Difference between revisions of "Kirchhoff method"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | k0554501.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 28 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 28 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/K055/K.0505450 Kirchhoff method | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A method for approximately solving problems in the theory of the diffraction of short waves; proposed by G.R. Kirchhoff. In its simplest version Kirchhoff's method amounts to the following: Let a wave process be described by the [[Helmholtz equation|Helmholtz equation]] and consider the problem of the scattering of a plane wave by a convex surface $ \Sigma $ | |
+ | on which the classical (Dirichlet) boundary condition $ u \mid _ \Sigma = 0 $ | ||
+ | holds. The solution reduces to finding a function $ u $ | ||
+ | satisfying the Helmholtz equation $ ( \Delta + k ^ {2} ) u = 0 $ | ||
+ | subject to the indicated boundary condition and representable as the sum $ u = e ^ {ikx _ {1} } + U $, | ||
+ | where $ U $ | ||
+ | satisfies the Sommerfeld [[Radiation conditions|radiation conditions]]. The solution of the problem exists and it has the integral representation | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | u ( x) = e ^ {ik x _ {1} } - | ||
+ | \frac{1}{4 \pi } | ||
+ | \int\limits _ \Sigma | ||
+ | \frac{\partial | ||
+ | u ( x ^ \prime ) }{\partial n _ {x ^ \prime } } | ||
− | + | \frac{e ^ {ik | x - x ^ \prime | } }{| x - x ^ \prime | } | |
+ | d \Sigma _ {x ^ \prime } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | x = ( x _ {1} , x _ {2} , x _ {3} ) ,\ x ^ \prime = \ | ||
+ | ( x _ {1} ^ \prime , x _ {2} ^ \prime , x _ {3} ^ \prime ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The | + | $$ |
+ | | x - x ^ \prime | = \sqrt {\sum _ { i= } 1 ^ { 3 } ( x _ {i} - x _ {i} ^ \prime ) ^ {2} } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $ \partial / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } $ | ||
+ | is the derivative along the normal to $ \Sigma $. | ||
+ | The normal is taken outward relative to the infinite domain bounded internally by $ \Sigma $. | ||
+ | It is assumed that on the part of $ \Sigma $ | ||
+ | illuminated by the plane wave $ e ^ {ikx _ {1} } $, | ||
+ | $ \partial u / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } $ | ||
+ | is approximately equal to the expression obtained by the [[Ray method|ray method]]. On the shadowed part one sets $ \partial u ( x ^ \prime ) / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } = 0 $. | ||
+ | The expression $ u _ {K} $ | ||
+ | obtained in this way is called the Kirchhoff approximation for $ u $. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the illuminated region, $ u _ {K} $ | ||
+ | and the [[Geometric approximation|geometric approximation]] for $ u $ | ||
+ | are the same in their principal terms. In a neighbourhood of the boundary between the illuminated and shadowed zones, the principal term of the asymptotic expansion of $ u _ {K} $ | ||
+ | is expressed in terms of the Fresnel integral $ \int _ {0} ^ \infty e ^ {i \alpha ^ {2} } d \alpha $, | ||
+ | and in the shadowed zone $ u _ {K} = O ( 1/ k ) $( | ||
+ | in fact in the shadowed zone $ u $ | ||
+ | decreases considerably faster than $ 1 / k $). | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Kirchhoff method gives a formula for $ u $ | ||
+ | that is correct in the principal terms and remains correct as $ | x | \rightarrow \infty $. | ||
+ | In the subsequent orders in $ k $ | ||
+ | the Kirchhoff approximation is no longer applicable. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Hönl, A.-W. Maue, K. Westpfahl, "Theorie der Beugung" S. Flügge (ed.) , ''Handbuch der Physik'' , '''25/1''' , Springer (1961) pp. 218–573</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Hönl, A.-W. Maue, K. Westpfahl, "Theorie der Beugung" S. Flügge (ed.) , ''Handbuch der Physik'' , '''25/1''' , Springer (1961) pp. 218–573</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Rubinowicz, "Die Beugungswelle in der Kirchhoffschen Theorie der Beugung" , PWN (1957)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Rubinowicz, "Die Beugungswelle in der Kirchhoffschen Theorie der Beugung" , PWN (1957)</TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 22:14, 5 June 2020
A method for approximately solving problems in the theory of the diffraction of short waves; proposed by G.R. Kirchhoff. In its simplest version Kirchhoff's method amounts to the following: Let a wave process be described by the Helmholtz equation and consider the problem of the scattering of a plane wave by a convex surface $ \Sigma $
on which the classical (Dirichlet) boundary condition $ u \mid _ \Sigma = 0 $
holds. The solution reduces to finding a function $ u $
satisfying the Helmholtz equation $ ( \Delta + k ^ {2} ) u = 0 $
subject to the indicated boundary condition and representable as the sum $ u = e ^ {ikx _ {1} } + U $,
where $ U $
satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation conditions. The solution of the problem exists and it has the integral representation
$$ \tag{1 } u ( x) = e ^ {ik x _ {1} } - \frac{1}{4 \pi } \int\limits _ \Sigma \frac{\partial u ( x ^ \prime ) }{\partial n _ {x ^ \prime } } \frac{e ^ {ik | x - x ^ \prime | } }{| x - x ^ \prime | } d \Sigma _ {x ^ \prime } , $$
$$ x = ( x _ {1} , x _ {2} , x _ {3} ) ,\ x ^ \prime = \ ( x _ {1} ^ \prime , x _ {2} ^ \prime , x _ {3} ^ \prime ) , $$
$$ | x - x ^ \prime | = \sqrt {\sum _ { i= } 1 ^ { 3 } ( x _ {i} - x _ {i} ^ \prime ) ^ {2} } , $$
where $ \partial / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } $ is the derivative along the normal to $ \Sigma $. The normal is taken outward relative to the infinite domain bounded internally by $ \Sigma $. It is assumed that on the part of $ \Sigma $ illuminated by the plane wave $ e ^ {ikx _ {1} } $, $ \partial u / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } $ is approximately equal to the expression obtained by the ray method. On the shadowed part one sets $ \partial u ( x ^ \prime ) / \partial n _ {x ^ \prime } = 0 $. The expression $ u _ {K} $ obtained in this way is called the Kirchhoff approximation for $ u $.
In the illuminated region, $ u _ {K} $ and the geometric approximation for $ u $ are the same in their principal terms. In a neighbourhood of the boundary between the illuminated and shadowed zones, the principal term of the asymptotic expansion of $ u _ {K} $ is expressed in terms of the Fresnel integral $ \int _ {0} ^ \infty e ^ {i \alpha ^ {2} } d \alpha $, and in the shadowed zone $ u _ {K} = O ( 1/ k ) $( in fact in the shadowed zone $ u $ decreases considerably faster than $ 1 / k $).
The Kirchhoff method gives a formula for $ u $ that is correct in the principal terms and remains correct as $ | x | \rightarrow \infty $. In the subsequent orders in $ k $ the Kirchhoff approximation is no longer applicable.
References
[1] | H. Hönl, A.-W. Maue, K. Westpfahl, "Theorie der Beugung" S. Flügge (ed.) , Handbuch der Physik , 25/1 , Springer (1961) pp. 218–573 |
Comments
References
[a1] | A. Rubinowicz, "Die Beugungswelle in der Kirchhoffschen Theorie der Beugung" , PWN (1957) |
Kirchhoff method. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Kirchhoff_method&oldid=47501