Difference between revisions of "Best quadrature formula"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | b0159401.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 32 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 32 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/B015/B.0105940 Best quadrature formula, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''optimal quadrature formula'' | ''optimal quadrature formula'' | ||
An approximate integration formula that guarantees the minimum error for a given class of functions, relative to all formulas of a specified type. As an example, consider the quadrature formula | An approximate integration formula that guarantees the minimum error for a given class of functions, relative to all formulas of a specified type. As an example, consider the quadrature formula | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{* } | |
+ | \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } | ||
+ | \rho (x) f (x) dx = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { n } | ||
+ | \sum _ {i = 0 } ^ { m } | ||
+ | p _ {ki} f ^ { (i) } (x _ {k} ) + R (f), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ \rho (x) $ |
+ | is a weight function. The remainder (error) term $ R (f) = R (f, X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $ | ||
+ | depends both on the function $ f (x) $, | ||
+ | and on the vector $ (X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $ | ||
+ | consisting of the interpolation nodes $ x _ {k} $( | ||
+ | it is usually assumed that $ x _ {k} \in [a, b] $) | ||
+ | and the coefficients $ p _ {ki} $, | ||
+ | $ k = 1 \dots n $; | ||
+ | $ i = 0 \dots m $. | ||
+ | Fixing $ n \geq 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ m \geq 0 $, | ||
+ | let $ A $ | ||
+ | denote some set of vectors $ (X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $( | ||
+ | and hence also some set of quadrature formulas), defined by some restrictions on the interpolation nodes and coefficients (in particular, one might consider the set $ A = A ( \overline{X}\; _ {n} ) $ | ||
+ | of coefficients $ p _ {ki} $ | ||
+ | for a fixed node vector $ \overline{X}\; _ {n} $). | ||
+ | Let $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | be some class of functions $ f (x) $, | ||
+ | it being assumed that the integral and the sum in (*) exist. The best quadrature formula of type (*) for the class $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
+ | relative to the set $ A $ | ||
+ | is defined by a vector $ (X _ {n} ^ {*} , P _ {nm} ^ {*} ) $ | ||
+ | for which | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \sup _ {f \in \mathfrak M } | | ||
+ | R (f, X _ {n} ^ {*} , P _ {nm} ^ {*} ) | = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \inf _ {(X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) \in A } \sup _ {f | ||
+ | \in \mathfrak M } | R (f, X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) | . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The construction of best quadrature formulas is intimately connected with certain problems in [[Spline approximation|spline approximation]]; in many cases it reduces to minimizing the norm of a monospline (see [[#References|[1]]]). Best quadrature formulas, together with sharp estimates for the remainder term, are known for many important classes of continuous and differentiable functions. From a more general point of view, the problem of finding best quadrature formulas and the corresponding errors for a class | + | The construction of best quadrature formulas is intimately connected with certain problems in [[Spline approximation|spline approximation]]; in many cases it reduces to minimizing the norm of a monospline (see [[#References|[1]]]). Best quadrature formulas, together with sharp estimates for the remainder term, are known for many important classes of continuous and differentiable functions. From a more general point of view, the problem of finding best quadrature formulas and the corresponding errors for a class $ \mathfrak M $ |
+ | may be viewed as the problem of optimal recovery of a functional | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | J (f) = \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } \rho (x) f (x) dx, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ f \in \mathfrak M $, |
+ | on the basis of the information $ \{ f ^ { (i) } (x _ {k} ) \} $, | ||
+ | $ k = 1 \dots n $; | ||
+ | $ i = 0 \dots m $. | ||
