|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | <!-- |
| + | f0418101.png |
| + | $#A+1 = 109 n = 0 |
| + | $#C+1 = 109 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/F041/F.0401810 Frommer method |
| + | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. |
| + | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, |
| + | if TeX found to be correct. |
| + | --> |
| + | |
| + | {{TEX|auto}} |
| + | {{TEX|done}} |
| + | |
| A method for investigating the singular points of an [[Autonomous system|autonomous system]] of second-order ordinary differential equations | | A method for investigating the singular points of an [[Autonomous system|autonomous system]] of second-order ordinary differential equations |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418101.png" /></td> <td valign="top" style="width:5%;text-align:right;">(1)</td></tr></table>
| + | $$ \tag{1 } |
| + | \dot{p} = f ( p),\ \ |
| + | p = ( x, y),\ \ |
| + | f = ( X, Y): G \rightarrow \mathbf R ^ {2} , |
| + | $$ |
| + | |
| + | where $ f $ |
| + | is an analytic or a sufficiently smooth function in the domain $ G $. |
| | | |
− | where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418102.png" /> is an analytic or a sufficiently smooth function in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418103.png" />.
| + | Suppose that $ O = ( 0, 0) $ |
| + | is a singular point of the system (1), that is, $ f ( O) = 0 $, |
| + | and that $ X $ |
| + | and $ Y $ |
| + | are analytic functions at $ O $ |
| + | with no common analytic factor that vanishes at $ O $. |
| + | The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all $ TO $- |
| + | curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to $ O $ |
| + | along a definite direction. Every $ TO $- |
| + | curve of (1) not lying on the axis $ x = 0 $ |
| + | is an $ O $- |
| + | curve of the equation |
| | | |
− | Suppose that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418104.png" /> is a singular point of the system (1), that is, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418105.png" />, and that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418106.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418107.png" /> are analytic functions at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418108.png" /> with no common analytic factor that vanishes at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f0418109.png" />. The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181011.png" />-curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181012.png" /> along a definite direction. Every <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181013.png" />-curve of (1) not lying on the axis <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181014.png" /> is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181016.png" />-curve of the equation
| + | $$ \tag{2 } |
| + | y ^ \prime = |
| + | \frac{Y ( x, y) }{X ( x, y) } |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181017.png" /></td> <td valign="top" style="width:5%;text-align:right;">(2)</td></tr></table>
| + | $$ |
| | | |
− | (that is, can be represented near <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181018.png" /> in the form | + | (that is, can be represented near $ O $ |
| + | in the form |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181019.png" /></td> <td valign="top" style="width:5%;text-align:right;">(3)</td></tr></table>
| + | $$ \tag{3 } |
| + | y = \phi ( x),\ \ |
| + | \phi ( x) \rightarrow 0 \ \ |
| + | \textrm{ as } x \rightarrow 0, |
| + | $$ |
| | | |
− | where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181020.png" /> is a solution of (2), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181021.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181022.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181023.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181024.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181025.png" /> for every <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181026.png" />), and conversely. | + | where $ \phi : I \rightarrow \mathbf R $ |
| + | is a solution of (2), $ I = ( 0, \delta ) $ |
| + | or $ (- \delta , 0) $, |
| + | $ \delta > 0 $, |
| + | $ \phi ( x) \equiv 0 $ |
| + | or $ \phi ( x) \neq 0 $ |
| + | for every $ x \in I $), |
| + | and conversely. |
| | | |
− | Consider equation (2) first in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181027.png" />. If it is a simple Bendixson equation, that is, if it satisfies the conditions | + | Consider equation (2) first in the domain $ x > 0 $. |
| + | If it is a simple Bendixson equation, that is, if it satisfies the conditions |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181028.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | $$ |
| + | X ( x, y) \equiv x ^ {h} ,\ \ |
| + | h \geq 1,\ \ |
| + | Y _ {y} ^ \prime ( 0, 0) = \ |
| + | a \neq 0, |
| + | $$ |
| | | |
− | then it has a unique <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181029.png" />-curve in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181030.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181031.png" />; the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181032.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181033.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181034.png" /> is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181035.png" /> (cf. [[Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations|Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations]]). Otherwise, to exhibit the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181036.png" />-curves of (2) in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181037.png" /> one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181038.png" />-curve (3) of equation (2), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181039.png" />, has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181040.png" />, namely, it can be represented in the form | + | then it has a unique $ O $- |
| + | curve in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
| + | for $ a < 0 $; |
| + | the domain $ x > 0 $, |
| + | $ x ^ {2} + y ^ {2} < r ^ {2} $, |
| + | where $ r $ |
| + | is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for $ a > 0 $( |
