|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | One of the topological characteristics of a graph. A graph is said to be connected if for any two of its vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449101.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449102.png" /> there exists a chain connecting these vertices. The vertex connectivity number of a graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449103.png" /> (denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449104.png" />) is the smallest number of vertices the removal of which results in a disconnected graph or in a graph consisting of one isolated vertex. The edge connectivity number (denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449105.png" />) is the smallest number of edges of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449106.png" /> the removal of which results in a disconnected graph. A graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449107.png" /> is said to be <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g0449109.png" />-connected if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491010.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491012.png" />-edge-connected if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491013.png" />. A maximal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491014.png" />-connected subgraph of a graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491015.png" /> is said to be a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491017.png" />-connected component of it; a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491018.png" />-connected component is called a connected component. In studying communication networks and logical networks, the connectivity numbers of the corresponding graphs can be interpreted as a degree of reliability of these networks.
| + | <!-- |
| + | g0449101.png |
| + | $#A+1 = 97 n = 0 |
| + | $#C+1 = 97 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/G044/G.0404910 Graph, connectivity of a |
| + | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. |
| + | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, |
| + | if TeX found to be correct. |
| + | --> |
| | | |
− | The theory of graphs studies methods for determining the connectivity of graphs, conditions under which a graph is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491019.png" />-connected or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491020.png" />-edge-connected, the relations between the different types of connectivity, the dependence of the connectivity numbers on other graph parameters, etc. Thus, if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491021.png" /> is the minimal degree of the vertices of a graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491022.png" />, the following inequalities are valid: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491023.png" />.
| + | {{TEX|auto}} |
| + | {{TEX|done}} |
| | | |
− | For any integers <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491024.png" /> (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491025.png" />) there exists a graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491026.png" /> for which <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491027.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491028.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491029.png" />. If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491030.png" /> has <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491031.png" /> vertices and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491032.png" />, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491033.png" />. One says that a set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491034.png" /> of vertices, edges, or vertices and edges separates two vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491035.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491036.png" /> if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491037.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491038.png" /> belong to different connected components of the graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491039.png" /> obtained from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491040.png" /> by the removal of the elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491041.png" />. The following statements are valid.
| + | One of the topological characteristics of a graph. A graph is said to be connected if for any two of its vertices $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $ |
| + | there exists a chain connecting these vertices. The vertex connectivity number of a graph $ G $( |
| + | denoted by $ \kappa ( G) $) |
| + | is the smallest number of vertices the removal of which results in a disconnected graph or in a graph consisting of one isolated vertex. The edge connectivity number (denoted by $ \lambda ( G) $) |
| + | is the smallest number of edges of $ G $ |
| + | the removal of which results in a disconnected graph. A graph $ G $ |
| + | is said to be $ k $- |
| + | connected if $ \kappa ( G) \geq k $, |
| + | and $ k $- |
| + | edge-connected if $ \lambda ( G) \geq k $. |
| + | A maximal $ k $- |
| + | connected subgraph of a graph $ G $ |
| + | is said to be a $ k $- |
| + | connected component of it; a $ 1 $- |
| + | connected component is called a connected component. In studying communication networks and logical networks, the connectivity numbers of the corresponding graphs can be interpreted as a degree of reliability of these networks. |
