Difference between revisions of "Best approximations, sequence of"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | b0159101.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 44 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 44 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/B015/B.0105910 Best approximations, sequence of | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $, | |
+ | $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ | ||
+ | of numbers, where $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $ | ||
+ | is the [[Best approximation|best approximation]] of an element $ x $ | ||
+ | of a normed linear space $ X $ | ||
+ | by elements of an $ n $- | ||
+ | dimensional subspace $ F _ {n} \subset X $, | ||
+ | with $ F _ {1} \subset F _ {2} \subset \dots $, | ||
+ | so that $ E (x, F _ {1} ) \geq E (x, F _ {2} ) \geq \dots $. | ||
+ | Usually, $ F _ {n} $ | ||
+ | is the linear span of the first $ n $ | ||
+ | elements of some fixed system $ \{ u _ {1} , u _ {2} , . . . \} $ | ||
+ | of linearly independent elements of $ X $. | ||
− | + | In the case $ X = C [a, b] $ | |
+ | and $ F _ {n} = F _ {n} ^ {A} $ | ||
+ | is the subspace of algebraic polynomials of degree $ n - 1 $, | ||
+ | sequences of best approximations were first considered in the 1850s by P.L. Chebyshev; the fact that | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | E (x, F _ {n} ^ {A} ) \rightarrow 0 \ \textrm{ as } n \rightarrow \infty | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | for any function $ x (t) \in C [a, b] $ | |
+ | was established in 1885 by K. Weierstrass. In the general case, the relation | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \lim\limits _ {n \rightarrow \infty } E (x, F _ {n} ) = 0 \ \ | ||
+ | \textrm{ for } \textrm{ all } x \in X | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | (essentially, this is an equivalent statement). However, the sequence | + | is always satisfied when the union of the subspaces $ F _ {n} $, |
+ | $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ | ||
+ | is everywhere dense in $ X $, | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \overline{ {\cup F _ {n} }}\; = X | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | (essentially, this is an equivalent statement). However, the sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $ | ||
+ | may converge to zero arbitrarily slowly. This follows from a theorem of Bernstein: If $ \{ F _ {n} \} $ | ||
+ | is a sequence of subspaces of dimension $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ | ||
+ | of a normed linear space $ X $, | ||
+ | such that $ F _ {1} \subset F _ {2} \subset \dots $ | ||
+ | and $ \overline{ {\cup F _ {n} }}\; = X $, | ||
+ | then, for any monotone decreasing null sequence $ \{ \mu _ {n} \} $ | ||
+ | of non-negative real numbers, there exists an $ x \in X $ | ||
+ | such that $ E (x, F _ {n} ) = \mu _ {n} $, | ||
+ | $ n = 1, 2 ,\dots $. | ||
+ | In the function spaces $ C $ | ||
+ | and $ L _ {p} $, | ||
+ | the rate at which a sequence of best approximations tends to zero depends both on the system of subspaces $ F _ {n} $ | ||
+ | and on the smoothness characteristics of the approximated function $ x $( | ||
+ | the modulus of continuity, the existence of derivatives up to a specific order, etc.), and it can be estimated in terms of these characteristics. Conversely, knowing the rate of convergence to zero of the sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $, | ||
+ | one can draw conclusions with respect to the smoothness of $ x (t) $( | ||
+ | see [[Approximation of functions, direct and inverse theorems|Approximation of functions, direct and inverse theorems]]). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.N. Bernshtein, "Collected works" , '''2''' , Moscow (1954) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.L. Goncharov, "The theory of interpolation and approximation of functions" , Moscow (1954) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.F. Timan, "Theory of approximation of functions of a real variable" , Pergamon (1963) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.N. Bernshtein, "Collected works" , '''2''' , Moscow (1954) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.L. Goncharov, "The theory of interpolation and approximation of functions" , Moscow (1954) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.F. Timan, "Theory of approximation of functions of a real variable" , Pergamon (1963) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | Theorems inferring smoothness characteristics of a function | + | Theorems inferring smoothness characteristics of a function $ x \in C $ |
+ | or $ L _ {p} $ | ||
+ | from properties of $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $ | ||
+ | were first given by D. Jackson in 1911 for algebraic or trigonometric approximation, see [[Jackson theorem|Jackson theorem]]. Theorems converse to these, i.e. inferring properties of $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $ | ||
+ | from smoothness characteristics of the function $ x $, | ||
+ | have been proved by S.N. Bernstein [S.N. Bernshtein] and A. Zygmund, cf. [[Bernstein theorem|Bernstein theorem]]. See also [[#References|[a2]]], Chapt. 4, Sect. 6 and Chapt. 6, Sect. 3. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.P. Natanson, "Constructive function theory" , '''1–3''' , F. Ungar (1964–1965) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.W. Cheney, "Introduction to approximation theory" , Chelsea, reprint (1982) pp. 203ff</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.P. Natanson, "Constructive function theory" , '''1–3''' , F. Ungar (1964–1965) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.W. Cheney, "Introduction to approximation theory" , Chelsea, reprint (1982) pp. 203ff</TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 10:58, 29 May 2020
A sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $,
$ n = 1, 2 \dots $
of numbers, where $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $
is the best approximation of an element $ x $
of a normed linear space $ X $
by elements of an $ n $-
dimensional subspace $ F _ {n} \subset X $,
with $ F _ {1} \subset F _ {2} \subset \dots $,
so that $ E (x, F _ {1} ) \geq E (x, F _ {2} ) \geq \dots $.