| + | cf. [[Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations|Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations]]). Otherwise, to exhibit the $ O $- |
| + | curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
| + | one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every $ O $- |
| + | curve (3) of equation (2), $ \phi ( x) \not\equiv 0 $, |
| + | has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, |
| + | namely, it can be represented in the form |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181041.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | $$ |
| + | y = x ^ {v ( x) } \ |
| + | \mathop{\rm sign} \phi ( x), |
| + | $$ |
| | | |
| and admits a finite or infinite limit | | and admits a finite or infinite limit |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181042.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | $$ |
| + | \nu = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } v ( x) = \ |
| + | \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \ |
| | | |
− | which is called its order of curvature at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181044.png" />, and for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181045.png" /> it also admits a finite or infinite limit
| + | \frac{ \mathop{\rm ln} | \phi ( x) | }{ \mathop{\rm ln} x } |
| + | \in \ |
| + | [ 0, + \infty ], |
| + | $$ |
| | | |
− | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181046.png" /></td> </tr></table>
| + | which is called its order of curvature at $ O $, |
| + | and for $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ |
| + | it also admits a finite or infinite limit |
| | | |
− | which is called its measure of curvature at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181048.png" />. Here the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181049.png" />-curve <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181050.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181051.png" />, is assigned the order of curvature <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181052.png" />.
| + | $$ |
| + | \gamma = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \ |
| + | \phi ( x) x ^ {- \nu } \in \ |
| + | [- \infty , + \infty ], |
| + | $$ |
| | | |
− | The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181053.png" /> (there is always a finite number of them), and for each order <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181054.png" /> all possible measures of curvature for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181055.png" />-curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181056.png" />-curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181057.png" /> of so-called characteristic pairs <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181059.png" />. For each of these <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181060.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181061.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181062.png" /> are natural numbers, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181063.png" />. Therefore the substitution <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181064.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181065.png" /> transforms (2) into a derived equation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181066.png" /> of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181067.png" />-curves with order of curvature <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181068.png" /> and measure of curvature <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181069.png" /> into the question of whether <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181070.png" /> has <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181071.png" />-curves in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181072.png" />.
| + | which is called its measure of curvature at $ O $. |
| + | Here the $ O $- |
| + | curve $ y = 0 $, |
| + | $ x \in ( 0, \delta ) $, |
| + | is assigned the order of curvature $ \nu = + \infty $. |
| | | |
− | If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181073.png" />-curves of (2) in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181074.png" /> have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs.
| + | The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature $ \nu $( |
| + | there is always a finite number of them), and for each order $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $ |
| + | all possible measures of curvature for $ O $- |
| + | curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has $ O $- |
| + | curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number $ ( \geq 0) $ |
| + | of so-called characteristic pairs $ ( \nu , \gamma ) $. |
| + | For each of these $ \nu = r/s $, |
| + | where $ r $ |
| + | and $ s $ |
| + | are natural numbers, and $ 0 < | \gamma | < + \infty $. |
| + | Therefore the substitution $ x = x _ {1} ^ {s} $, |
| + | $ y = ( \gamma + y _ {1} ) x _ {1} ^ {r} $ |
| + | transforms (2) into a derived equation $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ |
| + | of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has $ O $- |
| + | curves with order of curvature $ \nu $ |
| + | and measure of curvature $ \gamma $ |
| + | into the question of whether $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $ |
| + | has $ O $- |
| + | curves in the domain $ x _ {1} > 0 $. |
| | | |
− | Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181075.png" />-curves of (1) in the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181076.png" />, along with their asymptotic behaviour at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181077.png" />. Changing <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181078.png" /> to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181079.png" /> in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181080.png" />, and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181081.png" /> are <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181082.png" />-curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181083.png" /> can be determined on the basis of this information as follows.
