Difference between revisions of "Invariant imbedding"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | i0522301.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 38 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 38 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/I052/I.0502230 Invariant imbedding | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
A method of converting certain two-point boundary value problems to initial value problems. It is an outgrowth of the method of invariance, introduced by V.A. Ambarzumyan (V.A. Ambartsumyan) (cf. [[#References|[a1]]]) and used so successfully by S. Chandrasekhar in radiative transfer problems (cf. [[#References|[a2]]]). Invariant imbedding is closely related to the sweep method (cf. also [[Double-sweep method|Double-sweep method]]; [[Shooting method|Shooting method]]). | A method of converting certain two-point boundary value problems to initial value problems. It is an outgrowth of the method of invariance, introduced by V.A. Ambarzumyan (V.A. Ambartsumyan) (cf. [[#References|[a1]]]) and used so successfully by S. Chandrasekhar in radiative transfer problems (cf. [[#References|[a2]]]). Invariant imbedding is closely related to the sweep method (cf. also [[Double-sweep method|Double-sweep method]]; [[Shooting method|Shooting method]]). | ||
Consider the system of linear ordinary scalar differential equations | Consider the system of linear ordinary scalar differential equations | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a1 } | |
+ | |||
+ | \frac{du}{dz} | ||
+ | = A ( z) u + B ( z) v , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | - | ||
+ | \frac{dv}{dz} | ||
+ | = C ( z) u + D ( z) v , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | x \leq z \leq y, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | u ( x) = 0,\ v ( y) = 1. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | (When | + | (When $ B $ |
+ | and $ C $ | ||
+ | are non-negative, (a1) may be considered as describing a flow of right-moving particles, $ u $, | ||
+ | and left-moving particles, $ v $, | ||
+ | with unit input at $ y $ | ||
+ | and no input at $ x $. | ||
+ | This interpretation is often helpful but is by no means necessary.) One asks for $ R _ {r} ( x, y) \equiv u ( y) $. | ||
+ | (In the flow model, $ R _ {r} $ | ||
+ | is a reflection coefficient.) | ||
Write | Write | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a2 } | |
+ | u ( z) = R _ {r} ( x, z) v ( z). | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Substitution of (a2) into (a1) yields, formally, | Substitution of (a2) into (a1) yields, formally, | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a3 } | |
+ | |||
+ | \frac{dR _ {r} }{dz} | ||
+ | = \ | ||
+ | B + ( A + D) R _ {r} + CR _ {r} ^ {2} ,\ \ | ||
+ | R _ {r} ( x, x) = 0. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This [[Riccati equation|Riccati equation]] may, under certain conditions, be integrated from $ x $ | ||
+ | to $ y $ | ||
+ | to yield $ u ( y) $. | ||
+ | If one defines $ T _ {r} ( x, y) \equiv v ( x) $, | ||
+ | then | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \tag{a4 } | ||
− | + | \frac{d}{dz} | |
− | + | T _ {r} ( x, z) = \ | |
+ | [ D + CR _ {r} ( x, z)] | ||
+ | T _ {r} ( x, z),\ \ | ||
+ | T _ {r} ( y, y) = 1. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | If the boundary conditions in (a1) are simply switched, analogous functions, | + | If the boundary conditions in (a1) are simply switched, analogous functions, $ R _ {l} $ |
+ | and $ T _ {l} $, | ||
+ | can be defined. Like $ T _ {r} $, | ||
+ | they satisfy linear initial value equations. Only (a3) is non-linear (cf. [[#References|[a3]]]). | ||
The approach becomes much more valuable when the boundary conditions in (a1) are replaced by | The approach becomes much more valuable when the boundary conditions in (a1) are replaced by | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a5 } | |
+ | u ( x) = s _ {l} ,\ \ | ||
+ | v ( y) = s _ {r} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Then, for any | + | Then, for any $ z ^ {*} $, |
+ | $ x \leq z ^ {*} \leq y $, | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{a6 } | |
+ | u ( z ^ {*} ) = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) [ s _ {r} T _ {r} ( z ^ {*} , y) | ||
+ | R _ {r} ( x, z ^ {*} ) + s _ {l} T _ {l} ( x, z ^ {*} )], | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | v ( z ^ {*} ) = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) [ s _ {l} T _ {l} ( x, z ^ {*} ) | ||
+ | R _ {l} ( z ^ {*} , y) + s _ {r} T _ {r} ( z ^ {*} , y)], | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) = [ 1 - R _ {r} ( x,\ | ||
+ | z ^ {*} ) R _ {l} ( z ^ {*} , y)] ^ {-} 1 . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
There are many extensions and generalizations of these ideas. A few are: | There are many extensions and generalizations of these ideas. A few are: | ||
− | a) Equation (a1) may be replaced by a system with | + | a) Equation (a1) may be replaced by a system with $ u $ |
+ | an $ n $- | ||
+ | vector and $ v $ | ||
+ | a $ k $- | ||
+ | vector. | ||
b) Inhomogeneous terms may be appended to (a1). | b) Inhomogeneous terms may be appended to (a1). | ||
Line 51: | Line 129: | ||
c) Conditions (a5) may be replaced by mixed boundary conditions. | c) Conditions (a5) may be replaced by mixed boundary conditions. | ||
− | d) If (a3) fails to have a solution for all | + | d) If (a3) fails to have a solution for all $ z $, |
+ | $ x \leq z \leq y $, | ||
+ | various devices may be employed to cross the singularity. | ||
− | In all cases the function | + | In all cases the function $ R _ {r} $ |
+ | plays the crucial role and is the only function obtained by solving a non-linear equation. All other problems are linear. (Note: the theory may also be built around $ R _ {l} $, | ||
+ | which then satisfies a Riccati equation.) | ||
Invariant imbedding concepts have been employed to investigate problems in transport theory (cf. also [[Transport equations, numerical methods|Transport equations, numerical methods]]), wave propagation, difference equations, integral equations, quantum mechanics, and many other areas of mathematics and theoretical physics. | Invariant imbedding concepts have been employed to investigate problems in transport theory (cf. also [[Transport equations, numerical methods|Transport equations, numerical methods]]), wave propagation, difference equations, integral equations, quantum mechanics, and many other areas of mathematics and theoretical physics. |
Latest revision as of 22:13, 5 June 2020
A method of converting certain two-point boundary value problems to initial value problems. It is an outgrowth of the method of invariance, introduced by V.A. Ambarzumyan (V.A. Ambartsumyan) (cf. [a1]) and used so successfully by S. Chandrasekhar in radiative transfer problems (cf. [a2]). Invariant imbedding is closely related to the sweep method (cf. also Double-sweep method; Shooting method).