Usually, $ F _ {n} $
is the linear span of the first $ n $
elements of some fixed system $ \{ u _ {1} , u _ {2} , . . . \} $
of linearly independent elements of $ X $.
In the case $ X = C [a, b] $ and $ F _ {n} = F _ {n} ^ {A} $ is the subspace of algebraic polynomials of degree $ n - 1 $, sequences of best approximations were first considered in the 1850s by P.L. Chebyshev; the fact that
$$ E (x, F _ {n} ^ {A} ) \rightarrow 0 \ \textrm{ as } n \rightarrow \infty $$
for any function $ x (t) \in C [a, b] $ was established in 1885 by K. Weierstrass. In the general case, the relation
$$ \lim\limits _ {n \rightarrow \infty } E (x, F _ {n} ) = 0 \ \ \textrm{ for } \textrm{ all } x \in X $$
is always satisfied when the union of the subspaces $ F _ {n} $, $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ is everywhere dense in $ X $,
$$ \overline{ {\cup F _ {n} }}\; = X $$
(essentially, this is an equivalent statement). However, the sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $ may converge to zero arbitrarily slowly. This follows from a theorem of Bernstein: If $ \{ F _ {n} \} $ is a sequence of subspaces of dimension $ n = 1, 2 \dots $ of a normed linear space $ X $, such that $ F _ {1} \subset F _ {2} \subset \dots $ and $ \overline{ {\cup F _ {n} }}\; = X $, then, for any monotone decreasing null sequence $ \{ \mu _ {n} \} $ of non-negative real numbers, there exists an $ x \in X $ such that $ E (x, F _ {n} ) = \mu _ {n} $, $ n = 1, 2 ,\dots $. In the function spaces $ C $ and $ L _ {p} $, the rate at which a sequence of best approximations tends to zero depends both on the system of subspaces $ F _ {n} $ and on the smoothness characteristics of the approximated function $ x $( the modulus of continuity, the existence of derivatives up to a specific order, etc.), and it can be estimated in terms of these characteristics. Conversely, knowing the rate of convergence to zero of the sequence $ \{ E (x, F _ {n} ) \} $, one can draw conclusions with respect to the smoothness of $ x (t) $( see Approximation of functions, direct and inverse theorems).
References
[1] | S.N. Bernshtein, "Collected works" , 2 , Moscow (1954) (In Russian) |
[2] | V.L. Goncharov, "The theory of interpolation and approximation of functions" , Moscow (1954) (In Russian) |
[3] | A.F. Timan, "Theory of approximation of functions of a real variable" , Pergamon (1963) (Translated from Russian) |
Comments
Theorems inferring smoothness characteristics of a function $ x \in C $ or $ L _ {p} $ from properties of $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $ were first given by D. Jackson in 1911 for algebraic or trigonometric approximation, see Jackson theorem. Theorems converse to these, i.e. inferring properties of $ E (x, F _ {n} ) $ from smoothness characteristics of the function $ x $, have been proved by S.N. Bernstein [S.N. Bernshtein] and A. Zygmund, cf. Bernstein theorem. See also [a2], Chapt. 4, Sect. 6 and Chapt. 6, Sect. 3.
References
[a1] | I.P. Natanson, "Constructive function theory" , 1–3 , F. Ungar (1964–1965) (Translated from Russian) |
[a2] | E.W. Cheney, "Introduction to approximation theory" , Chelsea, reprint (1982) pp. 203ff |
Best approximations, sequence of. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Best_approximations,_sequence_of&oldid=46040