| + | If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all $ O $- |
| + | curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $ |
| + | have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs. |
| | | |
− | If the system (1) has no <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181084.png" />-curves, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181085.png" /> is a centre (cf. [[Centre of a topological dynamical system|Centre of a topological dynamical system]]), a [[Focus|focus]] or a [[Centro-focus|centro-focus]] for it. If the set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181086.png" /> of all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181087.png" />-curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181088.png" /> obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181089.png" /> into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181090.png" />-curves: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181091.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181092.png" />, each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181093.png" />-curve. The representatives <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181094.png" /> of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181095.png" />, which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181096.png" /> along a circle <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181097.png" /> of small radius <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181098.png" />, and they divide the disc bounded by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f04181099.png" /> into <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810100.png" /> sectors <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810101.png" />.
| + | Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all $ TO $- |
| + | curves of (1) in the domain $ x > 0 $, |
| + | along with their asymptotic behaviour at $ O $. |
| + | Changing $ x $ |
| + | to $ - x $ |
| + | in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain $ x < 0 $, |
| + | and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis $ x = 0 $ |
| + | are $ TO $- |
| + | curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of $ O $ |
| + | can be determined on the basis of this information as follows. |
| | | |
− | Suppose that the sector <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810102.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810103.png" />, has as its lateral edges the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810104.png" />-curves <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810105.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810106.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810107.png" /> is the same as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810108.png" />. Then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810109.png" /> is: a) elliptic, b) hyperbolic or c) parabolic, according to whether the bundles <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810110.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810111.png" /> are respectively a) both open, b) both "closed" or c) of different types.
| + | If the system (1) has no $ TO $- |
| + | curves, then $ O $ |
| + | is a centre (cf. [[Centre of a topological dynamical system|Centre of a topological dynamical system]]), a [[Focus|focus]] or a [[Centro-focus|centro-focus]] for it. If the set $ H $ |
| + | of all $ TO $- |
| + | curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at $ O $ |
| + | obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split $ H $ |
| + | into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of $ TO $- |
| + | curves: $ H _ {1} \dots H _ {k} $, |
| + | $ k \geq 2 $, |
| + | each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single $ TO $- |
| + | curve. The representatives $ l _ {1} \dots l _ {k} $ |
| + | of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at $ O $, |
| + | which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round $ O $ |
| + | along a circle $ C $ |
| + | of small radius $ r $, |
| + | and they divide the disc bounded by $ C $ |
| + | into $ k $ |
| + | sectors $ S _ {1} \dots S _ {k} $. |
| | | |
− | Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810112.png" />, and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810113.png" />, or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f041/f041810/f041810114.png" /> (cf. [[Centre and focus problem|Centre and focus problem]]). | + | Suppose that the sector $ S _ {i} $, |
| + | $ i \in \{ 1 \dots k \} $, |
| + | has as its lateral edges the $ TO $- |
| + | curves $ l _ {i} $ |
| + | and $ l _ {i + 1 } $, |
| + | where $ l _ {k + 1 } $ |
| + | is the same as $ l _ {1} $. |
| + | Then $ S _ {i} $ |
| + | is: a) elliptic, b) hyperbolic or c) parabolic, according to whether the bundles $ H _ {i} $ |
| + | and $ H _ {i + 1 } $ |
| + | are respectively a) both open, b) both "closed" or c) of different types. |
| + | |
| + | Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point $ O $, |
| + | and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of $ O $, |
| + | or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at $ O $( |
| + | cf. [[Centre and focus problem|Centre and focus problem]]). |
| | | |
| An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [[#References|[1]]]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems. | | An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [[#References|[1]]]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems. |
Line 49: |
Line 190: |
| ====References==== | | ====References==== |
| <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Frommer, "Die Integralkurven einer gewöhnlichen Differentialgleichung erster Ordnung in der Umgebung rationaler Unbestimmtheitsstellen" ''Math. Ann.'' , '''99''' (1928) pp. 222–272</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.F. Andreev, "Singular points of differential equations" , Minsk (1979) (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Frommer, "Die Integralkurven einer gewöhnlichen Differentialgleichung erster Ordnung in der Umgebung rationaler Unbestimmtheitsstellen" ''Math. Ann.'' , '''99''' (1928) pp. 222–272</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.F. Andreev, "Singular points of differential equations" , Minsk (1979) (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| ====Comments==== | | ====Comments==== |
− |
| |
| | | |
| ====References==== | | ====References==== |
| <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Hartman, "Ordinary differential equations" , Birkhäuser (1982) pp. 220–227</TD></TR></table> | | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Hartman, "Ordinary differential equations" , Birkhäuser (1982) pp. 220–227</TD></TR></table> |
A method for investigating the singular points of an autonomous system of second-order ordinary differential equations
$$ \tag{1 }
\dot{p} = f ( p),\ \
p = ( x, y),\ \
f = ( X, Y): G \rightarrow \mathbf R ^ {2} ,
$$
where $ f $
is an analytic or a sufficiently smooth function in the domain $ G $.