+ | The concept of a best quadrature formula generalizes in a natural way to functions of several variables (cubature formulas). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.M. Nikol'skii, "Quadrature formulae" , H.M. Stationary Office , London (1966) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.M. Krylov, "Approximate calculation of integrals" , Macmillan (1962) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.J. Laurent, "Approximation et optimisation" , Hermann (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.A. Zhensykbaev, "Monosplines of minimal norm and quadrature formulas" ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''36''' : 4 (1981) pp. 107–159 (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.M. Nikol'skii, "Quadrature formulae" , H.M. Stationary Office , London (1966) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.M. Krylov, "Approximate calculation of integrals" , Macmillan (1962) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.J. Laurent, "Approximation et optimisation" , Hermann (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.A. Zhensykbaev, "Monosplines of minimal norm and quadrature formulas" ''Uspekhi Mat. Nauk'' , '''36''' : 4 (1981) pp. 107–159 (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The terminology "best formula" is often encountered in the literature on numerical analysis, but, as was observed in [[#References|[a2]]], p. 75, it should be taken with a large dose of salt, because, after all, any quadrature formula, no matter how the weights | + | The terminology "best formula" is often encountered in the literature on numerical analysis, but, as was observed in [[#References|[a2]]], p. 75, it should be taken with a large dose of salt, because, after all, any quadrature formula, no matter how the weights $ p _ {k i } $ |
+ | and the nodes $ x _ {k} $ | ||
+ | are chosen, will exactly integrate an infinite-dimensional family of functions. | ||
A few recent textbooks are listed below. | A few recent textbooks are listed below. |
Latest revision as of 10:58, 29 May 2020
optimal quadrature formula
An approximate integration formula that guarantees the minimum error for a given class of functions, relative to all formulas of a specified type. As an example, consider the quadrature formula
$$ \tag{* } \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } \rho (x) f (x) dx = \ \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { n } \sum _ {i = 0 } ^ { m } p _ {ki} f ^ { (i) } (x _ {k} ) + R (f), $$
where $ \rho (x) $ is a weight function. The remainder (error) term $ R (f) = R (f, X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $ depends both on the function $ f (x) $, and on the vector $ (X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $ consisting of the interpolation nodes $ x _ {k} $( it is usually assumed that $ x _ {k} \in [a, b] $) and the coefficients $ p _ {ki} $, $ k = 1 \dots n $; $ i = 0 \dots m $. Fixing $ n \geq 1 $ and $ m \geq 0 $, let $ A $ denote some set of vectors $ (X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) $( and hence also some set of quadrature formulas), defined by some restrictions on the interpolation nodes and coefficients (in particular, one might consider the set $ A = A ( \overline{X}\; _ {n} ) $ of coefficients $ p _ {ki} $ for a fixed node vector $ \overline{X}\; _ {n} $). Let $ \mathfrak M $ be some class of functions $ f (x) $, it being assumed that the integral and the sum in (*) exist. The best quadrature formula of type (*) for the class $ \mathfrak M $ relative to the set $ A $ is defined by a vector $ (X _ {n} ^ {*} , P _ {nm} ^ {*} ) $ for which
$$ \sup _ {f \in \mathfrak M } | R (f, X _ {n} ^ {*} , P _ {nm} ^ {*} ) | = $$
$$ = \ \inf _ {(X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) \in A } \sup _ {f \in \mathfrak M } | R (f, X _ {n} , P _ {nm} ) | . $$
The construction of best quadrature formulas is intimately connected with certain problems in spline approximation; in many cases it reduces to minimizing the norm of a monospline (see [1]). Best quadrature formulas, together with sharp estimates for the remainder term, are known for many important classes of continuous and differentiable functions. From a more general point of view, the problem of finding best quadrature formulas and the corresponding errors for a class $ \mathfrak M $ may be viewed as the problem of optimal recovery of a functional
$$ J (f) = \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } \rho (x) f (x) dx, $$
where $ f \in \mathfrak M $, on the basis of the information $ \{ f ^ { (i) } (x _ {k} ) \} $, $ k = 1 \dots n $; $ i = 0 \dots m $. The concept of a best quadrature formula generalizes in a natural way to functions of several variables (cubature formulas).
References
[1] | S.M. Nikol'skii, "Quadrature formulae" , H.M. Stationary Office , London (1966) (Translated from Russian) |
[2] | N.M. Krylov, "Approximate calculation of integrals" , Macmillan (1962) (Translated from Russian) |
[3] | P.J. Laurent, "Approximation et optimisation" , Hermann (1972) |
[4] | A.A. Zhensykbaev, "Monosplines of minimal norm and quadrature formulas" Uspekhi Mat. Nauk , 36 : 4 (1981) pp. 107–159 (In Russian) |
Comments
The terminology "best formula" is often encountered in the literature on numerical analysis, but, as was observed in [a2], p. 75, it should be taken with a large dose of salt, because, after all, any quadrature formula, no matter how the weights $ p _ {k i } $ and the nodes $ x _ {k} $ are chosen, will exactly integrate an infinite-dimensional family of functions.
A few recent textbooks are listed below.
References
[a1] | H. Brass, "Quadraturverfahren" , Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (1977) |
[a2] | P.J. Davis, P. Rabinowitz, "Methods of numerical integration" , Acad. Press (1984) |
[a3] | H. Engels, "Numerical quadrature and cubature" , Acad. Press (1980) |
Best quadrature formula. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Best_quadrature_formula&oldid=46044