| | | |
− | The smallest number of vertices separating two non-adjacent vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491042.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491043.png" /> is equal to the largest number of simple chains without common vertices connecting <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491044.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491045.png" />. A graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491046.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491047.png" />-connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491048.png" /> chains which do not intersect at the vertices. Similar theorems are also valid for edge connectivity. A graph is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491049.png" />-edge-connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491050.png" /> chains which do not intersect at the edges. A set of edges whose removal results in the formation of a disconnected graph is known as a cut. In each graph the largest number of cuts which do not intersect at the edges and which separate two vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491051.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491052.png" /> is equal to the smallest number of edges of a simple chain connecting <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491053.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491054.png" />, i.e. to the distance <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491055.png" /> between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491056.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491057.png" />. | + | The theory of graphs studies methods for determining the connectivity of graphs, conditions under which a graph is $ k $- |
| + | connected or $ k $- |
| + | edge-connected, the relations between the different types of connectivity, the dependence of the connectivity numbers on other graph parameters, etc. Thus, if $ \delta ( G) $ |
| + | is the minimal degree of the vertices of a graph $ G $, |
| + | the following inequalities are valid: $ \kappa ( G) \leq \lambda ( G) \leq \delta ( G) $. |
| + | |
| + | For any integers $ a, b, c $( |
| + | $ 0 < a \leq b \leq c $) |
| + | there exists a graph $ G $ |
| + | for which $ \kappa ( G) = a $, |
| + | $ \lambda ( G) = b $, |
| + | $ \delta ( G) = c $. |
| + | If $ G $ |
| + | has $ n $ |
| + | vertices and $ \delta ( G) \geq [ n/2] $, |
| + | then $ \lambda ( G) = \delta ( G) $. |
| + | One says that a set $ S $ |
| + | of vertices, edges, or vertices and edges separates two vertices $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $ |
| + | if $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $ |
| + | belong to different connected components of the graph $ G- S $ |
| + | obtained from $ G $ |
| + | by the removal of the elements of $ S $. |
| + | The following statements are valid. |
| + | |
| + | The smallest number of vertices separating two non-adjacent vertices $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $ |
| + | is equal to the largest number of simple chains without common vertices connecting $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $. |
| + | A graph $ G $ |
| + | is $ k $- |
| + | connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least $ k $ |
| + | chains which do not intersect at the vertices. Similar theorems are also valid for edge connectivity. A graph is $ k $- |
| + | edge-connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least $ k $ |
| + | chains which do not intersect at the edges. A set of edges whose removal results in the formation of a disconnected graph is known as a cut. In each graph the largest number of cuts which do not intersect at the edges and which separate two vertices $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $ |
| + | is equal to the smallest number of edges of a simple chain connecting $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $, |
| + | i.e. to the distance $ d ( u , v) $ |
| + | between $ u $ |
| + | and $ v $. |
| | | |
| ====References==== | | ====References==== |
| <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Harary, "Graph theory" , Addison-Wesley (1969) pp. Chapt. 9</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.R. Ford, D.R. Fulkerson, "Flows in networks" , Princeton Univ. Press (1962)</TD></TR></table> | | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Harary, "Graph theory" , Addison-Wesley (1969) pp. Chapt. 9</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.R. Ford, D.R. Fulkerson, "Flows in networks" , Princeton Univ. Press (1962)</TD></TR></table> |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
| The assertions in the last section can be derived from the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem of L. Ford and D. Fulkerson (see [[#References|[2]]]). The first two are different versions of the vertex form of Menger's theorem (see [[#References|[1]]]). | | The assertions in the last section can be derived from the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem of L. Ford and D. Fulkerson (see [[#References|[2]]]). The first two are different versions of the vertex form of Menger's theorem (see [[#References|[1]]]). |
| | | |