Suppose that $ O = ( 0, 0) $
is a singular point of the system (1), that is, $ f ( O) = 0 $,
and that $ X $
and $ Y $
are analytic functions at $ O $
with no common analytic factor that vanishes at $ O $.
The Frommer method enables one to find explicitly all $ TO $-
curves of (1) — the semi-trajectories of the system joined to $ O $
along a definite direction. Every $ TO $-
curve of (1) not lying on the axis $ x = 0 $
is an $ O $-
curve of the equation
$$ \tag{2 }
y ^ \prime =
\frac{Y ( x, y) }{X ( x, y) }
$$
(that is, can be represented near $ O $
in the form
$$ \tag{3 }
y = \phi ( x),\ \
\phi ( x) \rightarrow 0 \ \
\textrm{ as } x \rightarrow 0,
$$
where $ \phi : I \rightarrow \mathbf R $
is a solution of (2), $ I = ( 0, \delta ) $
or $ (- \delta , 0) $,
$ \delta > 0 $,
$ \phi ( x) \equiv 0 $
or $ \phi ( x) \neq 0 $
for every $ x \in I $),
and conversely.
Consider equation (2) first in the domain $ x > 0 $.
If it is a simple Bendixson equation, that is, if it satisfies the conditions
$$
X ( x, y) \equiv x ^ {h} ,\ \
h \geq 1,\ \
Y _ {y} ^ \prime ( 0, 0) = \
a \neq 0,
$$
then it has a unique $ O $-
curve in the domain $ x > 0 $
for $ a < 0 $;
the domain $ x > 0 $,
$ x ^ {2} + y ^ {2} < r ^ {2} $,
where $ r $
is a sufficiently small positive number, is a parabolic sector for $ a > 0 $(
cf. Sector in the theory of ordinary differential equations). Otherwise, to exhibit the $ O $-
curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $
one applies the Frommer method. The basis for applying it is the fact that every $ O $-
curve (3) of equation (2), $ \phi ( x) \not\equiv 0 $,
has a completely determined asymptotic behaviour at $ O $,
namely, it can be represented in the form
$$
y = x ^ {v ( x) } \
\mathop{\rm sign} \phi ( x),
$$
and admits a finite or infinite limit
$$
\nu = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } v ( x) = \
\lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \
\frac{ \mathop{\rm ln} | \phi ( x) | }{ \mathop{\rm ln} x }
\in \
[ 0, + \infty ],
$$
which is called its order of curvature at $ O $,
and for $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $
it also admits a finite or infinite limit
$$
\gamma = \lim\limits _ {x \rightarrow 0 } \
\phi ( x) x ^ {- \nu } \in \
[- \infty , + \infty ],
$$
which is called its measure of curvature at $ O $.
Here the $ O $-
curve $ y = 0 $,
$ x \in ( 0, \delta ) $,
is assigned the order of curvature $ \nu = + \infty $.
The first step in the Frommer method consists in the following. One uses algebraic means to calculate all possible orders of curvature $ \nu $(
there is always a finite number of them), and for each order $ \nu \in ( 0, + \infty ) $
all possible measures of curvature for $ O $-
curves of (2). On the basis of the general theorems of the method, one can elucidate the question of whether (2) has $ O $-
curves with given possible order and measure of curvature, except for a finite number $ ( \geq 0) $
of so-called characteristic pairs $ ( \nu , \gamma ) $.