Consider the system of linear ordinary scalar differential equations
$$ \tag{a1 } \frac{du}{dz} = A ( z) u + B ( z) v , $$
$$ - \frac{dv}{dz} = C ( z) u + D ( z) v , $$
$$ x \leq z \leq y, $$
$$ u ( x) = 0,\ v ( y) = 1. $$
(When $ B $ and $ C $ are non-negative, (a1) may be considered as describing a flow of right-moving particles, $ u $, and left-moving particles, $ v $, with unit input at $ y $ and no input at $ x $. This interpretation is often helpful but is by no means necessary.) One asks for $ R _ {r} ( x, y) \equiv u ( y) $. (In the flow model, $ R _ {r} $ is a reflection coefficient.)
Write
$$ \tag{a2 } u ( z) = R _ {r} ( x, z) v ( z). $$
Substitution of (a2) into (a1) yields, formally,
$$ \tag{a3 } \frac{dR _ {r} }{dz} = \ B + ( A + D) R _ {r} + CR _ {r} ^ {2} ,\ \ R _ {r} ( x, x) = 0. $$
This Riccati equation may, under certain conditions, be integrated from $ x $ to $ y $ to yield $ u ( y) $. If one defines $ T _ {r} ( x, y) \equiv v ( x) $, then
$$ \tag{a4 } \frac{d}{dz} T _ {r} ( x, z) = \ [ D + CR _ {r} ( x, z)] T _ {r} ( x, z),\ \ T _ {r} ( y, y) = 1. $$
If the boundary conditions in (a1) are simply switched, analogous functions, $ R _ {l} $ and $ T _ {l} $, can be defined. Like $ T _ {r} $, they satisfy linear initial value equations. Only (a3) is non-linear (cf. [a3]).
The approach becomes much more valuable when the boundary conditions in (a1) are replaced by
$$ \tag{a5 } u ( x) = s _ {l} ,\ \ v ( y) = s _ {r} . $$
Then, for any $ z ^ {*} $, $ x \leq z ^ {*} \leq y $,
$$ \tag{a6 } u ( z ^ {*} ) = $$
$$ = \ \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) [ s _ {r} T _ {r} ( z ^ {*} , y) R _ {r} ( x, z ^ {*} ) + s _ {l} T _ {l} ( x, z ^ {*} )], $$
$$ v ( z ^ {*} ) = $$
$$ = \ \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) [ s _ {l} T _ {l} ( x, z ^ {*} ) R _ {l} ( z ^ {*} , y) + s _ {r} T _ {r} ( z ^ {*} , y)], $$
$$ \rho ( x, y, z ^ {*} ) = [ 1 - R _ {r} ( x,\ z ^ {*} ) R _ {l} ( z ^ {*} , y)] ^ {-} 1 . $$
There are many extensions and generalizations of these ideas. A few are:
a) Equation (a1) may be replaced by a system with $ u $ an $ n $- vector and $ v $ a $ k $- vector.
b) Inhomogeneous terms may be appended to (a1).
c) Conditions (a5) may be replaced by mixed boundary conditions.
d) If (a3) fails to have a solution for all $ z $, $ x \leq z \leq y $, various devices may be employed to cross the singularity.
In all cases the function $ R _ {r} $ plays the crucial role and is the only function obtained by solving a non-linear equation. All other problems are linear. (Note: the theory may also be built around $ R _ {l} $, which then satisfies a Riccati equation.)
Invariant imbedding concepts have been employed to investigate problems in transport theory (cf. also Transport equations, numerical methods), wave propagation, difference equations, integral equations, quantum mechanics, and many other areas of mathematics and theoretical physics.
References
[a1] | V.A. Ambarzumyan, "Diffuse reflection of light by a foggy medium" C.R. Acad. Sci. SSSR , 38 (1943) (In Russian) |
[a2] | S. Chandrasekhar, "Radiative transfer" , Dover, reprint (1960) |
[a3] | R. Bellman, G.M. Wing, "An introduction to invariant imbedding" , Wiley (1975) |
Invariant imbedding. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Invariant_imbedding&oldid=47412