− | The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem, or the Ford–Fulkerson theorem, deals with a directed graph <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491058.png" /> for which for each arc <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491059.png" /> a capacity <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491060.png" /> is specified. In addition, two special vertices, labeled <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491061.png" />, are specified, called source and sink respectively, and there are no arcs leaving <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491062.png" /> or entering <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491063.png" />. A flow on the graph is given by specifying for every arc (i.e. directed edge) a number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491064.png" /> such that for every vertex <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491065.png" />, | + | The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem, or the Ford–Fulkerson theorem, deals with a directed graph $ G $ |
| + | for which for each arc $ e $ |
| + | a capacity $ 0 \leq c _ {e} < \infty $ |
| + | is specified. In addition, two special vertices, labeled $ Q, S $, |
| + | are specified, called source and sink respectively, and there are no arcs leaving $ S $ |
| + | or entering $ Q $. |
| + | A flow on the graph is given by specifying for every arc (i.e. directed edge) a number $ 0 \leq f _ {e} \leq c _ {e} $ |
| + | such that for every vertex $ P \neq Q, S $, |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491066.png" /></td> <td valign="top" style="width:5%;text-align:right;">(*)</td></tr></table>
| + | $$ \tag{* } |
| + | \sum _ {a ( e) = P } f _ {e} = \ |
| + | \sum _ {b ( e) = P } f _ {e} $$ |
| | | |
− | where for an arc <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491067.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491068.png" /> denotes its source vertex and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491069.png" /> its target vertex. The maximum flow problem asks for a flow such that | + | where for an arc $ e $, |
| + | $ a ( e) $ |
| + | denotes its source vertex and $ b ( e) $ |
| + | its target vertex. The maximum flow problem asks for a flow such that |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491070.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | $$ |
| + | \sum _ {a ( e) = Q } f _ {e} $$ |
| | | |
− | is maximized. In this setting a cut is a set of arcs whose removal results in a disconnected graph with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491071.png" /> in one component and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491072.png" /> in another. The capacity of a cut is the sum of the capacities <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491073.png" /> of the elements of the cut. The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem now says that the maximum flow attainable is equal to the minimal attainable capacity of a cut. The maximum flow problem can be formulated as a linear programming problem, and then the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem is an instance of the duality theorem of linear programming. | + | is maximized. In this setting a cut is a set of arcs whose removal results in a disconnected graph with $ Q $ |
| + | in one component and $ S $ |
| + | in another. The capacity of a cut is the sum of the capacities $ c _ {e} $ |
| + | of the elements of the cut. The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem now says that the maximum flow attainable is equal to the minimal attainable capacity of a cut. The maximum flow problem can be formulated as a linear programming problem, and then the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem is an instance of the duality theorem of linear programming. |
| | | |
− | Recall that a chain in a non-oriented graph from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491074.png" /> to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491075.png" /> is a sequence <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491076.png" /> of alternating vertices and edges such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491077.png" /> is an edge between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491078.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491079.png" /> and such that all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491080.png" /> and all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491081.png" />, except possibly <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491082.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491083.png" />, are distinct. A <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491085.png" />-disconnecting set or cut, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491086.png" /> are two vertices, is a set of edges whose removal results in a disconnected graph with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491087.png" /> in one component and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491088.png" /> in another. The edge form of Menger's theorem now says that for a connected graph the maximum number of edge-disjoint chains from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491089.png" /> to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491090.png" /> is equal to the minimum number of edges in a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491091.png" />-disconnecting set. The theorem was in fact first proved by Ford and Fulkerson (1955). A <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491093.png" />-separating set is a set of vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491094.png" /> (not including <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491095.