For each of these $ \nu = r/s $,
where $ r $
and $ s $
are natural numbers, and $ 0 < | \gamma | < + \infty $.
Therefore the substitution $ x = x _ {1} ^ {s} $,
$ y = ( \gamma + y _ {1} ) x _ {1} ^ {r} $
transforms (2) into a derived equation $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $
of the same form, turning the question of whether (2) has $ O $-
curves with order of curvature $ \nu $
and measure of curvature $ \gamma $
into the question of whether $ ( 2 _ {1} ) $
has $ O $-
curves in the domain $ x _ {1} > 0 $.
If (2) has no characteristic pairs or if each of its derived equations turns out to be a simple Bendixson equation, then all $ O $-
curves of (2) in the domain $ x > 0 $
have been exhibited in the first step of the process. Otherwise one performs the second step — one studies, according to the plan of the first step, the derived equations that are not simple Bendixson equations. In doing this one arrives at derived equations of a second series, etc. At each stage the process, generally speaking, branches, but for a fixed equation (2) the number of branches of the process is finite and every branch terminates in a reduced equation which is either a simple Bendixson equation or has no characteristic pairs.
Thus, by means of a finite number of steps of the Frommer method one can exhibit all $ TO $-
curves of (1) in the domain $ x > 0 $,
along with their asymptotic behaviour at $ O $.
Changing $ x $
to $ - x $
in (1) enables one to do the same for the domain $ x < 0 $,
and a direct verification enables one to establish whether the semi-axes of the axis $ x = 0 $
are $ TO $-
curves. The behaviour of all trajectories of (1) in a neighbourhood of $ O $
can be determined on the basis of this information as follows.
If the system (1) has no $ TO $-
curves, then $ O $
is a centre (cf. Centre of a topological dynamical system), a focus or a centro-focus for it. If the set $ H $
of all $ TO $-
curves of (1) is non-empty, then the information about its asymptotic behaviour at $ O $
obtained by the Frommer method enables one to split $ H $
into a finite number of non-intersecting bundles of $ TO $-
curves: $ H _ {1} \dots H _ {k} $,
$ k \geq 2 $,
each of which is either open: it consists of semi-trajectories of one type (positive or negative) that fill a domain, or "closed" : it consists of a single $ TO $-
curve. The representatives $ l _ {1} \dots l _ {k} $
of these bundles have different asymptotic behaviour at $ O $,
which enables one to establish a cyclic sequential order for the bundles as one goes round $ O $
along a circle $ C $
of small radius $ r $,
and they divide the disc bounded by $ C $
into $ k $
sectors $ S _ {1} \dots S _ {k} $.
Suppose that the sector $ S _ {i} $,
$ i \in \{ 1 \dots k \} $,
has as its lateral edges the $ TO $-
curves $ l _ {i} $
and $ l _ {i + 1 } $,
where $ l _ {k + 1 } $
is the same as $ l _ {1} $.
Then $ S _ {i} $
is: a) elliptic, b) hyperbolic or c) parabolic, according to whether the bundles $ H _ {i} $
and $ H _ {i + 1 } $
are respectively a) both open, b) both "closed" or c) of different types.
Thus, the Frommer method enables one, in a finite number of steps, either to find, for the system (1), a cyclic sequence of hyperbolic, parabolic and elliptic sectors joined to the point $ O $,
and thereby completely to determine the topological type of the distribution of its trajectories in a neighbourhood of $ O $,
or to show that the problem of distinguishing between centre, focus and centro-focus arises at $ O $(
cf. Centre and focus problem).
An account of the method was given by M. Frommer [1]. It can also be adapted for investigating singular points of third-order systems.
References
[1] | M. Frommer, "Die Integralkurven einer gewöhnlichen Differentialgleichung erster Ordnung in der Umgebung rationaler Unbestimmtheitsstellen" Math. Ann. , 99 (1928) pp. 222–272 |
[2] | A.F. Andreev, "Singular points of differential equations" , Minsk (1979) (In Russian) |
References
[a1] | P. Hartman, "Ordinary differential equations" , Birkhäuser (1982) pp. 220–227 |