is the boundary value of an operator function $ \phi ( \lambda + i \mu ) $, | ||
| + | $ \mu \rightarrow 0 $, | ||
| + | that is analytic in the lower half-plane $ z = \lambda + i \mu $, | ||
| + | $ \mu < 0 $. | ||
| − | + | Every process $ \zeta ( t) $ | |
| + | that is stationary in the wide sense admits a decomposition into an orthogonal sum | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \zeta ( t) = \xi ( t) + \eta ( t) , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | {\mathsf E} \xi ( t) \overline{ {\eta ( t) }}\; = 0 , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | where $ \xi ( t) $ | |
| + | is a linearly-regular process and $ \eta ( t) $ | ||
| + | is a linearly-singular process, that is, a stochastic process that is stationary in the wide sense and for which | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \cap _ { t } H _ \eta ( - \infty , t ) = H _ \eta ( - \infty , \infty ) ; | ||
| + | $$ | ||
also, | also, | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) \subset H _ \zeta ( - \infty , t ) \ \ | ||
| + | \textrm{ and } \ H _ \eta ( - \infty , t ) \subset H _ \zeta ( - \infty , t) | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | for all | + | for all $ t $. |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.A. Rozanov, "Stationary random processes" , Holden-Day (1967) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.A. Rozanov, "Innovation processes" , Wiley (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.A. Rozanov, "Stationary random processes" , Holden-Day (1967) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Yu.A. Rozanov, "Innovation processes" , Wiley (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:17, 5 June 2020
A stationary stochastic process (in the wide sense) $ \xi ( t) $,
$ - \infty < t < \infty $,
for which the regularity condition
$$ \cap _ { t } H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) = 0 $$
is satisfied, where $ H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) $ is the mean square closed linear hull of the values $ \xi ( s) $, $ s \leq t $. (Here it is assumed that $ {\mathsf E} \xi ( t) = 0 $.) Regularity implies the impossibility of a (linear) prediction of the process $ \xi ( t) $ in the very distant future; more precisely, if $ \widehat \xi ( t + u ) $ is the best linear prediction for $ \xi ( t + u ) $ with respect to the values $ \xi ( s) $, $ s \leq t $,
$$ {\mathsf E} | \xi ( t + u ) - \widehat \xi ( t + u ) | ^ {2} = \ \min _ {\eta \in H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) } \ {\mathsf E} | \xi ( t + u ) - \eta | ^ {2} , $$
then
$$ \lim\limits _ {u \rightarrow \infty } \widehat \xi ( t + u ) = 0 . $$
A necessary and sufficient condition for regularity of a (one-dimensional) stationary process is the existence of a spectral density $ f ( \lambda ) $ such that
$$ \int\limits _ {- \infty } ^ \infty \frac{ \mathop{\rm ln} f ( \lambda ) }{1 + \lambda ^ {2} } d \lambda > - \infty . $$
The analytic conditions for regularity of multi-dimensional and infinite-dimensional stationary processes are more complicated. In the general case, when the spectral density $ f ( \lambda ) $ is a positive operator function in Hilbert space, the regularity condition is equivalent to the fact that $ f ( \lambda ) $ admits a factorization of the form
$$ f ( \lambda ) = \phi ^ {*} ( \lambda ) \phi ( \lambda ) , $$
where $ \phi ( \lambda ) $, $ - \infty < \lambda < \infty $, is the boundary value of an operator function $ \phi ( \lambda + i \mu ) $, $ \mu \rightarrow 0 $, that is analytic in the lower half-plane $ z = \lambda + i \mu $, $ \mu < 0 $.
Every process $ \zeta ( t) $ that is stationary in the wide sense admits a decomposition into an orthogonal sum
$$ \zeta ( t) = \xi ( t) + \eta ( t) , $$
$$ {\mathsf E} \xi ( t) \overline{ {\eta ( t) }}\; = 0 , $$
where $ \xi ( t) $ is a linearly-regular process and $ \eta ( t) $ is a linearly-singular process, that is, a stochastic process that is stationary in the wide sense and for which
$$ \cap _ { t } H _ \eta ( - \infty , t ) = H _ \eta ( - \infty , \infty ) ; $$
also,
$$ H _ \xi ( - \infty , t ) \subset H _ \zeta ( - \infty , t ) \ \ \textrm{ and } \ H _ \eta ( - \infty , t ) \subset H _ \zeta ( - \infty , t) $$
for all $ t $.
References
| [1] | Yu.A. Rozanov, "Stationary random processes" , Holden-Day (1967) (Translated from Russian) |
| [2] | Yu.A. Rozanov, "Innovation processes" , Wiley (1977) (Translated from Russian) |
Comments
One says more often purely non-deterministic process (in the wide sense) instead of linearly-regular process. The decomposition of a (second-order) process in a regular and a singular part (as in the main article) is known as the Wold decomposition.
References
| [a1] | I.A. Ibragimov, Yu.V. Linnik, "Independent and stationary sequences of random variables" , Wolters-Noordhoff (1971) (Translated from Russian) |
| [a2] | J.L. Doob, "Stochastic processes" , Chapman & Hall (1953) |
| [a3] | I.A. Ibragimov, Yu.A. Rozanov, "Gaussian random processes" , Springer (1978) (Translated from Russian) |
Linearly-regular random process. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Linearly-regular_random_process&oldid=47668