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491096.png" />) such that any chain from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491097.png" /> to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491098.png" /> passes through <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g04491099.png" />. The vertex form of Menger's theorem (Menger, 1928) now says that the maximum number of vertex-disjoint chains connecting distinct non-adjacent vertices <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g044910100.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g044910101.png" /> is equal to the minimal number of vertices in a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/g/g044/g044910/g044910102.png" />-separating set. Menger's theorem is closely related to the P. Hall marriage theorem; cf. [[Combinatorial analysis|Combinatorial analysis]] for that theorem. | + | Recall that a chain in a non-oriented graph from $ v _ {0} $ |
| + | to $ v _ {n} $ |
| + | is a sequence $ v _ {0} e _ {0} v _ {1} \dots e _ {n - 1 } v _ {n} $ |
| + | of alternating vertices and edges such that $ e _ {i} $ |
| + | is an edge between $ v _ {i} $ |
| + | and $ v _ {i + 1 } $ |
| + | and such that all $ e _ {j} $ |
| + | and all $ v _ {k} $, |
| + | except possibly $ v _ {0} $ |
| + | and $ v _ {n} $, |
| + | are distinct. A $ vw $- |
| + | disconnecting set or cut, where $ v, w $ |
| + | are two vertices, is a set of edges whose removal results in a disconnected graph with $ v $ |
| + | in one component and $ w $ |
| + | in another. The edge form of Menger's theorem now says that for a connected graph the maximum number of edge-disjoint chains from $ v $ |
| + | to $ w $ |
| + | is equal to the minimum number of edges in a $ vw $- |
| + | disconnecting set. The theorem was in fact first proved by Ford and Fulkerson (1955). A $ vw $- |
| + | separating set is a set of vertices $ S $( |
| + | not including $ v $ |
| + | or $ w $) |
| + | such that any chain from $ v $ |
| + | to $ w $ |
| + | passes through $ S $. |
| + | The vertex form of Menger's theorem (Menger, 1928) now says that the maximum number of vertex-disjoint chains connecting distinct non-adjacent vertices $ v $ |
| + | and $ w $ |
| + | is equal to the minimal number of vertices in a $ vw $- |
| + | separating set. Menger's theorem is closely related to the P. Hall marriage theorem; cf. [[Combinatorial analysis|Combinatorial analysis]] for that theorem. |
| | | |
| ====References==== | | ====References==== |
| <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.T. Tutte, "Connectivity in graphs" , Oxford Univ. Press (1966)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.J. Wilson, "Introduction to graph theory" , Longman (1985)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H.-J. Walther, "Ten applications of graph theory" , Reidel (1984) pp. Sect. 6.1</TD></TR></table> | | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W.T. Tutte, "Connectivity in graphs" , Oxford Univ. Press (1966)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.J. Wilson, "Introduction to graph theory" , Longman (1985)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H.-J. Walther, "Ten applications of graph theory" , Reidel (1984) pp. Sect. 6.1</TD></TR></table> |
One of the topological characteristics of a graph. A graph is said to be connected if for any two of its vertices $ u $
and $ v $
there exists a chain connecting these vertices. The vertex connectivity number of a graph $ G $(
denoted by $ \kappa ( G) $)
is the smallest number of vertices the removal of which results in a disconnected graph or in a graph consisting of one isolated vertex. The edge connectivity number (denoted by $ \lambda ( G) $)
is the smallest number of edges of $ G $
the removal of which results in a disconnected graph. A graph $ G $
is said to be $ k $-
connected if $ \kappa ( G) \geq k $,
and $ k $-
edge-connected if $ \lambda ( G) \geq k $.
A maximal $ k $-
connected subgraph of a graph $ G $
is said to be a $ k $-
connected component of it; a $ 1 $-
connected component is called a connected component. In studying communication networks and logical networks, the connectivity numbers of the corresponding graphs can be interpreted as a degree of reliability of these networks.
The theory of graphs studies methods for determining the connectivity of graphs, conditions under which a graph is $ k $-
connected or $ k $-
edge-connected, the relations between the different types of connectivity, the dependence of the connectivity numbers on other graph parameters, etc. Thus, if $ \delta ( G) $
is the minimal degree of the vertices of a graph $ G $,
the following inequalities are valid: $ \kappa ( G) \leq \lambda ( G) \leq \delta ( G) $.
For any integers $ a, b, c $(
$ 0 < a \leq b \leq c $)
there exists a graph $ G $
for which $ \kappa ( G) = a $,
$ \lambda ( G) = b $,
$ \delta ( G) = c $.
If $ G $
has $ n $
vertices and $ \delta ( G) \geq [ n/2] $,
then $ \lambda ( G) = \delta ( G) $.
One says that a set $ S $
of vertices, edges, or vertices and edges separates two vertices $ u $
and $ v $
if $ u $
and $ v $
belong to different connected components of the graph $ G- S $
obtained from $ G $
by the removal of the elements of $ S $.
The following statements are valid.
The smallest number of vertices separating two non-adjacent vertices $ u $
and $ v $
is equal to the largest number of simple chains without common vertices connecting $ u $
and $ v $.
A graph $ G $
is $ k $-
connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least $ k $
chains which do not intersect at the vertices. Similar theorems are also valid for edge connectivity. A graph is $ k $-
edge-connected if and only if any pair of its vertices is connected by at least $ k $
chains which do not intersect at the edges. A set of edges whose removal results in the formation of a disconnected graph is known as a cut. In each graph the largest number of cuts which do not intersect at the edges and which separate two vertices $ u $
and $ v $
is equal to the smallest number of edges of a simple chain connecting $ u $
and $ v $,
i.e. to the distance $ d ( u , v) $
between $ u $
and $ v $.
References
[1] | F. Harary, "Graph theory" , Addison-Wesley (1969) pp. Chapt. 9 |
[2] | L.R. Ford, D.R. Fulkerson, "Flows in networks" , Princeton Univ. Press (1962) |
The assertions in the last section can be derived from the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem of L. Ford and D. Fulkerson (see [2]). The first two are different versions of the vertex form of Menger's theorem (see [1]).
The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem, or the Ford–Fulkerson theorem, deals with a directed graph $ G $
for which for each arc $ e $
a capacity $ 0 \leq c _ {e} < \infty $
is specified. In addition, two special vertices, labeled $ Q, S $,
are specified, called source and sink respectively, and there are no arcs leaving $ S $
or entering $ Q $.
A flow on the graph is given by specifying for every arc (i.e. directed edge) a number $ 0 \leq f _ {e} \leq c _ {e} $
such that for every vertex $ P \neq Q, S $,
$$ \tag{* }
\sum _ {a ( e) = P } f _ {e} = \
\sum _ {b ( e) = P } f _ {e} $$
where for an arc $ e $,
$ a ( e) $
denotes its source vertex and $ b ( e) $
its target vertex. The maximum flow problem asks for a flow such that
$$
\sum _ {a ( e) = Q } f _ {e} $$
is maximized. In this setting a cut is a set of arcs whose removal results in a disconnected graph with $ Q $
in one component and $ S $
in another. The capacity of a cut is the sum of the capacities $ c _ {e} $
of the elements of the cut. The maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem now says that the maximum flow attainable is equal to the minimal attainable capacity of a cut. The maximum flow problem can be formulated as a linear programming problem, and then the maximum-flow-minimum-cut theorem is an instance of the duality theorem of linear programming.
Recall that a chain in a non-oriented graph from $ v _ {0} $
to $ v _ {n} $
is a sequence $ v _ {0} e _ {0} v _ {1} \dots e _ {n - 1 } v _ {n} $
of alternating vertices and edges such that $ e _ {i} $
is an edge between $ v _ {i} $
and $ v _ {i + 1 } $
and such that all $ e _ {j} $
and all $ v _ {k} $,
except possibly $ v _ {0} $
and $ v _ {n} $,
are distinct. A $ vw $-
disconnecting set or cut, where $ v, w $
are two vertices, is a set of edges whose removal results in a disconnected graph with $ v $
in one component and $ w $
in another. The edge form of Menger's theorem now says that for a connected graph the maximum number of edge-disjoint chains from $ v $
to $ w $
is equal to the minimum number of edges in a $ vw $-
disconnecting set. The theorem was in fact first proved by Ford and Fulkerson (1955). A $ vw $-
separating set is a set of vertices $ S $(
not including $ v $
or $ w $)
such that any chain from $ v $
to $ w $
passes through $ S $.
The vertex form of Menger's theorem (Menger, 1928) now says that the maximum number of vertex-disjoint chains connecting distinct non-adjacent vertices $ v $
and $ w $
is equal to the minimal number of vertices in a $ vw $-
separating set. Menger's theorem is closely related to the P. Hall marriage theorem; cf. Combinatorial analysis for that theorem.
References
[a1] | W.T. Tutte, "Connectivity in graphs" , Oxford Univ. Press (1966) |
[a2] | R.J. Wilson, "Introduction to graph theory" , Longman (1985) |
[a3] | H.-J. Walther, "Ten applications of graph theory" , Reidel (1984) pp. Sect. 6.1 |